Understanding barriers to new approaches – a case study from Australian remote indigenous policy

References

• Aggestam, F. 2014. “Effects of the Manager’s Value Orientation on Stakeholder Participation: At the Front Line of Policy Implementation.” Water Policy 16 (1): 62–78. doi:10.2166/wp.2013.135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, C., and A. Curtis. 2005. “Nipped in the Bud: Why Regional Scale Adaptive Management Is Not Blooming.” Environmental Management 36 (3): 414–425. doi:10.1007/s00267-004-0244-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., L. Pritchett, and M. Woolcock. 2013. “Escaping Capability Traps through Problem Driven Iterative Adaptation (PDIA).” World Development 51: 234–244. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin-Broos, D. 2011. A Different Inequality: The Politics of Debate about Remote Aboriginal Australia. Crows Nest, N.S.W: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Behrendt, L. 2007. “The Emergency We Had to Have.” In Coercive Reconciliation: Stabilise, Normalise, Exit Aboriginal Australia, edited by J. C. Altman and M. Hinkson, 15–20. North Carlton, Vic: Arena Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgon, J. 2008. “The Future of Public Service: A Search for A New Balance.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 67 (4): 390–404. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2008.00597.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslin, P. 2004. “Thinking outside Newton’s Box: Metaphors for Grassroots Development.” Grassroots Development 25 (1): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. R. 2017. “Attempting to Cultivate More Collaborative Mindsets for Boundary Spanning in Remote Indigenous Policy. .” Australian Journal of Public Administration 76: 412–425. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantin, B. 2010. “Integrated Place-Based Approaches for Sustainable Development.” Horizons: Sustainable Places 10: 4.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, G., P. McLoughlin, and B. Crammond. 2015. “Implementing Joined‐Up Government: Lessons from the Australian Social Inclusion Agenda.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 74 (2): 176–186. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CGRIS. 2010. Coordinator General for Remote Indigenous Services, Six Monthly Report December 2009 to August 2010. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• CGRIS. 2011. Coordinator General for Remote Indigenous Services, Six Monthly Report September 2010-March 2011. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffin, B. C., H. Gosnell, and B. A. Cosens. 2014. “A Decade of Adaptive Governance Scholarship: Synthesis and Future Directions.” Ecology and Society 19 (3): 1. doi:10.5751/ES-06824-190356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, M. 2012. “Talkin’ ‘Bout a Revolution: The Social, Political, and Fantasmatic Logics of Education Policy.” Journal of Education Policy 27 (2): 173–191. doi:10.1080/02680939.2011.623244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COAG. 2009a. “National Indigenous Reform Agreement (Closing the Gap).” accessed 6 February 2015. http://www.federalfinancialrelations.gov.au/content/npa/health_indigenous/indigenous-reform/national-agreement_sept_12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• COAG. 2009b. “National Partnership Agreement on Remote Service Delivery.” Council of Australian Governments, accessed 10 November 2014. http://www.federalfinancialrelations.gov.au/content/npa/other/remote_service_delivery/national_partnership.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cowlishaw, G., E. Kowal, and T. Lea. 2006. “Introduction: Double Binds.” In Moving Anthropology: Critical Indigenous Studies, edited by T. Lea, E. Kowal, and G. Cowlishaw, 1–15. Darwin, NT: Charles Darwin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. C., and I. B. Neumann. 2016. Undertaking Discourse Analysis for Social Research. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fforde, C., L. Bamblett, R. Lovett, S. Gorringe, and B. Fogarty. 2013. “Discourse, Deficit and Identity: Aboriginality, the Race Paradigm and the Language of Representation in Contemporary Australia.” Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy 149 (1): 162–173. doi:10.1177/1329878X1314900117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A. L., and A. Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Getha-Taylor, H., M. H. Holmes, W. S. Jacobson, R. S. Morse, and J. E. Sowa. 2011. “Focusing the Public Leadership Lens: Research Propositions and Questions in the Minnowbrook Tradition.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (suppl1): i83–i97. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynos, J. 2011. “On the Ideological and Political Significance of Fantasy in the Organization of Work.” Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 16 (4): 373–393. doi:10.1057/pcs.2010.34.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., D. Howarth, A. Norval, and E. Speed. 2009. Discourse Analysis: Varieties and Methods: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper. Swindon: Economic and Social Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., and D. R. Howarth. 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Vol. 26. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., R. Klimecki, and H. Willmott. 2015. “Logics in Policy and Practice: A Critical Nodal Analysis of the UK Banking Reform Process.” Critical Policy Studies 9 (4): 393–415. doi:10.1080/19460171.2015.1009841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., and E. Speed. 2012. “Varieties of Co-Production in Public Services: Time Banks in a UK Health Policy Context.” Critical Policy Studies 6 (4): 402–433. doi:10.1080/19460171.2012.730760.
   Google Scholar
• Gunder, M. 2014. “Fantasy in Planning Organisations and Their Agency: The Promise of Being at Home in the World.” Urban Policy and Research 32 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/08111146.2013.835261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollway, W., and T. Jefferson. 2013. Doing Qualitative Research Differently: A Psychosocial Approach. London. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, B. 2011. Citizens’ Engagement in Policymaking and the Design of Public Services. Canberra: Parliamentary Library.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. 2010. “Power, Discourse, and Policy: Articulating a Hegemony Approach to Critical Policy Studies.” Critical Policy Studies 3 (3): 309–335. doi:10.1080/19460171003619725.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. 2018. “‘Normalising’ Aboriginal housing in the Kimberley: Challenges at the interface of New Public Management approaches.” CAEPR Working Paper No 123/2018. Canberra: ANU.
   Google Scholar
• IPAA. 2014. “Australian Public Sector Innovation: Shaping the future through co-creation.” IPAA National Policy Paper June 2014. UTS. Sydney: Institute of Public Administration Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, H. 2011. Taking responsibility for complexity - How implementation can achieve results in the face of complex problems, Working paper 330. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Keast, R., M. P. Mandell, K. Brown, and G. Woolcock. 2004. “Network Structures: Working Differently and Changing Expectations.” Public Administration Review 64 (3): 363–371. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00380.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, S. 2002. “Tensions and Dilemmas in Community Development: New Discourses, New Trojans?” Community Development Journal 37 (4): 284–299. doi:10.1093/cdj/37.4.284.
   Google Scholar
• Kowal, E. 2010. “Is Culture the Problem or the Solution? Outstation Health and the Politics of Remoteness.” In Culture Crisis: Anthropology and Politics in Aboriginal Australia, edited by J. C. Altman and M. Hinkson, 179–194. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
   Google Scholar
• KPMG. 2007. Evaluation of Indigenous Coordination Centres: Final Report. Canberra: Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. .
   Google Scholar
• Lindquist, E., and J. Wanna. 2015. “Is Implementation Only about Policy Execution?: Advice for Public Sector Leaders from the Literature.” In New Accountabilities, New Challenges, edited by J. Wanna, 209–242. Acton: Acton: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Management Advisory Committee. 2010. Empowering Change: Fostering Innovation in the Australian Public Service. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., D. Richards, and M. J. Smith. 2001. Changing Patterns of Governance in the United Kingdom: Reinventing Whitehall? Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, D. 2006. “Why the ‘New Direction’ in Federal Indigenous Affairs Policy Is as Likely to ‘Fail’ as the Old Directions.” CAEPR Topical Issue No. 5. Canberra: CAEPR, ANU.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, M. 2007. “The Interethnic Practice of Local Governance in Aboriginal Settlements in Desert Australia.” Desert Knowledge CRC, The Working Paper Series, Working Paper (12). .
   Google Scholar
• Moran, M. 2016. Serious Whitefella Stuff: When Solutions Became the Problem in Indigenous Affairs. Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan Disney & Associates. 2006a. A Red Tape Evaluation in Selected Indigenous Communities, Final Report to the Office of Indigenous Policy Coordination. Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan Disney & Associates. 2006b. Synopsis Review of the COAG Trial Evaluations. Canberra: Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan Disney & Associates. 2007. Implementation Review of Shared Responsibility Agreements: Don’t Let’s Lose Another Good Idea. Canberra: Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. 2010. The New Public Governance? Emerging Perspectives on the Theory and Practice of Public Governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., and K. Strokosch. 2013. “It Takes Two to Tango? Understanding the Co-Production of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives.” British Journal of Management 24: S31–S47. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., and M. Painter. 2010. “Conclusion: Administrative Traditions in an Era of Administrative Change.” In Tradition and Public Administration, edited by M. Painter and B. G. Peters, 234–237. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips-Brown, P., T. Reddel, and B. Gleeson. 2012. “Learning from Experience? Getting Governments to Listen to What Evaluations are Telling Them.” In Better Indigenous Policies: The Role of Evaluation: Roundtable Proceedings, Canberra, 22-23 October 2012, edited by Productivity Commission, pp 245–264. Canberra: Productivity Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Pholi, K., D. Black, and C. Richards. 2009. “Is ‘Close the Gap’ a Useful Approach to Improving the Health and Wellbeing of Indigenous Australians?” Australian Review of Public Affairs 9 (2): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• PM&C. 2014. National Partnership Agreement on Remote Service Delivery: Evaluation 2013. Canberra: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• PM&C. 2019. Closing the Gap - The Prime Minister’s Report 2019. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet
   Google Scholar
• Pritchett, L., and F. de Weijer 2010. “Fragile States: Stuck in a Capability Trap?” World Development Report 2011 Background Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchett, L., M. Woolcock, and M. Andrews. 2013. “Looking like a State: Techniques of Persistent Failure in State Capability for Implementation.” The Journal of Development Studies 49 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1080/00220388.2012.709614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. 2008. Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, W., and J. Hunt. 2010. “Sorry, but the Indigenous Affairs Revolution Continues.” In The Rudd Government: Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007-2010, edited by C. Aulich and M. Evans, 221–240. Canberra: ANU E Press.
   Google Scholar
• SGS Economics and Planning. 2007. Evaluation of the ‘Communities in Crisis’ Policy, Evaluation Report. Canberra: Department of Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. .
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C., S. Wright, and D. Però. 2011. Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. 2013. “Representative Bureaucracy in Australia: A Post-Colonial, Multicultural Society.” In Representative Bureaucracy in Action: Country Profiles from the Americas, Europe, Africa and Asia, edited by P. von Maravi, B. Guy Peters, and E. Schröter, 217–229. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Strakosch, E. 2015. Neoliberal Indigenous Policy: Settler Colonialism and the ‘Post-Welfare’ State. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. 2005. “Strange Bedfellows: Whole-of-Government Policy, Shared Responsibility Agreement, and Implications for Regional Governance.” CAEPR-Reconciliation Australia ICG Project Workshop with WA and Australian Government Partners, Perth, WA, October 18.
   Google Scholar
• Walden, I., and B. Dennis. 2014. “Aboriginal People ‘Talking Back’ to Policy in Rural Australia.” Journal of Indigenous Social Development 3 (2): 1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• West, K. 2011. “Articulating Discursive and Materialist Conceptions of Practice in the Logics Approach to Critical Policy Analysis.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (4): 414–433. doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.628033.
   Google Scholar