Advanced search
Publication Cover
Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A Volume 35, 2018 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
533
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Detection of gelatin adulteration using bio-informatics, proteomics and high-resolution mass spectrometry

Charles T. YangDepartment of Environment & Food Safety, Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, U.S.A.View further author information
,
Dipankar GhoshDepartment of Environment & Food Safety, Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, U.S.A.View further author information
&
Francis BeaudryDépartement de biomédecine vétérinaire, Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, CanadaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 599-608 | Received 06 Oct 2017, Accepted 15 Nov 2017, Published online: 18 Jan 2018

References

  • Ballin NZ. 2010. Authentication of meat and meat products. Meat Sci. 86(3):577–587. doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.06.001
  • Boran G, Regenstein JM. 2010. Chapter 5. Fish gelatin. Adv Food Nutr Res. 60:119–143. doi:10.1016/S1043-4526(10)60005-8
  • DG Health and Consumers, European Commission. Horse meat issue. Brussels (Belgium): DG Health and Consumers, European Commission; 2013 [accessed 2017 Aug 23]. http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/horsemeat/tests_results_en.htm.
  • Djagny VB, Wang Z, Xu S. 2001. Gelatin: a valuable protein for food and pharmaceutical industries: review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 41(6):481–492.
  • Ellis DI, Brewster VL, Dunn WB, Allwood JW, Golovanov AP, Goodacre R. 2012. Fingerprinting food: current technologies for the detection of food adulteration and contamination. Chem Soc Rev. 41:5706–5727.
  • Everstine K, Spink J, Kennedy SJ. 2013. Economically moti- vated adulteration (EMA) of food: common characteristics of EMA incidents. J Food Protect. 76:723–735. doi:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-399
  • Herrero M, Simó C, García-Cañas V, Ibáñez E, Cifuentes A. 2012. Foodomics: MS-based strategies in modern food science and nutrition. Mass Spectrom Rev. 31:49–69. doi:10.1002/mas.20335
  • Hong E, Lee SY, Jeong JY, Park JM, Kim BH, Kwon K, Chun HS. 2017. Modern analytical methods for the detection of food fraud and adulteration by food category. J Sci Food Agric. 97(12):3877–3896. doi:10.1002/jsfa.8364
  • Karni M, Zidon D, Polak P, Zalevsky Z, Shefi O. 2013. Thermal degradation of DNA. DNA Cell Biol. 32(6):1–4.
  • Liu D, Nikoo M, Boran G, Zhou P, Regenstein JM. 2015. Collagen and gelatin. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 6:527–557.
  • Manning L, Soon JM. 2016. Food safety, food fraud, and food defense: a fast evolving literature. J Food Sci. 81(4):R823–R834. doi:10.1111/1750-3841.13256
  • Pailleux F, Beaudry F. 2012. Internal standard strategies for relative and absolute quantitation of peptides in biological matrices by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Biomed Chromatogr. 26:881–891. doi:10.1002/bmc.2757
  • Roepstorff P, Fohlman J. 1984. Proposal for a common nomen- clature for sequence ions in mass spectra of peptides. Biomed Mass Spectrom. 11:601.
  • Ruiz Orduna A, Husby E, Yang CT, Ghosh D, Beaudry F. 2015. Assessment of meat authenticity using bioinformatics, targeted peptide biomarkers and high-resolution mass spectrometry. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 32(10):1709–1717.
  • Ruiz Orduna A, Husby E, Yang CT, Ghosh D, Beaudry F. 2017. Detection of meat species adulteration using high-resolution mass spectrometry and a proteogenomics strategy. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 34(7):1110–1120.
  • Ruth SMV, Granato D. 2017. Food identity, authenticity and fraud: the full spectrum. Foods. 6(7):49.
  • Smith GC 2016. What is food fraud? Food safety net services; [accessed 2016 Dec 13]. http://fsns.com/news/what-is-food-fraud.
  • Solier C, Langen H. 2014. Antibody-based proteomics and biomarker research - current status and limitations. Proteomics. 14(6):774–783. doi:10.1002/pmic.201300334
  • Stadler RH, Tran LA, Cavin C, Zbinden P, Konings EJ. 2016. Analytical approaches to verify food integrity: needs and challenges. J AOAC Int. 99(5):1135–1144. doi:10.5740/jaoacint.16-0231
  • Strohalm M, Kavan D, Novák P, Volný M, Havlíček V. 2010. mMass 3: a cross-platform software environment for precise analysis of mass spectrometric data. Analytical Chemistry. 82:4648–4651.
  • Tighe PJ, Ryder RR, Todd I, Fairclough LC. 2015. ELISA in the multiplex era: potentials and pitfalls. Proteomics Clin Appl. 9(3–4):406–422. doi:10.1002/prca.201400130
  • Wilson R. 2013. Sensitivity and specificity: twin goals of proteomics assays. Can they be combined? Expert Rev Proteomics. 10(2):135–149.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.