References
- R.S. Jones, B. Yoo, Korea’s Green Growth Strategy: Mitigating Climate Change and Developing New Growth Engines, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, 2010.
- J.K. Lee, S. Lee, Reviewing Korea's strategic plan of adaptation and mitigation for sustainable development and climate change, Int. J. Urban Sci. 14(1) (2010) 60–72.10.1080/12265934.2010.9693664
- D. Whittington, J. Briscoe, X. Mu, W. Barron, Estimating the willingness to pay for water services in developing countries: A case study of the use of contingent valuation surveys in southern Haiti, Econ. Dev. Cul. Change 38(2) (1990) 293–311.10.1086/edcc.1990.38.issue-2
- J.H. North, C.C. Griffin, Water source as a housing characteristic: Hedonic property valuation and willingness to pay for water, Water Resour. Res. 29(7) (1993) 1923–1929.10.1029/92WR02995
- J.L. Jordan, A.H. Elnagheeb, Willingness to pay for improvements in drinking water quality, Water Resour. Res. 29(2) (1993) 237–245.10.1029/92WR02420
- D. Whittington, S.K. Pattanayak, J.C. Yang, K. Bal Kumar, Household demand for improved piped water services: Evidence from Kathmandu, Nepal, Water Policy 4(6) (2002) 531–556.
- D. Hensher, N. Shore, K. Train, Water supply security and willingness to pay to avoid drought restrictions, Econ. Record 82(256) (2006) 56–66.10.1111/ecor.2006.82.issue-256
- N. Adriano, D. Wilson, E. Joao, Contingent valuation of improvement in basic sanitation services: A case study in Brazil, Econ. Environ. Stud. 11(3) (2011) 213–234.
- P.G. Welle, J.B. Hodgson, Property owners’ willingness to pay for water quality improvements: Contingent valuation estimates in two central Minnesota watersheds, J. Appl. Bus. Econ. 12(1) (2011) 81–94.
- J.H. Kim, Benefit estimation of tap water quality improvement based on citizens’ willingness-to-pay, Int. J. Policy Stud. 10(3) (2001) 245–263.
- M. Riddel, Simulated maximum likelihood for double-bounded referendum models, J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 26(2) (2001) 491–507.
- P. Sarkhel, S. Banerjee, Municipal solid waste management, source-separated waste and stakeholder’s attitude: A contingent valuation study, Environ. Dev. Sustain. 12(5) (2010) 611–630.10.1007/s10668-009-9215-2
- K.G. Mäler, J.R. Vincent, Handbook of Environmental Economics: Valuing Environmental Changes, vol. 2, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, 2005.
- D.S. Brookshire, A. Randall, J.R. Stoll, Valuing increments and decrements in natural resource service flows, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 62(3) (1980) 478–488.10.2307/1240202
- K. Arrow, R. Solow, P.R. Portney, E.E. Leamer, R. Radner, H. Schuman, Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation, Fed. Register 58(10) (1993) 4601–4614.
- M. Hanemann, J. Loomis, B. Kanninen, Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 73(4) (1991) 1255–1263.10.2307/1242453
- W.M. Hanemann, Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 66(3) (1984) 332–341.10.2307/1240800
- W.M. Hanemann, Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete response data: Reply, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 71(4) (1989) 1057–1061.10.2307/1242685
- T. Park, J.B. Loomis, M. Creel, Confidence intervals for evaluating benefits estimates from dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies, Land Econ. 67(1) (1991) 64–73.10.2307/3146486
- I. Krinsky, A.L. Robb, On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities, Rev. Econ. Stat. 68 (1986) 715–719.10.2307/1924536
- D. Normile, Restoration or devastation? Science 327 (2010) 1568–1570.10.1126/science.327.5973.1568
- P.W. Jeanty. Constructing Krinsky and Robb Confidence Interval for Mean and Median WTP using Stata, Stata Users Group, 2007.