Bridging the gap between research traditions: on what we can really learn from Clifford Geertz

References

• Aagaard, P. 2012. “The Challenge of Adaptive Capability in Public Organizations.” Public Management Review 14 (6): 731–746. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.642626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, M. T. 1992. “Do Physicists Use Case Studies? Thoughts on Public Administration Research.” Public Administration Review 52 (1): 47–54. doi:10.2307/976545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuving, J., and G. De Vries. 2014. Doing Qualitative Research: The Craft of Naturalistic Inquiry. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., and R. A. W. Rhodes. 2005. “Interpretation and Its Others.” Australian Journal of Political Science 40 (2): 169–182. doi:10.1080/10361140500129974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., and R. A. W. Rhodes, eds. 2016. Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science. Abington: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brower, R., M. Y. Abolafia, and J. B. Carr. 2000. “On Improving Qualitative Methods in Public Administration Research.” Administration & Society 32 (4): 363–397. doi:10.1177/00953990022019470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crapanzo, V. 1986. “Hermes’s Dilemma: The Masking of Subversion in Ethnographic Description.” In Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, edited by J. Clifford and G. E. Marcus, 51–76. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cutcliffe, J. R. 2000. “Methodological Issues in Grounded Theory.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 31: 1476–1484. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01430.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, J., S. M. Ospina, and E. G. Foldy. 2005. “Integrating Rigor and Relevance in Public Administration Scholarship: The Contribution of Narrative Inquiry.” Public Administration Review 65 (3): 286–300. doi:10.1111/puar.2005.65.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, J. 2008. “Observation, the Police and Public Administration.” Public Administration 86 (3): 621–626. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00747.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, L. 2012. “In Search of Collaborative Public Management.” Public Management Review 14 (7): 947–966. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.650057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973a. “Deep Play. Notes on the Balinese Cockfight.” In The Interpretation of Cultures, edited by C. Geertz, 412–453. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973b. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” In The Interpretation of Cultures,, edited by C. Geertz, 3–30. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1983. “From the Natives’ Point of View.” In Local Knowledge. Further Essays on Interpretative Sociology,, edited by C. Geertz, 55–71. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1995. After the Fact: Two Countries, Four Decades, One Anthropologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, A., and A. Bennet. 2005. Case Study and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottowik, V. 2004. “Clifford Geertz und der Verstehensbegrif der interpretativen Anthropologie.” In Symbol, Existenz, Lebenswelt, Kulturphilosophische Zugänge zur Interkulturalität, edited by H.-M. Gerlach, A. Hutig, and O. Himmel. 155–167. Bern: Hersg Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Greenblatt, S. 1999. “The Touch of the Real.” In The Fate of Culture. Geertz and Beyond, edited by S. B. Ortner, 14–29. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groenevelt, S., L. Tummers, B. Bronkhorst, T. Ashikali, S. van Thiel. 2015. “Quantitative Methods in Public Administration: Their Use and Development Through Time.” International Public Management Journal 18 (1): 61–86.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, T. 1998. “Interpretive Social Science and the ‘Native’s Point of View’: A Closer Look.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (1): 32–68. doi:10.1177/004839319802800102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, 91–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lichterman, G. 2011. “Thick Description as a Cosmopolitan Practice.” In Interpreting Clifford Geertz. Cultural Investigation in the Social Sciences, edited by J.C. Alexander, P. Smith, and M. Norton, 77–91. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. 1997. “The Uses of Complicity in the Changing Mis-en-Scène of Anthropological Fieldwork.” Representations 59 (Summer): 85–108. doi:10.1525/rep.1997.59.1.99p0024m.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. 1993. “Geertz and the Interpretive Approach in Anthropology.” Synthese 97 (2): 269–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. [1963] 2002. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raadschelders, J. 2013. Public Administration. The Interdisciplinary Study of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 2011. “Thinking On: A Career in Public Administration.” Public Administration 89 (1): 196–212. doi:10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R.A.W. 2014. “Genre Blurring’ and Public Administration: What can we learn from Ethnography?” Australian Journal of Public Administration 73 (3): 317–330.
   Google Scholar
• Ricucci, N. M. 2010. Public Administration. Traditions of Inquiry and Philosophies of Knowledge. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohr, J. 2000. “Review Of: White; Taking Language Seriously.” American Political Science Review 94 (4): 937/8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseberry, W. 1982. “Balinese Cockfights and the Seduction of Anthropology.” Social Research 49 (4): 1013–1028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P., and D. Yanow. 2012. Interpretive Research Design. Concepts and Processes. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shankman, P. 1984. “The Thick and the Thin: On the Interpretive Theoretical Program of Clifford Geertz.” Current Anthropology 25 (3): 261–280. doi:10.1086/203135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. 2011. “The Balinese Cockfight Decoded: Reflections on Geertz and Structuralism.” In Interpreting Clifford Geertz. Cultural Investigation in the Social Sciences, edited by, J.C. Alexander, P. Smith, and M. Norton, 17–32. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. 2008. “Public Administration’s Myth of Sisyphus.” Administration & Society 39 (8): 1008–1012. doi:10.1177/0095399707309814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, W. B. 2001. “Policy Making through Thick and Thin: Thick Description as a Methodology for Communications and Democracy.” Policy Sciences 34 (1): 63–77. doi:10.1023/A:1010353113519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hulst, M. 2012. “Storytelling, a Model of and a Model for Planning.” Planning Theory 11 (3): 299–318. doi:10.1177/1473095212440425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. 2011. Meaning in Action. Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. New York: Sharp.
   Google Scholar
• Warnke, G. 2011. “Geertzian Irony.” In Interpreting Clifford Geertz. Cultural Investigation in the Social Sciences, edited by J.C. Alexander, P. Smith, and M. Norton, 45–54. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, G. 1989. “Definitive Geertz.” Ethnos 54 (1,2): 23–30. doi:10.1080/00141844.1989.9981378.
   Google Scholar
• White, J. D. 1999. Taking Language Seriously. The Narrative Foundations of Public Administration Research. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. 2000. Conducting Interpretive Policy Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. 2006. “Thinking Interpretively: Philosophical Presuppositions and the Human Sciences.” In Interpretation and Method. Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretative Turn, edited by D. Yanow and P. Schwartz-Shea, 5–26. New York: Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, F. 2002. “Administrative Practice and Rational Inquiry in Postmodern Public Administration Theory.” Administration & Society 34 (5): 482–498. doi:10.1177/009539902237272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar