Influence of crossflow microfiltration on ceramic membrane fouling and beer quality

References

• Cassano, A., Donato, L., and Drioli, E., 2007. Ultrafiltration of kiwifruit juice: Operating parameters, juice quality and membrane fouling, J. Food Eng. 79 (2007), pp. 613–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillaudeau, L., Blanpain-Avet, P., and Daufin, G., 2006. Water, wastewater and waste management in brewing industries, J. Clean. Product. 14 (2006), pp. 463–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordman, T.R., Peet, C., Iverson, W., Broens, L., and Hoof, S.v., 2001. Cross-flow filtration for clarification of lager beer economic reality, Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 38 (2001), pp. 207–210.
   Google Scholar
• G. Trägårdh, New developments in membrane processing, in: A.G. Gaonkar (Ed.), Food processing: Recent developments (Chapter 6), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995..
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, D.Y., Vigneswaran, S., Fane, A.G., and Aim, R.B., 2000. Experimental determination of critical flux in cross-flow microfiltration, Sep. Purif. Technol. 19 (3) (2000), pp. 169–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Horst, H.C., and Hanemaaijer, J.H., 1990. Cross-flow microfiltration in the food industry: State of the art, Desalination 77 (1990), pp. 235–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell, K.J., Gill, C., McKechnie, M.T., and Murray, J., 1994. Advance in separation technology for the brewer: Ceramic cross-flow microfiltration of rough beer, MBAA Tech. Q. 31 (2) (1994), pp. 42–50.
   Google Scholar
• Fillaudeau, L., and Carrerè, H., 2002. Yeast cells, beer composition and mean pore diameter impacts on fouling and retention during cross-flow filtration of beer with ceramic membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 196 (2002), pp. 39–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, Q., Howell, J.A., Field, R.W., England, R., Bird, M.R., O’Shaughnessy, C.L., and MeKechinie, M.T., 2001. Beer clarification by microfiltration—product quality control and fractionation of particles and macromolecules, J. Membr. Sci. 194 (2001), pp. 185–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabby, A.K, Sastre, A.M, and Rizvi, S.S.H, 2008. Handbook of Membrane Separation: Chemical, Pharmaceutical, Food and Biotechnological Applications. New York, NY: CRC; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, M., and Zydney, A., 2006. Effects of membrane pore geometry on fouling behavior during yeast cell microfiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 285 (1–2) (2006), pp. 334–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacio, L., Ho, C.C., Prádanos, P., Hernández, A., and Zydney, A.L., 2003. Fouling with protein mixtures in microfiltration: BSA-lysozyme and BSA-pepsin, J. Membr. Sci. 222 (1–2) (2003), pp. 41–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasco, C., Ouammou, M., Calvo, J.I., and Hernández, A., 2003. Protein fouling in microfiltration: Deposition mechanism as a function of pressure for different pH, J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 266 (1) (2003), pp. 148–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson, G., Dejmek, P., Trägårdh, G., and Paulsson, M., 1997. Minimizing whey protein retention in cross-flow microfiltration of skim milk, Int. Dairy J. 7 (4) (1997), pp. 237–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sur, H.W., and Cui, Z., 2001. Experimental study on the enhancement of yeast microfiltration with gas sparging, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 76 (5) (2001), pp. 477–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang, C.J., Wu, C.Y., and Wu, C.C., 2008. Combination of crossflow and electric field for microfiltration of protein/microbial cell suspensions, Desalination 233 (1–3) (2008), pp. 295–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourouzis, S.A.M., and Karabelas, A.J., 2008. Whey protein fouling of large pore size ceramic microfiltration membranes at small cross-flow velocity, J. Membr. Sci. 323 (1) (2008), pp. 17–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, F., Martín, A., Prádanos, P., Calvo, J.I., Palacio, L., and Hernández, A., 2000. Protein adsorption and deposition onto microfiltration membranes: The role of solute–solid interactions, J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 221 (2) (2000), pp. 254–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stopka, J., Schlosser, Š., Dömény, Z., and Šmogrovičov, D., 2000. Flux decline in microfiltration of beer and related solutions of model foulants through ceramic membranes, Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 9 (2000), pp. 65–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdanshenas, M., Tabatabaei Nejad, S.A.R., Soltanieh, M., Tavakkoli, A., Babaluo, A.A., and Fillaudeau, L., 2010. Dead-end microfiltration of rough nonalcoholic beer by different polymeric membranes, J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 68 (2) (2010), pp. 83–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, Q., 2001. Beer clarification by cross-flow microfiltration—effect of surface hydrodynamics and reversed membrane morphology, Chem. Eng. Process. 40 (2001), pp. 413–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanpain-Avet, P., Fillaudeau, L., and Lalande, M., 1999. Investigation of mechanisms governing membrane fouling and protein rejection in the sterile microfiltration of beer with an organic membrane, Trans. I Chem. E 77 (1999), pp. 75–89.
   Google Scholar
• Hermia, J., 1982. Constant pressure blocking filtration laws—application to power law non-newtonian fluids, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng. 60 (1982), pp. 183–187.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, W.R., Calvo, J.I., and Hernández, A., 1995. Steps of membrane blocking in flux decline during protein microfiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 101 (1995), pp. 153–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koltuniewicz, A.B., and Field, R.W., 1996. Process factors during removal of oil-in water emulsions with cross-flow microfiltration, Desalination 105 (1996), pp. 79–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zydney, A.L., Ho, C.C., Yuan, W., Dibakar, B., and Butterfield, D.A., 2003. Fouling phenomena during microfiltration: Effects of pore blockage cake filtration and membrane morphology, Membr. Sci. Technol. 8 (2003), pp. 27–44.
   Google Scholar
• C.C. Ho, A.L. Zydney, A combined pore blockage and cake filtration model for protein fouling during microfiltration, J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 232 (2000) 389–399..
   Google Scholar
• Aubert, M.C., Elluard, M.P., and Barnier, H., 1993. Shear stress induced erosion of filtration cake studied by a flat rotating disk method, determination of the critical shear stress of erosion, J. Membr. Sci. 84 (1993), pp. 229–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, Z., 2004. Across-Sample Incomparability of R²s and Additional Evidence on Value Relevance Changes Over Time. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Vela, M.C.V., Blanco, S.A., García, J.L., and Rodrgíuez, E.B., 2008. Analysis of membrane pore blocking models applied to the ultrafiltration of PEG, Sep. Purif. Technol. 62 (2008), pp. 489–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, Xiaoling, 2010. Simulation and mechanisms of aeration impacts on the permeate flux in submerged membrane systems, Desalin. Water Treat. 18 (2010), pp. 277–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Cui, Y., Yao, J., Chu, J., and Liang, Y., 2009. The influence of various operating conditions on specific cake resistance in the crossflow microfiltration of yeast suspensions, Desalin. Water Treat. 1 (2009), pp. 237–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar