Optimization of coagulation–flocculation process for combined sewer overflow wastewater treatment using response surface methodology

References

• U.S. Epa, Combined sewer overflow (CSO) control policy, Federal Register 59 (1994) 18688–18698.
   Google Scholar
• E. Alp, C.S. Melching, H. Zhang, R. Lanyon, Effectiveness of combined sewer overflow treatment for dissolved oxygen improvement in the Chicago Waterways, Water Sci. Technol. 56 (2007) 215–222.10.2166/wst.2007.455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. Zukovs, J. Marsalek, Planning and design of combined sewer overflow treatment, Water Qual. Res. J. Canada 39 (2004) 439–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Suarez, J. Puertas, Determination of COD, BOD, and suspended solids loads during combined sewer overflow (CSO) events in some combined catchments in Spain, Ecol. Eng. 24 (2005) 201–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Seidl, P. Servais, J.M. Mouchel, Organic matter transport and degradation in the river Seine (France) after a combined sewer overflow, Water Res. 32 (1998) 3569–3580.10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00169-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.S. Ham, H. Kobori, M. Takasago, Effects of combined sewer overflow and stormwater on indicator bacteria concentrations in the Tama River due to the high population density of Tokyo Metropolitan area, Environ. Monit. Assess. 152 (2009) 459–468.10.1007/s10661-008-0330-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.H. Lee, K.W. Bang, Characterization of urban stormwater runoff, Water Res. 34 (2000) 1773–1780.10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00325-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.Y. Meng, C. Feng, T. Li, L. Wang, Identifying dry-weather flow and pollution load sources of separate storm sewer systems with different degrees of illicit discharge, Environ. Sci. 30 (2009) 3527–3533 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• C.Y. Liu, W. Che, Z.Y. Dong, Sewer water quality comparison of separate discharge and combined overflow, Water Wastewater Eng. 33 (2007) 51–55 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• H. Li, T. Li, Study on the characteristics of combined sewer overflow from the high density residential area in Shanghai, Environ. Sci. 27 (2006) 1565–1569 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• J. Zhang, X.Y. Huang, X.H. Wei, Research on the quality of combined sewer overflows (CSO) and its effect with preliminary treatment, Environ. Ecol. Three Gorges. 32 (2010) 22–25 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• J.T. Smullen, A.L. Shallcross, K.A. Cave, Updating the U.S. nationwide urban runoff quality data base, Water Sci. Technol. 39 (1999) 9–16.10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00312-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Diaz-Fierros T, J. Puerta, J. Suarez, F. Diaz-Fierros V, Contaminant loads of CSOs at the wastewater treatment plant of a city in NW Spain, Urban Water 4 (2002) 291–299.10.1016/S1462-0758(02)00020-1
   Google Scholar
• J. Barco, S. Papiri, M.K. Stenstrom, First flush in a combined sewer system, Chemosphere 71 (2008) 827–833.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Uchimura, E. Nakamura, S. Fujita, Characteristics of stormwater runoff and its control in Japan, Water Sci. Technol. 36 (1997) 141–147.10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00606-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.G. Li, S. Dhanvantari, D. Averill, N. Biswas, Windsor combined sewer overflow treatability study with chemical coagulation, Water Qual. Res. J. Canada 38 (2003) 317–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.G. El Samrani, B.S. Lartiges, F. Villiéras, Chemical coagulation of combined sewer overflow: Heavy metal removal and treatment optimization, Water Res. 42 (2008) 951–960.10.1016/j.watres.2007.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Zhu, R. Seth, J. Lalman, Evaluation of a micro carrier weighted coagulation flocculation process for the treatment of combined sewer overflow, Environ. Technol. 28 (2007) 761–770.10.1080/09593332808618831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.F. Zhang, L.M. Ma, T.Y. Gao, Chemically enhanced primary treatment for combined sewage overflow, China Water Wastewater 21 (2005) 6–9 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• A.S. El-Gendy, J.G. Li, N. Biswas, Treatment of combined sewer overflow using retention treatment basin assisted with polymer chemical coagulation, Water Environ. Res. 80 (2008) 774–783.10.2175/106143007X22096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.I. Yoon, C.G. Kim, Case studies on rapid coagulation processes to cope with total emission controls, Desalination 231 (2008) 290–296.10.1016/j.desal.2007.10.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. BinAhmed, G. Ayoub, M. Al-Hindi, F. Azizi, The effect of fast mixing conditions on the coagulation–flocculation process of highly turbid suspensions using liquid bittern coagulant, Desalin. Water Treat. 53 (2015) 3388–3396.10.1080/19443994.2014.933043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Rohrsetzer, I. Paszli, F. Csempesz, Colloid stability of electrostatically stabilized sols, Colloid Polym. Sci. 276 (1998) 260–266.10.1007/s003960050237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.S. Aktas, M. Fujibayashi, C. Maruo, M. Nomura, O. Nishimura, Influence of velocity gradient and rapid mixing time on flocs formed by polysilica iron (PSI) and polyaluminum chloride (PACl), Desalin. Water Treat. 51 (2013) 4729–4735.10.1080/19443994.2012.751883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Zhu, M.G. El-Din, A.K. Moawad, D. Bromley, Physical and chemical processes for removing suspended solids and phosphorus from liquid swine manure, Environ. Technol. 25 (2004) 1177–1187.10.1080/09593332508618385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Guida, M. Mattei, C. Della Rocca, G. Melluso, S. Meric, Optimization of alum-coagulation/flocculation for COD and TSS removal from five municipal wastewater, Desalination 211 (2007) 113–127.10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Baş, I.H. Boyacı, Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology, J. Food Eng. 78 (2007) 836–845.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Malakahmad, S.Y. Chuan, Application of response surface methodology to optimize coagulation–flocculation treatment of anaerobically digested palm oil mill effluent using alum, Desalin. Water Treat. 51 (2013) 6729–6735.10.1080/19443994.2013.791778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Sadri Moghaddam, M.R. Alavi Moghaddam, M. Arami, Coagulation/flocculation process for dye removal using sludge from water treatment plant: Optimization through response surface methodology, J. Hazard. Mater. 175 (2010) 651–657.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.10.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.L. Ahmad, S. Ismail, S. Bhatia, Optimization of coagulation−flocculation process for palm oil mill effluent using response surface methodology, Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 (2005) 2828–2834.10.1021/es0498080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Kobya, E. Demirbas, U. Gebologlu, M.S. Oncel, Y. Yildirim, Optimization of arsenic removal from drinking water by electrocoagulation batch process using response surface methodology, Desalin. Water Treat. 51 (2013) 6676–6687.10.1080/19443994.2013.769700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.E.P.A. Chinese, Water and Wastewater Monitoring Methods, fourth ed., Chinese Environmental Science Publishing House, Beijing, 2002 (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• R.H. Myers, D.C. Montgomery, C.M. Anderson-Cook, Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, third ed., Wiley, New Jersey, NJ, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• R.O. Kuehl, Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis, second ed., Duxbury, CA, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• P. Jarvis, B. Jefferson, S.A. Parsons, How the natural organic matter to coagulant ratio impacts on floc structural properties, Environ. Sci. Technol. 39 (2005) 8919–8924.10.1021/es0510616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.W. Walker, M.M. Bob, Stability of particle flocs upon addition of natural organic matter under quiescent conditions, Water Res. 35 (2001) 875–882.10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00333-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Amal, J.A. Raper, T.D. Waite, Effect of fulvic acid adsorption on the aggregation kinetics and structure of hematite particles, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 151 (1992) 244–257.10.1016/0021-9797(92)90255-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Bell-Ajy, M. Abbaszadegan, E. Ibrahim, D. Verges, M. LeChevallier, Conventional and optimised coagulation for NOM removal, J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 92 (2000) 44–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.H. Guan, C. Shang, G.H. Chen, Competitive adsorption of organic matter with phosphate on aluminum hydroxide, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 296 (2006) 51–58.10.1016/j.jcis.2005.08.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O.S. Amuda, I.A. Amoo, Coagulation/flocculation process and sludge conditioning in beverage industrial wastewater treatment, J. Hazard. Mater. 141 (2007) 778–783.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.07.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O.S. Amuda, A. Alade, Coagulation/flocculation process in the treatment of abattoir wastewater, Desalination 196 (2006) 22–31.10.1016/j.desal.2005.10.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar