268
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Influence of different extraction conditions on the detection of glycinin and β-conglycinin in model processed foods by ELISA

, , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1087-1098 | Received 13 Jan 2020, Accepted 07 Apr 2020, Published online: 19 May 2020

References

  • [AFSSA] Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments. 2008. Allergies alimentaires et étiquetage de précaution. [accessed 2020 Jan 8]. https://www.anses.fr/fr/system/files/NUT-Ra-AllergiesEtiquetage.pdf.
  • Allen KJ, Turner PJ, Pawankar R, Taylor S, Sicherer S, Lack G, Rosario N, Ebisawa M, Wong G, Mills ENC, et al. 2014. Precautionary labelling of foods for allergen content: are we ready for a global framework? World Allergy Organ J. 7:1. doi:10.1186/1939-4551-7-10.
  • Amponsah A, Nayak B. 2016. Effects of microwave and ultrasound assisted extraction on the recovery of soy proteins for soy allergen detection. J Food Sci. 81:T2876–T2885. doi:10.1111/1750-3841.13534.
  • Amponsah A, Nayak B. 2018. Evaluation of the efficiency of three extraction conditions for the immunochemical detection of allergenic soy proteins in different food matrices. J Sci Food Agric. 98:2378–2384. doi:10.1002/jsfa.8729.
  • Crevel RW, Baumert JL, Baka A, Houben GF, Knulst AC, Kruizinga AG, Luccioli S, Taylor SL, Madsen CB. 2014. Development and evolution of risk assessment for food allergens. Food Chem Toxicol. 67:262–276. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2014.01.032.
  • Cucu T, Devreese B, Kerkaert B, Meulenaer B. 2012. ELISA-based detection of soybean proteins: A comparative study using antibodies against modified and native proteins. Food Anal Methods. 5:1121–1130. doi:10.1007/s12161-011-9341-y.
  • Cucu T, Jacxsens L, De Meulenaer B. 2013. Analysis to support allergen risk management: which way to go? J Agric Food Chem. 61:5624–5633. doi:10.1021/jf303337z.
  • Do AB, Khuda SE, Sharma GM. 2018. Undeclared food allergens and gluten in commercial food products analyzed by ELISA. J AOAC Int. 101:23–35. doi:10.5740/jaoacint.17-0384.
  • Ito K, Sjölander S, Sato S, Movérare R, Tanaka A, Söderström L, Borres M, Poorafshar M, Ebisawa M. 2011. IgE to Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 is associated with severe allergic reactions to soybean in Japanese children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 128:673–675. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2011.04.025.
  • Jideani VA. 2011. Functional properties of soybean food ingredients in food systems. Soybean: biochemistry, chemistry and physiology. Tzi-Bun Ng Editor. Rijeka (Croatia). [accessed 2020 Jan 8]. https://www.intechopen.com/books/soybean-biochemistrychemistry.
  • Kerbach S, Alldrick AJ, Crevel RW, Dömötör L, DunnGalvin A, Mills ENC, Pfaff S, Poms RE, Popping B, Tömösközi S. 2009. Managing food allergens in the food supply chain–viewed from different stakeholder perspectives. Qual Assur Saf Crop Foods. 1:50–60. doi:10.1111/j.1757-837X.2009.00009.x.
  • Khuda SE, Jackson LS, Fu TJ, Williams KM. 2015. Effects of processing on the recovery of food allergens from a model dark chocolate matrix. Food Chem. 168:580–587. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.084.
  • Khuda SE, Sharma GM, Gaines D, Do AB, Pereira M, Chang M, Ferguson M, Williams KM. 2016. Survey of undeclared soy allergen levels in the most frequently recalled food categories with or without precautionary labelling. Food Addit Contam B. 33:1274–1282.
  • Koppelman SJ, Lakemond CM, Vlooswijk R, Hefle SL. 2004. Detection of soy proteins in processed foods: literature overview and new experimental work. J AOAC Int. 87:1398–1407. doi:10.1093/jaoac/87.6.1398.
  • L’Hocine L, Boye JI. 2007. Allergenicity of soybean: new developments in identification of allergenic proteins, cross-reactivities and hypoallergenization technologies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 47:127–143. doi:10.1080/10408390600626487.
  • L’Hocine L, Pitre M. 2016. Quantitative and qualitative optimization of allergen extraction from peanut and selected tree nuts. Part 2. Optimization of buffer and ionic strength using a full factorial experimental design. Food Chem. 194:820–827. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.08.032.
  • Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 227:680–685. doi:10.1038/227680a0.
  • Loh W, Tangl MLK. 2018. The epidemiology of food allergy in the global context. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 15:2043. doi:10.3390/ijerph15092043.
  • Macedo-Silva A, Shimokomaki M, Vaz AJ, Yamamoto YY, Tenuta-Filho A. 2001. Textured soy protein quantification in commercial hamburger. J Food Compos Anal. 4:469–478. doi:10.1006/jfca.2001.1014.
  • Morishita N, Kamiya K, Matsumoto T, Sakai S, Teshima R, Urisu A, Moriyama T, Ogawa T, Akiyama H, Morimatsu F. 2008. Reliable enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the determination of soybean proteins in processed foods. J Agric Food Chem. 56:6818–6824. doi:10.1021/jf8007629.
  • Poms RE, Capelletti C, Anklam E. 2004. Effect of roasting history and buffer composition on peanut protein extraction efficiency. Mol Nutr Food Res. 48:459–464. doi:10.1002/mnfr.200400052.
  • Rencová E, Tremlová B. 2009. ELISA for detection of soya proteins in meat products. Acta Vet Brno. 78:667–671. doi:10.2754/avb200978040667.
  • Rudolf J, Ansari P, Kern C, Ludwig T, Baumgartner S. 2012. Effects of different extraction buffers on peanut protein detectability and lateral flow device (LFD) performance. Food Addit Contam A. 29:1–11. doi:10.1080/19440049.2011.619151.
  • Segura-Gil I, Blázquez-Soro A, Galán-Malo P, Mata L, Tobajas AP, Sánchez L, Pérez MD. 2019. Development of sandwich and competitive ELISA formats to determine β-conglycinin: evaluation of their performance to detect soy in processed food. Food Control. 103:78–85. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.03.035.
  • Segura-Gil I, Nicolau-Lapeña I, Galán-Malo P, Mata L, Calvo M, Sánchez L, Pérez MD. 2018. Development of two ELISA formats to determine glycinin. Application to detect soy in model and commercial processed food. Food Control. 93:32–39. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.05.038.
  • Sharma GM, Khuda SE, Parker CH, Eischeid AC, Pereira M. 2017. Detection of allergen markers in food: analytical methods. In: Spizzirri LG, Cirillo G, editors. Food safety: innovative analytical tools for safety assessment. Beverly (MA): Scrivener Publishing LLC;p; p. 65–121.
  • Sicherer SH, Sampson HA. 2018. Food allergy: a review and update on epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and management. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 141:41–58. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2017.11.003.
  • Spychaj A, Pospiech E, Iwańska E, Montowska M. 2018. Detection of allergenic additives in processed meat products. J Sci Food Agric. 98:4807–4815. doi:10.1002/jsfa.9083.
  • Steinhoff M, Fischer M, Paschke-Kratzin A. 2011. Comparison of extraction conditions for milk and hen’s egg allergens. Food Addit Contam A. 28:373–383. doi:10.1080/19440049.2010.545957.
  • Walczyk NE, Smith PM, Tovey ER, Roberts TH. 2017. Peanut protein extraction conditions strongly influence yield of allergens Ara h 1 and 2 and sensitivity of immunoassays. Food Chem. 221:335–344. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.063.
  • Walker MJ. 2019. Food allergens: an update on analytical methods. In: Melton L, Shahidi F, Varelis P, editors. Reference module in food science. Encyclopedia of food chemistry. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): Elsevier; p. 622–639.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.