Hybrid membrane bioreactor application for decentralized treatment and reuse

References

• Fane , A.S. , Ashbolt , N.J. and White , S.B. 2002 . Decentralized urban water reuse: The implications of system scale for cost and pathogens risk . Water Sci. Technol. , 46 : 281 – 288 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US EPA, Guidelines for Water Reuse, EPA-625/R-04/108 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson , B. , Laine , A.L. , Judd , S. and Stephenson , T. 2000 . Membrane bioreactors and their role in wastewater reuse . Water Sci. Technol. , 41 : 197 – 204 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuler , S. , Paris , S. and Hackner , T. 2008 . Membrane bio-reactors for decentralized wastewater treatment and reuse . Water Sci. Technol. , 58 : 285 – 294 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artiga , P. , Oyanedel , V. , Garrido , J.M. and Mendez , R. 2005 . An innovative biofilm-suspended biomass hybrid membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment . Desalination , 179 : 171 – 179 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Tejero, G. Cuevas, Sistema mixto para la depuración biológica de aguas residuales combinando biopelículas y membranas de filtración (Mixed system for biological treatment of wastewater by combining biofilms and membrane filtration), Spanish Patent ES 2213461B2 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Leiknes , T.O. and Odegaard , H. 2007 . The development of a biofilm membrane bioreactor . Desalination , 202 : 135 – 143 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanovic , I. and Leiknes , T.O. 2012 . The biofilm membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR): A review . Desalin. Water. Treat. , 37 : 288 – 295 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng , F. , Chae , S.R. , Shin , H.S. , Yang , F. and Zhou , Z. 2012 . Recent advances in membrane bioreactors: Configuration development, pollutant elimination, and sludge reduction . Environ. Eng. Sci. , 29 : 139 – 160 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ødegaard , H. , Mende , U. , Skjerping , E.O. , Simonsen , S. , Strube , R. and Bundgaard , E. 2012 . Compact tertiary treatment based on the combination of MBBR and contained hollow fiber UF-membranes . Desalin. Water. Treat. , 42 : 80 – 86 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Water Environment Federation, Biofilm Reactors, WEF Manual of Practice No. 35, Alexandria VA, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Hernandez , L. , Esteban-García , A.L. , Lobo , A. , Temprano , J. , Álvaro , C. , Mariel , A. and Tejero , I. 2012 . Evaluation of a hybrid vertical membrane bioreactor (HVMBR) for wastewater treatment . Water. Sci. Technol. , 65 : 1109 – 1115 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanovic , I. and Leiknes , T.O. 2011 . Membrane reactor design as a tool for better membrane performance in a biofilm MBR (BF-MBR) . Desalin. Water. Treat. , 25 : 259 – 267 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng , F. , Chae , S.R. , Drews , A. , Kraume , M. , Shin , H.S. and Yang , F. 2009 . Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): Membrane fouling and membrane material . Water Res. , 43 : 1489 – 1512 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu , Q. , Wang , X.C. , Liu , Y. , Yuan , H. and Du , Y. 2010 . Performance of a hybrid membrane bioreactor in municipal wastewater treatment . Desalination , 258 : 143 – 147 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Tejero, C. Santamaría, Proceso de tratamiento biológico de aguas basado en biopelícula sobre soporte de diseño específico (Biological Wastewater Treatment based on Biofilm grown on a specifically designed Support Media), Spanish Patent ES 2128962B1 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• APHA, AWWA, WEF, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Artiga , P. , García-Torrielo , G. , Garrido , J.M. and Méndez , R. 2006 . Biorreactores de membrana: una tecnología avanzada para la depuración y reutilización de aguas residuales [Membrane bioreactor: An advanced technology for the treatment and reuse of waste waters] . Tecnología del agua , 269 : 54 – 60 .
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez , A. , Garrido , J.M. and Méndez , R. 2010 . A comparative study of tertiary membrane filtration of industrial wastewater treated in a granular and a flocculent sludge SBR . Desalination , 250 : 810 – 814 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan , S.J. , Ilyas , S. , Javid , S. , Visvanathan , C. and Jegatheesan , V. 2011 . Performance of suspended and attached growth MBR systems in treating high strength synthetic wastewater . Bioresour. Technol. , 102 : 5331 – 5336 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pochana , K. , Keller , J. and Lant , P. 1999 . Model development for simultaneous nitrification and denitrification . Water Sci. Technol. , 39 : 235 – 243 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang , B. , Yamamoto , K. , Ohgaki , S. and Kamiko , N. 1997 . Floc size distribution and bacterial activities in membrane separation activated sludge processes for small-scale wastewater treatment/reclamation . Water Sci.Technol. , 35 : 37 – 44 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriques , I.D.S. , Holbrook , R.D. , Kelly , I. , Richard , T. and Love , N.G. 2005 . The impact of floc size on respiration inhibition by soluble toxicants-a comparative investigation . Water Res. , 39 : 2559 – 2568 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Real Decreto 1620/2007. por el que se establece el régimen jurídico de la reutilización de las aguas depuradas [Royal Decree which establishes the legal framework for the reuse of treated water], State Official Journal, BOE 294 (2007) 50639–50661 (8 December).
   Google Scholar