The indexical nature of classroom discourse: the role of technology integration

References

• Agresti, A. 2007. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R., and J. M. Gottman. 1997. Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: UK.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T. R., S. Battersby, S. W. Bednarz, A. M. Bodzin, B. Kolvoord, S. Moore, D. Sinton, and D. Uttal. 2015. “A Research Agenda for Geospatial Technologies and Learning.” Journal of Geography 114 (3): 118–130. doi:10.1080/00221341.2014.950684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M., and Y. Kong. 2017. “Reasoning Words as Linguistic Features of Exploratory Talk: Classroom Use and What It Can Tell Us.” Discourse Processes 54 (1): 62–81. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2015.1095596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. 2005. “Learning by Design: Good Video Games as Learning Machines.” E-Learning and Digital Media 2 (1): 5–16. doi:10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.5.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, R. M., and B. Baffour. 2017. “The Effects of Teacher-Introduced Multimodal Representations and Discourse on Students’ Task Engagement and Scientific Language during Cooperative, Inquiry-Based Science.” Instructional Science 45 (4): 493–513. doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9414-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. L., and C. N. Dixon. 2002. “Exploring Differences in Perspectives on Microanalysis of Classroom Discourse: Contributions and Concerns.” Applied Linguistics 23 (3): 393–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. 1998. “Boosting, Hedging and the Negotiation of Academic Knowledge.” Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 18 (3): 349–382. doi:10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349.
   Google Scholar
• Jansche, M. 2003, July. “Parametric Models of Linguistic Count Data.” In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Vol. 1, 288–295. Sapporo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. E., D. L. Schallert, Y. Park, S. Lee, Y. H. V. Chiang, A. C. J. Cheng, K. Song, H. N. R. Chu, T. Kim, and H. Lee. 2012. “Expressing Uncertainty in Computer-Mediated Discourse: Language as a Marker of Intellectual Work.” Discourse Processes 49 (8): 660–692. doi:10.1080/0163853X.2012.722851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschmann, T., G. Stahl, and A. Zemel. 2014. “The Video Analyst’s Manifesto (Or the Implications of Garfinkel’s Policies for the Development of a Program of Video Analytic Research within the Learning Sciences).” In Video Research in the Learning Sciences, edited by R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barorn, and S. J. Denny, 133–143. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O. 2017. “Common Core State Standards for ELA/literacy and Next Generation Science Standards: Convergences and Discrepancies Using Argument as an Example.” Educational Researcher 46 (2): 90–102. doi:10.3102/0013189X17699172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-A. 2004. “The Work of Examples in Classroom Instruction.” Linguistics and Education 15: 99–120. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2004.10.003.
   Google Scholar
• Levstik, L. S. 2008. “What Happens in Social Studies Classrooms.” In Levstik, L and Tyson, C (Eds.), Handbook of Research in Social Studies Education, 50–62. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C. Y. 2012. “Modifiers in BASE and MICASE: A Matter of Academic Cultures or Lecturing Styles?” English for Specific Purposes 31 (2): 117–126. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2011.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle, S. 2008. “Dialogic Teaching: Discussing Theoretical Contexts and Reviewing Evidence from Classroom Practice.” Language and Education 22 (3): 222–240. doi:10.1080/09500780802152499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, B. P. 1999. “Simple and Flexible SAS and SPSS Programs for Analyzing Lag-Sequential Categorical Data.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31 (4): 718–726. doi:10.3758/BF03200753.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W., V. L. Akerson, H. Colak, K. Pongsanon, and A. Genel. 2012. “The Implicit Communication of Nature of Science and Epistemology during Inquiry Discussion.” Science Education 96 (4): 652–684. doi:10.1002/sce.v96.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, A. D., A. L. Ponomarenko, and S. C. Brown. 2006. “A Fifth Grader’s Guide to the World.” Science and Children 43 (8): 24.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M. 2014. “Science Language Wanted Alive: Through the Dialectical/Dialogical Lens of Vygotsky and the Bakhtin Circle.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (8): 1049–1083. doi:10.1002/tea.21158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W., A. J. Kwako, A. Modrek, and J. Kawasaki. 2018, July. “Patterns of Classroom Talk through Participation in Discourse-Focused Teacher Professional Development.” Proceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Vol. 2. London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, E. K. 2007. “Using Geographic Information System (GIS) Technology to Enhance Elementary Students’ Geographic Understanding.” Theory & Research in Social Education 35 (2): 231–255. doi:10.1080/00933104.2007.10473334.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M., J. Radinsky, and S. R. Goldman. 2008. “The Role of Gesture in Meaning Construction.” Discourse Processes 45 (4–5): 365–386. doi:10.1080/01638530802145601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabak, I., and E. Baumgartner. 2004. “The Teacher as Partner: Exploring Participant Structures, Symmetry, and Identity Work in Scaffolding.” Cognition and Instruction 22 (4): 393–429. doi:10.1207/s1532690Xci2204_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 1999. Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Socio-Cultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: UK.
   Google Scholar