The embodied nature of students’ engagement and participation during a total physical response activity

References

• Baker, S., and P. MacIntyre. 2003. “The Role of Gender and Immersion in Communication and Second Language Orientations.” Language Learning 53 (S1): 65–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00224.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, J. 2008. “Displaying Orientation in the Classroom: Students’ Multimodal Responses to Teacher Instructions.” Linguistics and Education 19 (2): 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.05.005.
   Google Scholar
• Bolden, G. 2006. “Little Words That Matter: Discourse Markers “So” and “Oh” and the Doing of Other-Attentiveness in Social Interaction.” Journal of Communication 56 (4): 661–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00314.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Fornel, M. 1992. “The Return Gesture: Some Remarks on Context Inference and Iconic Gesture.” In The Contextualization of Language, edited by P. Auer and A. di Luzio, 159–176. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Douglah, J. 2021. “BOOM, so it Will Be Like an Attack Demonstrating in a Dance Class Through Verbal, Sound, and Body Imagery.” Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction 29:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. 1996. “Inclusion in What?: Thoughts on the Construction of Learning, Identity, and Affiliation in the General Education Classroom.” In Research on Classroom Ecologies: Implications for Inclusion of Children with Learning Disabilities, edited by D. Speeee and B. Keogh, 91–105. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Evnitskaya, N., and E. Berger. 2017. “Learners’ Multimodal Displays of Willingness to Participate in Classroom Interaction in the L2 and CLIL Contexts.” Classroom Discourse 8 (1): 71–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2016.1272062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasel Lauzon, V., and E. Berger. 2015. “The Multimodal Organization of Speaker Selection in Classroom Interaction.” Linguistics and Education 31:14–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gafvels, C. 2016. “Vision and Embodied Knowing: The Making of Floral Design.” Vocations and Learning 9 (2): 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-015-9143-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, R. 2007. “The Right Connections: Acknowledging Epistemic Progression in Talk.” Language in Society 36 (3): 319–341. https://doi.org/10.10170/S0047404507070169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1961. Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 1979. “The Interactive Construction of a Sentence in Natural Conversation.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, edited by G. Psathas, 87–121. New York: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 1994. “Professional Vision.” American Anthropologist 96 (3): 606–633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. 2007. “Participation, Stance and Affect in the Organization of Activities.” Discourse and Society 18 (1): 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C., and M. Goodwin. 2004. “Participation.” In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, edited by A. Duranti, 222–244. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. 2006. “Participation, Affect, and Trajectory in Family Directive/Response Sequences.” Text and Talk 26 (4/5): 515–543. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. 2007. “Occasioned Knowledge Exploration in Family Interaction.” Discourse and Studies 18 (1): 93–110. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42889105.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M., and A. Cekaite. 2013. “Calibration in Directive/Response Sequences in Family Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 122–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M., C. Goodwin, and M. Yaeger-Dror. 2002. “Multimodality in Girls’ Game Disputes.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (10–11): 1621–1649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00078-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, Y. 2002. “Motivation and Willingness to Communicate As Predictors of Reported L2 Use: The Japanese ESL Context.” Second Language Studies 20 (2): 29–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hazel, S., K. Mortensen, and G. Rasmussen. 2014. “Introduction: A Body of Resources – CA Studies of Social Conduct.” Journal of Pragmatics 65:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishino, M. 2022. “Teachers’ Embodied Mitigation Against Allocating Turns to Unwilling Students.” Classroom Discourse 13 (4): 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2021.1918194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacknick, C. 2021. Multimodal Participation and Engagement: Social Interaction in the Classroom. UK: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, G. 2004. “Glossary of Transcription Symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, edited by G. Lerner, 13–31. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kendon, A. 1990. Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koole, T. 2007. “Central and Parallel Activities in Classroom Interaction.” Language and Education 21 (6): 487–501. https://doi.org/10.2167/le713.0.
   Google Scholar
• Kunitz, S. 2018. “Collaborative Attention Work on Gender Agreement in Italian As a Foreign Language.” The Modern Language Journal 102:64–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindwall, O., and A. Ekstrom. 2012. “Instruction-In-Interaction: The Teaching and Learning of Manual Skill.” Human Studies 35 (1): 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-012-9213-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P., S. Baker, R. Clement, and L. Donovan. 2002. “Sex and Age Effects on Willingness to Communicate, Anxiety, Perceived Competence, and L2 Motivation Among Junior High School French Immersion Students.” Language Learning 52 (3): 537–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P., and C. Charos. 1996. “Personality, Attitudes, and Affect as Predictors of Second Language Communication.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 15 (1): 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X960151001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, P., Z. Dornyei, R. Clement, and K. Noels. 1998. “Conceptualizing Willingness to Communicate in a L2: A Situational Model of L2 Confidence and Affiliation.” Modern Language Journal 82 (4): 545–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb05543.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2011. “The Organization of Concurrent Courses of Action in Surgical Demonstration.” In Embodied Interaction: Language and the Material World, edited by J. Streeck, C. Goodwin, and C. LeBaron, 207–226. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. 2019. “Multiple Temporalities of Language and Body in Interaction: Challenges for Transcribing Multimodality.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51 (1): 85–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen, K. 2008. “Selecting Next Speaker in the Second Language Classroom: How to Find a Willing Next Speaker in Planned Activities.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 5 (1): 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v5i1.55.
   Google Scholar
• Pochon-Berger, E. 2011. “A Participant’s Perspective on Tasks: From Task Instruction, Through Pre-Task Planning, to Task Accomplishment.” Novitas-ROYAL – Research on Youth and Language 5 (1): 71–90.
   Google Scholar
• Ro, E., and A. R. Burch. 2020. “Willingness to Communicate/Participate in Action: A Case Study of Changes in a Recipient’s Practices in an L2 Book Club.” Linguistics and Education 58 (3): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100821.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlström, J. 2002. “The Interactional Organization of Hand Raising in Classroom Interaction.” The Journal of Classroom Interaction 37 (2): 47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E., and H. Sacks. 1973. “Opening Up Closings.” Semiotica 8 (4): 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289.
   Google Scholar
• Sert, O. 2013. “Epistemic Status Check As an Interactional Phenomenon in Instructed Learning Settings.” Journal of Pragmatics 45 (1): 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sert, O. 2015. Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. 2008. “Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling: When Nodding Is a Token of Affiliation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (1): 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810701691123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weddle, A., and J. Hollan. 2010. “Professional Perception and Expert Action: Scaffolding and Embodied Practices in Professional Education.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 17 (2): 119–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030902721754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar