Ranking academics: toward a critical politics of academic rankings

References

• Altbach, P. 2006. “The Dilemmas of Rankings.” Bridges 12: 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Altbach, P. 2012. “The Globalization of College and University Rankings.” Change: the Magazine of Higher Learning 44 (1): 26–31. doi:10.1080/00091383.2012.636001.
   Google Scholar
• Amsler, S., and C. Bolsmann. 2012. “University Ranking as Social Exclusion.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 33 (2): 283–301. doi:10.1080/01425692.2011.649835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artushina, I., and V. Troyan. 2007. “Methods Of The Quality Of Higher Education Social Assessment.” Higher Education In Europe 32 (1): 83-89.
   Google Scholar
• Bastedo, M., and N. Bowman. 2011. “College Rankings as an Organizational Dependency.” Research in Higher Education 52 (1): 3–23. doi:10.1007/s11162-010-9185-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndtson, E. 2013. Global Disciplinary Rankings and Images of Quality: The Case of Political Science. In Erkkilä. T. (ed), Global University Rankings: Challenges for European Higher Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan. 178-195.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 2008. A Realist Theory of Science. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, R. 2000. “Fantasy Higher Education: University And College League Tables.” Quality In Higher Education 6 (1): 41-60.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, P. 2004. College Rankings Exposed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, D. 2006. “Convergence and Diversity: The Role and Influence of University Rankings.” Consortium of Higher Education Researchers (CHER) 19th Annual Research Conference, Germany, University of Kassel, September, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, D., and M. Soo. 2005. “Academic Quality, League Tables, and Public Policy: A Cross-National Analysis of University Ranking System.” Higher Education 49: 495–533. doi:10.1007/s10734-004-1746-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, W. C. 1984. Jameson, Althusser, Marx: An Introduction to the Political Unconscious. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, D., and R. Karpf. 1981. “Ranking Academic Departments: Empirical Findings And A Theoretical Perspective.” Research In Higher Education 14 (4): 305-320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, R. 2002. Tuition Rising: Why College Costs so Much. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erkkilä, T., and O. Piironen. 2013. “Reforming Higher Education Institutions in Finland: Competitiveness and Global University Rankings.” In Global University Rankings: Challenges for European Higher Education, edited by T. Erkkilä, 124–143. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Erkkilä, T. 2013. “Introduction: University Rankings and University Higher Education.” In Global University Rankings: Challenges for European Higher Education, edited by T. Erkkilä, 3–19. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W., and M. Sauder. 2007. “Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Create Social Worlds.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (1): 1–40. doi:10.1086/517897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, M. 2009. Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? London: Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1991. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2001. Fearless Speech. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2003. Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the College De France, 1975-76. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2006. Psychiatric Power: Lectures At The Collège De France, 1973-74. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2002. “‘Omnes Et Singulatim’: Toward a Critique of Political Reason.” In Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984, Volume 3: Power, edited by P. Faubion, 298–325. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, L. 2008. “Rankings of Higher Education Institutions: A Critical Review.” Quality in Higher Education Policy 14 (3): 187–207. doi:10.1080/13538320802507711.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2011. “Pathology Without Crisis? The Strange Demise Of The anglo-saxon Growth Model.” Government And Opposition 46 (1): 1-31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E. 2008. “Learning to Live with League Tables and Ranking.” Higher Education Policy 20 (2): 193–215. doi:10.1057/hep.2008.1.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E. 2008. “Learning To Live With League Tables And Ranking.” Higher Education Policy 20 (2): 193-215.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E. 2011. Ranking and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World-Class Excellence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E. 2013. “Reflections on a Decade of Global Rankings: What We’ve Learned and Outstanding Issues.” Beiträge Zur Hochschulforschung 35: 8–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hinchcliffe, J. 2007. Governing Values for Future Universities. In Learning to Seek: Globalization, Governance, And the Futures of Higher Education, Truett Anderson, W., Dator, J., and Tehranian, M. (eds). Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, R. 2006. “The THES University Rankings: Are They Really World Class?” Asian Journal of University Education 2 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 2007. Late Marxism. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Kauppi, N. 2010. “The Political Ontology Of European Integration.” Comparative European Politics 8 (1): 19-36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppi, N., and M. Rask Madsen. 2008. “Institutions Et Acteurs : Rationalité.” Réflexivité Et Analyse De L’ue. Politique Européenne 2 (25): 87-113.
   Google Scholar
• Kauppi, N., and T. Erkkilä. 2010. “Alternatives to Existing International Rankings.” In World Social Science Report, 239–241. Unes.
   Google Scholar
• Kauppi, N., and T. Erkkila. 2011. “The Struggle over Global Higher Education: Actors, Institutions, and Practices.” International Political Sociology 5(: 314–326. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00136.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehm, B. 2013. “The Impact of Rankings on the European Higher Education Landscape.” In Global University Rankings: Challenges for European Higher Education, edited by T. Erkkilä, 20–35. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• King, R. 2009. Governing Universities Globally: Organizations, Regulation, And Rankings. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Labi, A. 2008 Obsession With Rankings Goes Global. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 17 October. Available online at: http://www.chronicle.com/article/Obsession-With-Rankings-Goes/33040 Accessed 30 October 2017)(
   Google Scholar
• Lang, D., and Q. Zha. 2004. “Comparing Universities: A Case Study between Canada and China.” Higher Education Policy 17 (4): 339–354. doi:10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300061.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., S. Shankar, and K. Ki Tang. 2011. “Why Does the USA Dominate University League Tables.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (8): 923–937. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.482981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, N. C., and Y. Cheng. 2005. “The Academic Ranking of World Universities.” Higher Education in Europe 30 (2): 127–136. doi:10.1080/03797720500260116.
   Google Scholar
• Lordon, F. 2014. Willing Slaves of Capital: Spinoza & Marx on Desire. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, C. 2012. “If You’re so Smart, Why are You under Surveillance? Universities, Neoliberalism and New Public Management.” Critical Inquiry 38 (3): 599–629. doi:10.1086/664553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. 1982. “Some Social Implications of Modern Technology.” In The Essential Frankfurt School Reader, edited by A. Arato and E. Gebhardt, 138–162. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, S. 2009. “University Rankings, Government and Social Order: Managing the Field of Higher Education according to the Logic of the Performative Present-as-Future.” In Re-Reading Education Policies: A Handbook Studying the Policy Agenda of the 21st Century, edited by M. Simons, M. Olssen, and M. Peters. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, M. 2004. Why Do Universities Compete in the Ratings Game? An Empirical Analysis Of The Effects Of The U.s. News And World Report College Rankings. Research in Higher Education 45(5): 443-461.
   Google Scholar
• Merisotis, J. 2002. “On The Ranking Of Higher Education Institutions.” Higher Education In Europe 27 (4): 361-363.
   Google Scholar
• Münch, R. 2013. “The Colonization of the Academic Field by Ranking.” In Global University Rankings: Challenges for European Higher Education, edited by T. Erkkilä, 196–219. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mustajoki, A. 2013. “Measuring Excellence in Social Sciences and Humanities.” In Global University Rankings: Challenges for European Higher Education, edited by T. Erkkilä, 147–165. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, J. 2013. The Drift to Conformity: The Myth of Institutional Diversity. In Erkkilä. T. (ed). Global University Rankings: Challenges for European Higher Education. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan. 92-106.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor, B. 2004. Adorno's Negative Dialectic: Philosophy And The Possibility Of Critical Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proulx, R. 2007. “Higher Education Ranking and League Tables: Lessons Learned from Benchmarking.” Higher Education in Europe 32 (1): 71–82. doi:10.1080/03797720701618898.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 1999. Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 2014. The Hatred of Democracy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 2015. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Ranking Forum of Swiss Universities.2008. Introduction: University Rankings Based On Football League Tables. Available online at: http://www.universityrankings.ch/en/on_rankings/introduction Accessed(30 October 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Rinia, E., T. Van Leeuwen, H. van Vuren, and A. Van Raan. 1998. “Comparative Analysis Of A Set Of Bibliometric Indicators And Central Peer Review Criteria.” Research Policy 27 (1): 95-107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmi, J., and A. Saroyan. 2007. “League Tables as Policy Instruments.” Higher Education Management and Policy 19 (2): 1–38. doi:10.1787/hemp-v19-2-en.
   Google Scholar
• Sauder, M., and G. Fine. 2008. “Arbiters, Entrepreneurs, and the Shaping of Business School Reputations.” Sociological Forum 23 (4): 699–723. doi:10.1111/socf.2008.23.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauder, M., and W. N. Espeland. 2009. “The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change.” American Sociological Review 74 (1): 63–82. doi:10.1177/000312240907400104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, JC, Toutkoushian, RK., and Teichler, U. (eds.) 2011. University Rankings: Theoretical Basis, Methodology and Impacts on Global Higher Education. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Stensaker, B., and B. Kehm. 2009. “Introduction.” In University Rankings, Diversity, and the New Landscape of Higher Education, edited by B. Kehm and B. Stensaker, vii–xix. Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, N., (2016) Building On Success And Learning From Experience: An Independent Review Of The Research Excellence Framework. London: Department For Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy, Uk Government. Available Online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/research-excellence-framework-review Accessed(30 October 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, M. 2007. Choosing a Class: College Admissions and the Education of Elites. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sünker, H. 2006. “Knowledge Society/ Knowledge Capitalism And Education.” Policy Futures In Education 4 (3): 217-219.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, P., S. Spoelstra, M. Pedersen, and S. Schreven. 2010. “The Excellent Institution.” Ephemera 10 (1): 1.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, A. 2009. “University Rankings 2.0: New Frontiers in Institutional Comparisons.” Australian Universities Review 51 (2): 87–90.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, A., and J. Medow. 2009. “A Global Survey Of University Rankings And League Tables.” In, eds 3-18. Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, A., and M. Savino. 2006. A World of Difference. A Global Survey of University League Tables, 1–21. Toronto: Educational Policy Institute (EPI).
   Google Scholar
• Usher, A., and M. Savino. 2007. “A Global Survey of University Ranking and League Tables.” Higher Education in Europe 32 (1): 5–15. doi:10.1080/03797720701618831.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wende, M. 2008. “Rankings And Classifications In Higher Education: A European Perspective.” Higher Education: Handbook Of Theory And Research 23: 49-73.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, N. 2005. “Twenty Years of University Report Cards: Where are We Now?” Higher Education in Europe 30 (2): 103–125. doi:10.1080/03797720500260173.
   Google Scholar
• Van Raan, A. 2005. “Fatal Attraction: Conceptual and Methodological Problems in the Ranking of Universities by Bibliometric Methods.” Scientometrics 62 (1): 133–143. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vught, F., and D. Westerheijden. 2010. “Multidimensional Ranking: A New Transparency Tool For Higher Education And Research.” Higher Education Management And Policy 22 (3): 1-26.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, T. 2001. “A Principal Component Analysis of the U.S. News & World Report Tier Rankings of Colleges and Universities.” Economics of Education Review 20 (3): 235–244. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(99)00066-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright Mills, C. 1970. The Sociological Imagination. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Zizek, S. 2014. Event: Philosophy In Transit. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar