Rethinking language teacher training: steps for making talk-in-interaction research accessible to practitioners

References

• Allen, L. Q. 2002. “Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs and the Standards for Foreign Language Learning.” Foreign Language Annals 35 (5): 518–529. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.2002.tb02720.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almarza, G. 1996. “Student Foreign Language Teachers’ Growth.” In Teacher Learning in Language Teaching, edited by D. Freeman and J. C. Richards, 50–78. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. 2012. “ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines 2012.” Accessed 22 March 2019. https://www.actfl.org/publications/guidelines-and-manuals/actfl-proficiency-guidelines-2012
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. 1999. “Why Do L2 Teachers Need to ‘Know about Language’? Teacher Metalinguistic Awareness and Input for Learning.” Language and Education 13 (3): 161–177. doi:10.1080/09500789908666766.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. 2001. “The Language Awareness of the L2 Teacher: Its Impact upon Pedagogical Practice.” Language Awareness 10 (2–3): 75−90. doi:10.1080/09658410108667027.
   Google Scholar
• Barcelos, A., and P. Kalaja. 2011. “Beliefs about SLA Revisited.” System 39 (3): 281–416. doi:10.1016/j.system.2011.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardovi-Harlig, K., and B. S. Hartford, eds. 1997. Beyond Methods: Components of Language Teacher Education. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Barraja-Rohan, A.-M. 1997. “Teaching Conversation and Sociocultural Norms with Conversation Analysis.” Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 14 (Series S): 71–88.
   Google Scholar
• Barraja-Rohan, A.-M. 2011. “Using Conversation Analysis in the Second Language Classroom to Teach Interactional Competence.” Language Teaching Research 15 (4): 479–507. doi:10.1177/1362168811412878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barraja-Rohan, A.-M., and C. R. Pritchard. 1997. Beyond Talk: A Course in Communication and Conversation Skills for Intermediate Adult Learners of English. Melbourne: Western Melbourne Institute of TAFE.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, W., and D. G. Dunning. 1982. “Pre-Indexing and Conversational Organization.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 68 (2): 170–185. doi:10.1080/00335638209383602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendig, I., E. Betz, and T. Huth. 2016. “‘weil – Das ist eben doch richtig so.’ Teaching variant types of weil- and obwohl-structures in German.” Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 49 (2): 214–227. doi:10.1111/tger.12013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, E., and T. Huth. 2014. “Beyond Grammar: Teaching Interaction in the German Language Classroom.” Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German 47 (2): 140–163. doi:10.1111/tger.10167.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S. 2003. “Teacher Cognition in Language Teaching: A Review of Research on What Language Teachers Think, Know, Believe, and Do.” Language Teaching 36: 81–109. doi:10.1017/S0261444803001903.
   Google Scholar
• Borg, S. 2009. Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Brandl, K. 2008. Communicative Language Teaching in Action: Putting Principles to Work. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., H. Roediger, and M. McDaniel. 2014. Make It Stick. The Science of Successful Learning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cabaroglu, N., and J. Roberts. 2000. “Development in Student Teachers’ Pre-Existing Beliefs during a 1-Year PGCE Programme.” System 28 (3): 387–402. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00019-1.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, L. 1999. “Operationalising ‘Metaphor’ for Applied Linguistic Research.” In Researching and Applying Metaphor, edited by L. Cameron and G. Low, 3–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A. 2007. “A Child’s Development of Interactional Competence in A Swedish L2 Classroom.” The Modern Language Journal 91 (1): 45–62. doi:10.1111/modl.2007.91.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cortazzi, M., and L. Jin. 1999. “Bridges to Learning: Metaphors of Teaching, Learning and Language.” In Researching and Applying Metaphor, edited by L. Cameron and G. Low, 149–176. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: CUP. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Framework_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. 2018. “The CEFR Companion Volume (Provisional Edition).” https://www.coe.int/en/web/education/-/the-cefr-companion-volume-with-new-descriptors-is-now-available-online-?desktop=false
   Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E., and M. Selting. 2018. Interactional Linguistics. Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, C., M. Sadler, J. H. Ha, and P. Ojiambo. 2013. “Beyond the Methods Course: Using Exploratory Practice for Graduate Student Teacher Development.” In Educating the Future Foreign Language Professoriate for the 21st Century. AAUSC Issues in Language Program Direction, edited by H. W. Allen and H. Maxim, 107–127. Boston: Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, C. 2015. “Exploratory Practice in the FL Teaching Methods Course: A Case Study of Three Graduate Student Instructors’ Experiences.” L2 Journal 7 (2): 1–23. doi:10.5070/L27224444.
   Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A., and S. Günthner. 2015. Temporality in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M., and N. J. Enfield. 2015. “Other-Initiated Repair across Languages: Towards a Typology of Conversational Structures.” Open Linguistics 1: 96–118. doi:10.2478/opli-2014-0007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, M., S. G. Roberts, J. Baranova, J. Blythe, P. Drew, S. Floyd, R. S. Gisladottir, et al. 2015. “Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems.” PLoS One 10 (9): e0136100. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaghue, H. 2003. “An Instrument to Elicit Teachers’ Beliefs and Assumptions.” ELT Journal 57 (4): 344–351. doi:10.1093/elt/57.4.344.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P. 1997. “‘Open’ Class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Troubles in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 28: 69–101. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(97)89759-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfield, N. J. 2006. “Social Consequences of Common Ground.” In Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, edited by N. Enfield and S. Levinson, 399–430. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S. W. 2017. “From Form-Meaning Pairings to Action-Construction Pairings: The Mutually Constitutive Nature of Linguistic Constructions and Social Action in L2.” Plenary talk delivered at ICOP-L2 2017, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S. W., and J. Wagner. 2013. “Recurring and Shared Gestures in the L2 Classroom: Resources for Teaching and Learning.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics 1 (1): 139–161. doi:10.1515/eujal-2013-0007.
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, S. W., and J. Wagner. 2015. “Embodied L2 Construction Learning.” Language Learning 65 (2): 419–448. doi:10.1111/lang.12106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasel Lauzon, V., and S. Pekarek Doehler. 2013. “Focus on Form as a Joint Accomplishment: An Attempt to Bridge the Gap between Focus on Form Research and Conversation Analytic Research on SLA.” IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 51 (4): 323–351. doi:10.1515/iral-2013-0014.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, L. 2017. “Researching Learners’ and Teachers’ Beliefs about Language Learning Using Metaphor.” In Discourse and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, edited by S. Wortham, D. Kim, and S. May, 329–339. 3rd ed. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, B. B. 2001. “Bilingual Education Teachers’ Beliefs and Their Relation to Self- Reported Practices.” Bilingual Research Journal 25 (3): 251–275. doi:10.1080/15235882.2001.10162795.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, B., F. Wouk, S. Fincke, W. Hernandez Flores, M. Hayashi, M. Laakso, Y. Maschler, et al. 2017. “Morphological Self-Repair: Self-Repair within the Word.” Studies in Language 41 (3): 638–665. doi:10.1075/sl.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, B., S. Maschler, and S. Uhmann. 2010. “A Cross-Linguistic Study of Self-Repair: Evidence from English, German and Hebrew.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2487–2505. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2010.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, D., and J. Richards, eds. 1996. Teacher Learning in Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, P. 2010. Attitudes to Language. Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golato, A. 2003. “Studying Compliment Responses: A Comparison of DCTs and Recordings of Naturally Occurring Talk.” Applied Linguistics 24 (1): 90–121. doi:10.1093/applin/24.1.90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Charles. 1987. “Forgetfulness as an Interactive Resource.” Social Psychology Quarterly 50 (2): 115–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. K. 2018. “From L2 Interactional Competence to L2 Interactional Repertoires: Reconceptualizing the Objects of L2 Learning.” Classroom Discourse 8 (1): 25–39. doi:10.1080/19463014.2018.1433050.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. K., J. Hellerman, and S. Pekarek Doehler, eds. 2011. L2 Interactional Competence and Development. Clevedon: Multilingual.
   Google Scholar
• Harren, I., and M. Raitaniemi. 2008. “The Sequential Structure of Closings in Private German Phone Calls.” GespräChsforschung 9: 198–223.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, V., and M. Morek. 2015. “Unterrichtsgespräche als Erwerbskontext: Kommunikative Gelegenheiten für bildungssprachliche Praktiken erkennen und nutzen.” Leseforum 3: 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Hellermann, J. 2009. “Practices for Dispreferred Responses Using No by a Learner of English.” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 47: 95–126. doi:10.1515/iral.2009.005.
   Google Scholar
• Huensch, A. 2017. “How the Initiation and Resolution of Repair Sequences Act as a Device for the Co-Construction of Membership and Identity.” Pragmatics and Society 8 (3): 355–376. doi:10.1075/ps.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huth, T. forthcoming. “Conceptualizing Interactional Learning Targets for the Second Language Curriculum.” In Classroom-Based Conversation Analytic Research: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Pedagogy, edited by S. Kunitz, N. Markee, and O. Sert. Heidelberg: Springer (Educational Linguistics series).
   Google Scholar
• Huth, T., and C. Taleghani-Nikazm. 2006. “How Can Insights from Conversation Analysis Be Directly Applied to Teaching L2 Pragmatics?” Language Teaching Research 10 (1): 53–79. doi:10.1191/1362168806lr184oa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, Gail. 1974. “Error Correction as an Interactional Resource.” Language in Society 3 (2): 181–199. doi:10.1017/S0047404500004334.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G. 1997. “The Role of Pragmatics in Language Teaching Education.” In Beyond Methods: Components of Second Language Education, edited by K. Bardovi-Harlig, 113–136. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Kotthoff, H. 2013. “Grundlagen der Gesprächsanalyse und ihre schulische Relevanz.” In Sprach- und Mediendidaktik, edited by H.-W. Huneke, 108–125. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
   Google Scholar
• Kumaravadivelu, B. 2006. Understanding Language Teaching: From Method to Postmethod. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kupetz, M. 2018. “Gesprächsanalytische Unterrichtsforschung als Möglichkeit einer kasuistischen Lehrer*innenbildung im Bereich sprachsensibler Fachunterricht.” In Sprache im Unterricht – Ansätze, Konzepte, Methoden, edited by A. Rohde, J. Hoffmann, C. Caruso and K. Schick, 49–67. Trier: WVT.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Theoretical Prerequisites. Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, D., and M. Anderson. 2011. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and B. VanPatten. 2003. Making Communicative Language Teaching Happen. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. 2006. “Cognition at the Heart of Human Interaction.” Discourse Studies 8 (1): 85–93. doi:10.1177/1461445606059557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., and S. Walsh. 2011. “‘Seeing Is Believing’: Looking at EFL Teachers’ Beliefs through Classroom Interaction.” Classroom Discourse 2 (1): 39–57. doi:10.1080/19463014.2011.562657.
   Google Scholar
• Loewen, S. 2014. Introduction to Instructed Second Language Acquisition. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maheux-Pelletier, G., and A. Golato. 2008. “The Organization of Repair and Membership Categorization in French.” Language in Society 37 (5): 689–712. doi:10.1017/S0047404508080998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell Atkinson, J., and J. Heritage. 1984. Structures of Social Action. London, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2014. “The Local Constitution of Multimodal Resources for Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 65: 137–156. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L., and V. Traverso. 2015. “Beyond Orality: Interaction and Multimodality.” In Varieties of Spoken French: A Source Book, edited by S. Detey, J. Durand, B. Laks, and C. Lyche, 108–119. Oxford: Oxford University. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, I. 2010. “Strukturelle Probleme der Unterrichtskommunikation.” In Kommunikation im Unterricht. Besser kommunizieren lernen, edited by M. Trautmann and J. Sacher, 167–184. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., and E. Pochon-Berger. 2011. “Developing “Methods” for Interaction: Disagreement Sequences in French L2.” In L2 Interactional Competence and Development, edited by J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, and S. P. Doehler, 206–243. Bristol: Multilingual.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., and E. Pochon-Berger. 2015. “The Development of L2 Interactional Competence: Evidence from Turn-Taking Organization, Sequence Organization, Repair Organization and Preference Organization.” In Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning, edited by T. Cadierno and S. W. Eskildsen, 233–268. Berlin: DeGruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Pekarek Doehler, S., and E. Berger. 2016. “L2 Interactional Competence as Increased Ability for Context- Sensitive Conduct: A Longitudinal Study of Story-Openings.” Applied Linguistics 39 (4): 555–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roever, C. 2018. “Assessing Interactional Competence: Features, Scoring, and Practicality.” Keynote address delivered at the conference Assessing speaking in context: New trends, Houston, TX: CLIC, Rice University.
   Google Scholar
• Roever, C., and G. Kasper. 2018. “Speaking in Turns and Sequences: Interactional Competence as a Target Construct in Testing Speaking.” Language Testing 35 (3): 331–355. doi:10.1177/0265532218758128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, G. 2014. “When Do People Not Use Language to Make Requests?” In Requesting in Social Interaction, edited by P. Drew and E. Couper-Kuhlen, 303–334. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. 1995. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 1987. “Between Micro and Macro: Contexts and Other Connections.” In The Micro-Macro Link, edited by J. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch, and N. Smelser, 207–234. Berkeley: UC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., and H. Sacks. 1973. “Opening up Closings.” Semiotica 8 (4): 289–327. doi:10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289.
   Google Scholar
• Schieffelin, B., and E. Ochs, eds. 1986. Language Socialization across Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schieffelin, B. B., K. A. Woolard, and P. V. Kroskrity, eds. 1998. Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics. Vol. 16. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmenk, B. 2015. “Grammatik. Macht. Sprache. Teach as you were taught und die Ordnung des DaF- Unterrichts.” Informationen Deutsch als Fremdsprache 42 (1): 25–42. doi:10.1515/infodaf-2015-0104.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. 2005. “Conversation Analysis and Language Learning.” Language Teaching 38 (4): 165–187. doi:10.1017/S0261444805003010.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P., S. Walsh, and C. Jenks, eds. 2010. Conceptualizing Learning in Applied Linguistics. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O. 2015. Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O., and P. Seedhouse, eds. 2011. “Special Issue: Conversation Analysis in Applied Linguistics.” Novitas-ROYAL 5 (1): 1–168.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. 2010. Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J., and T. Stivers. 2012. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Skovholt, K. 2018. “Anatomy of a Teacher–Student Feedback Encounter.” Teaching and Teacher Education 69: 142–153. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skovholt, K., M. S. Solem, T. Moser, E. Stokoe, and R. O. Sikveland. 2018. CAiTE – Conversation Analytic Innovation for Teacher Education. Poster Presented at ICCA 2018. Loughborough, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. 2011. “Simulated Interaction and Communication Skills Training: The “Conversation Analytic Role-Play Method.” In Applied Conversation Analysis: Changing Institutional Practices, edited by C. Antaki, 119–139. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Stokoe, E. 2014. “The Conversation Analytic Role-Play Method (CARM): A Method for Training Communication Skills as an Alternative to Simulated Role-Play.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 47 (3): 255–265. doi:10.1080/08351813.2014.925663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., C. Goodwin, and C. LeBaron, eds. 2011. Embodied Interaction: Language and Body in the Material World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taleghani-Nikazm, C. 2015. “Multimodality and Coordinated Participation in L2 Interaction.” In Dialogue in Multilingual and Multimodal Communities, edited by D. Koike and C. Blyth, 79–107. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Tschirner, E., ed. 2012. Aligning Frameworks of Reference in Language Testing: The ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines and the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, J., S. Pekarek Doehler, and E. González-Martínez. 2018. “Longitudinal Research on the Organization of Social Interaction: Current Developments and Methodological Challenges.” In Longitudinal Studies on the Organization of Social Interaction, edited by S. Pekarek Doehler, J. Wagner, and E. González-Martínez, 3–35. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. 2012. “Conceptualizing Classroom Interactional Competence.” Novitas-ROYAL 6 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Wardhaugh, R. 1999. Proper English: Myths and Misunderstandings about Language. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. 2018. “Teaching L2 Interactional Competence: Problems and Possibilities.” Classroom Discourse 1 (9): 57–67. doi:10.1080/19463014.2018.1434082.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M., and R. Burden. 1997. Psychology for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J. 2002. “‘Applying’ Conversation Analysis in Applied Linguistics: Evaluating Dialogue in English as a Second Language Textbooks.” IRAL 40: 37–60. doi:10.1515/iral.2002.003.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J., and H. Z. Waring. 2010. Conversation Analysis and Second Language Pedagogy. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. 1996. Teacher Cognition in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, R. 2011. “Interactional Competence in Learning, Teaching, and Testing.” In Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning, edited by E. Hinkel, 426–443. Vol. II. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar