Agreeing to disagree: ‘doing disagreement’ in assessed oral L2 interactions

References

• Alderson, J. C., E. Nagy, and E. Öveges, eds. 2000. English Language Education in Hungary. - Part II: Examining Hungarian learners’ Achievements in English. Budapest: The British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C., and K. Szollas. 2000. “The Context: The Current School-Leaving Examination.” In English Language Education in Hungary Part II: Examining Hungarian learners’ Achievements in English, edited by C. Alderson, E. Nagy, and E. Öveges, 9–21. Budapest: The British Council.
   Google Scholar
• Angouri, J., and F. Bargiela-Chiappini. 2011. “‘So What Problems Bother You and You Are Not Speeding up Your Work?’ Problem Solving Talk at Work.” Discourse & Communication 5 (3): 209–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angouri, J., and M. A. Locher. 2012. “Theorising Disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics 44: 1549–1553.10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. M., and P. Drew. 1979. Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bardovi-Harlig, K., and T. Salsbury. 2004. “The Organization of Turns in the Disagreements of L2 Learners: A Longitudinal Perspective.” In Studying Speaking to Inform Second Language Learning, edited by D. Boxer, and A. D. Cohen, 199–227. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Bolden, G. B. 2009. “Implementing Incipient Actions. The Discourse Marker ‘so’ in English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (5): 974–998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. 2005. Interviewer Variability in Oral Proficiency Interview. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., and S. Levinson. 1978. “Universals in Language Usage: Politness Phenomena.” In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, 56–310, edited by E. Goody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., and S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brumfit, C. 1984. Communicative Methodology in Language Teaching: The Roles of Fluency and Accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cazden, C. B. 2000. Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Chalhoub-Deville, M. 2003. “Second Language Interaction: Current Perspectives and Future Trends.” Language Testing 20 (4): 369–383.10.1191/0265532203lt264oa
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, W., and A. B. M. Tsui. 2009. “‘Ahh ((Laugh)) Well There is No Comparison between the Two I think’: How Do Hong Kong Chinese and Native Speakers of English Disagree with Each Other?” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (11): 2365–2380.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christie, F. 2002. Classroom Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, A. 1996. “The Discursive Accomplishment of Normality: On ‘Lingua franca’ English and Conversation Analysis.” Journal of Pragmatics 26 (2): 237–259.10.1016/0378-2166(96)00014-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimoto, D. 2010. “Agreements and Disagreements: The Small Group Discussion in a Foreign Language Classroom.” In Pragmatics and Language Learning, edited by G. Kasper, H. T. Nguyen, D. R. Yoshimi, and J. K. Yoshioka, 297–326. Manoa, Hawaii: National Foreign Language Rescourse Center (University of Hawaii at Manoa).
   Google Scholar
• Fulcher, G. 2003. Testing Second Language Speaking. London: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Fulcher, G., and F. Davidson. 2007. Language Testing and Assessment: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203449066
   Google Scholar
• Galaczi, E. D. 2008. “Peer–Peer Interaction in a Speaking Test: The Case of the First Certificate in English Examination.” Language Assessment Quarterly 5 (2): 89–119.10.1080/15434300801934702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgakopoulou, A. 2001. “Arguing about the Future: On Indirect Disagreements in Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (12): 1881–1900.10.1016/S0378-2166(00)00034-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgakopoulou, A., and M. Patrona. 2000. “Disagreements in Television Discussions: How Small Can Small Screen Arguments Be.” Pragmatics 10 (3): 323–338.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. 1983. “Aggravated Correction and Disagreement in Children’s Conversations.” Journal of Pragmatics 7: 657–677.10.1016/0378-2166(83)90089-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. 1990. He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, P. H. 2001. “A Problem-Solving Perspective on Knowledge Management Practices.” Decision Support Systems 31 (1): 87–102.10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00121-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greatbatch, D. 1992. “On the Management of Disagreement between News Interviewees.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, edited by P. Drew, and J. Heritage, 268–301. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hellermann, J. 2009. “Practices for Dispreferred Responses Using “No” by a Learner of English.” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL) 47: 95–126.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 1989. “Current Developments in Conversation Analysis.” In Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, edited by D. Roger, and P. Bull, 21–47. Avon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, E. 2010. “The Last Laugh: Shared Laughter and Topic Termination.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 1513–1525.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. E. 1995. Understanding Communication in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. 2001. The Art of Nonconversation: A Reexamination of the Validity of the Oral Proficiency Interview. Yale: Yale Univ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kangasharju, H. 1996. “Aligning as a Team in Multiparty Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 26: 291–319.10.1016/0378-2166(95)00051-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kangasharju, H. 2002. “Alignment in Disagreement: Forming Oppositional Alliances in Committee Meetings.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (10–11): 1447–1471.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00073-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Muntigl, P., and W. Turnbull. 1998. “Conversational Structure and Facework in Arguing.” Journal of Pragmatics 29 (3): 225–256.10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00048-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. 1989. Understanding Language Classrooms: A Guide for Teacher-Initiated Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., and E. Pochon-Berger. 2011. “Developing ‘methods’ for Interaction: A Cross-Sectional Study of Disagreement Sequences in French L2.” In L2 Interactional Competence and Development, edited by J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, and S. Pekarek Doehler, 206–244. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Pomerantz, A. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessment: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage, 75–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. 1987. “On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organization, edited by G. Button, and J. Lee, 54–69. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Sandlund, E., and P. Sundqvist. 2013. “Diverging Task Orientations in L2 Oral Proficiency Tests – a Conversation Analytic Approach to Participant Understandings of Pre-Set Discussion Tasks.” Nordic Journal of Modern Language Methodology 2 (1): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffrin, D. 1984. “Jewish Argument as Sociability.” Language in Society 13: 311–335.10.1017/S0047404500010526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. 2004. The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective Language Learning Monograph Series. Malden & Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P., and M. Egbert. 2006. “The Interactional Organisation of the IELTS Speaking Test.” IELTS Research Reports 6: 161–206.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, B. K. 2012. “Conceding in Disagreements during Small Group Interactions in Academic Writing Class.” Classroom Discourse 3 (1): 4–29.10.1080/19463014.2012.666024
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, B.K. 2013. “Enactment of Teacher Identity in Resolving Student Disagreements in Small Group Peer Interactions.” Linguistics and Education (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Statistik Austria. 2012. Statistisches Jahrbuch Österreichs 2013. Vienna: Statistik Austria. URL.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. 2008. “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation Through Storytelling: When Nodding is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57.10.1080/08351810701691123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., L. Mondada, and J. Steensig, eds. 2011. The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., M. Milanovic, and C. J. Weir, eds. 2011. Examining Speaking. Vol. 30 of Studies in Language Testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. 2006. Investigating Classroom Discourse. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. 2011. Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action Routledege Introductions to Applied Linguistics. London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. 2001. “Balancing the Competing Interests in Seminar Discussion: Peer Referencing and Asserting Vulnerability.” Issues in Applied Linguistics 12 (1): 29–50.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. 2005. “Peer Tutoring in a Graduate Writing Centre Identity Expertise and Advice Resisting.” Applied Linguistics 26 (2): 141–168.10.1093/applin/amh041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, R. 2009. Discursive Practice in Language Learning and Teaching. Wiley-Blackwell: Malden & Oxford.
   Google Scholar