The surrogacy question, unresolved: surrogacy policy debate as a hegemonic struggle over rights

References

• Andersen, U. C. 2013. “Offerposisjonens paradoks: Offentlig debatt om surrogati.” Tidskrift for Samfundsforskning 54 (1): 31–62. doi:10.18261/1504-291X-2013-01-02.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, A., S. Johnsdotter, B. Essén, and N. Gleicher. 2015. “Views of Swedish Commissioning Parents Relating to the Exploitation Discourse in Using Transnational Surrogacy.” PLoS ONE 10 (5): e0126518. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2000. “Suffering Rights as Paradoxes.” Constellations 7 (2): 230–241. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.00183.
   Google Scholar
• Canoilas, V. 2020. “Så gick surrogatmödraskap om utlandsadoptioner i Sverige.” Dagens Nyheter, 11 February 2020. https://www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/sa-gick-surrogatmodraskap-om-utlandsadoptioner-i-sverige/
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. 2003. “Ghostly Rights”. Cultural Critique 54 (2003 Spring): 148–177. DOI:10.1353/cul.2003.0031.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. 2004. “Giving up (On) Rights? the Future of Rights and the Project of Radical Democracy.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 185–200. doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00064.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edenborg, E. 2021. “Anti-Gender Politics as Discourse Coalitions: Russia’s Domestic and International Promotion of “Traditional Values”.” Problems of Post-Communism 1–10. doi:10.1080/10758216.2021.1987269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, K. E. 2010. Varat och varan: Prostitution, surrogatmödraskap och den delade människan. Stockholm: Leopard.
   Google Scholar
• Gondouin, J. 2018. “Reproducing Heteronormativity: Gay Parenthood and Transnational Surrogacy in Sweden.” In Transnationalising Reproduction: Third Party Conception in a Globalised World, edited by R. Ryan-Flood and J. Gunnarsson Payne, 107–121. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson Payne, J. 2018. “Fruktbara fantasier: Žižeks fantasibegrepp, barnlängtan och begärbara reproduktiva subjekt.” In Žižek som samtidsanalytiker, edited by Burman and Sjöholm. Tankekraft: Hägersten. 79–99.
   Google Scholar
• Gunnarsson Payne, J., S. Mezinska, and E. Korolczuk. 2020. “Surrogacy Relationships: A Critical Interpretative Review.” Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences 125 (2): 183–191. doi:10.1080/03009734.2020.1725935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. 1993. “Discourse Coalitions and the Institutionalization of Practice.” In The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, edited by F. Fischer and J. Forester, 43–76. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. 2006. “Doing Discourse Analysis: Coalitions, Practices, Meaning.” In Words Matter in Policy and Planning: Discourse Theory and Method in the Social Sciences, edited by M. Van den Brink and T. Metze, 65–76. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Urban and Regional Research.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. 2010. “Power, Discourse, and Policy: Articulating a Hegemony Approach to Critical Policy Studies.” Critical Policy Studies 3 (3–4): 309–335. doi:10.1080/19460171003619725.
   Google Scholar
• Jönsson, K. 2004. Det förbjudna mödraskapet: En moralfilosofisk undersökning av surrogatmödraskap. Lund: Bokbox förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Koch-Baumgarten, S., and K. Woltmer. 2010. “Introduction: Mass-Media and Public Policy – Is There a Link?” In Public Policy and the Mass Media: The Interplay of Mass Communication and Political Decision Making, edited by Koch-Baumgarten and Woltmer, 1–14. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 2005. On Populist Reason. London & New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lennerhed, L. 2008. Historier om ett brott: Illegala aborter i Sverige på 1900-talet. Stockholm: Atlas.
   Google Scholar
• Levold, N., M. Svingen, and M. Aune. 2019. “Stories of Creation: Governance of Surrogacy through Media.” Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies 7 (1): 4–17. doi:10.5324/njsts.v7i1.3066.
   Google Scholar
• Markens, S. 2012. “The Global Reproductive Health Market: U.S. Media Framings and Public Discourse about Transnational Surrogacy.” Social Science & Medicine 74 (11): 1745–1753. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MFoF. 2021. Kunskapsstöd till surrogatarrangemang i utlandet. Accessed 8 January 2022 https://www.mfof.se/
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2005. On the Political. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nebeling Petersen, M., C. Kroløkke, and L. Myong. 2017. “Dad and Daddy Assemblage: Resuturing the Nation through Transnational Surrogacy, Homosexuality, and Norweigan Exceptionalism.” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 23 (1): 83–112. doi:10.1215/10642684-3672312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordic Surrogacy. 2018. Surrogatarrangemang blir allt vanligare. https://www.nordicsurrogacy.se/nyheter/surrogatarrangemang-blir-allt-vanligare/
   Google Scholar
• Pande, A. 2010. “‘At Least I Am Not Sleeping with Anyone’: Resisting the Stigma of Commercial Surrogacy in India.” Feminist Studies 26 (2): 292–312.
   Google Scholar
• Rabinow, P. 2002. “Midst Anthropology’s Problems.” Cultural Anthropology 17 (2): 135–149. doi:10.1525/can.2002.17.2.135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rancière, J. 2004. “Who Is the Subject of the Rights of Man.” The South Atlantic Quarterly 103 (2–3): 297–310. doi:10.1215/00382876-103-2-3-297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, D. W., and D. Clemence. 2013. “Representations of Reproductive Citizenship and Vulnerability in Media Reports of Offshore Surrogacy.” Citizenship Studies 17 (8): 956–969. doi:10.1080/13621025.2013.851145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sera, J. M. 1997. “Surrogacy and Prostitution: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Gender, Social Policy and the Law 5 (2): 315–342.
   Google Scholar
• SOU Statens offentliga utredningar. 1985. Barn genom befruktning utanför kroppen: Betänkande av inseminationsutredningen 5: 33–34.
   Google Scholar
• SOU Statens offentliga utredningar. 2016. Olika vägar till föräldraskap. Slutbetänkande av Utredningen om olika möjligheter till behandling av ofrivillig barnlöshet. 11. https://www.regeringen.se/contentassets/e761299bb1a1405380e7e608a47b3656/olika-vagar-till-foraldraskap-sou-201611
   Google Scholar
• Statens Medicinsk-Etiska Råd (Smer) Assisterad befruktning – etiska aspekter. 2013. http://www.smer.se/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Smer_rapport_2013_1_webb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Teman, E. 2008. “The Social Construction of Surrogacy Research: An Anthropological Critique of the Psychosocial Scholarship on Surrogate Motherhood.” Social Science and Medicine 67 (7): 1104–1112. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teman, E. 2019. “The Power of the Single Story: Surrogacy and Social Media in Israel.” Medical Anthropology 38 (3): 282–294. doi:10.1080/01459740.2018.1532423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar