Collaborative character searches in L2 Chinese peer writing: sequential design and object affordances

References

• Arano, Y. 2020. “Doing Reflecting: Embodied Solitary Confirmation of Instructed Enactment.” Discourse Studies 22 (3): 261–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445620906037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arano, Y. 2023. “Ways of the Brush in Japanese Calligraphy Art Lessons.” In Instructed and Instructive Actions, edited by M. Lynch and O. Lindwall, 153–177. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cekaite, A. 2009. “Collaborative Corrections with Spelling Control: Digital Resources and Peer Assistance.” International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 4 (3): 319–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9067-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deppermann, A., and J. Streeck. 2018. “The Body in Interaction: Its Multiple Modalities and Temporalities.” In Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, edited by A. Deppermann and J. Streeck, 1–29. Vol. 293. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Everson, M. E. 2011. “Best Practices in Teaching Logographic and Non-Roman Writing Systems to L2 Learners.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31:249–274. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R., and M. Levy. 2010. “The Coordination of Talk and Action in the Collaborative Construction of a Multimodal Text.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (8): 2189–2203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glenn, P. J. 2003. Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 1994. “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist 96 (3): 606–633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2000. “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32 (10): 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2013. “The Co-Operative, Transformative Organization of Human Action and Knowledge.” Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2017. Co-Operative Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. 1983. “Searching for a Word As an Interactive Activity.” In Semiotics 1981, edited by J. N. Deely and M. D. Lenhart, 129–137. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., and C. Goodwin. 1986. “Gesture and Coparticipation in the Activity of Searching for a Word.” Semiotica 62 (1–2): 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greer, T., and C. Leyland. 2020. “Inscribed Objects as Resources for Achieving Progressivity in Lesson Planning Talk.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 14 (2). https://doi.org/10.1558/jalpp.33667.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, M. 2003. “Language and the Body as Resources for Collaborative Action: A Study of Word Searches in Japanese Conversation.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 36 (2): 109–141. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3602_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazel, S., and K. Mortensen. 2019. “Designedly Incomplete Objects as Elicitation Tools in Classroom Interaction.” In Objects, Bodies and Work Practice, edited by D. Day and J. Wagner, 216–249. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 1984. “A Change-Of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by J. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, J. 2012. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, M.-J. 2009. “Brush Talk at the Conversation Table: Interaction Between L1 and L2 Speakers of Chinese.” PhD diss., University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.
   Google Scholar
• Jakonen, T., and T. Morton. 2015. “Epistemic Search Sequences in Peer Interaction in a Content-Based Language Classroom.” Applied Linguistics 36 (1): 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 2004. “Glossary of Transcript Symbols with an Introduction.” In Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, edited by G. H. Lerner, 13–31. Vol. 125. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kasper, G., and A. R. Burch. 2016. “Focus on Form in the Wild.” In Authenticity, Language, and Interaction in Second Language Contexts, edited by R. A. van Compernolle and J. McGregor, 198–232. Bristol, U.K: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Ke, C. 1998. “Effects of Strategies on the Learning of Chinese Characters Among Foreign Language Students.” Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association 33 (2): 93–112.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H. 2021. “The ‘Other’ Side of Recruitment: Methods of Assistance in Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 178:68–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendrick, K. H., and P. Drew. 2016. “Recruitment: Offers, Requests, and the Organization of Assistance in Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2016.1126436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komter, M. L. 2006. “From Talk to Text: The Interactional Construction of a Police Record.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 39 (3): 201–228. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3903_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshik, I., and M. Seo. 2012. “Word (And Other) Search Sequences Initiated by Language Learners.” Text & Talk 32 (2). https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunitz, S. 2015. “Scriptlines as Emergent Artifacts in Collaborative Group Planning.” Journal of Pragmatics 76:135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunitz, S. 2018. “Collaborative Attention Work on Gender Agreement in Italian as a Foreign Language.” The Modern Language Journal 102 (S1): 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12458.
   Google Scholar
• Kurhila, S. 2006. Second Language Interaction (Vol. 145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Leyland, C., and J. Riley. 2021. “Enhanced English Conversations-For-Learning: Constructing and Using Notes for Deferred Correction Sequences.” Linguistics and Education 66:100976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y.-H. A. 2017. “Chinese Ba.” In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, edited by M. Everaert and H. C. van Riemsdijk, 1–72. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwel.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, S. 2021. “Establishing Jointness in Proximal Multiparty Decision-Making: The Case of Collaborative Writing.” Journal of Pragmatics 181:32–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majlesi, A. R., and M. Broth. 2012. “Emergent Learnables in Second Language Classroom Interaction.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 1 (3–4): 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2012.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markee, N., and S. Kunitz. 2013. “Doing Planning and Task Performance in Second Language Acquisition: An Ethnomethodological Respecification.” Language Learning 63 (4): 629–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mlynář, J. 2023. “Lifting the Pen and the Gaze: Embodied Recruitment in Collaborative Writing.” Text & Talk 43 (1): 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2020-0148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2014a. “Conventions for Multimodal Transcription.” https://franz.unibas.ch/fileadmin/franz/user_upload/redaktion/Mondada_conv_multimodality.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2014b. “The Local Constitution of Multimodal Resources for Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 65:137–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2014c. “Pointing, Talk, and the Bodies: Reference and Joint Attention As Embodied Interactional Achievements.” In From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action As Utterance, edited by M. Seyfeddinipur and M. Gullberg, 95–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L., and S. Pekarek Doehler. 2004. “Second Language Acquisition as Situated Practice: Task Accomplishment in the French Second Language Classroom.” The Modern Language Journal 88 (4): 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-15-.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L., and K. Svinhufvud. 2016. “Writing-In-Interaction: Studying Writing As a Multimodal Phenomenon in Social Interaction.” Language and Dialogue 6 (1): 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.6.1.01mon.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, J., and A. Hasegawa. 2009. “Doing Being a Foreign Language Learner in a Classroom: Embodiment of Cognitive States as Social Events.” IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 47 (1): 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.004.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, K. 2013. “Writing Aloud: Some Interactional Functions of the Public Display of Emergent Writing.” In Proceedings of the participatory innovation conference PIN-C 2013, edited by H. Melkas and J. Buur, 119–125. Lahti: Lappeenranta University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Musk, N. 2016. “Correcting Spellings in Second Language learners’ Computer-Assisted Collaborative Writing.” Classroom Discourse 7 (1): 36–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2015.1095106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musk, N. 2021. “How Do You Spell that?”: Doing Spelling in Computer-Assisted Collaborative Writing.” In Classroom-Based Conversation Analytic Research, edited by S. Kunitz, N. Markee, and O. Sert, 103–131. Vol. 46. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Musk, N., and A. Cekaite. 2017. “Mobilising Distributed Memory Resources in English Project Work.” In Memory Practices and Learning: Interactional, Institutional and Sociocultural Perspectives, edited by Å. Mäkitalo, P. Linell, and R. Säljö, 153–186. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nevile, M., P. Haddington, T. Heinemann, and M. Rauniomaa. 2014. Interacting with Objects: Language, Materiality, and Social Activity. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Nishizaka, A. 2020. “Appearance and Action: The Sequential Organization of Instructions in Japanese Calligraphy Lessons.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 53 (3): 295–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1739428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. 2003. “Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68 (6): 939–967. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240306800607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichert, T., and G. Liebscher. 2012. “Positioning the Expert: Word Searches, Expertise, and Learning Opportunities in Peer Interaction.” The Modern Language Journal 96 (4): 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01397.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizvanovic, A. 2013. “Spelling Correction in Collaborative Writing in English Project Work.” PhD diss., Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A., G. Jefferson, and H. Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1977.0041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sert, O., and M. Amri. 2021. “Learning Potentials Afforded by a Film in Task-Based Language Classroom Interactions.” The Modern Language Journal 105 (S1): 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12684.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, H. H. 2005. “An Investigation of Chinese-Character Learning Strategies Among Non-Native Speakers of Chinese.” System 33 (1): 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.11.001.
   Google Scholar
• Skogmyr, Marian, K. 2015. “Doing Solving Spelling Problems in a Swedish EFL Classroom: A Conversation Analytic Study.” Master’s thesis. Stockholm University.
   Google Scholar
• Steinbach-Koehler, F., and S. L. Thorne. 2011. “The Social Life of Self-Directed Talk: A Sequential Phenomenon?” In L2 Interactional Competence and Development, edited by J. Hall, J. Hellermann, S. P. Doehler, and D. Olsher, 66–92. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., L. Mondada, and J. Steensig. 2011. “Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Social Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, edited by T. Stivers, L. Mondada, and J. Steensig, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Storch, N. 2019. “Collaborative Writing.” Language Teaching 52 (1): 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. 2015. “Air Writing as a Technique for the Acquisition of Sino-Japanese Characters by Second Language Learners.” Language Learning 65 (3): 631–659. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tůma, F., and T. Sherman. 2022. “Recruiting Help in Word Searches in L2 Peer Interaction: A Multimodal Conversation-Analytic Study.” Linguistics and Education 67:100999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuncer, S., C. Licoppe, and P. Haddington. 2019. “When Objects Become the Focus of Human Action and Activity: Object-Centred Sequences in Social Interaction.” Gesprächsforschung: Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 20:384–398.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai, M. 2020. “Peer-Interaction Patterns in a Chinese As a Foreign Language Pair Writing Task: A Conversation Analytical Perspective. Chinese As a Second Language.” The Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, USA 55 (2): 133–169.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., and C. Ke. 2018. “Research on L2 Chinese Character Acquisition.” In The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Second Language Acquisition, edited by C. Ke, 103–133. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar