Polarisation assessment in an intelligent argumentation system using fuzzy clustering algorithm for collaborative decision support

References

• Arvapally, R.S., Liu, X.F., and Jiang, W. (2012), ‘Identification of Faction Groups and Leaders in Web-Based Intelligent Argumentation System for Collaborative Decision Support’, Proceedings of International Conference on Collaborative Technologies and Systems. Denver, Colorado, USA, pp. 509–516.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., and McBurney, P. (2006), ‘PARMENIDES: Facilitating Deliberation in Democracies’, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 14(4), 261–275. doi: 10.1007/s10506-006-9001-5
   Google Scholar
• Bezdek, J.C. (1981), Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms, Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., and Jordan, M.I. (2003), ‘Latent Dirichlet Allocation’, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
   Google Scholar
• Centola, D., and Macy, M.W. (2007), ‘Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties’, American Journal of Sociology, 113, 702–734. doi: 10.1086/521848
   Google Scholar
• Conklin, J., and Begeman, B.L. (1988), ‘gIBIS: A Hypertext Tool for Exploratory Policy Discussion’, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Portland, Oregon, USA, 140–152.
   Google Scholar
• Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., and Harshman, R. (1990), ‘Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 391–407. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<391::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-9
   Google Scholar
• Du, N., Wu, B., Pei, X., Wang, B., and Xu, L. (2007), ‘Community Detection in Large-Scale Social Networks’, Proceedings of WebKDD and SNA-KDD, New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Dung, P.M. (1995), ‘On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games’, Artificial Intelligence, 77, 321–357. doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X
   Google Scholar
• Flache, A., and Macy, M.W. (2011), ‘Small Worlds and Cultural Polarization’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 34, 146–176. doi: 10.1080/0022250X.2010.532261
   Google Scholar
• Forgy, E. (1965), ‘Cluster Analysis of Multivariate Data: Efficiency vs. Interpretability of Classifications’, Biometrics, 21, 768–780.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, T.F., and Karacapilidis, N. (1997), ‘The Zeno Argumentation Framework’, Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on AI and Law, Melbourne, Australia, 10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M.S. (1973), ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. doi: 10.1086/225469
   Google Scholar
• Harton, H.C., Green, L.R., Jackson, C., and Latane, B. (2000), ‘Demonstrating Dynamic Social Impact: Consolidation, Clustering, Correlation, and (sometimes) the Correct Answer’, Handbook of Demonstrations and Activities in the Teaching of Psychology: Personality, Abnormal, Clinical, Counseling, and Social 3, second edition, M.E. Ware and D. Johnson, Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers, 255–259.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, T. (2001), ‘Unsupervised Learning by Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis’, Machine Learning, 42(1–2), 177–196. doi: 10.1023/A:1007617005950
   Google Scholar
• Karacapilidis, N. (2006), ‘CoPe_it!: Towards Augmenting Collaboration and Learning in Communities of Practice’, Workshop in Modelling Meetings, Argumentation and Discourse, in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, Liverpool. http://www.memetic-vre.net/MMAD/MMAD2006.Karacapilidis.pdf (accessed April 22, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Karacapilidis, N., and Papadias, D. (2001), ‘Computer Supported Argumentation and Collaborative Decision Making: The HERMES System’, Information Systems, 26, 259–277. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4379(01)00020-5
   Google Scholar
• Karacapilidis, N., Tzagarakis, M., Karousos, N., Gkotsis, G., Kallistros, V., Christodoulou, S., and Mettouris, C., (2009), ‘Tackling Cognitively-Complex Collaboration with CoPe_it!’, International Journal of Web-based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 4(3), 22–38. doi: 10.4018/jwbltt.2009090802
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M. (2010), ‘Using Metrics to Enable Large-Scale Deliberation’, Collective Intelligence in Organizations: A Workshop of the ACM Group, Sanibel Island, Florida. http://www.parc.com/content/events/attachments/Klein_Group10.pdf (accessed April 22, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M. (2012a), ‘How to Harvest Collective Wisdom on Complex Problems: An Introduction to the MIT Deliberatorium’, MIT Center for Collective Intelligence. http://cci.mit.edu/klein/papers/deliberatorium-intro.pdf accessed (December 30, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Klein, M. (2012b), ‘Enabling Large-Scale Deliberation Using Attention-Mediation Metrics’, Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 21, 449–473. doi: 10.1007/s10606-012-9156-4
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, S., Sycara, K., and Evenchik, A. (1998), ‘Reaching Agreements Through Argumentation: A Logical Model and Implementation’, Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 104(1–2), 1–69. doi: 10.1016/S0004-3702(98)00078-2
   Google Scholar
• Kunz, W., and Rittel, H. (1970), ‘IBIS: Issues as Elements of Information Systems’, Working paper 131. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley, California.
   Google Scholar
• Latane, B. (1981), ‘The Psychology of Social Impact’, American Psychologist, 36, 343–356. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343
   Google Scholar
• Latane, B. (1996), ‘Dynamic Social Impact: The Creation of Culture by Communication’, The Journal of Communication, 46, 13–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01501.x
   Google Scholar
• Latane, B., and Wolf, S. (1981), ‘The Social Impact of Majorities and Minorities’, Psychological Review, 88, 438–453. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.438
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X.F., Barnes, E.C., and Savolainen, J.E. (2012), ‘Conflict Detection and Resolution for Product Line Design in a Collaborative Decision Making Environment’, Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Seattle, Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X.F., Khudkhudia, E., and Leu, M. (2008), ‘Incorporation of Evidences into an Intelligent Computational Argumentation Network for a Web-Based Collaborative Engineering Design System’, Proceedings of International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems, Irvine, California, 376–382.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X.F., Khudkhudia, E., Wen, L., Sajja, V., and Leu, M. (2009), ‘An Intelligent Computational Argumentation System for Supporting Collaborative Software Development Decision Making’, Artificial Intelligence Applications for Improved Software Engineering Development, F. Meziane and S. Vadera, Hershey: IGI Global, 167–180.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X.F., Raorane, S., and Leu, M. (2007), ‘A Web-based Intelligent Collaborative System for Engineering Design’, Collaborative Product Design and Manufacturing Methodologies and Applications, W.D. Li, S.K. Ong, Y.C. Andrew, and C. McMohan, Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing, London, United Kindgom: Springer-Verlag, pp. 37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X.F., Wanchoo, R., and Arvapally, R.S. (2011), ‘Empirical Study of an Intelligent Argumentation System in MCDM’, The International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 125–133.
   Google Scholar
• Macqueen, J.B. (1967), ‘Some Methods for Classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations’, Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA: University of California Press, pp. 281–297.
   Google Scholar
• Macy, M.W., Kitts, J., Flache, A., and Benard, S. (2003), ‘Polarization in Dynamic Networks: A Hopfield Model of Emergent Structure’, Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers the national academies press, 162–173.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M.E.J. (2004), ‘Detecting Community Structure in Networks’, The European Physical Journal – Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 38, 321–330. doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2004-00124-y
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M.E.J., and Girvan, M. (2004), ‘Finding and Evaluating Community Structure in Networks’, Physical Review E, 69, 026113, pp. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Satyavolu, M. (2010), ‘Contribution-Based Priority Assessment in a Web-Based Intelligent Argumentation Network for Collaborative Software Development,’ Thesis, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla. http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/thesis/pdf/Satyavolu_09007dcc8082f337.pdf (accessed January 7, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Sillince, J.A.A. (1995), ‘A Model of Social, Emotional and Symbolic Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication within Organizations’, Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 4(1), 1–31. doi: 10.1007/BF00823361
   Google Scholar
• Sillince, J.A.A., and Saeedi, M.H. (1999), ‘Computer-Mediated Communication: Problems and Potentials of Argumentation Support Systems’, Journal of Decision Support Systems (DSS), Elsevier, 26, 287–306. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9236(99)00058-5
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, B., and Macy, M.W. (2004), ‘Power, Identity, and Collective Action in Social Exchange’, Social Forces 82(4), 1371–1409.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C.R. (1999), ‘The Law of Group Polarization’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 10, 175–195. doi: 10.1111/1467-9760.00148
   Google Scholar
• Takacs, K. (2005), ‘An Experimental Analysis of Network Segregation and Intergroup Conflict’, Review of Sociology, 11(1), 5–34. doi: 10.1556/RevSoc.11.2005.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. (1958), The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tzagarakis, M., Gkotsis, G., Hatzitaskos, M., Karousos, N., and Karacapilidis, N. (2009), ‘CoPe{_}it!: Argumentative Collaboration towards Learning’, Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices: CSCL 2009 Community Events Proceedings, A. Dimitracopoulou, C. O'Malley, D. Suthers, and P. Reimann, Greece: Rhodes, 126–128.
   Google Scholar
• Tzagarakis, M., Karousos, N., Gkotsis, G., Kallistros, V., Mettouris, C., Kyriakou, P., and Nousia, D. (2010), ‘From Collecting to Deciding: Facilitating the Emergence of Decisions in Argumentative Collaboration’, Web-Based Learning Solutions for Communities of Practice: Developing Virtual Environments for Social and Pedagogical Advancement, IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania, 128–142.
   Google Scholar
• Vennam, J.R., and Vadapalli, S. (2005), ‘Syndeca: A Tool to Generate Synthetic Datasets for Evaluation of Clustering Algorithms’, Proceedings of International Conference on Management of Data (COMAD 2005), Goa, India, 27–36.
   Google Scholar
• Vesic, S., Ianchuk, M., and Rubtsov, A. (2012), ‘The Synergy: A Platform for Argumentation-Based Group Decision Making’, Computational Models of Argument, B. Berheij, Vienna, Austria: IOS Press, 501–502.
   Google Scholar
• Vimal, A., Valluri, S.R., and Karlapalem, K. (2008a), ‘An Experiment with Distance Measures for Clustering’, Proceedings of International Conference on Management of Data (COMAD 2008), December 17–19. Mumbai, India, 241–244.
   Google Scholar
• Vimal, A., Valluri, S.R., and Karlapalem, K. (2008b), ‘An Experiment with Distance Measures for Clustering’, Technical Report IIIT/TR/2008/132, Center for Data Engineering, International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D.N., and Krabbe, E.C.W. (1995), ‘Commitment in Dialogue’, SUNY Press, 65–66.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, R. 2000, ‘CRISP-DM: Towards a Standard Process Model for Data Mining’, Proceedings of the Fourth International conference on the Practical Application of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, NY, USA, 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Wang, R.S., and Zhang, X.S. (2007), ‘Identification of Overlapping Community Structure in Complex Networks Using Fuzzy c-Means Clustering’, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 374, 483–490. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2006.07.023
   Google Scholar