Exploring the effects of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles on traffic safety and operation at full-cloverleaf interchanges

References

• Alozi, A. R., & Hamad, K. (2019, May). Quantifying impacts of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic operation using micro-simulation in Dubai, UAE. In VEHITS (pp. 528–535). Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
   Google Scholar
• Amundsen, F., & Hyden, C. (1977). Proceedings of first workshop on traffic conflicts. Institute of Transport Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. M., Kalra, N., Stanley, K. D., Sorensen, P., Samaras, C., & Oluwatola, O. A. (2014). The promise and perils of autonomous vehicle technology. Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers, 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Aria, E., Olstam, J., & Schwietering, C. (2016). Investigation of automated vehicle effects on driver’s behavior and traffic performance. Transportation Research Procedia, 15, 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.06.063
   Google Scholar
• Arun, A., Haque, M. M., Bhaskar, A., Washington, S., & Sayed, T. (2021). A systematic mapping review of surrogate safety assessment using traffic conflict techniques. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 153, 106016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi, F. E., Anwar, A. K., & Miles, J. C. (2019, November). Investigating the potential transportation impacts of connected and autonomous vehicles. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVE45908.2019.8964994
   Google Scholar
• Atkins, W. S. (2016). Research on the impacts of connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) on traffic flow. Stage 2: Traffic Modelling and Analysis Technical Report.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P., Zeng, W., Yu, G., & Wang, Y. (2017). Surrogate safety analysis of pedestrian-vehicle conflict at intersections using unmanned aerial vehicle videos. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2017, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5202150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deluka Tibljaš, A., Giuffrè, T., Surdonja, S., & Trubia, S. (2018). Introduction of autonomous vehicles: Roundabouts design and safety performance evaluation. Sustainability, 10(4), 1060. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gettman, D., & Head, L. (2003). Surrogate safety measures from traffic simulation models: Final Report. No. FHWA-RD-03-050. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Research, Development, and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Gettman, D., Pu, L., Sayed, T., Shelby, S. G., & Energy, S. (2008). Surrogate safety assessment model and validation (No. FHWA-HRT-08-051). Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Hamad, K., & Alozi, A. R. (2022). Shared vs. dedicated lanes for automated vehicle deployment: A simulation-based assessment. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 11(2), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.03.001
   Google Scholar
• He, S., Guo, X., Ding, F., Qi, Y., & Chen, T. (2020). Freeway traffic speed estimation of mixed traffic using data from connected and autonomous vehicles with a low penetration rate. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1361583
   Google Scholar
• Himes, S., Arnold, S., Gayah, V. V., & O'Connor, G. (2023). Interchange comparison safety tool user guide (No. FHWA-HRT-23-041). Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety and Operations Research and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogendoorn, R., van Arerm, B., & Hoogendoom, S. (2014). Automated driving, traffic flow efficiency, and human factors: Literature review. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2422(1), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.3141/2422-13
   Google Scholar
• Kukkapalli, V. M., & Pulugurtha, S. S. (2021). Comparing travel time performance-based measures to assess the effect of a freeway road construction project on freeway and connecting arterial street links. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 9(1), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2021.1942186
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D., & Hess, D. J. (2022). Public concerns and connected and automated vehicles: Safety, privacy, and data security. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01110-x
   Google Scholar
• Lim, C., Deng, Z., Poon, S., Molan, A. M., & Hummer, J. E. (2022). Evaluating traffic operation and safety of a new interchange design in comparison to system cloverleaf interchanges. In International Conference on Transportation and Development 2022 (pp. 277–286). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484333.025
   Google Scholar
• Litman, T. (2017). Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. https://vtpi.org/avip.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Liu, P., & Fan, W. (2020). Exploring the impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on freeway capacity using a revised Intelligent Driver Model. Transportation Planning and Technology, 43(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2020.1735746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoDOT Engineering Policy Guide (234.5 cloverleaf interchanges). (2021). 234.5 cloverleaf interchanges. https://epg.modot.org/index.php/234.5_Cloverleaf_Interchanges#:∼:text=The%20principal%20disadvantages%20of%20the,right%20of%20way%20area%20needed.
   Google Scholar
• Papadoulis, A., Quddus, M., & Imprialou, M. (2019). Evaluating the safety impact of connected and autonomous vehicles on motorways. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 124, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parr, S., Wolshon, B., Renne, J., Murray-Tuite, P., & Kim, K. (2020). Traffic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic: Statewide analysis of social separation and activity restriction. Natural Hazards Review, 21(3), 04020025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PTV Group. (2016). PTV VISSIM 9 user manual.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, S. (2013). Report on automated and autonomous vehicles and managed lanes. Center for Urban Transportation Research.
   Google Scholar
• Stanek, D., Milam, R. T., Huang, E., & Wang, Y. A. (2018). Measuring autonomous vehicle impacts on congested networks using simulation (No. 18-04585). Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting Location: Washington DC, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Sukennik, P. (2020). Micro-simulation guide for automated vehicles—Final. PTV Group.
   Google Scholar
• Sukennik, P., & PTV Group. (2018). D. 25 Micro-simulation guide for automated vehicles. PTV Group.
   Google Scholar
• Taxonomy, S. (2016). Definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles (j3016) (Technical report). Society for Automotive Engineering. VDOT-VISSIM User Guide.
   Google Scholar
• Virdi, N., Grzybowska, H., Waller, S. T., & Dixit, V. (2019). A safety assessment of mixed fleets with connected and autonomous vehicles using the surrogate safety assessment module. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 131, 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vissim 4.10 User Manual - Government of New York. (2005). VISSIM 4.10 User Manual. https://www.dot.ny.gov/main/roundabouts/files/manual_vissim_410.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Washington State Department of Transportation. (2014). Traffic analysis – VISSIM protocol. https://wsdot.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-03/TrafficOps-VISSIM-Protocol.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Waymo. (2016). Report on autonomous mode disengagements for self-driving vehicles in California.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, V., Buck, H. S., Kautzsch, L., Vortisch, P., & Weyland, C. M. (2019, January). Simulation of autonomous vehicles based on Wiedemann’s car following model in PTV vissim. In Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (TRB) (pp. 13–17). Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (TRB), Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar