2,671
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Flows of power: an analytical framework for the study of collaboration

ORCID Icon

References

  • Ansell, C. 2012. “Collaborative Governance.” In The Oxford Handbook of Governance, edited by D. Levi-Faur, 454–467. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2008. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
  • Ansell, C., and J. Torfing. 2018. How Does Collaborative Governance Scale? New Perspectives in Policy and Politics. Bristol: Policy Press.
  • Arendt, H. 1970. On Violence. London: Penguin Press.
  • Avelino, F. 2011. Power in Transition. Empowering Discourses on Sustainability Transitions. Rotterdam: Wöhrmann Print Services.
  • Bacharach, S. B., and E. J. Lawler. 1980. Power and Politics in Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Bachrach, P., and M. S. Baratz. 1962. “The Two Faces of Power.” American Political Science Review 56 (4): 941–952. doi:10.2307/1952796.
  • Bartels, K. P. R. 2012. “The Actionable Researcher.” Administrative Theory and Praxis 34 (3): 433–455. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806340306.
  • Bartels, K. P. R. 2014. “Communicative Capacity.” The American Review of Public Administration 44 (6): 656–674. doi:10.1177/0275074013478152.
  • Blue, G., and J. Dale. 2016. “Framing and Power in Public Deliberation with Climate Change: Critical Reflections on the Role of Deliberative Practitioners.” Journal of Public Deliberation 12 (1). Article 2.
  • Bobbio, L. 2019. “Designing Effective Public Participation.” Policy and Society 38 (1): 41–57. doi:10.1080/14494035.2018.1511193.
  • Bryson, J. M., K. S. Quick, C. S. Slotterback, and B. C. Crosby. 2013. “Designing Public Participation Processes.” Public Administration Review 73 (1): 23–34. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02678.x.
  • Castells, M. 2011. Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Collins, R. 2005. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton Studies in Cultural Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Cook, S. D. N., and J. S. Brown. 1999. “Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing.” Organization Science 10 (4): 381–400. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.4.381.
  • Cook, S. N., and H. Wagenaar. 2012. “Navigating the Eternally Unfolding Present.” The American Review of Public Administration 42 (1): 3–38. doi:10.1177/0275074011407404.
  • Dahl, R. A. 1957. “The Concept of Power.” Systems Research and Behavioural Science 2: 201–215.
  • Dalton, R. J. 2017. The Participation Gap: Social Status and Political Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • de Souza Briggs, X. 1998. “Doing Democracy Up-Close: Culture, Power, and Communication in Community Building.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 18 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1177/0739456X9801800101.
  • Dewulf, A., and W. Elbers. 2018. “Power in and over Cross-Sector Partnerships: Actor Strategies for Shaping Collective Decisions.” Administrative Sciences 8 (3): 43. doi:10.3390/admsci8030043.
  • Dryzek, J. S. 2001. “Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 29 (5): 651–669. doi:10.1177/0090591701029005003.
  • Escobar, O. 2015. “Scripting Deliberative Policy-Making: Dramaturgic Policy Analysis and Engagement Know-How.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 17 (3): 269–285.
  • Escobar, O. 2019. “Facilitators: The Micropolitics of Public Participation and Deliberation.” In Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance, edited by S. Elstub and O. Escobar, 178–195. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Felt, U., and M. Fochler. 2010. “Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-Scribing Publics in Public Engagement.” Minerva 48 (3): 219–238. doi:10.1007/s11024-010-9155-x.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. 2002. “Bringing Power to Planning Research: One Researcher’s Praxis Story.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 21 (4): 353–366. doi:10.1177/0739456X0202100401.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. 2006a. “Making Organization Research Matter: Power, Values and Phronesis.” In The SAGE Handbook of Organization Studies, edited by S. Glegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, and W. R. Nord, 370–387, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. 2006b. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363.
  • Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. 1st American ed. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Freeman, R., and S. Sturdy, eds. 2014. Knowledge in Policy: Embodied, Inscribed, Enacted. Bristol: Policy Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt9qgztx.
  • Fung, A. 2003. “Survey Article: Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences.” Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (3): 338–367. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00181.
  • Fung, A. 2005. “Deliberation before the Revolution: Toward an Ethics of Deliberative Democracy in an Unjust World.” Political Theory 33 (3): 397–419. doi:10.1177/0090591704271990.
  • Gash, A. 2016. “Collaborative Governance.” In Handbook on Theories of Governance, edited by C. Ansell, and J. Torfing, 454–467. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781782548508.00049.
  • Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
  • Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Goffman, E. 1959. “The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.” In The Goffman Reader, edited by C. Lemert, and A. Branaman, 21–26, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Goffman, E. 1983. “The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address.” American Sociological Review 48 (1): 1–17. doi:10.2307/2095141.
  • Hajer, M. A. 2005. “Setting the Stage.” Administration and Society 36 (6): 624–647. doi:10.1177/0095399704270586.
  • Hardy, C., and N. Phillips. 1998. “Strategies of Engagement: Lessons from the Critical Examination of Collaboration and Conflict in an Interorganizational Domain.” Organization Science 9 (2): 217–230. doi:10.1287/orsc.9.2.217.
  • Haug, C., D. Rucht, and S. Teune. 2013. “A Methodology for Studying Democracy and Power in Group Meetings.” In Meeting Democracy, edited by D. Della Porta and D. Rucht, 23–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Herberg, J. 2020. “Control before Collaborative Research – Why Phase Zero Is Not Co-Designed but Scripted.” Social Epistemology 3: 1–13.
  • Hoppe, R. 2011. “Institutional Constraints and Practical Problems in Deliberative and Participatory Policy Making.” Policy and Politics 39 (2): 163–186. doi:10.1332/030557310X519650.
  • Huxham, C. 1996. “Advantage or Inertia? Making Collaboration Work.” In The New Management Reader, edited by R. Paton, G. Clark, and G. Jones, 238–254. London: Routledge.
  • Huxham, C., and N. Beech. 2008. “Inter-Organizational Power.” In The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations, edited by S. Cropper, C. Huxham, M. Ebers, and P. S. Ring, 555–579. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Innes, J. E., and D. E. Booher. 2015. “A Turning Point for Planning Theory?: Overcoming Dividing Discourses.” Planning Theory 14 (2): 195–213. doi:10.1177/1473095213519356.
  • Kadlec, A., and W. Friedman. 2007. “Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of Power.” Journal of Public Deliberation 3 (1). Article 8.
  • Langley, A. 1999. “Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data.” The Academy of Management Review 24 (4): 691. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248.
  • Langley, A., C. Smallman, H. Tsoukas, and A. H. van de Ven. 2013. “Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity, and Flow.” The Academy of Management Journal 56 (1): 1–13. doi:10.5465/amj.2013.4001.
  • Lee C. W. 2015. Do-it-yourself democracy: The rise of the public engagement industry. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
  • Lee, C. W., M. McQuarrie, and E. T. Walker, eds. 2015. Democratizing Inequalities: Dilemmas of the New Public Participation. New York: New York University Press.
  • Levine, P., A. Fung, and J. Gastil. 2005. “Future Directions for Public Deliberation.” Journal of Public Deliberation 1 1 . Article 3
  • Lukes, S. 2005. Power: A Radical View. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Marshall, N., and J. Rollinson. 2004. “Maybe Bacon Had a Point: The Politics of Interpretation in Collective Sensemaking.” British Journal of Management 15 (S1): 71–86. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.00407.x.
  • Molinengo, G., and D. Stasiak. 2020. “Scripting, Situating, and Supervising. The Role of Artefacts in Collaborative Practices”. Sustainability, 12 (16): 6407
  • Molinengo, G., Stasiak, D., and R. Freeth. 2021. “Process expertise in policy advice. Designing collaboration in collaboration”. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8 (310): 1–12.
  • Morley, L. 2006. “Hidden Transcripts: The Micropolitics of Gender in Commonwealth Universities.” Women’s Studies International Forum 29 (6): 543–551. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2006.10.007.
  • Mouffe, C. 1999. “Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?” Social Research 66 (3): 745–758.
  • Nicolini, D. 2009. “Zooming in and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections.” Organization Studies 30 (12): 1391–1418. doi:10.1177/0170840609349875.
  • Purdy, J. M. 2012. “A Framework for Assessing Power in Collaborative Governance Processes.” Public Administration Review 72 (3): 409–417. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02525.x.
  • Rubinstein, R. A., S. Sanchez, and S. Lane. 2018. “Coercing Consensus? Notes on Power and the Hegemony of Collaboration.” In Conflict and Collaboration: For Better or Worse. Routledge Studies in Security and Conflict Management, edited by C. Gerard, and L. Kriesberg, 104–119, London: Routledge.
  • Sanders, L. M. 1997. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25 (3): 347–376. doi:10.1177/0090591797025003002.
  • Schatzki, T. R. 2002. The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • Schwartz-Shea, P., and D. Yanow. 2012. Interpretive Research Design: Concepts and Processes. Routledge Series on Interpretive Methods. New York: Routledge.
  • Tello-Rozas, S., M. Pozzebon, and C. Mailhot. 2015. “Uncovering Micro-Practices and Pathways of Engagement that Scale up Social-Driven Collaborations: A Practice View of Power.” Journal of Management Studies 52 (8): 1064–1096. doi:10.1111/joms.12148.
  • van der Arend, S., and J. Behagel. 2011. “What Participants Do. A Practice Based Approach to Public Participation in Two Policy Fields.” Critical Policy Studies 5 (2): 169–186. doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.576529.
  • Vandenbussche, L., J. Edelenbos, and J. Eshuis. 2020. “Plunging into the Process: Methodological Reflections on a Process-Oriented Study of Stakeholders’ Relating Dynamics.” Critical Policy Studies 14 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/19460171.2018.1488596.
  • Walker, E. T., M. McQuarrie, and C. W. Lee. 2015. “Rising Participation and Declining Democracy.” In Democratizing Inequalities: Dilemmas of the New Public Participation, edited by C. W. Lee, M. McQuarrie, and E. T. Walker, 3–26. New York: New York University Press.
  • Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage Publications.
  • Weick, K. E. 2001. Making Sense of the Organization. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Young, I. M. 2001. “Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy.” Political Theory 29 (5): 670–690. doi:10.1177/0090591701029005004.