Structural equation modeling approach for investigating drivers’ risky behavior in clear and adverse weather using SHRP2 naturalistic driving data

References

• Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Mohmad Sidek, M. H. (2017). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 890(1), 012163. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, M. M., Das, A., Khan, M. N., Hammit, B., & Ali, E. (2021). Driver Performance and Behavior in Adverse Weather Conditions: Microsimulation and Variable Speed Limit Implementation of the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study Results-Phase 3. Final Report WY-2105F, Wyoming Department of Transportation. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/60907
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, M. M., Ghasemzadeh, A., Hammit, B., Khan, N., Das, A., Ali, E., Young, R. K., & Eldeeb, H. (2018). Driver performance and behavior in adverse weather conditions: An investigation using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study data-phase 2. Final Report WY-18/05F, U.S. Department of Transportation
   Google Scholar
• Ali, E. M., Ahmed, M. M., & Yang, G. (2021). Normal and risky driving patterns identification in clear and rainy weather on freeway segments using vehicle kinematics trajectories and time series cluster analysis. IATSS Research, 45(1), 137–152. doi:10.1016/j.iatssr.2020.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mahameed, F. J., Qin, X., Schneider, R. J., & Shaon, M. R. R. (2019). Analyzing pedestrian and bicyclist crashes at the corridor level: Structural equation modeling approach. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2673(7), 308–318. doi:10.1177/0361198119845353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, K. H., Yan, F., & Wang, M. Q. (2007). Cell phone users, reported crash risk, unsafe driving behaviors and dispositions: A survey of motorists in Maryland. Journal of Safety Research, 38(6), 683–688. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2007.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78–117. doi:10.1177/0049124187016001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cangur, S., & Ercan, I. (2015). Comparison of model fit indices used in structural equation modeling under multivariate normality. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 14(1), 152–167. doi:10.22237/jmasm/1430453580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, A., Ghasemzadeh, A., & Ahmed, M. M. (2019). Analyzing the effect of fog weather conditions on driver lane-keeping performance using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study data. Journal of Safety Research, 68(February), 71–80. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2018.12.015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Das, A., Khan, M. N., & Ahmed, M. M. (2020). Detecting lane change maneuvers using SHRP2 naturalistic driving data: A comparative study machine learning techniques. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 142, 105578. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, A., Khan, M. N., Ahmed, M. M. & Wulff, S. S. (2022). Cluster Analysis and Multi-level Modeling for Evaluating the Impact of Rain on Aggressive Lane-changing Characteristics Utilizing Naturalistic Driving Data. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2022.2069896
   Google Scholar
• DeCoster, J. (1998). Overview of factor analysis, http://www.stat-help.com/factor.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dula, C. S., & Geller, E. S. (2003). Risky, aggressive, or emotional driving: Addressing the need for consistent communication in research. Journal of Safety Research, 34(5), 559–566. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2003.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eby, D. W., & Charles, S. (2004). Risky Driving. Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology, 1, 627–632.
   Google Scholar
• Everitt, B., & Hothorn, T. (2011). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis with R. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2011). Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fazeen, M., Gozick, B., Dantu, R., Bhukhiya, M., & González, M. C. (2012). Safe driving using mobile phones. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13(3), 1462–1468. doi:10.1109/TITS.2012.2187640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FHWA. (2022). How Do Weather Events Impact Roads? https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/weather/q1_roadimpact.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, C. D., Samuel, S., & Knodler, M. A. (2017). The use of a driving simulator to determine how time pressures impact driver aggressiveness. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 108(February), 131–138. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.017
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, A., Thomas, L., Kirley, B., Hall, W., O’Brien, N., & Hill, K. (2015). Countermeasures that work: A highway safety countermeasure guide for State highway safety offices, Eighth edition. Report No. DOT HS 812 202, November, 161–387.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, H. M., & Abdel-Aty, M. A. (2011). Analysis of drivers’ behavior under reduced visibility conditions using a structural equation modeling approach. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14(6), 614–625. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2011.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model FIT. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.58
   Google Scholar
• Horswill, M. S., & Coster, M. E. (2002). The effect of vehicle characteristics on drivers’ risk-taking behaviour. Ergonomics, 45(2), 85–104. doi:10.1080/00140130110115345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-C., Wang, Y.-M., Wu, T.-W., & Wang, P.-A. (2013). An empirical analysis of the antecedents and performance consequences of using the Moodle platform. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 3(2), 217–221. doi:10.7763/IJIET.2013.V3.267
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, S., Fangwei, Z., Siddiqi, A. F., Ali, Z., & Shabbir, M. S. (2018). Structural equation model for evaluating factors affecting quality of social infrastructure projects. Sustainability, 10(5), 1415–1425. doi:10.3390/su10051415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• InSight SHRP2 NDS. (2022). SHRP2 NDS Data Access. https://insight.shrp2nds.us/
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, H. (2004). Risk-taking attitudes and risky driving behaviour. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 7(3), 135–150. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2003.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jafarpour, S., & Rahimi-Movaghar, V. (2014). Determinants of risky driving behavior: A narrative review. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic Of Iran, 28(1), 1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In The handbook of social psychology: Vols. 1 and 2 (pp. 233–265). McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Pant, P., & Yamashita, E. (2011). Measuring influence of accessibility on accident severity with structural equation modeling. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2236(1), 1–10. doi:10.3141/2236-01
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. Y., Chung, J. H., & Son, B. (2008). Analysis of traffic accident size for Korean highway using structural equation models. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 40(6), 1955–1963. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2008.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, C., Hao, W., Xiang, W., & Yan, W. (2018). The impact of aggressive driving behavior on driver-injury severity at highway-rail grade crossings accidents. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2018, 1–10. doi:10.1155/2018/9841498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. G., Morrison, M. A., & McCutcheon, J. M. (2017). Best practice recommendations for using structural equation modelling in psychological research. Psychology, 08(09), 1326–1341. doi:10.4236/psych.2017.89086
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2020). Traffic safety facts 2018 annual report: A compilation of motor vehicle crash data (Report No. DOT HS 812 981). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, N., & Hatcher, L. (2013). A step-by-step approach to using SAS for factor analysis and structural equation modelling. Sas Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Paleti, R., Eluru, N., & Bhat, C. R. (2010). Examining the influence of aggressive driving behavior on driver injury severity in traffic crashes. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 42(6), 1839–1854. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantangi, S. S., Fountas, G., Anastasopoulos, P. C., Pierowicz, J., Majka, K., & Blatt, A. (2020). Do high visibility enforcement programs affect aggressive driving behavior? An empirical analysis using naturalistic driving study data. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 138, 105361. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perneger, T., & Smith, G. S. (1991). The driver’s role in fatal two-car crashes: A paired “case-control” study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 134(10), 1138–1145. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2021). Package ‘psych.’
   Google Scholar
• Rezapour, M., Wulff, S. S., & Ksaibati, K. (2021). A comprehensive sequential strategy for structural equation modeling of traffic barrier crashes. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 13(11), 1215–1239. doi:10.1080/19439962.2020.1716908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. K. (1999). Basic Concepts of Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, 1–27. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED427091
   Google Scholar
• Schorr, J. P., & Hamdar, S. H. (2014). Safety propensity index for signalized and unsignalized intersections: Exploration and assessment. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 71, 93–105. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2014.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaaban, K., Gaweesh, S., & Ahmed, M. M. (2018). Characteristics and mitigation strategies for cell phone use while driving among young drivers in Qatar. Journal of Transport & Health, 8(February), 6–14. doi:10.1016/j.jth.2018.02.001
   Google Scholar
• Shaaban, K., Gaweesh, S., & Ahmed, M. M. (2020). Investigating in-vehicle distracting activities and crash risks for young drivers using structural equation modeling. Plos One, 15(7), e0235325–14. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S. (2018). Critical reasons for crashes investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey. Report No. DOT HS 812 506. Traffic Safety Facts - Crash Stats. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, T. (2022). Overview of motor vehicle crashes in 2020. In DOT HS 813 266 (Issue March). https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/813060
   Google Scholar
• Stipancic, J., Miranda-Moreno, L., & Saunier, N. (2018). Vehicle manoeuvers as surrogate safety measures: Extracting data from the GPS-enabled smartphones of regular drivers. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 115, 160–169. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stipancic, J., Miranda-Moreno, L., Saunier, N., & Labbe, A. (2019). Network screening for large urban road networks: Using GPS data and surrogate measures to model crash frequency and severity. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 125, 290–301. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundararajan, S., Zohdy, I. (2016). Vehicle automation and weather: Challenges and opportunities. FHWA-JPO-17-494, December. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/32494/dot_32494_DS1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ulleberg, P., & Rundmo, T. (2003). Personality, attitudes and risk perception as predictors of risky driving behaviour among young drivers. Safety Science, 41(5), 427–443. doi:10.1016/S0925-7535(01)00077-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K., & Qin, X. (2014). Use of structural equation modeling to measure severity of single-vehicle crashes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2432(1), 17–25. doi:10.3141/2432-03
   Google Scholar
• Wen, X., Fu, L., Fu, T., Keung, J., & Zhong, M. (2021). Driver behavior classification at stop-controlled intersections using video-based trajectory data. Sustainability, 13(3), 1404–1418. doi:10.3390/su13031404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2018). Global status report on road safety. World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Du, Y., Qi, G., & Xu, M. (2015). Leveraging longitudinal driving behaviour data with data mining techniques for driving style analysis. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 9(8), 792–801. doi:10.1049/iet-its.2014.0139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, L., Li, X., Guan, W., & Jiang, S. (2020). Assessing the relationship between driving skill, driving behavior and driving aggressiveness. Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, 14(5), 737–753. doi:10.1080/19439962.2020.1812785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D., Xie, K., Ozbay, K., & Yang, H. (2021). Fusing crash data and surrogate safety measures for safety assessment: Development of a structural equation model with conditional autoregressive spatial effect and random parameters. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 152, 105971–105913. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.105971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, D., Xie, K., Ozbay, K., Yang, H., & Budnick, N. (2019). Modeling of time-dependent safety performance using anonymized and aggregated smartphone-based dangerous driving event data. Accident; Analysis and Prevention, 132, 105286–105212. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Xu, W., Ma, J., Li, H., & Chen, Y. (2019). An analysis of the relationship between driver characteristics and driving safety using structural equation models. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 62, 529–545. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar