820
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Analyzing educational interactions: exploring the methodological breadth

Developing student-teachers’ interactional competence through video-enhanced reflection: a discursive timeline analysis of negative evaluation in classroom interaction

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 01 Nov 2023, Accepted 26 Mar 2024, Published online: 08 May 2024

References

  • Agar, M. 1994. Language Shock: Understanding the Culture of Conversation. New York: William Morrow.
  • Agar, M., M. R. Agar, W.-K. Soo, T. To, and J. L. Phillips. 2006. “An Ethnography by Any Other name… Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research.” 7 (4): 616–627. Accessed May 19, 2021. http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs.
  • Aşık, A., O. Sert, and P. Miller. 2024. “The Affordances of a Mobile Video-Tagging Tool for Evaluating Presentation Skills in a Second Language.” Reflective Practice 25 (2): 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2024.2305878.
  • aus der Wieschen, M. V., and O. Sert. 2021. “Divergent Language Choices and Maintenance of Intersubjectivity: The Case of Danish EFL Young Learners.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 24 (1): 107–123.
  • Balaman, U. 2019. “Sequential Organization of Hinting in Online Task-Oriented L2 Interaction.” Text & Talk 39 (4): 511–534.
  • Bell, B., and J. Gilbert. 1994. “Teacher Development as Professional, Personal, and Social Development.” Teaching and Teacher Education 10 (5): 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(94)90002-7.
  • Bozbıyık, M., O. Sert, and K. Dilek Bacanak. 2021. “VEO-Integrated IMDAT in Pre-Service Language Teacher Education: A Focus on Change in Teacher Questioning Practices.” In Video Enhanced Observation for Language Teaching: Reflection and Professional Development, edited by P. Seedhouse, 97–116. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Bruneel, S., and E. Vanassche. 2021. “Conceptualising Triadic Mentoring As Discursive Practice: Positioning Theory and Frame Analysis.” European Journal of Teacher Education 46 (4): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1985456.
  • Carpenter, L. B. 2023. “Supporting Student–Teacher Development of Elicitations Over Time: A Conversation Analytic Intervention.” Classroom Discourse 14 (2): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2021.1946112.
  • Castanheira, M. L., T. Crawford, C. N. Dixon, and J. L. Green. 2000. “Interactional Ethnography: An Approach to Studying the Social Construction of Literate Practices.” Linguistics and Education 11 (4): 353–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00032-2.
  • Çelik, S., E. Baran, and O. Sert. 2018. “The Affordances of Mobile-App Supported Teacher Observations for Peer Feedback.” International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 10 (2): 36–49. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2018040104.
  • Daşkın, N. C., and Ç. Hatipoğlu. 2019. “Reference to a Past Learning Event in Teacher Turns in an L2 Instructional Setting.” Journal of Pragmatics 142: 16–30.
  • Ding, A. C. E., K. Glazewski, and F. Pawan. 2022. “Language Teachers and Multimodal Instructional Reflections During Video-Based Online Learning Tasks.” Technology, Pedagogy & Education 31 (3): 293–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2030790.
  • Duran, D., and O. Sert. 2019. “Preference Organization in English as a Medium of Instruction Classrooms in a Turkish Higher Education Setting.” Linguistics and Education 49:72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2018.12.006.
  • Duran, D., and O. Sert. 2021. “Student-Initiated Multi-Unit Questions in EMI Classrooms.” Linguistics and Education 65:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100980.
  • Eskildsen, S. W., and A. R. Majlesi. 2018. “Learnables and Teachables in Second Language Talk: Advancing a Social Reconceptualization of Central SLA Tenets. Introduction to the Special Issue.” The Modern Language Journal 102 (S1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12462.
  • Evans, L. 2002. “What Is Teacher Development?” Oxford Review of Education 28 (1): 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980120113670.
  • Farrell, T. S., and L. Baecher. 2017. Reflecting on Critical Incidents in Language Education: 40 Dilemmas for Novice TESOL Professionals. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Gaudin, C., and S. Chaliès. 2015. “Video Viewing in Teacher Education and Professional Development: A Literature Review.” Educational Research Review 16:41–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.06.001.
  • Green, J. L., W. D. Baker, M. M. Chian, C. Vanderhoof, L. Hooper, G. J. Kelly, A. Skukauskaite, and M. Z. Kalainoff. 2020. “Studying the Over-Time Construction of Knowledge in Educational Settings: A Microethnographic Discourse Analysis Approach.” Review of Research in Education 4 (1): 161–194. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903121.
  • Grossman, P. “Collecting Evidence of Instruction with Video and Observation Data in NCES Surveys.” Prepared for the National Academy of Education’s Workshop to Examine Current and Potential Uses of NCES Longitudinal Surveys by the Education Research Community, Washington, DC, November 2014.
  • Gynne, A., M. Larsson, and O. Sert. 2022. “Digitaliserad Reflektion Och lärares Agerande I Klassrumsinteraktion. [Digitalized Reflection and teachers’ Actions in Classroom Interaction.” In Didaktikens språk – om skolundervisningens mål, innehåll och form, edited by A. Nordin and M. Uljens, 171–180. Malmö: Gleerups.
  • Hall, J. K. 2018. “From L2 Interactional Competence to L2 Interactional Repertoires: Reconceptualising the Objects of L2 Learning.” Classroom Discourse 9 (1): 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1433050.
  • Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
  • Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., M. D. Steele, and M. Cirillo. 2013. “(Developing) Teacher Discourse Moves: A Framework for Professional Development.” Mathematics Teacher Educator 1 (2): 181–196. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteaceduc.1.2.0181.
  • Hidson, E. 2018. “Video-Enhanced Lesson Observation As a Source of Multiple Modes of Data for School Leadership: A Videographic Approach.” Management in Education 32 (1): 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020617748144.
  • Ingram, J., F. Baldry, and A. Pitt. 2013. “The Influence of How Teachers Interactionally Manage Mathematical Mistakes on the Mathematics That Students Experience.” In Proceedings of the 8th Congress of the European Society of Research in Mathematics Education, Antalya, Turkiye (pp. 1487–1495).
  • Ishino, M. 2022. “Teachers’ Embodied Mitigation Against Allocating Turns to Unwilling Students.” Classroom Discourse 13 (4): 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2021.1918194.
  • Jacknick, C. M. 2011. ““But This Is writing”: Post-Expansion in Student-Initiated Sequences.” Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 5 (1): 39–54.
  • Jackson, D. O., and M. Cho. 2018. “Language Teacher Noticing: A Socio-Cognitive Window on Classroom Realities.” Language Teaching Research 22 (1): 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816663754.
  • Jakonen, T. 2018. “Retrospective Orientation to Learning Activities and Achievements as a Resource in Classroom Interaction.” The Modern Language Journal 102 (4): 758–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12513.
  • Jederud, S., J. Rytzler, and P. Lindqvist. 2021. “Learning to Teach As a Two-Sided Endeavor: Mentors’ Perceptions of Paired Practicum in Initial Teacher Education.” Teaching Education 33 (4): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2021.1978967.
  • Jefferson, G. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by G. H. Lerner, 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Jenks, C. 2010. “Adaptation in Online Voice-Based Chat Rooms: Implications for Language Learning in Applied Linguistics.” In Conceptualising ‘Learning’in Applied Linguistics, edited by P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh and C. Jenks, 147–162. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Jons, L. 2019. “The Supportive Character of Teacher Education Triadic Conferences: Detailing the Formative Feedback Conveyed.” European Journal of Teacher Education 42 (1): 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2018.1550065.
  • Kaufmann, O. T., M. Larsson, and A. Ryve. 2022. “Teachers’ Error-Handling Practices within and Across Lesson Phases in the Mathematics Classroom.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 21 (4): 1289–1314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10294-2.
  • Kazemi, E., and A. Hintz. 2014. Intentional Talk: How to Structure and Lead Productive Mathematical Discussions. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
  • Kim, Y., and R. E. Silver. 2016. “Provoking Reflective Thinking in Post Observation Conversations.” Journal of Teacher Education 67 (3): 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116637120.
  • König, J., R. Santagata, T. Scheiner, A. K. Adleff, X. Yang, and G. Kaiser. 2022. “Teacher Noticing: A Systematic Literature Review of Conceptualizations, Research Designs, and Findings on Learning to Notice.” Educational Research Review 36:100453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100453.
  • Koole, T. 2010. “Displays of Epistemic Access: Student Responses to Teacher Explanations.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43 (2): 183–209.
  • Körkkö, M., S. Morales Rios, and O. Kyrö-Ämmälä. 2019. “Using a Video App as a Tool for Reflective Practice.” Educational Research 61 (1): 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2018.1562954.
  • Koshik, I. 2002. “Designedly Incomplete Utterances: A Pedagogical Practice for Eliciting Knowledge Displays in Error Correction Sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 35 (3): 277–309. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3503_2.
  • Lee, Y. A. 2007. “Third Turn Position in Teacher Talk: Contingency and the Work of Teaching.” Journal of Pragmatics 39 (1): 180–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.02.004.
  • Li, L. 2019. Language Teacher Cognition: A Sociocultural Perspective. Cham: Springer Nature.
  • Li, Y., and S. Walsh. 2023. “Technology-Enhanced Reflection and Teacher Development: A Student teacher’s Journey.” RELC Journal 356–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231161153. 54 2
  • Looney, S. D., and Y. He. 2021. “Laughter and Smiling: Sequential Resources for Managing Delayed and Disaligning Responses.” Classroom Discourse 12 (4): 319–343.
  • Mann, S., and S. Walsh. 2017. Reflective Practice in English Language Teaching: Research-Based Principles and Practices. New York: Routledge.
  • Markee, N. 2008. “Toward a Learning Behavior Tracking Methodology for CA–For–SLA.” Applied Linguistics 29 (3): 404–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm052.
  • Markee, N. 2011. “Doing, and Justifying Doing, Avoidance.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (2): 602–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.012.
  • Markee, N. 2017. “Are Replication Studies Possible in Qualitative Second/Foreign Language Classroom Research? A Call for Comparative Re-Production Research.” Language Teaching 50 (3): 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444815000099.
  • McHoul, A. 1978. “The Organization of Turns at Formal Talk in the Classroom.” Language in Society 7 (2): 183–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500005522.
  • Mehan, H. 1979. Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Miller, P., and J. Haines. 2021. “From Teaching to Learning: The Development of the VEO App.” In Video Enhanced Observation for Language Teaching: Reflection and Professional Development, edited by P. Seedhouse, 21–38. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Mitchell, J. C. 1984. “Typicality and the Case Study.” In Ethnographic Research: A Guide to General Conduct, edited by R. F. Ellen, 238–241, London: Academic Press.
  • Mondada, L. 2022. “Conventions for Multimodal Transcription.” Accessed February 1, 2024. https://www.lorenzamondada.net/multimodal-transcription.
  • Mortensen, K. 2008. “Selecting Next Speaker in the Second Language Classroom: How to Find a Willing Next Speaker in Planned Activities.” Journal of Applied Linguistics 5 (1): 55–78.
  • Morton, T. 2012. “Classroom Talk, Conceptual Change and Teacher Reflection in Bilingual Science Teaching.” Teaching and Teacher Education 28 (1): 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.07.006.
  • Netz, H. 2020. “The Case of the Non-Missing “No”: Implications of Extensive Direct Repair on Tutor-Learner Interactions.” Linguistics and Education 57:100814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100814.
  • Park, M. Y. 2016. “Integrating Rapport-Building into Language Instruction: A Study of Korean Foreign Language Classes.” Classroom Discourse 7 (2): 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2015.1116103.
  • Richards, K. 2007. “Knowing When to ‘No’: Aspects of Alignment in Professional Relationships.” In Conversation Analysis and Language for Specific Purposes, edited by H. Bowles and P. Seedhouse, 69–98. Bern: Peter Lang.
  • Sacks, H., E. A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010.
  • Santagata, R., J. König, T. Scheiner, H. Nguyen, A. K. Adleff, X. Yang, and G. Kaiser. 2021. “Mathematics Teacher Learning to Notice: A Systematic Review of Studies of Video-Based Programs.” ZDM–Mathematics Education 53 (1): 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01216-z.
  • Schegloff, E. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Schön, D. A. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Seedhouse, P. 1997. “The Case of the Missing “No”: The Relationship Between Pedagogy and Interaction.” Language Learning 47 (3): 547–583. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00019.
  • Seedhouse, P. 2004. The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom: A Conversation Analysis Perspective. Blackwell.
  • Seedhouse, P. 2008. “Learning to Talk the Talk: Conversation Analysis As a Tool for Induction of Trainee Teachers.” In Professional Encounters in TESOL, edited by S. Garton and K. Richards, 42–57. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Seedhouse, P. 2010. “A Framework for Conceptualising Learning in Applied Linguistics.” In Conceptualising ‘Learning’in Applied Linguistics, edited by P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh and C. Jenks, 240–256. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  • Seedhouse, P., Ed. 2021. Video Enhanced Observation for Language Teaching: Reflection and Professional Development. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Seedhouse, P. 2022. “Transitioning from Conversation Analysis to Mixed Methods.” Language Teaching 57 (1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444822000027.
  • Seidel, T., K. Stürmer, G. Blomberg, M. Kobarg, and K. Schwindt. 2011. “Teacher Learning from Analysis of Videotaped Classroom Situations: Does it Make a Difference Whether Teachers Observe Their Own Teaching or That of Others?” Teaching and Teacher Education 27 (2): 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.009.
  • Sert, O. 2013. “‘Epistemic Status Check’ as an Interactional Phenomenon in Instructed Learning Settings.” Journal of Pragmatics 45 (1): 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.005.
  • Sert, O. 2015. Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Sert, O. 2019. “Classroom Interaction and Language Teacher Education.” In The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teacher Education, edited by S. Walsh and S. Mann, 216–238, London: Routledge.
  • Sert, O. 2021. “Transforming CA Findings into Future L2 Teaching Practices: Challenges and Prospects for Teacher Education.” In Classroom-Based Conversation Analytic Research: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Pedagogy, edited by S. Kunitz, N. Markee, and O. Sert, 259–279. Cham: Springer.
  • Sert, O. 2023a. ““It Helped Me Grow and develop”: Video Enhanced Reflection and Feedback in a Swedish Teacher Education Context.” TESOL Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.771.
  • Sert, O. (2023b). “Discursive Timeline Analysis: In Search of Methodological Rigor in Investigating Interactional and Professional Development in a Digital World.” British Association for Applied Linguistics Conference 2023, University of York, York, UK, 23-25 August.
  • Sert, O., and C. M. Jacknick. 2015. “Student Smiles and the Negotiation of Epistemics in L2 Classrooms.” Journal of Pragmatics 77:97–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.001.
  • Sert, O., and C. Jonsson. Forthcoming. “Digital Data-Led Reflections on Language Classroom Interaction: A Collaborative Action Research.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language Teacher Action Research, edited by A. Burns and K. Dikilitaş. Routledge.
  • Sert, O., and S. Walsh. 2013. “The Interactional Management of Claims of Insufficient Knowledge in English Language Classrooms.” Language and Education 27 (6): 542–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2012.739174.
  • Sherin, M., and E. A. van Es. 2005. “Using Video to Support teachers’ Ability to Notice Classroom Interactions.” Journal of Technology & Teacher Education 13 (3): 475–491.
  • Sikveland, R. O., T. Moser, M. S. Solem, and K. Skovholt. 2023. “The Effectiveness of the Conversation Analytic Role-Play Method (CARM) on Interactional Awareness: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial with Student Teachers.” Teaching and Teacher Education 129:104136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104136.
  • Sinclair, J., and M. Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Skovholt, K. 2018. “Anatomy of a Teacher–Student Feedback Encounter.” Teaching and Teacher Education 69:142–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.09.012.
  • Stokoe, E. 2014. “The Conversation Analytic Role-Play Method (CARM): A Method for Training Communication Skills as an Alternative to Simulated Role-Play.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 47 (3): 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2014.925663.
  • Sun, J., and E. A. van Es. 2015. “An Exploratory Study of the Influence That Analyzing Teaching Has on Preservice teachers’ Classroom Practice.” Journal of Teacher Education 66 (3): 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115574103.
  • Swedish Research Council. (2017). Good Research Practice. Accessed August 10, 2021: https://www.vr.se/english/analysis/reports/our-reports/2017-08-31-good-research-practice.html.
  • Ten Have, P. 2007. Doing Conversation Analysis. London: Sage.
  • Tsui, A. B. M. 1995. Classroom Interaction. Harmonds-worth: Penguin group.
  • van Es, E. A., M. Cashen, T. Barnhart, and A. Auger. 2017. “Learning to Notice Mathematics Instruction: Using Video to Develop Preservice teachers’ Vision of Ambitious Pedagogy.” Cognition and Instruction 35 (3): 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2017.1317125.
  • van Es, E. A., and M. G. Sherin. 2002. “Learning to Notice: Scaffolding New teachers’ Interpretations of Classroom Interactions.” Journal of Technology & Teacher Education 10 (4): 571–596.
  • Walsh, S. 2011. Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. London: Routledge.
  • Walsh, S. 2013. Classroom Discourse and Teacher Development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Walsh, S., and S. Mann. 2015. “Doing Reflective Practice: A Data-Led Way Forward.” Elt Journal 69 (4): 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv018.
  • Waring, H. Z. 2008. “Using Explicit Positive Assessment in the Language Classroom: IRF, Feedback, and Learning Opportunities.” The Modern Language Journal 92 (4): 577–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00788.x.
  • Waring, H. Z. 2011. “Learner Initiatives and Learning Opportunities in the Language Classroom.” Classroom Discourse 2 (2): 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2011.614053.
  • Waring, H. Z., and S. C. Creider. 2021. Micro-Reflection on Classroom Communication: A FAB-Framework. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing Limited.
  • Waring, H. Z., E. Reddington, and N. Tadic. 2016. “Responding Artfully to Student-Initiated Departures in the Adult ESL Classroom.” Linguistics and Education 33:28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.12.001.