Innovative ceramic hollow fiber membranes for recycling/reuse of oilfield produced water

References

• UNESCO, Global Water Resources Under Increasing Pressure from Rapidly Growing Demands and Climate Change, According to New UN World Water Development Report, WWDR4—Background Information Brief, United Nations World Water Assessment Program, 2012, UNESCOPRESS.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Folarin, D. An, S. Caffrey, J. Soh, C.W. Sensen, J. Voordouw, T. Jack, G. Voordouw, Contribution of make-up water to the microbial community in an oil field from which oil is produced by produced water re-injection, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 81 (2013) 44–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Bakke, J. Klungsøyr, S. Sanni, Environmental impacts of produced water and drilling waste discharges from the Norwegian offshore petroleum industry, Mar. Environ. Res. 92 (2013) 154–169.10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Kose, H. Ozgun, M. Evren Ersahin, N. Dizge, D.Y. Koseoglu-Imer, B. Atay, R. Kaya, M. Altinbas, S. Sayili, P. Hoshan, D. Atay, E. Eren, C. Kinaci, I. Koyuncu, Performance evaluation of a submerged membrane bioreactor for the treatment of brackish oil and natural gas field produced water, Desalination 285 (2012) 295–300.10.1016/j.desal.2011.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Bailey, M. Crabtree, J. Tyrie, J. Elphick, F. Kuchuk, C. Romano, L. Roodhart, Water control, Oilfield Rev. 12 (2000) 30–51.
   Google Scholar
• J.A. Veil, M.G. Puder, D. Elcock, R.J. Redweik Jr, A White Paper Describing Produced Water from Production of Crude Oil, Natural Gas, and Coal Bed Methane, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, 2004.10.2172/821666
   Google Scholar
• S. Alzahrani, A.W. Mohammad, N. Hilal, P. Abdullah, O. Jaafar, Comparative study of NF and RO membranes in the treatment of produced water—Part I: Assessing water quality, Desalination 315 (2013) 18–26.10.1016/j.desal.2012.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Wandera, S.R. Wickramasinghe, S.M. Husson, Modification and characterization of ultrafiltration membranes for treatment of produced water, J. Membr. Sci. 373 (2011) 178–188.10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.E. Horner, J.W. Castle, J.H. Rodgers, A risk assessment approach to identifying constituents in oilfield produced water for treatment prior to beneficial use, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 74 (2011) 989–999.10.1016/j.ecoenv.2011.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Xu, J.E. Drewes, Viability of nanofiltration and ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis membranes for multi-beneficial use of methane produced water, Sep. Purif. Technol. 52(1) (2006) 67.10.1016/j.seppur.2006.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Fakhru’l-Razi., A. Pendashteh, L.C. Abdullah, D.R.A. Biak, S.S. Madaeni, Z.Z. Abidin, Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment, J. Hazard. Mater. 170 (2009) 530–551.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Robinson., Oil and gas: Treatment of produced waters for injection and reinjection, Filtr. Sep., 50 (4), July–August, 2013, 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• G. Li, S. Guo, F. Li, Treatment of oilfield produced water by anaerobic process coupled with micro-electrolysis, J. Environ. Sci. 22(12) (2010) 1875–1882.10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60333-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Li, C. Kang, C. Zhang, Waste water produced from an oilfield and continuous treatment with an oil-degrading bacterium, Proc. Biochem. 40 (2005) 873–877.10.1016/j.procbio.2004.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Bayati, J. Shayegan, A. Noorjahan, Treatment of oil field produced water by dissolved air precipitation/solvent sublation, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 80 (2012) 26–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Shokrollahzadeh, F. Golmohammad, N. Naseri, H. Shokouhi, M. Arman-mehr, Chemical oxidation for removal of hydrocarbons from gas-field produced water, Procedia Eng. 42 (2012) 942.10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.487
   Google Scholar
• J.M. Younker, M.E. Walsh, Bench-scale investigation of an integrated adsorption–coagulation–dissolved air flotation process for produced water treatment, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2 (2014) 692–697.10.1016/j.jece.2013.11.009
   Google Scholar
• A. Alkhudhiri, N. Darwish, N. Hilal, Produced water treatment: Application of air gap membrane distillation, Desalination 309 (2013) 46–51.10.1016/j.desal.2012.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Yuliwati, A.F. Ismail, T. Matsuura, M.A. Kassim, M.S. Abdullah, Effect of modified PVDF hollow fiber submerged ultrafiltration membrane for refinery wastewater treatment, Desalination 283 (2011) 214–220.10.1016/j.desal.2011.03.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Ahmadun, A. Pendashteh, L.C. Abdullah, D.R. Awang Biak, S.S. Madaeni, Z.Z. Abidin, Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment, J. Hazard. Mater 170 (2009) 530–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ebrahimi, O. Schmitz, S. Kerker, F. Liebermann, P. Czermak, Dynamic cross-flow filtration of oilfield produced water by rotating ceramic filter discs, Desalin. Water Treat. 51(7–9) (2013) 1762–1768, doi: 10.1080/19443994.2012.694197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Ebrahimi, Z. Kovacs, M. Schneider, P. Mund, P. Bolduan, P. Czermak, Multistage filtration process for efficient treatment of oil-field produced water using ceramic membranes, Desalin. Water Treat. 42 (2012) 17–23.10.1080/19443994.2012.682964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Czermak, M. Ebrahimi, Multiphase cross-flow filtration process for efficient treatment of oil-field produced water using ceramic membranes, Proceedings 7th Produced Water Workshop, paper 5, April 29–30, 2009, Aberdeen, UK.
   Google Scholar
• K. ShamsAshaghi, M. Ebrahimi, P. Czermak, Ceramic ultra- and nanofiltration membranes for oilfield produced water treatment—A mini review, The Open Environ. J. 1 (2007) 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• M. Ebrahimi, K. Shams Ashaghi, L. Engel, P. Mund, P. Bolduan, P. Czermak, Investigations on the use of different ceramic membranes for efficient oil-field produced water treatment, Desalination 250 (2010) 991–996.10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Lee, Z. Wu, R. Wang, K. Li, Micro- structured alumina hollow fiber membranes - potential applications in wastewater treatment, J. Membr. Sci. 461 (2014) 39–48.10.1016/j.memsci.2014.02.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Tan, K. Li, Inorganic hollow fiber membranes in catalytic processing, Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 1 (2011) 69–76.10.1016/j.coche.2011.08.004
   Google Scholar
• I. Gaspar, A. Koris, Z. Bertalan, G. Vatai, Comparison of ceramic capillary membrane and ceramic tubular membrane with inserted static mixer, Chem. Pap. 65 (5) (2011) 596–602, doi: 10.2478/s11696-011-0045-y.10.2478/s11696-011-0045-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Ohlrogge, K. Ebert, Membranen: Grundlagen, Verfahren und Industrielle Anwendungen, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2006.10.1002/3527609008
   Google Scholar
• E.L. Cussler, Diffusion: Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Cui, W. Peng, Y. Fan, W. Xing, N. Xu, Effect of cross-flow velocity on the critical flux of ceramic membrane filtration as a pre-treatment for seawater desalination, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 21(4) (2013) 341–347.10.1016/S1004-9541(13)60470-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Alventosa-deLara, S. Barredo-Damas, M.I. Alcaina-Miranda, M.I. Iborra-Clar, Ultrafiltration technology with a ceramic membrane for reactive dye removal: Optimization of membrane performance, J. Hazard. Mater. 209–210(492–500) 2012 27–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Alpatova, E. Kim, S. Dong, N. Sun, P. Chelme-Ayala, M.G. El-Din, Treatment of oil sands process-affected water with ceramic ultrafiltration membrane: Effects of operating conditions on membrane performance, Sep. Purif. Technol. 122 (2014) 170–182.10.1016/j.seppur.2013.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Chen, A.S. Kim, Prediction of permeate flux decline in cross-flow membrane filtration of colloidal suspension: A radial basis function neural network approach, Desalination 192 (2006) 415–428.10.1016/j.desal.2005.07.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Reyhani, F. Rekabdar, M. Hemmati, A.A. SafeKordi, M. Ahmadi, Optimization of conditions in ultrafiltration treatment of produced water by polymeric membrane using Taguchi approach, Desalin. Water Treat. 51(40–42) (2013) 1–10, doi: 10.1080/19443994.2013.776505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Abdelrasoul, H. Doan, A. Lohi, Mass transfer - advances in sustainable energy and environment oriented numerical modeling, in: H. Nakajima (Ed.), Fouling in Membrane Filtration and Remediation, Methods, InTech, ISBN 978-953-51-1170-2, Published: July 24, 2013 (Chapter 8).
   Google Scholar
• S. Hong, P. Krishna, C. Hobbs, D. Kim, J. Cho, Variations in backwash efficiency during colloidal filtration of hollow-fiber microfiltration membranes, Desalination 17(x) (2005) 257–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Janus, P. Parneet, B. Ulanicki, Modelling and simulation of short and long term membrane filtration experiments, Desalin. Water Treat. 8 (2009) 37–47.10.5004/dwt.2009.688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar