Policy ecology as concept and method

References

• Ahmed, S. 2012. On being Included Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. 2015. “Duality in Climate Science.” Nature Geoscience 8 (12): 898–900. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacchi, C. 2009. Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be? Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 1993. “What is Policy? Texts, Trajectories and Toolboxes.” Discourse 13 (2): 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2010. “Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/Continuities, SpaceTime Enfoldings, and Justice-To-Come.” Derrida Today 3 (2): 240–268.
   Google Scholar
• Borges, J. L. 1998. A Universal History of Infamy” In Collected Fictions. Translated by Andrew Hurley. New York: Viking Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Brenneis, D. 1994. “Discourse and Discipline at the National Research Council: A Bureaucratic Bildungsroman.” Cultural Anthropology 9 (1): 23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. Forthcoming. “Performing Like a State? Stateness, Sovereignty and the Illegal Immigrant.” Critical Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H. K. 2009. Policy. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• de la Cadena, M. 2021. “Not Knowing: In the Presence of …” In Experimenting with Ethnography: A Companion to Analysis, edited by Andrea Ballestero and Brit Ross Winthereik, 246–256. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 1989. Cinema II: The Time-Image. Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Robert Galeta Robert. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1994. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International. Translated by Peggy Kamuf. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Diamanti-Kandarakis, E., J.-P. Bourguignon, L. C. Giudice, R. Hauser, G. S. Prins, A. M. Soto, R. Thomas Zoeller, and A. C. Gore. 2009. “Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement.” Endocrine Reviews 30 (4): 293–342. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2009-0002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, R. Forthcoming. “Where is the Power? A Policy Ontologies Approach.” Critical Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Dumit, J. 2014. “Writing the Implosion: Teaching the World One Thing at a Time.” Cultural Anthropology 29 (2): 344–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, A. 1994. “On Cultural Anesthesia: From Desert Storm to Rodney King.” American Ethnologist 21 (2): 404–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth, M. 2022. “Policing in a Relational State: The Case of Sorcery Accusation-Related Violence in Papua New Guinea.” Policing & Society 32 (5): 611–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortier, A.-M. 2016. “The Psychic Life of Policy: Desire, Anxiety and ‘Citizenisation’ in Britain.” Critical Social Policy 37 (1): 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2011. The Government of Self and Others: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1982-1983. Translated by Graham Burchell. New York: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Göpfert, M. 2013. “Bureaucratic Aesthetics: Report Writing in the Nigérien Gendarmerie.” American Ethnologist 40 (2): 324–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, A. 1997. Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. 2015. The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy.
   Google Scholar
• Guattari, F. 2000. The Three Ecologies. Translated by Ian Pindar and Paul Sutton. London and New Brunswick, NJ: The Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T. B., and F. Stepputat. 2001. “Introduction: States of Imagination” In States of Imagination: Ethnographic Explorations of the Postcolonial State, edited by Thomas Blom Hansen and Finn Stepputat. 1–38. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. P. 2003. The Dominion of the Dead. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hightower-Weaver, M. 2008. “An Ecology Metaphor for Educational Policy Analysis: A Call to Complexity.” Educational Researcher 37 (3): 153–167. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08318050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchens, T. 2020. “Norm Setting and Transparency and Confidence-Building in Space Governance” In War and Peace in Outer Space: Law, Policy, and Ethics, edited by Cassandra Steer and Matthew Hersch, 55–90. New York: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197548684.003.0003.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, P. 2022. “Carceral Spectres: Hyperincarceration and the Haunting of Aboriginal Life.” The Australian Journal of Anthropology 33 (SI): 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/taja.12431.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. 2008. “Living Documents: A Feminist Psychosocial Approach to the Relational Politics of Policy Documentation.” Critical Social Policy 28 (4): 506–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018308095300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ialenti, V. 2021. “Drum Breach: Operational Temporalities, Error Politics and WIPP’s Kitty Litter Nuclear Waste Accident.” Social Studies of Science 51 (3): 364–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720986609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jameson, F. 2005. Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Langford, J. M. 2013. Consoling Ghosts: Stories of Medicine and Mourning from Southeast Asians in Exile. Michigan: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lea, T. 2020. Wild Policy: Indigeneity and the Unruly Logics of Intervention. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lendvai-Bainton, N., and P. Stubbs. “The Anthropology of Policy.” Oxford Research Encyclopaedias. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190854584.013.627.
   Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M. 2021. Pollution is Colonialism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowi, T. J., and B. Ginsburg. 1996. American Government: Freedom and Power. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, C. 2014. “Cars and Transport: The Car-Made City.” In Companion to Urban Anthropology, edited by D. M. Nonini, 142–153. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lynteris, C. 2013. “El estado como una relación social. Una crítica materialista antropológica.” Anthropology & Materialism. http://journals.openedition.org/am/291;.
   Google Scholar
• Marriott, J., and M. Minio-Paluello. 2014. “The Political and Material Landscape of European Energy Distribution: Tracking the Oil Road.” Theory, Culture & Society 31 (5): 83–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucchelli, F., and N. Novello Paglianti. 2022. “How to Remember a Place to Forget? The Semiotic Design of Deep Geological Nuclear Repositories, from Long-Term Communication to Memory Transmission.” Linguistic Frontiers 5 (3): 22–36.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. 2003. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Education Association. 2020. Preservation of Records, Knowledge and Memory (RK&M) Across Generations: Final Report of the RK&M Initiative. Paris: Radioactive Waste Management, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/50292bbb-en.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, C., and F. Haines. 2018. “An Ecological Approach to Regulatory Studies?” Journal of Law and Society 45 (1): 136–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povinelli, E. A. 2017. “Geontologies: The Concept and its Territories.” e-flux Journal: 81. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/81/123372/geontologies-the-concept-and-its-territories/.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, S. 2023. “Ocean Justice: Reckoning with Material Vulnerability.” Cultural Politics 19 (1): 107–127.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, C. J. 2019. “Solving the Plastic Problem: From Cradle to Grave, to Reincarnation.” Science Progress 102 (3): 218–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadaan, R., and M. Murphy. 2020. “Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) as Industrial and Settler Colonial Structures: Towards a Decolonial Feminist Approach.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 6 (1): 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. 2017. “The Ruse of Consent and the Anatomy of ‘Refusal’: Cases from Indigenous North America and Australia.” Postcolonial Studies 20 (1): 18–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, O. 2007. “Object Artifact, Image Artifacts and Conceptual Artifacts: Beyond the Object into the Event.” Artifact 1 (1): 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/17493460600610707.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, L. 2014. Life Beside itself: Imagining Care in the Canadian Arctic. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tarnoff, B. 2022. Internet for the People: The Fight for Our Digital Future. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Truscello, M. 2020. Infrastructural Brutalism: Art and the Necropolitics of Infrastructure. Cambridge MS: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zevin, A. 2023. “Gaza and New York.” New Left Review 144: 5–19. https://newleftreview.org/issues/ii144/articles/alexander-zevin-gaza-and-new-york.
   Google Scholar