A Capability Approach to Intergenerational Justice? Examining the Potential of Amartya Sen's Ethics with Regard to Intergenerational Issues

References

• Anand, S., and A. Sen. 2000. “Human Development and Economic Sustainability.” World Development 28 (12): 2029–2049. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00071-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arneson, R. 1989. “Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.” Philosophical Studies 56: 77–93. doi: 10.1007/BF00646210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, B. 1997. “Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice.” Theoria 45 (89): 43–65. doi: 10.3167/004058197783593443
   Google Scholar
• Birnbacher, D. 2009. “What Motivates Us to Care for the (Distant) Future?.” In Intergenerational Justice, edited by A. Gosseries and L. H. Meyer, 273–300. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. A. 1989. “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.” Ethics 99: 906–944. doi: 10.1086/293126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deneulin, S. 2002. “Perfectionism, Liberalism and Paternalism in Sen and Nussbaum's Capability Approach.” Review of Political Economy 14 (4): 497–518. doi: 10.1080/0953825022000009924
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, J. 2003. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. 2nd edn. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. 1981. “What Is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10: 283–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworkin, R. 2000. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gosseries, A., and L. H. Meyer. 2009. Intergenerational Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutwald, R., O. Leßmann, and M. Rechenauer. forthcoming. “Thresholds of Capabilities—What Do We Owe to Future Generations.” paper presented at the HDCA-conference in Jakarta, 2012, GeNECA working paper, in progress.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, B. 2008. “Ecology and the Limits of Justice: Establishing Capability Ceilings in Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach.” Journal of Human Development 9 (3): 401–425. doi: 10.1080/14649880802236631
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, J., and C. Favor. 2008. “Distributive Justice.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta (Fall 2008 Edition). Accessed October 18, 2011. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/justice-distributive/
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., I. Scoones, and A. Sterling. 2010. Dynamic Sustainabilities—Technology, Environment, Social Justice. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Leßmann, O. 2007. “Effective Freedom and External Capabilities: Two Different Conceptions of Capability.” In Beiträge zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Nr. 152, Sozialökonomisches Seminar der Universität Hamburg (Institute of Socioeconomics).
   Google Scholar
• Leßmann, O. 2010. “Sustainability and Rationality: Individual and Collective Responsibility in the CA.” paper presented at the HDCA-conference in Amman, Jordan, 21–23 September 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Leßmann, O., and F. Rauschmayer. 2013. “Re-conceptualising Sustainable Development on the Basis of the Capability Approach: A Model and Its Difficulties.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 14 (1): 95–114. doi: 10.1080/19452829.2012.747487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, L. 2008. “Intergenerational Justice.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta (Spring 2010 Edition). Accessed October 18, 2011. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/justice-intergenerational/
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., and D. Roser. 2009. “Enough for the Future?.” In Intergenerational Justice, edited by A. Gosseries and L. H. Meyer, 273–300. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, T. 2008. Future People: A Moderate Consequentialist Account of Our Obligations to Future Generations. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. 2001. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C., and A. K. Sen. 1989. “Internal Criticism and Indian Rationalist Traditions.” In Relativism, Interpretation and Confrontation, edited by M. Krausz, 229–325.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, K., and R. Döring. 2004. Theorie und Praxis starker Nachhaltigkeit. Marburg: Metropolis.
   Google Scholar
• Page, E. 2007. Climate Change, Justice and Future Generations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, W., J. Dirix, and S. Sterckx. 2013. “Putting Sustainability into Sustainable Human Development.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 14 (1): 58–76. doi: 10.1080/19452829.2012.748019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogge, T. 1989. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rauschmayer, F., T. Masson, O. Leßmann, and R. Gutwald. forthcoming. “Sustaining Human Well-Being Across Time and Space—Sustainable Development, Justice and the Capability Approach.” In Capability and Sustainability, edited by A. Crabtree and M. Tiwari. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rauschmayer, F., I. Omann, and J. Frühmann, eds. 2011. Sustainable Development: Capabilities, Needs, and Well-Being. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. 2005. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. 2005a. “Culture, Development, Economics and the Capability Approach.” HDCA e-bulletin Maitreyee 1: 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. 2005b. “The Capability Approach: A Theoretical Survey.” Journal of Human Development 6 (1): 93–114. doi: 10.1080/146498805200034266
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I. 2009. “Capabilities and Theories of Justice.” In Debating Global Society: Reach and Limits of the Capability Approach, edited by E. Chiappero-Martinetti, 61–68. Milan: Feltrinelli.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholtes, F. 2007. Umweltherrschaft und Freiheit. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. 1980. “Equality of What?.” Reprinted In Choice, Welfare and Measurement, edited by A. Sen, 353–369 (1982). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. 1985. “Well-being, Agency and Freedom: The Dewey Lectures, 1984.” Journal of Philosophy 82 (4): 169–221. doi: 10.2307/2026184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. 1993. “Capability and Well-being.” In The Quality of Life, edited by A. Sen and M. Nussbaum, 30–53. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. 1995. Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. 2010a. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. K. 2010b. “The Place of Capability in a Theory of Justice.” In Measuring Justice, edited by H. Brighouse and I. Robeyns, 239–253. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spangenberg, D. 2005. Die ökonomische Nachhaltigkeit der Wirtschaft: Theorien, Kriterien und Indikatoren. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• WCED (United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development). 1987. Our Common Future. Accessed April 3, 2010. http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, J., and A. De-Shalit. 2007. Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar