Exploring the possible reasons for fish fraud in China based on results from monitoring sardine products sold on Chinese markets using DNA barcoding and real time PCR

References

• Armani A, Guardone L, Castigliego L, D’Amico P, Messina A, Malandra R, Gianfaldoni D, Guidi A. 2015. DNA and Mini-DNA barcoding for the identification of Porgies species (family Sparidae) of commercial interest on the international market. Food Control. 50:589–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armani A, Tinacci L, Giusti A, Castigliego L, Gianfaldoni D, Guidi A. 2013. What is inside the jar? Forensically informative nucleotide sequencing (FINS) of a short mitochondrial COI gene fragment reveals a high percentage of mislabeling in jellyfish food products. Food Res Int. 54:1383–1393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armani A, Tinacci L, Lorenzetti R, Benvenuti A, Susini F, Gasperetti L, Ricci E, Guarducci M, Guidi A. 2017. Is raw better? A multiple DNA barcoding approach (full and mini) based on mitochondrial and nuclear markers reveals low rates of misdescription in sushi products sold on the Italian market. Food Control. 79:126–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbuto M, Galimberti A, Ferri E, Labra M, Malandra R, Galli P, Casiraghi M. 2010. DNA barcoding reveals fraudulent substitutions in shark seafood products: the Italian case of “palombo” (Mustelus spp.). Food Res Int. 43:376–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besbes N, Fattouch S, Sadok S. 2011. Comparison of methods in the recovery and amplificability of DNA from fresh and processed sardine and anchovy muscle tissues. Food Chem. 129:665–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunholi IV, Ferrette BLDS, De Biasi JB, Magalhães CDO, Rotundo MM, Oliveira C, Foresti F, Mendonça FF. 2018. The fishing and illegal trade of the angelshark: DNA barcoding against misleading identifications. Fish Res. 206:193–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catanese G, Manchado M, Infante C. 2010. Evolutionary relatedness of mackerels of the genus Scomber based on complete mitochondrial genomes: strong support to the recognition of Atlantic Scomber colias and Pacific Scomber japonicus as distinct species. GENE. 452:35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cawthorn D, Hoffman LC. 2017. Deceit with decapods? Evaluating labelling accuracy of crustacean products in South Africa. Food Control. 73:741–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C, Lin H, Ren Q, Lin Y, Shao K. 2016. DNA barcode identification of fish products in Taiwan: government-commissioned authentication cases. Food Control. 66:38–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin TC, Bakar AA, Zainal Abidin DH, Mohd Nor SA. 2016. Detection of mislabelled seafood products in Malaysia by DNA barcoding: improving transparency in food market. Food Control. 64:247–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cline E. 2012. Marketplace substitution of Atlantic salmon for Pacific salmon in Washington State detected by DNA barcoding. Food Res Int. 45:388–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codex Alimentarius Commission. 1995. Standard for canned sardines and sardine-type products. Rome (Italy).
   Google Scholar
• Craig SR, MacKenzie DS, Jones G, Gatlin DM. 2000. Seasonal changes in the reproductive condition and body composition of free-ranging red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus. Aquaculture. 190:89–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donlan CJ, Luque GM. 2019. Exploring the causes of seafood fraud: A meta-analysis on mislabeling and price. Mar Policy. 100:258–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabinyi M, Barclay K, Eriksson H. 2017. Chinese trader perceptions on sourcing and consumption of endangered seafood. Front Mar Sci. 4:181–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization. 2019. Fishery statistical collections; accessed 2019 Aug 27. http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/global-production/en.
   Google Scholar
• Galal-Khallaf A, Ardura A, Borrell YJ, Garcia-Vazquez E. 2016. Towards more sustainable surimi? PCR-cloning approach for DNA barcoding reveals the use of species of low trophic level and aquaculture in Asian surimi. Food Control. 61:62–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galimberti A, De Mattia F, Losa A, Bruni I, Federici S, Casiraghi M, Martellos S, Labra M. 2013. DNA barcoding as a new tool for food traceability. Food Res Int. 50:55–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giusti A, Ricci E, Guarducci M, Gasperetti L, Davidovich N, Guidi A, Armani A. 2018. Emerging risks in the European seafood chain: molecular identification of toxic Lagocephalus spp. in fresh and processed products. Food Control. 91:311–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Estaca J, Montero P, Giménez B, Gómez-Guillén MC. 2007. Effect of functional edible films and high pressure processing on microbial and oxidative spoilage in cold-smoked sardine (Sardina pilchardus). Food Chem. 105:511–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 41:95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Handy SM, Deeds JR, Ivanova NV, Hebert PD, Hanner RH, Ormos A, Weigt LA, Moore MM, Yancy HF. 2011. A single-laboratory validated method for the generation of DNA barcodes for the identification of fish for regulatory compliance. J AOAC Int. 94:201–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, de Waard JR. 2003. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. P Roy Soc B Biol Sci. 270:96–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellberg RS, Isaacs RB, Hernandez EL. 2019. Identification of shark species in commercial products using DNA barcoding. Fish Res. 210:81–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hird H, Chisholm J, Sanchez A, Hernandez M, Goodier R, Schneede K, Boltz C, Popping B. 2006. Effect of heat and pressure processing on DNA fragmentation and implications for the detection of meat using a real-time polymerase chain reaction. Food Addit Contam. 23:645–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horreo JL, Fitze PS, Jiménez-Valverde A, Noriega JA, Pelaez ML. 2019. Amplification of 16S rDNA reveals important fish mislabeling in Madrid restaurants. Food Control. 96:146–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh C, Chang W, Chang HC, Hsieh H, Chung Y, Hwang D. 2010. Puffer fish-based commercial fraud identification in a segment of cytochrome b region by PCR–RFLP analysis. Food Chem. 121:1305–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Huang SY, Hanner R, Levin J, Lu X. 2018. Study of fish products in Metro Vancouver using DNA barcoding methods reveals fraudulent labeling. Food Control. 94:38–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquet JL, Pauly D. 2008. Trade secrets: renaming and mislabeling of seafood. Mar Policy. 32:309–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahncke M, Hale MB, Gooch JA, Hopkins JS. 1988. Comparison of pond-raised and wild red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) with respect to proximate composition, fatty acid profiles, and sensory evaluations. J Food Sci. 53:286–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappel K, Haase I, Käppel C, Sotelo CG, Schröder U. 2017. Species identification in mixed tuna samples with next-generation sequencing targeting two short cytochrome b gene fragments. Food Chem. 234:212–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labrador K, Agmata A, Palermo JD, Follante J, Pante MJ. 2019. Authentication of processed Philippine sardine products using Hotshot DNA extraction and minibarcode amplification. Food Control. 98:150–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lago FC, Herrero B, Vieites JM, Espiñeira M. 2011. FINS methodology to identification of sardines and related species in canned products and detection of mixture by means of SNP analysis systems. Eur Food Res Technol. 232:1077–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardo R, Nunes RSC, Monteiro MLG, Conte-Junior CA, Del Aguila EM, Paschoalin VMF. 2016. Molecular testing on sardines and rulings on the authenticity and nutritional value of marketed fishes: an experience report in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Food Control. 60:394–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Li J, Zhang S, He Y, Pan L. 2013. Novel real-time PCR method based on growth hormone gene for identification of Salmonidae ingredient in food. J Agric Food Chem. 61:5170–5177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin W, Hwang D. 2007. Application of PCR-RFLP analysis on species identification of canned tuna. Food Control. 18:1050–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Y, Shaw P. 2018. DNA-based techniques for authentication of processed food and food supplements. Food Chem. 240:767–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenstein JH, Burger J, Jeitner CW, Amato G, Kolokotronis S, Gochfeld M. 2010. DNA barcodes reveal species-specific mercury levels in tuna sushi that pose a health risk to consumers. Biol Lett. 6:692–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metian AGJT. 2009. Fishing for feed or fishing for food: increasing global competition for small pelagic forage fish. Ambio. 38:294–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan CO, Remya S, Ravishankar CN, Vijayan PK, Srinivasa Gopal TK. 2014. Effect of filling ingredient on the quality of canned yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares). Int J Food Sci Tech. 49:1557–1564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pazartzi T, Siaperopoulou S, Gubili C, Maradidou S, Loukovitis D, Chatzispyrou A, Griffiths AM, Minos G, Imsiridou A. 2019. High levels of mislabeling in shark meat – investigating patterns of species utilization with DNA barcoding in Greek retailers. Food Control. 98:179–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack SJ, Kawalek MD, Williams-Hill DM, Hellberg RS. 2018. Evaluation of DNA barcoding methodologies for the identification of fish species in cooked products. Food Control. 84:297–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarmiento-Camacho S, Valdez-Moreno M. 2018. DNA barcode identification of commercial fish sold in Mexican markets. Genome. 61:457–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokralla S, Hellberg RS, Handy SM, King I, Hajibabaei M. 2015. A DNA mini-barcoding system for authentication of processed fish products. Sci Rep. 5:15894–15899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonko P, Chih-Cheng CS, Chou C, Huang Y, Hsu S, Barčák D, Oros M, Fan C. 2019. Multidisciplinary approach in study of the zoonotic Anisakis larval infection in the blue mackerel (Scomber australasicus) and the largehead hairtail (Trichiurus lepturus) in Northern Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol. (In Press).
   Google Scholar
• Steffens DL, Roy R. 1998. Sequence analysis of mitochondrial DNA hypervariable regions using infrared fluorescence detection. Biotechniques. 24:1044–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultana S, Ali ME, Hossain M, Naquiah N, Zaidul I. 2018. Universal mini COI barcode for the identification of fish species in processed products. Food Res Int. 105:19–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triantafyllidis A, Karaiskou N, Perez J, Martinez JL, Roca A, Lopez B, Garcia-Vazquez E. 2010. Fish allergy risk derived from ambiguous vernacular fish names: forensic DNA-based detection in Greek markets. Food Res Int. 43:2214–2216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen J, Hu C, Zhang L, Fan S. 2012. Identification of 11 sea cucumber species by species-specific PCR method. Food Control. 27:380–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong X, Damico P, Guardone L, Castigliego L, Guidi A, Gianfaldoni D, Armani A. 2016. The uncertainty of seafood labeling in China: a case study on Cod, Salmon and Tuna. Mar Policy. 68:123–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong X, Guardone L, Giusti A, Castigliego L, Gianfaldoni D, Guidi A, Andrea A. 2015. DNA barcoding reveals chaotic labeling and misrepresentation of cod (Xue) products sold on the Chinese market. Food Control. 60:519–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong X, Yao L, Ying X, Lu LX, Guardone L, Armani A, Guidi A, Xiong XH. 2018. Multiple fish species identified from China’s roasted Xue Yu fillet products using DNA and mini-DNA barcoding: implications on human health and marine sustainability. Food Control. 88:123–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong X, Yuan FY, Huang MH, Lu LX, Xiong XH, Wen J. 2019. DNA barcoding revealed mislabeling and potential health concerns with roasted fish products sold across China. J Food Prot. 82(7):1200–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Yan B, Teng Y, Lou G, Lu Z. 2010. Analysis of nutrient composition and fatty acid profiles of Japanese sea bass Lateolabrax japonicus (Cuvier) reared in seawater and freshwater. J Food Compos Anal. 23:401–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu W, Guo A, Zhang Y, Chen X, Qian W, Li Y. 2018. Climate-induced habitat suitability variations of chub mackerel Scomber japonicus in the East China Sea. Fish Res. 207:63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng L, Wen J, Fan S, Chen Z, Xu Y, Sun Y, Chen D, Zhao J. 2018. Species identification of fish maw (Porcupinefish) products sold on the market using DNA sequencing of 16S rRNA and COI genes. Food Control. 86:159–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar