Dropping the devil’s advocate: One novice language tester’s shifting interactional practices across a series of speaking tests

References

• Beach, Wayne, and Terrir Metzger. 1997. “Claiming Insufficient Knowledge.” Human Communication Research 23 (4): 562–588. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1997.tb00410.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonk, William, and Gary Ockey. 2003. “A Many-Facet Rasch Analysis of the Second Language Group Oral Discussion Task.” Language Testing 20 (1): 89–110. doi:10.1191/0265532203lt245oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Lindsay. 2009. “Interacting in Pairs in a Test of Oral Proficiency: Co-Constructing a Better Performance.” Language Testing 26 (3): 341–366. doi:10.1177/0265532209104666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, Catherine, and Johannes Wagner. 2004. “Developmental Issues in Second Language Conversation.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 1 (1): 29–47. doi:10.1558/japl.1.1.29.55873.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Annie. 2003. “Interviewer Variation and the Co-Construction of Speaking Proficiency.” Language Testing 20 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1191/0265532203lt242oa.
   Google Scholar
• Chalhoub-Deville, Micheline, and Glenn Fulcher. 2003. “The Oral Proficiency Interview: A Research Agenda.” Foreign Language Annals 36 (4): 498–506. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb02139.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, W. Martin. 2007. “Cognitive Contours: Recent Work on Cross-Cultural Psychology and Its Relevance for Education.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 26 (1): 13–42. doi:10.1007/s11217-006-9012-4.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Larry. 2009. “The Influence of Interlocutor Proficiency in a Paired Oral Assessment.” Language Testing 26 (3): 367–396. doi:10.1177/0265532209104667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devil’s advocate [Def. 1]. (n.d.). Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. Accessed August 6, 2015. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/devil’s-advocate
   Google Scholar
• Drew, Paul. 2013. “Turn Design.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 131–149. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118325001.ch7.
   Google Scholar
• Fujimoto, Donna. 2010. “Agreements and Disagreements: The Small Group Discussion in a Foreign Language Classroom.” In Pragmatics and Language Learning, edited by Gabriele Kasper, Hanh Thi Nguyen, Dina Yoshimi, and Jim Yoshioka, 297–326. Manoa, Hawaii: National Foreign Language Resource Center (University of Hawaii at Manoa).
   Google Scholar
• Galaczi, Evelina. 2008. “Peer–Peer Interaction in a Speaking Test: The Case of the First Certificate in English Examination.” Language Assessment Quarterly 5 (2): 89–119. doi:10.1080/15434300801934702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, Zhengdong. 2010. “Interaction in Group Oral Assessment: A Case Study of Higher- and Lower-Scoring Students.” Language Testing 27 (4): 585–202. doi:10.1177/0265532210364049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, Tim, and Hitomi Potter. 2008. “Turn-taking Practices in Multi-Party EFL Oral Proficiency Tests.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 5 (3): 297–320. doi:10.1558/japl.v5i2.297.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Charles. 1979. “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, edited by George Psathas, 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, Joan Kelly, John Hellermann, and Simona Pekarek Doehler, eds. 2011. L2 Interactional Competence and Development, 147–172. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, John. 2012. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosoda, Yuri. 2014. “Missing Response after Teacher Question in Primary School English as a Foreign Language Classes.” Linguistics and Education 28: 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2014.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hüttner, Julia. 2014. “Agreeing to Disagree: ‘Doing Disagreement’ in Assessed Oral L2 Interactions.” Classroom Discourse 5 (2): 194–215. doi:10.1080/19463014.2014.893897.
   Google Scholar
• Ishida, Midori. 2011. “Engaging in Another Person’s Telling as a Recipient in L2 Japanese: Development of Interactional Competence during One-Year Study Abroad.” In L2 Learning as Social Practice: Conversation-Analytic Perspectives, edited by Gabriele Pallotti and Johannes Wagner, 45–85. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Marysia, and Andrea Tyler. 1998. “Re-Analyzing the OPI: How Much Does It Look like Natural Conversation?” In Talking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency, edited by Richard Young and Agnes Weiyun He, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kanno, Yasuko, and Christian Stuart. 2011. “Learning to Become a Second Language Teacher: Identities-in-Practice.” The Modern Language Journal 95 (2): 236–252. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01178.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasper, Gabriele. 2013. “Managing Task Uptake in Oral Proficiency Interviews.” In Assessing Second Language Pragmatics, edited by Steven Ross and Gabriele Kasper, 258–287. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, Gabriele, and Steven Ross. 2007. “Multiple Questions in Oral Proficiency Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 2045–2070. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Lazaraton, Anne. 1996. “Interlocutor Support in Oral Proficiency Interviews: The Case of CASE.” Language Testing 13: 151–172. doi:10.1177/026553229601300202.
   Google Scholar
• Lazaraton, Anne, and Larry Davis. 2008. “A Microanalytic Perspective on Discourse, Proficiency, and Identity in Paired Oral Assessment.” Language Assessment Quarterly 5 (4): 313–335. doi:10.1080/15434300802457513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Yo-An, and John Hellermann. 2014. “Tracing Developmental Changes through Conversation Analysis: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis.” TESOL Quarterly 48 (4): 763–788. doi:10.1002/tesq.149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Seung-Hee, Jae-Eun Park, and Sung-Ock Sohn. 2011. “Expanded Responses of English-Speaking Korean Heritage Speakers during Oral Interviews.” In L2 Learning as Social Practice: Conversation-Analytic Perspectives, edited by Gabriele Pallotti and Johannes Wagner, 87–104. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, Gene, Galina Bolden, Alexa Hepburn, and Jenny Mandelbaum. 2012. “Reference Recalibration Repairs: Adjusting the Precision of Formulations for the Task at Hand.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (2): 191–212. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.674190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, Gene, and Celia Kitzinger. 2015. “Or -Prefacing in the Organization of Self-Initiated Repair.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48 (1): 58–78. doi:10.1080/08351813.2015.993844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Yongcan, and Linda Fisher. 2006. “The Development Patterns of Modern Foreign Language Student Teachers’ Conceptions of Self and Their Explanations about Change: Three Cases.” Teacher Development 10 (3): 343–360. doi:10.1080/13664530600922203.
   Google Scholar
• MacDougall, Colin, and Frances Baum. 1997. “The Devil’s Advocate: A Strategy to Avoid Groupthink and Stimulate Discussion in Focus Groups.” Qualitative Health Research 7 (4): 532–541. doi:10.1177/104973239700700407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, Margaret. 2003. “Research on the Oral Proficiency Interview: Analysis, Synthesis, and Future Directions.” Foreign Language Annals 36 (4): 491–497.10.1111/flan.2003.36.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markee, Numa. 2008. “Toward a Learning Behavior Track Methodology for CA-for-SLA.” Applied Linguistics 29 (3): 404–427. doi:10.1093/applin/amm052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markee, Numa. 2011. “Doing, and Justifying Doing, Avoidance.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 602–615. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, Junko. 1999. Negotiating Agreement and Disagreement in Japanese: Connective Expressions and Turn Construction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sidag.8
   Google Scholar
• Okada, Yusuke, and Tim Greer. 2013. “Pursuing a Relevant Response in Oral Proficiency Interview Role Plays.”’ In Assessing Second Language Pragmatics, edited by Steven Ross and Gabriele Kasper, 288–310. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Prichard, Caleb. 2004. “Enabling English Students to Be Active Participants in Discussions.” JALT 2003 Proceedings, 104–111. doi: http://jalt-publications.org/archive/proceedings/2003/E055.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, Geoffrey. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68: 939–967. doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/151975210.2307/1519752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, Jack. 2008. “Second Language Teacher Education Today.” RELC Journal 39 (2): 158–177. doi:10.1177/0033688208092182.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, Steven, and Gabriele Kasper, eds. 2013. Assessing Second Language Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. doi:10.2307/412243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandlund, Erica, and Pia Sundqvist. 2011. “Managing Task-Related Trouble in L2 Oral Proficiency Tests: Contrasting Interaction Data and Rater Assessment.” Novitas Royal: Research on Youth and Language 5 (1): 91–120. doi: http://www.novitasroyal.org/Vol_5_1/sandlund_sundqvist.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sandlund, Erica, and Pia Sundqvist. 2013. “Diverging Task Orientation in L2 Oral Proficiency Tests - a Conversation Analytic Approach to Participant Understandings of Pre-Set Discussion Tasks.” Nordic Journal of Modern Language Methodology 1 (2): 1–21. doi: http://journal.uia.no/index.php/NJMLM/article/view/71#.VcyNBJlwYdU
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, Emanuel. 2007. Sequence Organisation in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, Paul, and Maria Egbert. 2006. “The Interactional Organisation of the IELTS Speaking Test.” IELTS Research Reports 6: 161–206. doi: https://ielts.org/pdf/Volume%206,%20Report%206.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, Paul, and Andrew Harris. 2011. “Topic Development in the IELTS Speaking Test.” IELTS Research Reports 12: 69–124. doi: https://www.ielts.org/pdf/Vol12_Report2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sert, Olcay, and Paul Seedhouse. 2011. “Introduction: Conversation Analysis in Applied Linguistics.” Novitas Royal: Research on Youth and Language 5 (1): 1–14. doi: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED529384.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, Bal. 2012. “Conceding in Disagreements during Small Group Interactions in Academic Writing Class.” Classroom Discourse 3 (1): 4–28. doi: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19463014.2012.666024#.VdM53JlwYdU10.1080/19463014.2012.666024
   Google Scholar
• Van Moere, Alistair. 2006. “Validity Evidence in a University Group Oral Test.” Language Testing 23 (4): 411–440. doi:10.1191/0265532206lt336oa.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, Steve. 2002. “Construction or Obstruction: Teacher Talk and Learner Involvement in the EFL Classroom.” Language Teaching Research 6 (1): 3–23. doi:10.1191/1362168802lr095oa.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, Steve, and Li Li. 2013. “Conversations as Space for Learning.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 23 (2): 247–266. doi:10.1111/ijal.12005.
   Google Scholar
• Watzke, John. 2007. “Foreign Language Pedagogical Knowledge: Toward a Developmental Theory of Beginning Teacher Practices.” Modern Language Journal 91 (1): 63–82. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00510.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, Richard, and Agnes Weiyun He. 1998. Talking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/sibil
   Google Scholar