Oscillating meanings of the Nordic model: ideas and the welfare state in Finland and Sweden

References

• Alestalo, M., and S. Kuhnle. 1987. “The Scandinavian Route: Economic, Social, and Political Developments.” In The Scandinavian Model: Welfare States and Welfare Research, edited by R. Erikson, E. J. Hansen, S. Ringen, and H. Uusitalo. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, J. 2009. “Nordic Nostalgia and Nordic Light: The Swedish model as Utopia 1930–2007.” Scandinavian Journal of History 34 (3): 229–245. doi:10.1080/03468750903134699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D. 2010. “The Idea of Power and the Role of Ideas.” Political Studies Review 8 (2): 145–154. doi:10.1111/psr.2010.8.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D., and R. H. Cox, eds. 2010. Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D., and A. Lecours. 2008. Nationalism and Social Policy: The Politics of Territorial Solidarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D., and K. Petersen. 2014. “Introduction: Social Policy Concepts and Language.” In Analysing Social Policy Concepts and Language: Comparative and Transnational Perspectives, edited by D. Béland and K. Petersen. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, S. 1998. The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making of Interwar Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, S. 2006. Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe’s Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. 2002. Great Transformations: The Rise and Decline of Embedded Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, M. W. 1936. Sweden: The Middle Way. London: Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, N. F., and P. Markkola. 2006. “Introduction.” In The Nordic Model of Welfare: A Historical Reappraisal, edited by N. F. Christiansen, K. Petersen, N. Edling, and P. Haave. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. H. 2004. “The Path-Dependency of an Idea: Why Scandinavian Welfare States Remain Distinct.” Social Policy & Administration 38 (2): 204–219. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2004.00386.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. 2004. Narratives in Social Science Research. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Edling, N., J. H. Petersen, and K. Petersen. 2014. “Social Policy Language in Denmark and Sweden.” In Analysing Social Policy Concepts and Language: Comparative and Transnational Perspectives, edited by D. Béland and K. Petersen. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Einhorn, E. S., and J. Logue. 2003. Modern Welfare States: Scandinavian Politics and Policy in the Global Age. 2nd ed. Westport: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Einhorn, E. S., and J. Logue. 2010. “Can Welfare States Be Sustained in a Global Economy? Lessons from Scandinavia.” Political Science Quarterly 125 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1002/j.1538-165X.2010.tb00666.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Geyer, R. R. 2003. “Globalization, Europeanization, Complexity, and the Future of Scandinavian Exceptionalism.” Governance 16 (4): 559–576. doi:10.1111/1468-0491.00228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1976. New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R., and I. Peng. 1996. “The East Asian Welfare States: Peripatetic Learning, Adaptive Change, and Nation-Building.” In Welfare States in Transition, edited by G. Esping-Andersen. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., and D. W. Soskice, eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2002. Political Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2004. “Ideas, Interests and Institutions in the Comparative Political Economy of Great Transformations.” Review of International Political Economy 11 (1): 204–226. doi:10.1080/0969229042000179811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2006. “What’s Globalization Got to Do with It? Economic Interdependence and the Future of European Welfare States.” Government and Opposition 41 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1111/goop.2006.41.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C., and N. Smith. 2010. “How Policy-Makers (Really) Understand Globalization: The Internal Architecture of Anglophone Globalization Discourse in Europe.” Public Administration 88 (4): 903–927. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01863.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heclo, H. 1986. “Reaganism and the Search for a Public Philosophy.” In Perspectives on the Reagan Years, edited by J. L. Palmer. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinnfors, J. 2006. Reinterpreting Social Democracy: A History of Stability in the British Labour Party and Swedish Social Democratic Party. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., and S. E. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, T. 1999. Contested Economic Institutions: The Politics of Macroeconomics and Wage Bargaining in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, T., and J. D. Stephens. 2008. “Partisan Politics, the Welfare State, and Three Worlds of Human Capital Formation.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (4–5): 600–637. doi:10.1177/0010414007313117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julkunen, R. 2006. Kuka vastaa? Hyvinvointivaltion rajat ja julkinen vastuu. Helsinki: Sosiaali- ja terveysalan tutkimus- ja kehittämiskeskus Stakes.
   Google Scholar
• Kettunen, P. 2001. “The Nordic Welfare State in Finland.” Scandinavian Journal of History 26 (3): 225–247. doi:10.1080/034687501750303864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettunen, P., and K. Petersen. 2010. “Introduction: Rethinking Welfare State Models.” In Beyond Welfare State Models: Transnational Historical Perspectives on Social Policy, edited by P. Kettunen and K. Petersen. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, H. 1994. The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, C. 2004. “Feminist Approaches.” In Qualitative Research Practice, edited by C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. Gubrium and D. Silverman. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kuisma, M. 2007a. “Nordic Models of Citizenship: Lessons from Social History for Theorising Policy Change in the ‘Age of Globalisation’.” New Political Economy 12 (1): 87–95. doi:10.1080/13563460601068818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuisma, M. 2007b. “Social Democratic Internationalism and the Welfare State after the ‘Golden Age’.” Cooperation and Conflict 42 (1): 9–26. doi:10.1177/0010836707073474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuisma, M. 2013. “Understanding Welfare Crises: The Role of Ideas.” Public Administration 91 (4): 797–805. doi:10.1111/padm.2013.91.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuisma, M., and M. Nygård. 2015. “The European Union and the Nordic Models of Welfare – Path Dependency or Policy Harmonisation?” In The Nordic Countries and the European Union: Still the Other European Community? edited by C. H. Grøn, P. Nedergaard, and A. Wivel. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuisma, M., and M. Ryner. 2012. “Third Way Decomposition and the Rightward Shift in Finnish and Swedish Politics.” Contemporary Politics 18 (3): 325–342. doi:10.1080/13569775.2012.702975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. 2007. Doing Interviews. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• May, T. 2001. Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process. 3rd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, J. 2010. “The Varied Roles of Ideas in Politics: From “Whether” to “How”.” In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, edited by D. Béland and R. H. Cox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pontusson, J. 2011. “Once again a Model: Nordic Social Democracy in a Globalized World.” In What’s Left of the Left: Democrats and Social Democrats in Challenging Times, edited by J. E. Cronin, G. Ross, and J. Shoch. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., J. Lewis, and G. Elam. 2003. “Designing and Selecting Samples.” In Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, edited by J. Ritchie and J. Lewis. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. 2005. Social Traps and the Problem of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryner, J. M. 2002. Capitalist Restructuring, Globalisation, and the Third Way: Lessons from the Swedish Model. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ryner, J. M. 2007. “The Nordic Model: Does it Exist? Can it Survive?” New Political Economy 12 (1): 61–70. doi:10.1080/13563460601068644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajari, P. 2009. “Kännykkäyhtiön painostus sai aikaan Lex Nokian.” Helsingin Sanomat, February 1.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. 1991. Crisis and Choice in European Social Democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzman, L., and A. L. Strauss. 1973. Field Research: Strategies for a Natural Sociology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2002a. “Does Discourse Matter in the Politics of Welfare State Adjustment?” Comparative Political Studies 35 (2): 168–193. doi:10.1177/0010414002035002002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2002b. The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 2006. Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. 3rd ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Steinmo, S. 2003. “Bucking the Trend? The Welfare State and the Global Economy: The Swedish Case up Close.” New Political Economy 8 (1): 31–48. doi:10.1080/1356346032000078714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. 2010. “The Strategy of Paired Comparison: Toward a Theory of Practice.” Comparative Political Studies 43 (2): 230–259. doi:10.1177/0010414009350044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trägårdh, L. 2007. “The “Civil Society” Debate in Sweden: The Welfare State Challenged.” In State and Civil Society in Northern Europe: The Swedish Model reconsidered, edited by L. Trägårdh. Oxford: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Wincott, D. 2003. “Slippery Concepts, Shifting Context: (National) States and Welfare in the Veit-Wilson/Atherton Debate.” Social Policy & Administration 37 (3): 305–315. doi:10.1111/1467-9515.00340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wincott, D. 2013. “The (Golden) Age of the Welfare State: Interrogating a Conventional Wisdom.” Public Administration 91 (4): 806–822. doi:10.1111/padm.2013.91.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar