Pursuing student response through incomplete syntax, prosody, bodily- and visuo-orthographical resources in Chinese-as-a-second-language classrooms

References

• Abreu Fernandes, O., and H. Melander Bowden. 2022. “Designedly Incomplete Utterances as Prompts for Co-Narration in Home Literacy Events with Young Multilingual Children.” Linguistics and Education 71:101089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrup, M. 2019. “‘Well Let Me Put it Uhm the Other Way Around maybe’: Managing Students’ Trouble Displays in the CLIL Classroom.” Classroom Discourse 10 (1): 46–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2019.1567360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer, P. 2005. “Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar.” Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 25 (1): 7–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7.
   Google Scholar
• Auer, P. 2009a. “Online-Syntax: Thoughts on the Temporality of Spoken Language.” Language Sciences 31 (1): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer, P. 2009b. “Projection and Minimalistic Syntax in Interaction.” Discourse Processes 46 (2–3): 180–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aus der Wieschen, M. V., and O. Sert. 2021. “Divergent Language Choices and Maintenance of Intersubjectivity: The Case of Danish EFL Young Learners.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 24 (1): 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1447544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaman, U. 2019. “Sequential Organization of Hinting in Online Task-Oriented L2 Interaction.” Text & Talk 39 (4): 511–534. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-2038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., and D. Weenink. 2023. “Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer Program]. Version 6.4.01. 30 November, http://www.praat.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Bolden, G. B. 2003. “Multiple modalities in collaborative turn sequences.” Gesture 3 (2): 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.3.2.04bol.
   Google Scholar
• Chao, Y. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chazal, K. 2015. “Pedagogical Artifacts in Teacher-Initiated Response Pursuits: A Conversation Analytic Study of Interaction in the French Foreign Language Classroom.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chazal, K. 2020. “Multimodal Mechanisms for Mobilizing Students to Give Pre-Structured Responses in French L2 Classroom Interaction.” In Mobilizing Others: Grammar and Lexis within Larger Activities, edited by C. Taleghani-Nikazm, E. Betz, and P. Golato, 175–201. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P. 1999. Modern Chinese: History and Sociolinguistics. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier, F. H. G. 2008. “Unfinished Turns in French Conversation: How Context Matters.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevalier, F. H. G., and R. Clift. 2009. “Unfinished Turns in French Conversation: Projectability, Syntax and Action.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (10): 1731–1752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C. 2007. “Teacher Questioning in Science Classrooms: Approaches That Stimulate Productive Thinking.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (6): 815–843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, E., and M. Selting. 2001. “Introducing Interactional Linguistics.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, edited by M. Selting and E. Couper-Kuhlen, 1–22. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira, A. W. 2009. “Teacher-Student Interaction: The Overlooked Dimension of Inquiry-Based Professional Development.” Ph.D. dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P. 2004. “Conversation Analysis.” In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, edited by K. L. Fitch and R. E. Sanders, 71–102. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Duran, D., and C. M. Jacknick. 2020. “Teacher Response Pursuits in Whole Class Post-Task Discussions.” Linguistics and Education 56:100808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, D., and N. Mercer. 1987. Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classroom. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203095287.
   Google Scholar
• ELAN (Version 6.7) [Computer software]. 2023. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, the Language Archive. Accessed November 30 from https://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elan.
   Google Scholar
• Etehadieh, E., and J. Rendle-Short. 2016. “Intersubjectivity or Preference: Interpreting Student Pauses in Supervisory Meetings.” Australian Journal of Linguistics 36 (2): 172–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2015.1121529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, C. E., S. A. Thompson, and V. Drake. 2012. “Bodily-Visual Practices and Turn Continuation.” Discourse Processes 49 (3–4): 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2012.654761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, B. A., and S. A. Thompson. 2010. “Responses to Wh-Questions in English Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (2): 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351811003751680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. 2012. “Conversation Analysis in the Classroom Context.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Sidnell and T. Stivers, 593–611. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 1979. “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, edited by G. Psathas, 97–121. New York: Irvington Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2007. “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse & Society 18 (1): 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2013. “The Co-Operative, Transformative Organization of Human Action and Knowledge.” Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2018. Co-Operative Action. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139016735.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., and C. Goodwin. 1986. “Gesture and Co-Participation in the Activity of Searching for a Word.” Semiotica 62 (1–2): 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., and J. Heritage. 1990. “Conversation Analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19 (1): 283–307. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.001435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. H. 1963. Universals of Language. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. K. 2019. “The Contributions of Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics to a Usage‐Based Understanding of Language: Expanding the Transdisciplinary Framework.” The Modern Language Journal 103 (S1): 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12535.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M. 1999. “Where Grammar and Interaction Meet: A Study of Co-Participant Completion in Japanese Conversation.” Human Studies 22 (2): 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005492027060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M. 2003a. Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M. 2003b. “Language and the Body as Resources for Collaborative Action: A Study of Word Searches in Japanese Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 36 (2): 109–141. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3602_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M., and J. Mori. 1998. “Co-Construction in Japanese Revisited: We Do ‘Finish Each other’s sentences’.” In Japanese/Korean Linguistics 7, edited by N. Akatsuka, H. Hoji, S. Iwasaki, S. Sohn, and S. Strauss, 77–93. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
   Google Scholar
• Hosoda, Y. 2014. “Missing Response After Teacher Question in Primary School English as a Foreign Language Classes.” Linguistics and Education 28:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwasaki, S. 2009. “Initiating Interactive Turn Spaces in Japanese Conversation: Local Projection and Collaborative Action.” Discourse Processes 46 (2–3): 226–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902728918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacknick, C. M. 2021. Multimodal Participation and Engagement. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by G. H. Lerner, 13–31. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Käänta, L. 2010. “Teacher Turn-Allocation and Repair Practices in Classroom Interaction: A Multisemiotic Perspective.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Keevallik, L. 2013. “The Interdependence of Bodily Demonstrations and Clausal Syntax.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 46 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.753710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, S. 2013. Understanding the Dynamics of Classroom Communication. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Koshik, I. 2002. “Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 35 (3): 277–309. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam Hoang, T. G., and A. Filipi. 2016. “In Pursuit of Understanding and Response: A Microanalysis of Language Alternation Practices in an EFL University Context in Vietnam.” The Language Learning Journal 47 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1221439.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. A. 2007. “Third Turn Position in Teacher Talk: Contingency and the Work of Teaching.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (1): 180–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. 1991. “On the Syntax of Sentences-In-Progress.” Language in Society 20 (3): 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500016572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H. 1995. “Turn Design and the Organization of Participation in Instructional Activities.” Discourse Processes 19 (1): 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, G. H., and T. Takagi. 1999. “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in the Organization of Talk-In-Interaction: A Co-Investigation of English and Japanese Grammatical Practices.” Journal of Pragmatics 31 (1): 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00051-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. 2014. “Leaning and Recipient Intervening Questions in Mandarin Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 67:34–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. 2016. “Some Interactional Uses of Syntactically Incomplete Turns in Mandarin Conversation.” Chinese Language and Discourse: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 7 (2): 237–271. https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.7.2.03li.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X. 2019a. “Multimodal Turn Construction in Mandarin Conversation – Verbal, Vocal, and Visual Practices in the Construction of Syntactically Incomplete Turns.” In Multimodality in Chinese Interaction, edited by X. Li and T. Ono, 181–212. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110462395-008.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X. 2019b. “Researching Multimodality in Chinese Interaction: A Methodological Account.” In Multimodality in Chinese Interaction, edited by X. Li and T. Ono, 24–62. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110462395-003.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X. 2021. “Multimodal Practices for Negative Assessments as Delicate Matters: Incomplete Syntax, Facial Expressions, and Head Movements.” Open Linguistics 7 (1): 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2020-0164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. N., and S. A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Local, J. 2005. “On the Interactional and Phonetic Design of Collaborative Completions.” In A Figure of Speech: A Festschrift for John Laver, edited by W. Hardcastle and J. M. Beck, 263–282. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Long, M. H. 1980. “Input, Interaction, and Second Language Acquisition.” Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California at Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Margutti, P. 2006. “‘Are You Human beings?’ Order and Knowledge Construction Through Questioning in Primary Classroom Interaction.” Linguistics and Education 17 (4): 313–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.12.002.
   Google Scholar
• Margutti, P. 2010. “On Designedly Incomplete Utterances: What Counts as Learning for Teachers and Students in Primary Classroom Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (4): 315–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2010.497629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mchoul, A. 1978. “The Organization of Turns at Formal Talk in the Classroom.” Language in Society 7 (2): 183–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. 1979a. Learning Lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. 1979b. “‘What Time Is It, Denise?’: Asking Known Information Questions in Classroom Discourse.” Theory into Practice 18 (4): 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405847909542846.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. 1995. The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2018. “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L., and S. Pekarek Doehler. 2004. “Second Language Acquisition as Situated Practice: Task Accomplishment in the French Second Language Classroom.” The Modern Language Journal 88 (4): 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-15-.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, K. 2008. “Selecting Next Speaker in the Second Language Classroom: How to Find a Willing Next Speaker in Planned Activities.” Applied Linguistics 5 (1): 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v5i1.55.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, K. 2009. “Establishing Recipiency in Pre-Beginning Position in the Second Language Classroom.” Discourse Processes 46 (5): 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902959463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, C. 2004. “Forms and Uses of the Palm Up Open Hand: A Case of a Gesture Family?” In The Semantics and Pragmatics of Everyday Gestures, edited by C. Müller and R. Posner, 233–256. Berlin: Weidler.
   Google Scholar
• Netz, H. 2016. “Designedly Incomplete Utterances and Student Participation.” Linguistics and Education 33:56–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsher, D. 2004. “Talk and Gesture: The Embodied Completion of Sequential Actions in Spoken Interaction.” In Second Language Conversations, edited by R. Gardner and J. Wagner, 221–245. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Ono, T., and S. A. Thompson. 1996. “Interaction and Syntax in the Structure of Conversational Discourse: Collaboration, Overlap, and Syntactic Dissociation.” In Computational and Conversational Discourse. NATO ASI Series, edited by E. H. Hovy and D. R. Scott, 67–96. Vol. 151. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Park, I., and J. Kline. 2020. “Incomplete utterances as critical assessments.” Discourse Studies 22 (4): 441–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620914669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, R. 2017. “Fill-In-The-Blank Questions in Interaction: Incomplete Utterances as a Resource for Doing Inquiries.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 50 (3): 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2017.1340698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacks, H. 1992. Lectures on Conversation, Volumes I & II. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, H., E. A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 1968. “Sequencing in Conversational Openings 1.” American Anthropologist 70 (6): 1075–1095. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 1984. “On Some Gestures, Relation to Talk.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 266–295. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seedhouse, P. 2004. The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Selting, M., P. Auer, D. Barth-Weingarten, J. R. Bergmann, P. Bergmann, K. Birkner, E. Couper-Kuhlen, et al. 2009. “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2).” Gesprächsforschung - Online-Zeitschrift Zur Verbalen Interaktion 10:353–402. https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/record/2472604.
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O. 2015. Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/j.ctt1g09vt3.
   Google Scholar
• Sikveland, R. O., and R. Ogden. 2012. “Holding Gestures Across Turns: Moments to Generate Shared Understanding.” Gesture 12 (2): 166–199. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.12.2.03sik.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, J., and M. Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., and F. Rossano. 2010. “Mobilizing Response.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (1): 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810903471258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., and J. Sidnell. 2005. “Introduction: Multimodal Interaction.” Semiotica 2005 (156): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J. 2009. Gesturecraft: The Manu-Facture of Meaning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., C. Goodwin, and C. LeBaron. 2011. “Embodied Interaction in the Material World: An Introduction.” In Embodied Interaction: Language and the Body in the Material World, edited by J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, and C. LeBaron, 1–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, J., and U. Hartge. 1992. “Previews: Gestures at the Transition Place.” In The Contextualization of Language, edited by P. Auer and A. D. Luzio, 135–157. John Benjamins Publishing: Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, C. 2006. Chinese: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szczepek, B. 2000a. Formal Aspects of Collaborative Productions in English Conversation. InList-Interaction and Linguistic Structures, Vol. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Szczepek, B. 2000b. Functional Aspects of Collaborative Productions in English Conversation. InList-Interaction and Linguistic Structures, Vol. 21.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. A., B. A. Fox, and E. Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar in Everyday Talk. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381154.
   Google Scholar
• Walper, K., D. Reed, and H. Marsden. 2023. “Designedly Incomplete Elicitations: Teachers’ Multimodal Practices to Mobilise Student-Next Action in Chilean Secondary EFL Classrooms.” Classroom Discourse 14 (1): 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2021.1920997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. 2003. “Developing Interactional Awareness in the Second Language Classroom Through Teacher Self-Evaluation.” Language Awareness 12 (2): 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410308667071.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S. 2006. Investigating Classroom Discourse. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. Forthcoming. “The Interplay of Designedly Incomplete Utterances and Representational Gestures in Chinese As a Second Language Classrooms.” In At the Crossroads Between Grammar and Multimodality: Resources for Interaction. Bulletin suisse de linguistique appliquée, edited by S. Fiedler, L. Janin, and M. Juillet. Neuchâtel: Université de Neuchâtel.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., and X. Li. Forthcoming. “Using Syntactically Incomplete Structures and Visual Signs to Request students’ Knowledge Display in CSL Classrooms: A Multimodal Perspective.” In Researching and Teaching the Chinese Language in Canada - a Festschrift in Honor of Dr. Shu-Ning Sciban, edited by W. Cai. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. 2011. “Learner Initiatives and Learning Opportunities in the Language Classroom.” Classroom Discourse 2 (2): 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2011.614053.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. 2015. “Promoting Self-Discovery in the Language Classroom.” International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 53 (1): 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2015-0003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, D. 2011. Lectures on Grammar. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
   Google Scholar