Strategic ignorance and politics of time: how expert knowledge framed shale gas policies

References

• Chailleux, S., J. Merlin, and Y. Gunzburger. 2018. “Unconventional Oil and Gas in France: From Popular Distrust to Politicization of the Underground.” The Extractive Industries and Society 5 (4): 682–690.
   Google Scholar
• Barthe, Y. 2006. Le pouvoir d’indécision. Paris: Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Batelier, P. 2010. Dm101, Memoir to the BAPE.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A., and J. Bury. 2013. Subterranean Struggles. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bherer, L., P. Dufour, and C. Rothmayr Allison. 2013. Analyse comparée des mobilisations autour du développement du gaz de schiste au Québec, en France, aux États-Unis et en Colombie-Britannique. Montréal: Université de Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• Blanck, J. 2017. “Gouverner par le temps: la gestion des déchets radioactifs en France, entre changements organisationnels et construction de solutions techniques irréversibles (1950–2014).” Ph Dissertation, Institut d’études politiques de Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Bomberg, E. 2017. “Shale We Drill? Discourse Dynamics in UK Fracking Debates.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 19 (1): 72–88. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1053111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. 2009. The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement. 2011. Le développement durable de l’industrie des gaz de schiste au Québec. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement. 2014. Les enjeux liés à l’exploration et l’exploitation du gaz de schiste dans le shale de l’Utica des basses terres du Saint-Laurent. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Chateauraynaud, F., and J. Debaz 2011. “L’affaire des gaz de schiste. Anatomie d’une mobilisation fulgurante.” http://socioargu.hypotheses.org/3262
   Google Scholar
• Chateauraynaud, F., and J. Debaz. 2017. Aux Bords De L’irreversible. Paris: Petra.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H., and R. Evans. 2017. Why Democracy Needs Science. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Comité d’évaluation environnementale stratégique. 2014. Rapport de synthèse. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Commission du développement durable et de l’aménagement du territoire (Gonnot-Martin). 2011. Rapport d’information sur les gaz et huiles de schiste. Paris: Assemblée Nationale.
   Google Scholar
• Commission du développement durable et de l’aménagement du territoire (Havard-Chanteguet). 2011. Rapport 3392 sur la proposition de loi 3301. Paris: Assemblée Nationale.
   Google Scholar
• Conseil général de l’industrie, de l’énergie et des technologies, Conseil général de l’environnement et du développement durable. 2012. Les hydrocarbures de roche-mère en France. Paris: Ministère de l’économie.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, M., I. Rattle, and J. Van Alstine. 2014. “Shale Gas Policy in the United Kingdom: An Argumentative Discourse Analysis.” Energy Policy 73: 427–438. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodge, J., and J. Lee. 2017. “Framing Dynamics and Political Gridlock: The Curious Case of Hydraulic Fracturing in New York.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 19 (1): 14–34. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2015.1116378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C., and C. Radaelli. 2018. “The Lessons of Policy Learning: Types, Triggers, Hindrances and Pathologies.” Policy & Politics 46: 255–272. doi:10.1332/030557318X15230059735521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. 2009. Democracy and Expertise, Reorienting Policy Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., and J. Forester. 1993. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin, M.-J., and Y. Fournis. 2013. Facteurs pour une analyse intégrée de l’acceptabilité sociale selon une perspective de développement territorial: L’industrie du gaz de schiste au Québec. Rimouski: Université du Québec à Rimouski.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin, M.-J., and Y. Fournis. 2015. “Une participation conflictuelle: La trajectoire territoriale des mobilisations contre le gaz de schiste au Québec.” Participations 13 (3): 119–144. doi:10.3917/parti.013.0119.
   Google Scholar
• Frickel, S., S. Gibbon, J. Howard, J. Kempner, G. Ottinger, and D. J. Hess.et al. 2009. “Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting.” Science, Technology & Human Values 35 (4): 444–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis. Chicago: Harper Colophon.
   Google Scholar
• Goldthau, A., and M. Labelle. 2016. “The Power of Policy Regimes: Explaining Shale Gas Policy Divergence in Bulgaria and Poland.” Review of Policy Research 33 (6): 603–622. doi:10.1111/ropr.2016.33.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P. 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organizations 46 (1): 1–35. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., J. Pierce, S. Gallaher, J. Kagan, D. Crow, and C. Weible. 2014. “Understanding a Period of Policy Change: The Case of Hydraulic Fracturing Disclosure Policy in Colorado.” Review of Policy Research 31 (2): 65–87. doi:10.1111/ropr.2014.31.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, D. 2016. Undone Science. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, C., and L. D. Hartwig. 2017. “The Friction of Fracking: Discursive Constraints on Aboriginal Participation in Coal Seam Gas in Northern NSW.” The Extractive Industries and Society 4 (2): 329–336. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2017.01.010.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch – Science Advisers as Policymakers. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kinchy, A. 2016. “Citizen Science and Democracy: Participatory Water Monitoring in the Marcellus Shale Fracking Boom.” Science as a Practice 26 (1): 88–110.
   Google Scholar
• Kinchy, A., S. Parks, and K. Jalbert. 2016. “Fractured Knowledge: Mapping the Gaps in Public and Private Water Monitoring Efforts in Areas Affected by Shale Gas Development.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 34 (5): 879–899. doi:10.1177/0263774X15614684.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, S. 2014. Mining Capitalism. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, E., É. Montpetit, and J. P. Gauvin. 2014. “Public Perceptions of Expert Credibility on Policy Issues: The Role of Expert Framing and Political Worldviews.” Policy Studies Journal 42 (4): 674–697. doi:10.1111/psj.12073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lis, A., and P. Stankiewicz. 2017. “Framing Shale Gas for Policy Making in Poland.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 19 (1): 53–71. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2016.1143355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie Research Capital Corporation. 2010. Spotlight on the Utica Shale: Next Steps – The Path to Commercialization. Montreal: Mackie Research Capital Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• McGoey, L. 2012. “The Logic of Strategic Ignorance.” The British Journal of Sociology 63: 533–576. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01424.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metze, T. 2018. “Framing the Future of Fracking: Discursive Lock-In or Energy Degrowth in the Netherlands?” Journal of Cleaner Production 197: 1737–1745. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metze, T., and J. Dodge. 2016. “Dynamic Discourse Coalitions on Hydro-Fracking in Europe and the United States.” Environmental Communication 10 (3): 365–379. doi:10.1080/17524032.2015.1133437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministère de l’Energie et des Ressources Naturelles. 2016. Livre vert en matière d’acceptabilité sociale. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère des Ressources Naturelles et de la Faune. 2010. Le développement du gaz de schiste au Québec. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Molinatti, G., and L. Simonneau. 2015. “A Socioenvironmental Shale Gas Controversy - Scientists’ Public Communications, Social Responsibility and Collective versus Individual Positions.” Science Communication 37 (2): 190–216. doi:10.1177/1075547014560827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montpetit, E., and E. Lachapelle. 2013. L’opinion des Québécois sur les gaz de schiste: Une comparaison avec la Pennsylvanie et le Michigan. Montréal: Université de Montréal.
   Google Scholar
• Moyson, S. 2017. “Cognition and Policy Change: The Consistency of Policy Learning in the Advocacy Coalition Framework.” Policy and Society 36 (2): 320–344. doi:10.1080/14494035.2017.1322259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, K. 2018. “Mining, Time and Protest: Dealing with Waiting in German Coal Mine Planning.” The Extractive Industries and Society, Online first. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2018.09.001.
   Google Scholar
• Office parlementaire d’évaluation des choix scientifiques et techniques. 2013. Rapport sur les techniques alternatives à la fracturation hydraulique pour l’exploration et l’exploitation des hydrocarbures non conventionnels. Paris: Assemblée Nationale.
   Google Scholar
• Oreske, N., and E. Conway. 2010. Merchants of Doubt. New York, NY: Bloomsbery Press.
   Google Scholar
• Partridge, T., M. Thomas, N. Pidgeon, and B. H. Harthorn. 2018. “Urgency in Energy Justice: Contestation and Time in Prospective Shale Extraction in the United States and United Kingdom.” Energy Research & Social Science 42: 138–146. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, A., and C. McLean. 2018. “The Regulation of Risk: The Case of Fracking in the UK and the Netherlands.” Science and Public Policy 45 (1): 45–52. doi:10.1093/scipol/scx036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. N. 2008. Agnotology: The Making and Unmaking of Ignorance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rabe, B. G., and C. Borick. 2013. “Conventional Politics for Unconventional Drilling? Lessons from Pennsylvania’s Early Move into Fracking Policy Development.” Review of Policy Research 30 (3): 321–340. doi:10.1111/ropr.2013.30.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P., and H. Jenkins-Smith. 1993. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Secor. 2010. Évaluation des retombées économiques du développement des shales de l’Utica. Montréal: Secor.
   Google Scholar
• Sica, C., and M. Hubert. 2017. “‘We Can’t Be Dependent on Anybody’: The Rhetoric of ‘Energy Independence’and the Legitimation of Fracking in Pennsylvania.” The Extractive Industries and Society 4 (2): 337–343. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2017.02.003.
   Google Scholar
• Terral, P.-M. 2012. “La fronde contre le gaz de schiste: Essai d’histoire immédiate d’une mobilisation éclair (2010–2011).” Ecologie&politique 45: 185–194.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Graaf, T., T. Haesebrouck, and P. Debaere. 2017. “Fractured Politics? the Comparative Regulation of Shale Gas in Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1301985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, A. 2015. “Shale Gas: Energy Innovation in A (Non-)Knowledge Society: A Press Discourse Analysis.” Science and Public Policy 42 (2): 273–286. doi:10.1093/scipol/scu050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. [1922] 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C., and T. Heikkila. 2016. “Comparing the Politics of Hydraulic Fracturing in New York, Colorado, and Texas.” Review of Policy Research 33 (3): 232–250. doi:10.1111/ropr.2016.33.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C., T. Heikkila, K. Ingold, and M. Fischer. 2016. Policy Debates on Hydraulic Fracturing: Comparing Coalition Politics in North America and Europe. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Widener, P. 2018. “National Discovery and Citizen Experts in Aotearoa New Zealand: Local and Global Narratives of Hydraulic Fracturing.” The Extractive Industries and Society 5: 515–523. Online first. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2018.06.009.
   Google Scholar
• Zittoun, P. 2009. “Understanding Policy Change as a Discursive Problem.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 11 (1): 65–82. doi:10.1080/13876980802648235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zittoun, P. 2014. The Political Process of Policymaking. New York, NY: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Zittoun, P., and S. Chailleux. forthcoming. Policies under Pressure. Cheltenham: Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar