Evaluating efficiency of H₂O₂ on removal of organic matter from drinking water

References

• AWWA, Water Treatment Plant Design, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1996, 255.
   Google Scholar
• S.R. Qasim, Wastewater Treatment Plants: Planning, Design and Operation, 2nd ed., Technomic Publishing, Lancaster, PA, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE, AWWA, Water Treatment Plant Design, 2nd ed., McGraw- Hill, New York, NY, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• AWWA, Water Quality and Treatment, 4th ed.,McGraw-Hill Book, New York, NY, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• M. James, Inc. Water Treatment Principles and Design, Wiley, New York, NY, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• W.L. Lappenbusch, Contaminated Drinking Water and Your Health, Lappenbusch Environmental Health, Alexandria, VA, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• G. Tchobanoglous, E.D. Schroeder, Water Quality: Characteristics, Modeling and Modification, Addison-Wesley, Reading, AM, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• C.N. Sawyer, P.L. McCarty, Chemistry for Environmental Engineering, McGraw-Hill Book, New York, NY, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• S.W. Krasner, M.J. McGuire, J.G. Jacangelo, N.L. Patania, K.M. Reagan, E.M. Aieta, The occurrence of disinfection by-products in US drinking water, J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 81 (1989) 41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.C. Kim, M.J. Yu, Characterization of natural organic matter in conventional water treatment processes for selection of treatment processes focused on DBPs control, Water Res. 39 (2005) 4779–4789.10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Gallard, U.V. von Gunten, Chlorination of natural organic matter: kinetics of chlorination and of THM formation, Water Res. 36 (2002) 65–74.10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00187-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO, Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, (Chloroform), Health Criteria and Other Supporting Information, Geneva, 1998, pp. 255–275.
   Google Scholar
• G. Ducom, C. Cabassud, Interests and limitations of nanofiltration for the removal of volatile organic compounds in drinking water production, Desalination 124 (1999) 115–123.10.1016/S0011-9164(99)00095-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Odom, S. Regli, M. Messner, J. Cromwell, M. Javdan, Benefit-cost of the Stage 1 D: DBP rule, J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 91 (1999) 137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Mahmud, A. Kumar, R.M. Narbaitz, T. Matsuura, A study of mass transfer in the membrane air-stripping process using microporous polyproplylene hollow fibers, J. Membr. Sci. 179 (2000) 29–41.10.1016/S0376-7388(00)00381-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Mikutta, M. Kleber, K. Kaiser, R. Jahn, Review: Organic matter removal from soils using hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, and disodium peroxodisulfate, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69 (2005) 120–135.10.2136/sssaj2005.0120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Cotruvo, G.F. Craun, N. Hearne, Providing Safe Drinking Water in Small Systems: Technology, Operation and Economics, CRC Press, New York, NY, 1999, pp. 247–249.
   Google Scholar
• D.L. Pardieck, E.J. Bouwer, A.T. Stone, Hydrogen peroxide use to increase oxidant capacity for in situ bioremediation of contaminated soils and aquifers: A review, J. Contam. Hydrol. 9 (1992) 221–242.10.1016/0169-7722(92)90006-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degremont Inc, Water Treatment Handbook, 6th ed., Lavoisier, Paris, 1991, pp. 824–824.
   Google Scholar
• H. Zahedi, Lui Pastor’s Biography, Iranian Corporation for extension of Libraries Pub., Tehran, 1993, 201.
   Google Scholar
• APHA, AWWA, WEF, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, twenty 1st ed., APHA, Washington, DC, 2005, p.201.
   Google Scholar
• H. Amin, A. Amer, A. Fecky, I. Ibrahim, Treatment of textile wastewater using H2O2/UV system, Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 42 (2008) 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.I. Stefan, A.R. Hoy, J.R. Bolton, Kinetics and mechanism of the degradation and mineralization of acetone in dilute aqueous solution sensitized by the UV photolysis of hydrogen peroxide, Environ. Sci. Technol. 30 (1996) 2382–2390.10.1021/es950866i
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Chu, Modeling the quantum yields of herbicide 2,4-D decay in UV/H2O2 process, Chemosphere 44 (2001) 935–941.10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00556-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.Y. Ghaly, G. Härtel, R. Mayer, R. Haseneder, Photochemical oxidation of p-chlorophenol by UV/H2O2 and photo-Fenton process. A comparative study, Waste Manage. 21 (2001) 41–47.10.1016/S0956-053X(00)00070-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Daneshvar, N. Mohammad Rabbani, M.-A Modirshahla, M.A. Behnajady, Photooxidative degradation of Acid Red 27 (AR27): Modeling of reaction kinetic and influence of operational parameters, J. Environ. Sci. Health A 39 (2004) 2319–2332.10.1081/ESE-200026272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.V. Buxton, C.L. Greenstock, W.P. Helman, A.B. Ross, Critical review of rate constants for reactions of hydrated electrons chemical kinetic data base for combustion chemistry. Part 3: Propane, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 17 (1988) 513–886.10.1063/1.555805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.D. Dionysiou, M.T. Suidan, I. Baudin, J.M. Laı̂né, Effect of hydrogen peroxide on the destruction of organic contaminants-synergism and inhibition in a continuous-mode photocatalytic reactor, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 50 (2004) 259–269.10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Aleboyeh, Y. Moussa, H. Aleboyeh, The effect of operational parameters on UV/H2O2 decolourisation of Acid Blue 74, Dyes Pigm. 66 (2005) 129–134.10.1016/j.dyepig.2004.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar