Practices of visual communication in a primary school classroom: digital image collection as a potential semiotic mode

References

• Archer, A., and S. Stent. 2011. “Red Socks and Purple Rain: The Political Uses of Colour in Late Apartheid South Africa.” Visual Communication 10: 115–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S. M., and J. W. Gentry. 1996. “Kids as Collectors: A Phenomenological Study of First and Fifth Graders.” Advances in Consumer Research 23: 132–137.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. 1977. Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Bebell, D., L. M. O’Dwyer. 2010. “Educational Outcomes and Research from 1:1 Computing Settings.” The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment 9: 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J., and C. Jewitt. 2009. “Social Semiotics.” In Handbook of Pragmatics Online, edited by J.-O. Östman and J. Verschueren. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://benjamins.com/online/hop/.
   Google Scholar
• Björkvall, A. 2012a. “Artefakters betydelsepotentialer: En presentation av den sociosemiotiska etnografin som teori och metod.” [The Meaning Potentials of Artefacts: A Presentation of Social Semiotic Ethnography as Theory and Method]. In Nordisk socialsemiotik: Pædagogiske, multimodale og sprogvidenskabelige landvindinger, edited by T. Hestbæk Andersen and M. Boeriis, 59–88. (University of Southern Denmark studies in linguistics 22). Odense: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Björkvall, A. 2012b. “Multimodality.” In Handbook of Pragmatics Online, edited by J.-O. Östman and J. Verschueren, n. pag. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://benjamins.com/online/hop/.
   Google Scholar
• Björkvall, A. 2012c. “Text- och resursorientering inom multimodalitetsforskningen: En teoretisk diskussion om förklaringsvärden.” [Text and Resource Orientation in Multimodal Research: A Theoretical Discussion of Explanatory Values’, with summary in English]. Språk & Stil 22 (1): 135–161.
   Google Scholar
• Björkvall, A., and C. Engblom. 2010. “Young Children’s Exploration of Semiotic Resources during Unofficial Computer Activities in the Classroom.” Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 10: 271–293.
   Google Scholar
• Bulfin, S., and D. Koutsogiannis. 2012. “New Literacies as Multiply Placed Practices: Expanding Perspectives on Young people’s Literacies across Home and School.” Language and Education 26: 331–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danet, B., and T. Katriel. 1989. “No Two Alike: Play and Aesthetics in Collecting.” Play & Culture 2: 253–277.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. H. 2003. The Brothers and Sisters Learn to Write: Popular Literacies in Childhood and School Culture. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. 2004. “Critical Discourse Analysis in Researching Language in the New Capitalism: Overdetermination, Transdisciplinarity and Textual Analysis.” In Systemic Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis: Studies in Social Change, edited by L. Young and C. Harrison, 103–122. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Flewitt, R. 2011. “Bringing Ethnography to a Multimodal Investigation of Early Literacy in a Digital Age.” Qualitative Research 11: 293–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J., and D. Bloome. 1997. “Ethnography and Ethnographers of and in Education: A Situated Perspective.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching and Literacy through the Communicative and Visual Arts, edited by J. Flood, S. Brice Heath and D. Lapp, 181–202. Mahwah, N.J. and London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Jacknick, C. M. 2011. “Breaking in is Hard to Do: How Students Negotiate Classroom Activity Shift.” Classroom Discourse 2: 20–38.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. 2006. Technology, Literacy and Learning: A Multimodal Approach. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2011. “‘Partnerships in research’: Multimodality and Ethnography.” Qualitative Research 11: 239–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G., C. Jewitt, J. Bourne, A. Franks, J. Hardcastle, K. Jones, and E. Reid. 2005. English in Urban Classrooms: A Multimodal Perspective on Teaching and Learning. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen. 2006. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kroksmark, T. 2011. “Lärandets stretchadhet: Lärandets digitala mysterium i En-till-En-miljöer i skolan.” The “Stretchedness” of Learning: The Digital Mystery of Learning in “One-to-One” Contexts in School. Didaktisk Tidskrift 20: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, T. 2011. The Language of Colour: An Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C. 1992. “Activity Types and Language.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, edited by P. Drew and J. Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, D. 2004. “Building the world’s Visual Language: The Increasing Global Importance of Image Banks in Corporate Media.” Visual Communication 3: 316–336.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, D. 2009. “Multimodality and Theories of the Visual.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, edited by C. Jewitt, 181–190. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maybin, J. 2007. “Literacy under and over the Desk: Oppositions and Heterogeneity.” Language and Education 21: 515–530.
   Google Scholar
• Metz, C. 1974 [1971]. Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, M. 2011. The Language of Displayed Art. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl, K., and J. Rowsell. 2010. Artifactual Literacies: Every Object Tells a Story. New York and London: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weston, M. E., and A. Bain. 2010. “The End of Techno-Critique: The Naked Truth about 1:1 Laptop Initiatives and Educational Change.” The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment 9: 5–25.
   Google Scholar