Development and testing of a transparent membrane biofouling monitor

References

• M.A. Shannon, P.W. Bohn, M. Elimelech, J.G. Georgiadis, B.J. Mariñas, A.M. Mayes, Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades, Nature 452 (2008) 301–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.S. Baker, L.Y. Dudley, Biofouling in membrane systems—A review, Desalination 118 (1998) 81–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.F. Ridgway, H.C. Flemming, Biofouling of membranes, in: J. Mallevialle, P.E. Odendaal, M.R. Wiesner (Ed.), Water treatment membrane processes, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1996, pp. 629–640.
   Google Scholar
• H.F. Ridgway, A. Kelly, C. Justice, B.H. Olson, Microbial fouling of reverse-osmosis membranes used in advanced wastewater treatment technology: Chemical, bacteriological, and ultrastructural analyses, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45 (1983) 1066–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.P. Schneider, L.M. Ferreira, P. Binder, E.M. Bejarano, K.P. Góes, E. Slongo, C.R. Machado, G.M.Z. Rosa, Dynamics of organic carbon and of bacterial populations in a conventional pretreatment train of a reverse osmosis unit experiencing severe biofouling, J. Membr. Sci. 266 (2005) 18–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Tasaka, T. Katsura, H. Iwahori, Y. Kamiyama, Analysis of RO elements operated at more than 80 plants in Japan, Desalination 96 (1994) 259–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.S. Vrouwenvelder, S.A. Manolarakis, J.P. van der Hoek, J.A.M. van Paassen, W.G.J. van der Meer, J.M.C. van Agtmaal, H.D.M. Prummel, J.C. Kruithof, M.C.M. van Loosdrecht, Quantitative biofouling diagnosis in full scale nanofiltration and reverse osmosis installations, Water Res. 42 (2008) 4856–4868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Huiting, J.W.N.M. Kappelhof, T.G.J. Bosklopper, Operation of NF/RO plants: From reactive to proactive, Desalination 139 (2001) 183–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.M. Nederlof, J.C. Kruithof, J.S. Taylor, D. van der Kooij, J.C. Schippers, Comparison of NF/RO membrane performance in integrated membrane systems, Desalination 131 (2000) 257–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.A. Araújo, J.C. Kruithof, M.C.M. Van Van Loosdrecht, J.S. Vrouwenvelder, The potential of standard and modified feed spacers for biofouling control, J. Membr. Sci. 403–404 (2012) 58–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.A. Creber, J.S. Vrouwenvelder, M.C.M. van Loosdrecht, M.L. Johns, Chemical cleaning of biofouling in reverse osmosis membranes evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging, J. Membr. Sci. 362 (2010) 202–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.J. Miller, P.A. Araújo, P.B. Correia, M.M. Ramsey, J.C. Kruithof, M.C.M. van Loosdrecht, B.D. Freeman, D.R. Paul, M. Whiteley, J.S. Vrouwenvelder, Short-term adhesion and long-term biofouling testing of polydopamine and poly(ethylene glycol) surface modifications of membranes and feed spacers for biofouling control, Water Res. 46 (2012) 3737–3753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.I. Prest, M. Staal, M. Kühl, M.C.M. van Loosdrecht, J.S. Vrouwenvelder, Quantitative measurement and visualization of biofilm O2 consumption rates in membrane filtration systems. J. Membr. Sci. 392–393 (2012) 66–75.
   Google Scholar
• J.S. Vrouwenvelder, J. Buiter, M. Riviere, W.G.J. van der Meer, M.C.M. van Loosdrecht, J.C. Kruithof, Impact of flow regime on pressure drop increase and biomass accumulation and morphology in membrane systems, Water Res. 44 (2010) 689–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.S. Vrouwenvelder, C. Hinrichs, W.G.J. Van der Meer, M.C.M. Van Loosdrecht, J.C. Kruithof, Pressure drop increase by biofilm accumulation in spiral wound RO and NF membrane systems: Role of substrate concentration, flow velocity, substrate load and flow direction, Biofouling 25 (2009) 543–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.S. Vrouwenvelder, S.M. Bakker, M. Cauchard, R. Le Grand, M. Apacandié, M. Idrissi, S. Lagrave, L.P. Wessels, J.A.M. van Paassen, J.C. Kruithof, M.C.M. van Loosdrecht, The membrane fouling simulator: A suitable tool for prediction and characterisation of membrane fouling, Water Sci. Technol. 55 (2007) 197–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.S. Vrouwenvelder, S.M. Bakker, L.P. Wessels, J.A.M. van Paassen, The membrane fouling simulator as a new tool for biofouling control of spiral-wound membranes, Desalination 204 (2007) 170–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.S. Vrouwenvelder, J.A.M. Van Paassen, L.P. Wessels, A.F. Van Dam, S.M. Bakker, The membrane fouling simulator: A practical tool for fouling prediction and control, J. Membr. Sci. 281 (2006) 316–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Schock, A. Miquel, Mass transfer and pressure loss in spiral wound modules, Desalination 64 (1987) 339–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.G.J. van der Meer, Mathematical modeling of NF and RO membrane filtration plants and modules in PhD thesis, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• J.S. Vrouwenvelder, M.C.M. Van Loosdrecht, J.C. Kruithof, A novel scenario for biofouling control of spiral wound membrane systems, Water Res. 45 (2011) 3890–3898.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• C. Dreszer, J.S. Vrouwenvelder, A.H. Paulitsch-Fuchs, A. Zwijnenburg, J.C. Kruithof, H.C. Flemming, Hydraulic resistance of biofilms, J. Membr. Sci. 429 (2013) 436–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.J. Reasoner, E.E. Geldreich, A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49 (1985) 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Lautenschlager, C. Hwang, W.T. Liu, N. Boon, O. Köster, H. Vrouwenvelder, T. Egli, F.A. Hammes, A microbiology-based multi-parametric approach towards assessing biological stability in drinking water distribution networks, Water Res. 47 (2013) 3015–3025.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• F. Hammes, M. Berney, Y. Wang, M. Vital, O. Köster, T. Egli, Flow-cytometric total bacterial cell counts as a descriptive microbiological parameter for drinking water treatment processes, Water Res. 42 (2008) 269–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Van Gauwbergen, J. Baeyens, Macroscopic fluid flow conditions in spiral-wound membrane elements, Desalination 110 (1997) 287–299.
   Google Scholar
• J. Baker, T. Stephenson, S. Dard, P. Côté, Characterisation of fouling of nanofiltration membranes used to treat surface waters, Environ. Technol. 16 (1995) 977–985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.R. Suwarno, X. Chen, T.H. Chong, V.L. Puspitasari, D. McDougald, Y. Cohen, S.A. Rice, A.G. Fane, The impact of flux and spacers on biofilm development on reverse osmosis membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 405–406 (2012) 219–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Tran, B. Bolto, S. Gray, M. Hoang, E. Ostarcevic, An autopsy study of a fouled reverse osmosis membrane element used in a brackish water treatment plant, Water Res. 41 (2007) 3915–3923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.A.M. van Paassen, J.C. Kruithof, S.M. Bakker, F.S. Kegel, Integrated multi-objective membrane systems for surface water treatment: Pre-treatment of nanofiltration by riverbank filtration and conventional ground water treatment, Desalination 118 (1998) 239–248.
   Google Scholar
• J.S. Vrouwenvelder, D.A. Graf von der Schulenburg, J.C. Kruithof, M.L. Johns, M.C.M. van Loosdrecht, Biofouling of spiral-wound nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: A feed spacer problem, Water Res. 43 (2009) 583–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.C. Flemming, Role and levels of real-time monitoring for successful anti-fouling strategies—an overview, Water Sci. Technol. 47 (2003) 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.-C. Flemming, A. Tamachkiarowa, J. Klahre, J. Schmitt, Monitoring of fouling and biofouling in technical systems, Water Sci. Technol. 38 (1998) 291–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Huang, E.A. Swanson, C.P. Lin, J.S. Schuman, W.G. Stinson, W. Chang, M.R. Hee, T. Flotte, K. Gregory, C.A. Puliafito, J.G. Fujimoto, Optical coherence tomography, Science 254 (1991) 1178–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Xi, D. Marks, S. Schlachter, W. Luo, S.A. Boppart, High-resolution three-dimensional imaging of biofilm development using optical coherence tomography, J. Biomed. Opt. 11 (2006) 034001–034001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• C. Haisch, R. Niessner, Visualisation of transient processes in biofilms by optical coherence tomography, Water Res. 41 (2007) 2467–2472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Wagner, D. Taherzadeh, C. Haisch, H. Horn, Investigation of the mesoscale structure and volumetric features of biofilms using optical coherence tomography, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 107 (2010) 844–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Derlon, M. Peter-Varbanets, A. Scheidegger, W. Pronk, E. Morgenroth, Predation influences the structure of biofilm developed on ultrafiltration membranes, Water Res. 46 (2012) 3323–3333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Derlon, N. Koch, B. Eugster, T. Posch, J. Pernthaler, W. Pronk, E. Morgenroth, Activity of metazoa governs biofilm structure formation and enhances permeate flux during Gravity-Driven Membrane (GDM) filtration, Water Res. 47 (2013) 2085–2095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Janjaroen, F. Ling, G. Monroy, N. Derlon, E. Mogenroth, S.A. Boppart, W.-T. Liu, T.H. Nguyen, Roles of ionic strength and biofilm roughness on adhesion kinetics of Escherichia coli onto groundwater biofilm grown on PVC surfaces, Water Res. 47 (2013) 2531–2542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar