‘Rationalized incrementalism’. How behavior experts in government negotiate institutional logics

References

• Ansell, C., A. Boin, and M. Farjoun. 2015. “Dynamic Conservatism: How Institutions Change to Remain the Same.” Research in the Sociology of Organizations 44: 89–119.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S., M. Hiscox, and T. Oliver. 2017. “Starting a Behavioural Insights Team: Three Lessons from the Behavioural Economics Team of the Australian Government.” Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy 1: 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Behavioural Insights Network Netherlands. 2018. A Wealth of Behavioural Insights: 2017 Edition. The Hague: Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy. https://www.government.nl/binaries/government/documents/reports/2018/04/01/a-wealth-of-behavioural-insights-2017-edition/A+Wealth+of+Behavioural+Insights+2017+edition.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Behavioural Insights Team UK. 2012. Test, Learn, Adapt: Developing Public Policy with Randomised Controlled Trials. London: Cabinet Office Behavioural Insights Team.
   Google Scholar
• Behavioural Insights Team UK. 2018. Behavioural Government. London: BIT/Institute for Government.
   Google Scholar
• Bendor, J. 2015. “Incrementalism: Dead yet Flourishing.” Public Administration Review 75 (2): 194–205. doi:10.1111/puar.12333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BIN NL. 2018. “Zeven Behavioural Insights Tools.” Accessed November 2017. https://www.communicatierijk.nl/documenten/publicaties/2017/11/23/tooloverzicht-bin-nl
   Google Scholar
• Bjerregaard, T. 2011. “Co-Existing Institutional Logics and Agency among Top-Level Public Servants: A Praxeological Approach.” Journal of Management and Organization 17 (2): 194–209. doi:10.1017/S1833367200001619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, J. 2017. “What Makes Evidence-Based Policy Making Such a Useful Myth? The Case of NICE Guidance on Bariatric Surgery in the United Kingdom.” Governance 31: 199–214. doi:10.1111/gove.12285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsson, N. 2007. The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. 2017. “Evidence-Based Best Practice Is More Political than It Looks: A Case Study of the ‘Scottish Approach’.” Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 13 (3): 499–515. doi:10.1332/174426416X14609261565901.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., J. G. March, and J. P. Olsen. 1972. “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice.” Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (1): 1–25. doi:10.2307/2392088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaton, A., and N. Cartwright. 2016. “Understanding and Misunderstanding Randomized Controlled Trials.” (NBER Working Paper, No. 22595). Princeton: Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, P., M. Hallsworth, D. Halpern, D. King, and I. Vlaev. 2010. MINDSPACE: Influencing Behaviour Through Public Policy. London: Cabinet Office and Institute for Government.
   Google Scholar
• Dror, Y. 1964. “‘Muddling Through’ - ‘Science’ or Inertia?” Public Administration Review 24: 153–157. doi:10.2307/973640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. 1967. “Mixed-Scanning: A ‘Third’ Approach to Decision-Making.” Public Administration Review 27: 385–392. doi:10.2307/973394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feitsma, J. N. P. 2018a. “Brokering Behaviour Change: The Work of Behavioural Insights Experts in Government.” Policy and Politics Advance view. doi:10.1332/030557318X15174915040678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feitsma, J. N. P. 2018b. “The Behavioural State: Critical Observations on Technocracy and Psychocracy.” Policy Sciences 51: 387–410. doi:10.1007/s11077-018-9325-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feitsma, J. N. P., and T. Schillemans. Forthcoming. “Behaviour Experts in Government: From Newcomers to Professionals?” In Handbook of Behavioural Change and Public Policy, edited by H. Strassheim and S. Beck. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Pre-publication version available at SSRN: “https://ssrn.com/abstract=3250352”
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., D. Torgerson, A. Durnova, and M. Orsini. 2015. “Introduction to Critical Policy Studies.” In Handbook of Critical Policy Studies, edited by F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnova, and M. Orsini, 1–24. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gemeente Schoon. 2014. “Stappenplan voor gedragsverandering.” Accessed June 2015. http://kenniswijzerzwerfafval.nl/document/stappenplan-voor-gedragsverandering
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. 2015. Inside the Nudge Unit. London: Ebury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R. 2010. “From ‘Knowledge Use’ Towards ‘Boundary Work’.” In Knowledge Democracy. Consequences for Science, Politics and Media, edited by R. In ‘T Veld, 169–186. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M., E. Bergsma, and K. Cooper. 2017. “Positieve gedragsbeïnvloeding om inwoners te activeren.” Sociaal Bestek 5: 37–39.
   Google Scholar
• John, P. 2014. “Policy Entrepreneurship in UK Central Government.” Public Policy and Administration 29 (3): 257–267. doi:10.1177/0952076713509297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, P. 2018. How Far To Nudge? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., J. Pykett, and M. Whitehead. 2013. Changing Behaviours: On the Rise of the Psychological State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jupp, E., J. Pykett, and F. M. Smith. 2016. Emotional States: Sites and Spaces of Affective Governance. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, C., and C. Lyall. 2013. “Knowledge Brokers: The Role of Intermediaries in Producing Research Impact.” Evidence and Policy 9 (3): 309–316. doi:10.1332/174426413X14809298820296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leggett, W. 2014. “The Politics of Behaviour Change: Nudge, Neoliberalism and the State.” Policy and Politics 42 (1): 3–19. doi:10.1332/030557312X655576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. 1959. “The Science of ‘Muddling Through.” Public Administration Review 19 (2): 79–88. doi:10.2307/973677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., and K. Wegrich. 2016. “The Rationality Paradox of Nudge: Rational Tools of Government in a World of Bounded Rationality.” Law & Policy 38 (3): 250–267. doi:10.1111/lapo.12056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenço, J. S., E. Ciriolo, S. R. Almeida, and X. Troussard. 2016. Behavioural Insights Applied to Policy. Luxembourg: European Commission Joint Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Lugosi, P. 2006. “Between Overt and Covert Research: Concealment and Disclosure in an Ethnographic Study of Commercial Hospitality.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (3): 541–561. doi:10.1177/1077800405282801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malecka, M., and R. Lepenies. 2018. “Is the Behavioral Approach a Form of Scientific Imperialism? An Analysis of Law and Policy.” In Scientific Imperialism: Exploring the Boundaries of Interdisciplinarity, edited by U. Mäki, A. Walsh, and M. Pinto. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. 2016. “Deconstructing the Debate over Evidence-Based Policy.” Critical Policy Studies 11 (2): 211-226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. Behavioural Insights and Public Policy Lessons from around the World. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, W. 2002. “From Muddling through to Muddling up – Evidence Based Policy Making and the Modernisation of British Government.” Public Policy and Administration 17 (3): 43–60. doi:10.1177/095207670201700304.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., and P. Hupe. 2011. “Talking About Government.” Public Management Review 13 (5): 641–658. doi:10.1080/14719037.2010.532963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pykett, J., R. Jones, M. Welsh, and M. Whitehead. 2014. “The Art of Choosing and the Politics of Social Marketing.” Policy Studies 35 (2): 97–114. doi:10.1080/01442872.2013.875141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R., P. ‘T Hart, and M. Noordegraaf. 2007. Observing Government Elites. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, C. 2017. “Exploring the (Behavioural) Political Economy of Nudging.” Journal of Institutional Economics 13 (3): 499–522. doi:10.1017/S1744137416000448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sent, E.-M. 2004. “Behavioural Economics: How Psychology Made Its (Limited) Way Back into Economics.” History of Political Economy 4: 735–760. doi:10.1215/00182702-36-4-735.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G., and D. May. 1980. “The Artificial Debate between Rationalist and Incrementalist Models of Decision Making.” Policy and Politics 8 (2): 147–161. doi:10.1332/030557380782629005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strassheim, H., A. Jung, and R. Korinek. 2015. “Reframing Expertise: The Rise of Behavioural Insights and Interventions in Public Policy.” In Moments of Valuation. Exploring Sites of Dissonance, edited by A. Bertoin Antal, M. Hutter, and D. Stark, 249–268. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strassheim, H. 2017. “Bringing the Political Back in: Reconstructing the Debate over Evidence-Based Policy. A Response to Newman.” Critical Policy Studies 11 (2): 235–245. doi:10.1080/19460171.2017.1323656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strategic Policy Making Team Cabinet Office. 1999. Professional Policymaking in the Twenty-First Century. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R., and C. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hulst, M. 2008. “Quite an Experience: Using Ethnography to Study Local Governance.” Critical Policy Analysis 2 (2): 143–159.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, V., A. House, and S. Hamer. 2009. “Knowledge Brokering: The Missing Link in the Evidence to Action Chain?” Evidence and Policy 5: 267–279. doi:10.1332/174426409X463811.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. 1979. “The Many Meanings Of Research Utilization.” Public Administration Review 39 (5): 426–431. doi:10.2307/3109916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M., R. Jones, R. Lilley, J. Pykett, and R. Howell. 2017. Neuroliberalism. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar