Undermining or defending democracy? The consequences of distrust for democratic attitudes and participation

References

• Almond, G. A., and S. Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. J., and Y. V. Tverdova. 2001. “Winners, Losers, and Attitudes about Government in Contemporary Democracies.” International Political Science Review 22 (4): 321–338. doi:10.1177/0192512101022004003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, M., and H. S. Christensen. 2016. “When Trust Matters – A Multilevel Analysis of the Effect of Generalized Trust on Political Participation in 25 European Democracies.” Journal of Civil Society 12 (2): 178–197. doi:10.1080/17448689.2016.1176730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, B. 1983. The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behnke, J. 2009. “Vertrauen und Kontrolle: Der Einfluss von Werten auf Einstellungen zu politischen Institutionen.” ZParl 40 (2): 397–413. doi:10.5771/0340-1758-2009-2.
   Google Scholar
• Blaeser, M., F. Butzlaff, M. Micus, R. Pausch, and G. Scalabrino. 2016. “Wahl und Nichtwahl: Politikeinstellungen und Politik-Hoffnungen in Göttinger Stadtvierteln.” Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Empirische Sozialforschung 5. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/dialog/12567.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Braun, D., and S. Hutter. 2016. “Political Trust, Extra-Representational Participation and the Openness of Political Systems.” International Political Science Review 37 (2): 151–165. doi:10.1177/0192512114559108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butzlaff, F. 2016. Die neuen Bürgerproteste in Deutschland: Organisatoren - Erwartungen - Demokratiebilder. Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. 1998. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delhey, J., and K. Newton. 2003. “Who Trusts? The Origins of Social Trust in Seven Societies.” European Societies 5 (2): 93–137. doi:10.1080/1461669032000072256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. H. 1950. Childhood and Society. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A. 1968. Power and Discontent. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Pr.
   Google Scholar
• Grande, E. 2000. “Charisma und Komplexität: Verhandlungsdemokratie, Mediendemokratie und der Funktionswandel politischer Eliten.” Leviathan 28 (1): 122–141. doi:10.1007/s11578-000-0007-1.
   Google Scholar
• Hanisch, K., and S. Messinger-Zimmer. 2017. “‘Also ich trau da überhaupt gar keinem.’: Die Konflikte aus der Perspektive der Unbeteiligten.” In Bürgerproteste in Zeiten der Energiewende. Lokale Konflikte um Windkraft, Stromtrassen und Fracking, edited by C. Hoeft, S. Messinger-Zimmer, and J. Zilles, 169–181. Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. 2002. Trust and Trustworthiness. The Russell Sage Foundation series on trust volume 4. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Haß, R., H. Hielscher, and D. Klink. 2014. “Germany – A Movement Society? An Investigation of Non-Activism.” Journal of Civil Society 10 (4): 353–372. doi:10.1080/17448689.2014.984971.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeft, C. 2017. “Zwischen ‘Hoffnungslosen’ und ‘heimlichen AktivistInnen’: Typen der Nicht-Beteiligung.” In Bürgerproteste in Zeiten der Energiewende. Lokale Konflikte um Windkraft, Stromtrassen und Fracking, edited by C. Hoeft, S. Messinger-Zimmer, and J. Zilles, 183–195. Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeft, C., S. Messinger-Zimmer, and J. Zilles, eds. 2017. Bürgerproteste in Zeiten der Energiewende: Lokale Konflikte um Windkraft, Stromtrassen und Fracking. Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., B. Hosch-Dayican, and J. W. van Deth. 2014. “Conceptualizing Political Participation.” Acta Politica 49 (3): 337–348. doi:10.1057/ap.2014.7.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, J. 2010. The Life and Death of Democracy. London: Pocket Books.
   Google Scholar
• Klandermans, B., and J. van Stekelenburg. 2014. “Why People Don’t Participate in Collective Action.” Journal of Civil Society 10 (4): 341–352. doi:10.1080/17448689.2014.984974.
   Google Scholar
• Klecha, S., S. Marg, and F. Butzlaff. 2013. “Wie erforscht man Protest? Forschungsdesign und Methodik.” In Die neue Macht der Bürger: Was motiviert die Protestbewegungen? edited by F. Walter, F. Butzlaff, L. Geiges, and S. Marg, 12–45. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, R. A., and M. A. Casey. 2009. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lenard, P. T. 2008. “Trust Your Compatriots, but Count Your Change: The Roles of Trust, Mistrust and Distrust in Democracy.” Political Studies 56 (2): 312–332. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00693.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenard, P. T. 2015. “The Political Philosophy of Trust and Distrust in Democracies and Beyond.” The Monist 98 (4): 353–359. doi:10.1093/monist/onv017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M., and L. Stoker. 2000. “Political Trust and Trustworthiness.” Annual Review of Political Science 3: 475–507. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 2009. Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, M. K., and M. E. Warren. 2012. “Two Trust-Based Uses of Minipublics in Democratic Systems.” In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, edited by J. Parkinson and J. J. Mansbridge, 95–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nannestad, P. 2008. “What Have We Learned About Generalized Trust, If Anything?” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 413–436. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2002. Democratic Phoenix: Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., S. Walgrave, and P. van Aelst. 2005. “Who Demonstrates? Antistate Rebels, Conventional Participants, or Everyone?” Comparative Politics 37 (2): 189–205. doi:10.2307/20072882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S., ed. 1997. Why People Don’t Trust Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parvin, P. 2015. “Is Deliberative Democracy Feasible? Political Disengagement and Trust in Liberal Democratic States.” The Monist 98 (4): 407–423. doi:10.1093/monist/onv021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton, P. 2002. “Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship.” American Sociological Review 67 (2): 254–277. doi:10.2307/3088895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przyborski, A., and M. Wohlrab-Sahr. 2010. Qualitative Sozialforschung: Ein Arbeitsbuch. Münich: Oldenbourg.
   Google Scholar
• Puchta, C., and S. Wolff. 2003. “Diskursanalysen institutioneller Gespräche - das Beispiel von ‘Focus Groups’.” In Handbuch sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse, edited by R. Keller, A. Hirseland, W. Schneider, and W. Viehöver, 439–456. Opladen: Leske u. Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, A. 2015. Der Verlust politischer Gleichheit: Warum die sinkende Wahlbeteiligung der Demokratie schadet. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. 2014. “Qualitative Content Analysis.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, edited by U. Flick, 170–183. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 1999. The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Stolle, D. 2002. “Trusting Strangers: The Concept of Generalized Trust in Perspective.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 31 (4): 397–412.
   Google Scholar
• Ullmann-Margalit, E. 2004. “Trust, Distrust, and in Between.” In Distrust, edited by R. Hardin, 60–82. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. M. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. M., and M. Brown. 2005. “Inequality, Trust, and Civic Engagement.” American Politics Research 33 (6): 868–894. doi:10.1177/1532673X04271903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Walle, S., and F. Six. 2014. “Trust and Distrust as Distinct Concepts: Why Studying Distrust in Institutions Is Important.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 16 (2): 158–174. doi:10.1080/13876988.2013.785146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer, T., and E. van Ingen. 2009. “Schools of Democracy? Disentangling the Relationship between Civic Participation and Political Action in 17 European Countries.” European Journal of Political Research 48 (2): 281–308. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2008.00836.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Deth, J. W. 2014. “A Conceptual Map of Political Participation.” Acta Politica 49 (3): 349–367. doi:10.1057/ap.2014.6.
   Google Scholar
• Vráblíková, K. 2017. What Kind of Democracy? Participation, Inclusiveness and Contestation. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, F., F. Butzlaff, L. Geiges, and S. Marg, eds. 2013. Die neue Macht der Bürger: Was motiviert die Protestbewegungen? Reinbek: Rowohlt.
   Google Scholar
• Westle, B. 2015. “German Views of the Political System.” German Politics 24 (3): 317–353. doi:10.1080/09644008.2015.1060962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zittel, T., and D. Fuchs, eds. 2007. Participatory Democracy and Political Participation: Can Participatory Engineering Bring Citizens Back In? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar