Influence of membrane, pH and water matrix properties on the retention of emerging contaminants by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration

References

• N. Bolong, A.F. Ismail, M.R. Salim, T. Matsuura, A review of the effects of emerging contaminants in wastewater and options for their removal, Desalination 239 (2009) 229–246.10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Ikehata, M.G. El-Din, S.A. Snyder, Ozonation and advanced oxidation treatment of emerging organic pollutants in water and wastewater, Ozone Sci. Eng. 30 (2008) 21–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Kovalova, H. Siegrist, U. von Gunten, J. Eugster, M. Hagenbuch, A. Wittmer, R. Moser, C.S. McArdell, Elimination of micropollutants during post-treatment of hospital wastewater with powdered activated carbon, ozone, and UV, Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (2013) 7899–7908.10.1021/es400708w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Nakada, K. Komori, Y. Suzuki, C. Konishi, I. Houwa, H. Tanaka, Occurrence of 70 pharmaceutical and personal care products in Tone River basin in Japan, Water Sci. Technol. 56 (2007) 133–140.10.2166/wst.2007.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Westerhoff, Y. Yoon, S. Snyder, E. Wert, Fate of endocrine-disruptor, pharmaceutical, and personal care product chemicals during simulated drinking water treatment processes, Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 (2005) 6649–6663.10.1021/es0484799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.E. Stackelberg, E.T. Furlong, M.T. Meyer, S.D. Zaugg, A.K. Henderson, D.B. Reissman, Persistence of pharmaceutical compounds and other organic wastewater contaminants in a conventional drinking-water-treatment plant, Sci. Total Environ. 329 (2004) 99–113.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.03.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Goren, A. Aharoni, M. Kummel, R. Messalen, I. Mukmenev, A. Brenner, V. Gitis, Role of membrane pore size in tertiary flocculation/adsorption/ultrafiltration treatment of municipal wastewater, Sep. Purif. Technol. 61 (2008) 193–203.10.1016/j.seppur.2007.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.M. Al-Bastaki, Performance of advanced methods for treatment of wastewater: UV/TiO2, RO and UF, Chem. Eng. Process. 43 (2004) 935–940.10.1016/j.cep.2003.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Wintgens, T. Melin, A. Schafer, S. Khan, S. Muston, D. Bixio, C. Thoeye, The role of membrane processes in municipal wastewater reclamation and reuse, Desalination 178 (2005) 1–11.10.1016/j.desal.2004.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.R.D. Verliefde, S.G.J. Heijman, E.R. Cornelissen, G. Amy, B. Van der Bruggen, J.C. van Dijk, Influence of electrostatic interactions on the rejection with NF and assessment of the removal efficiency during NF/GAC treatment of pharmaceutically active compounds, Water Res. 41 (2007) 3227–3240.10.1016/j.watres.2007.05.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Haberkamp, M. Ernst, U. Bockelmann, U. Szewzyk, M. Jekel, Complexity of ultrafiltration membrane fouling caused by macromolecular dissolved organic compounds in secondary effluents, Water Res. 42 (2008) 3153–3161.10.1016/j.watres.2008.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.E. Wray, R.C. Andrews, P.R. Bérubé, Surface shear stress and retention of emerging contaminants during ultrafiltration for drinking water treatment, Sep. Purif. Technol. 122 (2014) 183–191.10.1016/j.seppur.2013.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.H.M. Anwar Sadmani, R.C. Andrews, D.M. Bagley, Nanofiltration of pharmaceutically active compounds as a function of compound interactions with DOM fractions and cations in natural water, Sep. Purif. Technol. 122 (2014) 462–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.A. Neale, A.I. Schafer, Quantification of solute-solute interactions in steroidal hormone removal by ultrafiltration membranes, Sep. Purif. Technol. 90 (2012) 31–38.10.1016/j.seppur.2012.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.-E. Chang, U.-C. Chang, C.-H. Liang, C.-P. Huang, P.-C. Chiang, Identifying the rejection mechanism for nanofiltration membranes fouled by humic acids and calcium ions exemplified by acetaminophen, sulfamethoxazole, and triclosan, J. Hazard. Mater. 221–222 (2012) 19–27.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.03.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Bellona, J.E. Drewes, P. Xu, G. Amy, Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment—A literature review, Water Res. 38 (2004) 2795–2809.10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.D. Nghiem, A.I. Schafer, M. Elimelech, Pharmaceutical retention mechanisms by nanofiltration membranes, Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 (2005) 7698–7705.10.1021/es0507665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.D. Nghiem, S. Hawkes, Effects of membrane fouling on the nanofiltration of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs): Mechanisms and role of membrane pore size, Sep. Purif. Technol. 57 (2007) 176–184.10.1016/j.seppur.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.I. Schafer, L.D. Nghiem, A. Meier, P.A. Neale, Impact of organic matrix compounds on the retention of steroid hormone estrone by a ‘loose’ nanofiltration membrane, Sep. Purif. Technol. 73 (2010) 179–187.10.1016/j.seppur.2010.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Comerton, R.C. Andrews, D.M. Bagley, The influence of natural organic matter and cations on the rejection of endocrine disrupting and pharmaceutically active compounds by nanofiltration, Water Res. 43 (2009) 613–622.10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Comerton, R.C. Andrews, D.M. Bagley, C. Hao, The rejection of endocrine disrupting and pharmaceutically active compounds by NF and RO membranes as a function of compound and water matrix properties, J. Membr. Sci. 313 (2008) 323–335.10.1016/j.memsci.2008.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Fujioka, L.D. Nghiem, S.J. Khan, J.A. McDonald, Y. Poussade, J.E. Drewes, Effects of feed solution characteristics on the rejection of N-nitrosamines by reverse osmosis membranes, J. Membr. Sci. 409–410 (2012) 66–74.10.1016/j.memsci.2012.03.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Loos, B.M. Gawlik, G. Locoro, E. Rimaviciute, S. Contini, G. Bidoglio, EU wide survey of polar organic persistent pollutants in European river waters, Environ. Pollut. 157 (2009) 561–568.10.1016/j.envpol.2008.09.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.D. Costanzo, A.J. Watkinson, E.J. Murby, D.W. Kolpin, M.W. Sandstrom, Is there a risk associated with the insect repellent DEET (N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide) commonly found in aquatic environments? Sci. Total Environ. 384 (2007) 214–220.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.05.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Boehmer, H. Ruedel, A. Wenzel, C. Schröeter-Kermani, Retrospective monitoring of triclosan and methyl-triclosan in fish: Results from the german environmental specimen bank, Organohalogen Compd. 66 (2004) 1489–1494.
   Google Scholar
• L. Wenhui, L. Xinghai, L. Dongyan, S. Lei, S. Qi, Vapor-phase synthesis of 3-methylindole over Fe-, Co-, or Ni-promoted Ag/SiO2, Chin. J. Catal. 30 (2009) 1287–1290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.H. Langford, K.V. Thomas, Determination of pharmaceutical compounds in hospital effluents and their contribution to wastewater treatment works, Environ. Int. 35 (2009) 766–770.10.1016/j.envint.2009.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.S. Clesceri, A.E. Greenberg, R.R. Trussell, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, seventeenth ed., APHA, AWWA, WPCF, Washington, DC, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• F.J. Benitez, J.L. Acero, F.J. Real, G. Roldan, E. Rodriguez, Photolysis of model emerging contaminants in ultra-pure water: Kinetics, by-products formation and degradation pathways, Water Res. 47 (2013) 870–880.10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L. Acero, F.J. Benitez, A.I. Leal, F.J. Real, F. Teva, Membrane filtration technologies applied to municipal secondary effluents for potential reuse, J. Hazard. Mater. 177 (2010) 390–398.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.12.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y. Yoon, P. Westerhoff, S.A. Snyder, E.C. Wert, Nanofiltration and ultrafiltration of endocrine disrupting compounds, pharmaceuticals and personal care products, J. Membr. Sci. 270 (2006) 88–100.10.1016/j.memsci.2005.06.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Maximous, G. Nakhla, W. Wan, Comparative assessment of hydrophilic membrane fouling in wastewater applications, J. Membr. Sci. 339 (2009) 93–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.D. Nghiem, P.J. Coleman, C. Espendiller, Mechanisms underlying the effects of membrane fouling on the nanofiltration of trace organic contaminants, Desalination 250 (2010) 682–687.10.1016/j.desal.2009.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Altapova, E.-S. Kim, S. Dong, N. Sun, P. Chelme-Ayala, M.G. El-Din, Treatment of oil sands process-affected water with ceramic ultrafiltration membrane: Effects of operating conditions on membrane performance, Sep. Purif. Technol. 122 (2014) 170–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.R. Teixeira, M.J. Rosa, Microcystins removal by nanofiltration membranes, Sep. Purif. Technol. 46 (2005) 192–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.J. López-Muñoz, A. Sotto, J.M. Arsuaga, B. Van der Bruggen, Influence of membrane, solute and solution properties on the retention of phenolic compounds in aqueous solution by nanofiltration membranes, Sep. Purif. Technol. 66 (2009) 194–201.10.1016/j.seppur.2008.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M.R. Teixeira, M.J. Rosa, M. Nystrom, The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration, J. Membr. Sci. 265 (2005) 160–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Van der Bruggen, J. Shaep, W. Maes, D. Wilms, C. Vandecasteele, Nanofiltration as a treatment method for the removal of pesticides from ground waters, Desalination 117 (1998) 139–147.10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00081-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Katsoufidou, S.G. Yiantsios, A.J. Karabelas, A study of ultrafiltration membrane fouling by humic acids and flux recovery by backwashing: Experiments and modelling, J. Membr. Sci. 266 (2005) 40–50.10.1016/j.memsci.2005.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F.J. Benitez, J.L. Acero, F.J. Real, C. Garcia, Combination of chemical oxidation-membrane filtration processes for the elimination of phenyl-ureas in water matrices, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 84 (2009) 1883–1893.10.1002/jctb.v84:12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Li, M. Elimelech, Organic fouling and chemical cleaning of nanofiltration membranes: Measurements and mechanisms, Environ. Sci. Technol. 38 (2004) 4683–4693.10.1021/es0354162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar