A case study of two South Korean middle school EFL teachers’ practices: instructional stances and use of classroom materials

References

• Bloome, D., S. P. Carter, B. M. Christian, S. Otto, and N. Shuart-Faris. 2005. Discourse Analysis and the Study of Classroom Language and Literacy Events: A Microethnographic Perspective. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bloome, D., and A. Egan-Roberton. 1993. “The Social Construction of Intertextuality in Classroom Reading and Writing Lessons.” Reading Research Quarterly 28 (4): 304–333. doi:10.2307/747928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M., and D. Rubin. 2006. “How Contingent Questioning Promotes Extended Student Talk: A Function of Display Questions.” Journal of Literacy Research 38 (2): 141–169. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3802_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd, M. P., and W. C. Markarian. 2015. “Dialogic Teaching and Dialogic Stance: Moving beyond Interactional Form.” Research in the Teaching of English 49 (3): 272–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossley, S. A., M. M. Louwerse, P. M. McCarthy, and D. S. McNamara. 2007. “A Linguistic Analysis of Simplified and Authentic Texts.” The Modern Language Journal 91 (1): 15–30. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00507.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, N. W., K. James Hartshorn, and N. J. Anderson. 2010. “A Principled Approach to Content-based Materials Development for Reading.” In English Language Teaching Materials: Theory and Practice, edited by N. Harwood, 131–156. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flecha, R. 2011. “The Dialogic Sociology of Education.” International Studies in Sociology of Education 21 (1): 7–20. doi:10.1080/09620214.2011.543849.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E. 1993. Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. 2010. “Listening as Process: Learning Activities for Self-appraisal and Self-regulation.” In English Language Teaching Materials: Theory and Practice, edited by N. Harwood, 179–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guerrettaz, A. M., and B. Johnston. 2013. “Materials in the Classroom Ecology.” The Modern Language Journal 97 (3): 779–796. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12027.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haneda, M. 2006. “Classrooms as Communities of Practice: A Reevaluation.” TESOL Quarterly 40 (4): 807–817. doi:10.2307/40264309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haneda, M., B. Sherman, F. N. Bose, and A. Teemant. 2019. “Ways of Interacting: What Underlies Instructional Coaches’ Discursive Actions.” Teaching and Teacher Education 78 (1): 165–173. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.11.017.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood, N. 2010. English Language Teaching Materials: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jakonen, T. 2015. “Handling Knowledge: Using Classroom Materials to Construct and Interpret Information Requests.” Journal of Pragmatics 89: 100–112. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffries, S. 1985. “English Grammar Terminology as an Obstacle to Second Language Learning.” Modern Language Journal 69 (4): 385–390. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1985.tb04809.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, L. G. 1996. “Child Development Knowledge and Teacher Preparation: Confronting Assumptions.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 11 (2): 135–146. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(96)90002-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozulin, A. 1998. Psychological Tools: A Sociocultural Approach to Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, B., S. Lee, C. Kim, K. Mira, and S. Kim. 2019. Middle School English 2. Seoul: Donga.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. N. F., and A.-M. Bathmaker. 2007. “The Use of English Textbooks for Teaching English to ‘Vocational’ Students in Singapore Secondary Schools: A Survey of Teachers’ Beliefs.” RELC Journal 38 (3): 350–374. doi:10.1177/0033688207085852.
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, K., and N. Mercer. 2013. Interthinking: Putting Talk to Work. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, Y. 2019. “Material Moments: Teacher and Student Use of Materials in Multilingual Writing Classroom Interactions.” The Modern Language Journal 103 (1): 179–204. doi:10.1111/modl.12547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. 1979. “‘What Time Is It, Denise’: Asking Known Information Questions in Classroom Discourse.” Theory into Practice 18 (4): 285–294. doi:10.1080/00405847909542846.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 2007. “Sociocultural Discourse Analysis: Analysing Classroom Talk as a Social Mode of Thinking.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 1 (2): 137–168. doi:10.1558/japl.v1.i2.137.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. 2002. “Introduction to Qualitative Research.” In Qualitative Research in Practice: Examples for Discussion and Analysis, edited by S. B. Merriam, 3–17. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, J. C. 1984. “Typicality and the Case Study.” In Ethnographic Research: A Guide to General Conduct, edited by R. F. Ellen, 237–241. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nassaji, H., and G. Wells. 2000. “What’s the Use of ‘Triadic Dialogue’?: An Investigation of Teacher-student Interaction.” Applied Linguistics 21 (3): 376–406. doi:10.1093/applin/21.3.376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., and T. S. Rodgers. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubdy, R. 2003. “Selection of Materials.” In Developing Materials for Language Teaching, edited by B. Tomlinson, 37–57. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Rymes, B. 2009. Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Tool for Critical Reflection. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sipe, L. R. 2001. “A Palimpsest of Stories: Young Children’s Construction of Intertextual Links among Fairytale Variants.” Literacy Research and Instruction 40 (4): 333–352.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., L. Mondada, and J. Steensig. 2011. “Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Social Interaction.” The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation 2011: 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland, J., M. Cowley, F. A. Rahim, C. Leontzakou, and J. Shattuck. 2000. “From Bias ‘In the Text’ to ‘Teacher Talk around the Text’: An Exploration of Teacher Discourse and Gendered Foreign Language Textbook Texts.” Linguistics and Education 11 (3): 251–286. doi:10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00034-6.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, B. 2008. English Language Learning Materials: A Critical Review. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Tribble, C. 2010. “A Genre-based Approach to Developing Materials for Writing.” In English Language Teaching Materials: Theory and Practice, edited by N. Harwood, 157–178. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. 2003. Understanding Expertise in Teaching: Case Studies of Second Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Lier, L. 2004. The Ecology and Semiotics of Language Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. London: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1986. Though and Language. Trans. Alex Kozulin. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. 2011. Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. 2009. “Moving Out of IRF (Initiation‐response‐feedback): A Single Case Analysis.” Language Learning 59 (4): 796–824. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00526.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. 1999. Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Socio-cultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G., and R. M. Arauz. 2006. “Dialogue in the Classroom.” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (3): 379–428. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar