Enhancing city resilience to climate change by means of ecosystem services improvement: a SWOT analysis for the city of Faro, Portugal

References

• Bennet EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett. 12:1394–1404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolund P, Hunhammar S. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ. 29:293–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonan GB. 2002. Ecological climatology: concepts and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron RWF, Blanusa T, Taylor JE, Salisbury A, Halstead AJ, Henricot B, Thompson K. 2012. The domestic garden – its contribution to urban green infrastructure. Urban For Urban Gree. 11:129–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmin J, Nadkarni N, Rhie C. 2012. Progress and challenges in urban climate adaptation planning: results from a global survey. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter SR, Bennet EM, Peterson GD. 2006. Scenarios for ecosystem services: an overview. Ecol Soc. [Internet]. [cited 2013 Sept 12]; 11:29. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art29/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CII and Birdlife International. 2011. Measuring and monitoring ecosystem services at the site scale. Cambridge: Cambridge Conservation Initiative and Bird Life International.
   Google Scholar
• Civil Protection of Portugal. 2013 [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jun 27]. Available from: http://www.proteccaocivil.pt/
   Google Scholar
• COST. 2012. COST action FP1204 Green infrastructure approach: linking environmental with social aspects in studying and managing urban forests [Internet]. [cited 2014 Jun 20]. Available from: http://www.greeninurbs.com/
   Google Scholar
• Costanza R, d’Arge R, De Groot R, Farberk S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387:253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily G, Ellison K. 2003. The new economy of nature: the quest to make conservation profitable. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daily GC. 1997. Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex. 7:260–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RMJ. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ. 41:393–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbs C, Escobedo FJ, Zipperer WC. 2011. A framework for developing urban forest ecosystem services and goods indicators. Landscape Urban Plan. 99:196–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duque JAG, Panagopoulos T. 2010. Urban planning throughout environmental quality and human well-being. Spat Organ Dyn- Discuss Pap. 4:7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Duque JAG, Panagopoulos T. 2013. Evaluation of the urban green infrastructure using landscape modules, GIS and a population survey. Spat Organ Dyn. 13:82–95.
   Google Scholar
• Egoh B, Drakou EG, Dunbar MB, Maes J, Willemen L. 2012. Indicators for mapping ecosystem services: a review. European Commission, EUR 25456 – Joint Research Centre – Institute for Environment and Sustainability [Internet]. [cited 2013 Nov 4]. Available from: http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/111111111/26749/1/lbna25456enn.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Escobedo FJ, Kroeger T, Wagner JE. 2011. Urban forests and pollution mitigation: analyzing ecosystem services and disservices. Environ Pollut. 159:2078–2087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 1999. Evaluating socio-economic programmes. Principal evaluation techniques and tools. MEANS-collection, Vol. 3. Luxembourg: European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. The economics of climate change adaptation in EU coastal areas [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jul 12]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/maritimeaffairs/documentation/studies/documents/portugal_climate_change_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. 2011. Green infrastructure and territorial cohesion. The concept of green infrastructure and its integration into policies using monitoring systems. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. 2012. Urban adaptation to climate change in Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Ewel KC. 1997. Water Quality Improvement by Wetlands. In: Daily GC, editor. Natures services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington (DC): Island Press; p. 329–344.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer A, Bassi F, Fergusson M. 2008. Water scarcity and droughts. Policy Department Economic and Scientific Policy. IP/A/ENVI/ST/2007-17
   Google Scholar
• Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ. 68:643–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel M. 2007. Os Sistemas de Informacao geografica na gestao do espaco verde publico. Caso de Cidade de Faro [ Master Thesis]. Faro: University of Algarve.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez F, Tamarit N, Jabaloyes J. 2001. Green zones, bioclimatics studies and human comfort in the future development of urban planning. Landscape Urban Plan. 55:151–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Baggethun E, Gren A, Barton DN, Langemeyer J, McPhearson T, O’Farrell P, Andersson E, Hamstead Z, Kremer P. 2013. Urban ecosystem services. In: Elmqvist T, Fragkias M, Goodness J, Güneralp B, Marcotullio PJ, McDonald RI, Parnell S, Schewenius M, Sendstad M, Seto KC, Wilkinson C, editors. Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services, challenges and opportunities. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grahn P, Stigsdotter UK. 2010. The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape Urban Plan. 94:264–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey P. 2010. Making better places: the planning project in the twenty-first century. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hubacek K, Kronenberg J. 2013. Synthesizing different perspectives on the value of urban ecosystem services. Landscape Urban Plan. 109:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICNF – Instituto de Conservação da Naturesa e Florestas. 2006. Plano Regional de Ordenamento Florestal do Algarve [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jul 26]. Available from: http://www.icnf.pt/portal/florestas/profs/algarv
   Google Scholar
• IPCC, 2007. Summary for policymakers. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE, editors. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jankovska I, Straupe I, Panagopoulos T. 2010. Professional’s awareness in promotion of conservation and management of urban forests as green infrastructure of Riga, Latvia. WSEAS Trans Environ Dev. 6:614–623.
   Google Scholar
• Jenerette GD, Harlan SL, Stefanov WL, Martin CA. 2011. Ecosystem services and urban heat riskscape moderation: water, green spaces, and social inequality in Phoenix, USA. Ecol Appl. 21:2637–2651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jim CY, Chen WY. 2009. Ecosystem services and valuation of urban forests in China. Cities. 26:187–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson G, Scholes GK, Sexty RW. 1989. Exploring strategic management. Scarborough (ON): Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Karanikola P, Panagopoulos T, Tampakis S, Karantoni MI, Tsantopoulos G. 2014. Facing and managing natural disasters in the Sporades Islands, Greece. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 14:995–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karppi I, Kokonen M, Latheenmaki-Smith K. 2001. SWOT analysis as a basis for regional strategies. Stockholm: Nordregio.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy AW, Van Wassenaer PJE, Satel LA. 2011. Criteria and indicators for strategic urban forest planning and management. Arboriculture and Urban Forestry. 37:108–117.
   Google Scholar
• Kraemer RA. 2007. Economic impact of droughts: challenges for water & environmental policies. Water Scarcity and Drought – a Priority of the Portuguese Presidency, Jg. 1:61–88.
   Google Scholar
• Logsdon R, Chaubey I. 2013. A quantitative approach to evaluating ecosystem services. Ecol Modell. 257:57–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [MEA] Millenniun Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merz B, Kreibich H, Schwarze R, Thieken A. 2010. Assessment of economic flood damage. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci. 10:1697–1724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen AB, Nilsson K. 2007. Urban forestry for human health and wellbeing. Urban For Urban Gree. 6:195–197.
   Google Scholar
• Ninyerola M, Pons X, Roure JM. 2005. Atlas Climático Digital de la Península Ibérica. Metodología y aplicaciones en bioclimatología y geobotánica. Bellaterra: Autonomous University of Bellaterra.
   Google Scholar
• Oberndorfer E, Lundholm J, Bass B, Coffman RR, Doshi H, Dunnett N, Gaffin S, Kohler M, Liu KKY, Rowe B. 2007. Green roofs as urban ecosystems: ecological structures, functions, and services. Bioscience. 57:823–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos T. 2009. Linking forestry, sustainability and aesthetics. Ecol Econ. 68:2485–2489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos T, Barreira AP. 2012. Shrinkage perceptions and smart growth strategies for the municipalities of Portugal. Built Environ. 38:276–292.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu G, Li H, Zhang Q, Chen W, Liang X, Li X. 2013. Effects of evapotranspiration on mitigation of urban temperature by vegetation and urban agriculture. J Integr Agric. 12:1307–1315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy S, Byrne J, Pickering C. 2012. A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban For Urban Gree. 11:351–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuster WD, Morrison MA, Webb R. 2008. Front-loading urban storm water management for success – a perspective incorporating current studies on the implementation of retrofit low-impact development. Cities Environ. 1:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Soares AL, Rego FC, McPherson EG, Simpson JR, Peper PJ, Xiao Q. 2011. Benefits and costs of street trees in Lisbon, Portugal. Urban For Urban Gree. 10:69–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub C, Ott W, Heusi F, Klingler G, Jenny A, Häcki M, Hauser A. 2011. Indicators for ecosystem goods and services: framework, methodology and recommendations for a welfare-related environmental reporting. Bern: Federal Office for the Environment. Environmental studies no. 1102: 17 S.
   Google Scholar
• The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity. 2011. TEEB manual for cities: ecosystem services in urban management [Internet]. [cited 2013 Oct 1]. Available from: www.teebweb.org
   Google Scholar
• Trigo RM, Ramos AM, Nogueira PJ, Santos FD, Garcia-Herrera R, Gouveia C, Santo FE. 2009. Evaluating the impact of extreme temperature based indices in the 2003 heatwave excessive mortality in Portugal. Environ Sci Policy. 12:844–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsenkova S. 2002. SWOT analysis of Sofia’s economy, infrastructure and spatial planning issues. Washington (DC): World Bank, Infrastructure Sector Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrväinen L. 2001. Economic valuation of urban forest benefits in Finland. J Environ Manage. 62:75–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kazmierczak A, Niemela J, James P. 2007. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landscape Urban Plan. 81:167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Videira N, Correia A, Alves I, Ramires C, Subtil R, Martins V. 2006. Environmental and economic tools to support sustainable golf tourism: the Algarve experience, Portugal. Tourism and Hosp Res. 6:204–217.
   Google Scholar
• WMO. 2014. WMO statement on the status of the global climate in 2013. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization.
   Google Scholar