The politics of making Finland an experimenting nation

References

• Adkins, L., and H. Ylöstalo. 2018. “Experimental Policy, Price and the Provocative State.” Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory 19 (2): 152–169. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2018.1494615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adkins, L., M. Kortesoja, M. Mannevuo, and H. Ylöstalo. 2019. “Experimenting with Price: Crafting the New Social Contract in Finland.” Critical Sociology 45 (4–5): 683–696. doi:10.1177/0896920517740614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antikainen, R., H.-L. Kangas, K. Alhola, J. Stenvall, U. Leponiemi, E. Pekkola, P.-H. Rannisto, and J. Poskela. 2019. Kokeilukulttuuri Suomessa - Nykytila Ja Kehittämistarpeet. Helsinki: Valtioneuvoston selvitys- ja tutkimustoiminnan julkaisusarja, 2/2019.
   Google Scholar
• Bäcklund, P., L. Häikiö, H. Leino, and V. Kanninen. 2018. “Bypassing Publicity for Getting Things Done: Between Informal and Formal Planning Practices in Finland.” Planning Practice & Research 33 (3): 309–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhshi, H., A. Freeman, and J. Potts. 2011. State of Uncertainty: Innovation Policy through Experimentation. London: Nesta.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1999. World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovey, W. H., and A. Hede. 2001. “Resistance to Organisational Change: The Role of Defence Mechanisms.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 16 (7): 534–548. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000006166.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, J. J, and R.R. Brown. 2012. “Governance experimentation and factors of success in socio-technical transitions in the urban water sector.” JTechnological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (7): 1340–1353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. A., V. C. Broto, and G. A. Edwards. 2015. An Urban Politics of Climate Change: Experimentation and the Governing of Socio-technical Transitions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. 2016. The Politics of Evidence-based Policy Making. London: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, N., and J. Hardie. 2012. Evidence-based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Cook, S. N., and H. Wagenaar. 2012. “Navigating the Eternally Unfolding Present: Toward an Epistemology of Practice.” The American Review of Public Administration 42 (1): 3–38. doi:10.1177/0275074011407404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Búrca, G., R. O. Keohane, and C. Sabel. 2014. “Global Experimentalist Governance.” British Journal of Political Science 44 (3): 477–486. doi:10.1017/S0007123414000076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings about Case-study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., S. Griggs, and A. Boaz. 2011. “The Practice of Policy Making.” Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 7 (2): 127–136. doi:10.1332/174426411X579180.
   Google Scholar
• Gilley, A., P. Dixon, and J. W. Gilley. 2008. “Characteristics of Leadership Effectiveness: Implementing Change and Driving Innovation in Organizations.” Human Resource Development Quarterly 19 (2): 153–169. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallitusohjelma 2011. Pääministeri Jyrki Kataisen hallitusohjelma. Valtioneuvoston kanslia. Valtioneuvostonjulkaisusarja 1/2011. Available at: https://vm.fi/julkaisu?pubid=3604 (accessed 10 May 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., M. Jalas, J. Rinkinen, and P. Tainio. 2015. “The Local Community as a “Low-carbon Lab”: Promises and Perils.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 14: 149–164. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2014.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildén, M., A. Jordan, and D. Huitema. 2018. “Special Issue on Experimentation for Climate Change Solutions Editorial: The Search for Climate Change and Sustainability Solutions - the Promise and the Pitfalls of Experimentation.” Journal of Cleaner Production 169: 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, O., S. Jilke, and G. G. Van Ryzin. 2017. Experiments in Public Management Research. Challenges and Contributions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., M. Hildén, D. Huitema, A. Jordan, and J. Newig. 2017. “Experiments in Climate Governance–a Systematic Review of Research on Energy and Built Environment Transitions.” Journal of Cleaner Production 169: 17–29. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronsell, A., and D. Mukhtar-Landgren. 2018. “Experimental Governance: The Role of Municipalities in Urban Living Labs.” European Planning Studies 26 (5): 988–1007. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1435631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, S., A. Berg, and M. Annala. 2017. “Dynamics of Experimental Governance: A Meta-study of Functions and Uses of Climate Governance Experiments.” Journal of Cleaner Production 169: 8–16. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laws, D., and J. Forester. 2015. Conflict, Improvisation, Governance: Street Level Practices for Urban Democracy. Routledge New York :
   Google Scholar
• Laws, D., and M. Hajer. 2006. “Policy in practice”. The Oxford handbook of public policyedited by M.Moran, M. Rein and R.E. Goodin, 409-425. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, M. 2014. “Presentation and Persuasion: The Meaning of Evidence in Irish Green Infrastructure Policy.” Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 10 (2): 167–186. doi:10.1332/174426414X13935916947767.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., and G. G. Van Ryzin. 2017. “A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies in Public Management Journals.” In Experiments in Public Management Research. Challenges and Contributions, edited by O. James, S. R. Jilke, and G. G. Van Ryzin, 20–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liedtke, C., J. M. Welfens, H. Rohn, and J. Nordmann. 2012. “LIVING LAB: User-driven Innovation for Sustainability.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 13 (2): 106–118. doi:10.1108/14676371211211809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-level Bureaucracy: The Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Mannevuo, M. 2019. “Neuroliberalism in Action: The Finnish Experiment with Basic Income.” Theory, Culture & Society 36 (4): 27–47. doi:10.1177/0263276419834066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2004. “Qualitative Content Analysis.” A Companion to Qualitative Research 1 (2): 159–176.
   Google Scholar
• McFadgen, B., and D. Huitema. 2017. “Stimulating Learning through Policy Experimentation: A Multi-case Analysis of How Design Influences Policy Learning Outcomes in Experiments for Climate Adaptation.” Water 9 (9): 648. doi:10.3390/w9090648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. 2014. “Innovation in the Public Sector; How Can Public Organisations Better Create, Improve and Adapt?.” London: Nesta.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. 2016. “Deconstructing the Debate over Evidence-Based Policy”.Critical Policy Studies 1–16 doi:10.1080/19460171.2016.1224724
   Google Scholar
• Oreg, S., M. Vakola, and A. Armenakis. 2011. “Change Recipients’ Reactions to Organizational Change: A 60-year Review of Quantitative Studies.” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 47 (4): 461–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overdevest, C., A. Bleicher, and M. Gross. 2010. “The Experimental Turn in Environmental Sociology: Pragmatism and New Forms of Governance.” In Environmental Sociology, edited by G. Matthias and H. Harald, 279–294. Dordrecht: Springer
   Google Scholar
• Overdevest, C., and J. Zeitlin. 2014. “Assembling an Experimentalist Regime: Transnational Governance Interactions in the Forest Sector.” Regulation & Governance 8 (1): 22–48. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01133.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powells, G., and L. Blake. 2016. “10 Urban Science Networks and Local Economy.” In The Experimental City, edited by J. Evans, A. Karvonen, and R. Raven, 137–149. New York: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office. 2015. Finland, a Land of Solutions. Strategic Programme of Prime Minister Juha Sipilä’s Government. Helsinki: Prime Minister’s Office.
   Google Scholar
• Romijn, H Raven, R and I. de Visser 2010. “Biomass energy experiments in rural India: Insights from learning-based development approaches and lessons for Strategic Niche Management”Environmental Science and Policy 13 (4):326–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and F. W. Geels. 2008. “Strategic Niche Management and Sustainable Innovation Journeys: Theory, Findings, Research Agenda, and Policy.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 20 (5): 537–554. doi:10.1080/09537320802292651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schram, S. F., and B. Silverman. 2012. “The End of Social Work: Neoliberalizing Social Policy Implementation.” Critical Policy Studies 6 (2): 128–145. doi:10.1080/19460171.2012.689734.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I., and A. Stirling. 2020. The Politics of Uncertainty: Challenges of Transformation. London: Taylor & Francis
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, F., J. Mattsson, and J. Sundbo. 2010. “Experimental Methods in Innovation Research.” Research Policy 39 (3): 313–322. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standring, A. 2017. “Evidence-based Policymaking and the Politics of Neoliberal Reason: A Response to Newman.” Critical Policy Studies 11 (2): 227–234. doi:10.1080/19460171.2017.1304226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. H., and C. R. Sunstein. 2009. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Unruh, G. C. 2000. “Understanding carbon lock-in.” In Energy policy, 28 (12):817–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
   Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S. 2017. “Experiments in Public Management Research. Challenges and Contributions.” In The Experimental Turn in Public Management: How Methodological Preferences Drive Substantive Choices, edited by O. James, S. R. Jilke, and G. G. Van Ryzin, 461–475. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., and S.N. Cook. 2003. Understanding policy practices: action, dialectic and deliberation in policy analysis. In Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society edited by M. Hajer and H. Wagenaar 139–171 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wesselink, A., H. Colebatch, and W. Pearce. 2014. “Evidence and Policy: Discourses, Meanings and Practices.” Policy Sciences 47 (4): 339–344. doi:10.1007/s11077-014-9209-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylöstalo, H. 2019. “The Role of Scientific Knowledge in Dealing with Complex Policy Problems under Conditions of Uncertainty.” Policy and Politics 48 (2): 259–276. doi:10.1332/030557319X15707904457648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar