Blending adaptive governance and institutional theory to explore urban resilience and sustainability strategies in the Rome metropolitan area, Italy

References

• Adger WN. 2000. Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr. 24:347–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adger WN. 2006. Vulnerability. Global Environ Chang. 16:268–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahern J. 2013. Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: the promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landscape Ecol. 28:1203–1212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderies JM, Janssen MA, Ostrom E. 2004. A framework to analyze the robustness of social-ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecol Soc. [Internet]. [cited 2014 Jun 10]; 9:18. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art18/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahadur A, Tanner T. 2014. Transformational resilience thinking: putting people, power and politics at the heart of urban climate resilience. Environ Urban. 26:200–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates RH. 1989. Beyond the miracle of the market: the political economy of agrarian development in Kenya. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes F, editor. 1989. Common property resources: ecology of community-based sustainable development. London: Belhaven.
   Google Scholar
• Birkmann J, Garschagen M, Kraas F, Quang N. 2010. Adaptive urban governance: new challenges for the second generation of urban adaptation strategies to climate change. Sustainability Sci. 5:185–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone G. 2010. Environmental justice, sustainability and vulnerability. Int J of Urban Sustainable Dev. 2:135–140.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd E. 2012. Adapting to global climate change: evaluating resilience in two networked policy institutions. In: Boyd E, Folke C, editors. Adapting institutions: governance, complexity and social ecological resilience. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd E, Folke C, editors. 2012. Adapting institutions: governance, complexity and social ecological resilience. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner RD. 2010. Adaptive governance as a reform strategy. Policy Sci. 43:301–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner RD, Lynch AH. 2010. Adaptive governance and climate change. Boston (MA): American Meteorological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant RL, Bailey S. 1997. Third world political ecology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley H. 2013. Cities and climate change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho-Ribeiro SM, Lovett A, O’Riordan T. 2010. Multifunctional forest management in Northern Portugal: moving from scenarios to governance for sustainable development. Land Use Policy. 27:1111–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cities Alliance. 2007. Liveable cities: the benefits of urban environmental planning. Washington (DC): Cities Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• Collier MJ, Nedović-Budić Z, Aerts J, Connop S, Foley D, Foley K, Newport D, McQuaid S, Slaev A, Verburg P. 2013. Transitioning to resilience and sustainability in urban communities. Cities. 32:S21–S28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooney R, Lang A. 2007. Taking uncertainty seriously: adaptive governance and international trade. European J Int Law. 18:523–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell MM. 2013. Bounce back or move on: regional resilience and economic development planning. Cities. 30:212–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva J, Kernaghan S, Luque A. 2012. A systems approach to meeting the challenges of urban climate change. Int J Urban Sust Dev. 4.2:125–145.
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi S. 2012. Resilience: a bridging concept or a dead end? ‘Reframing’ resilience: challenges for planning theory and practice. Plann Theory Pract. 13:299–334.
   Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M, Mische A. 1998. What is agency? Am J Sociol. 103:962–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ensminger J. 1993. Making a market: the institutional transformation of an African society. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qual Inq. 12:219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke C. 2007. Social-ecological systems and adaptive governance of the commons. Ecological Res. 22:14–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J. 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 30:441–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke C, Pritchard L, Berkes F, Colding J, Swedin U. 2007. The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: ten years later. Ecol Soc. [Internet]. [cited 2014 Mar 5]; 12:32. Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art32/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth T. 2003. Critical political ecology: the politics of environmental science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Garmestani AS, Benson MH. 2013. A framework for resilience-based governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 18:9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey D. 2009. Social justice and the city. Athens (GA): University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holling CS. 1986. The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. In: Clark WC, Munn RE, editors. Sustainable development of the biosphere. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kampelmann S, Vanhollebeke S, Vandergert P 2015. The governance of economic resilience: 20 years of urban adaptation projects in Brussels. DULBEA Working Paper, Research series, N°15-01.RS, February
   Google Scholar
• Knight J. 1993. Institutions and social conflict. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krellenberg K, Link F, Welz J, Harris J, Barth K, Irarrazaval F. 2014. Supporting local adaptation: the contribution of socio-environmental fragmentation to urban vulnerability. Appl Geography. 55:61–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancet. 2012. Shaping cities for health: a UCL/Lancet commission. The Lancet. 379:2079–2108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libecap GD. 1989. Contracting for property rights. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon D, Cumbers A, Pike A, Birch K, McMaster R. 2009. Evolution in economic geography: institutions, political economy and adaptation. Econ Geogr. 85:129–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman M. 2007. Multi-scalar large institutional networks in regional planning. Plann Theory Pract. 8:319–344.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer E. 2010. Weak versus strong sustainability: exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• North DC. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 2010. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environ Chang. 20:550–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom V, Tiebout CM, Warren R. 1961. The organization of government in metropolitan areas: a theoretical inquiry. Am Pol Sci Rev. 55:831–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl C, Kranz N. 2010. Water governance in times of change. Environ Sci Policy. 13:567–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickett STA, Boone CG, McGrath BP, Cadenasso ML, Childers DL, Ogden LA, McHale M, Grove JM. 2013. Ecological science and transformation to the sustainable city. Cities. 32:S10–S20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price RK, Vojinovic Z. 2008. Urban flood disaster management. Urban Water J. 5:259–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redclift MR. 1984. Development and the environmental crisis: red or green alternatives? London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Redclift MR. 1987. Sustainable development: exploring the contradictions. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin Y, Kendall Bush K. 2009. Megalopolises and sustainability. London: UCL Environment Institute Seminar Series Report.
   Google Scholar
• Sevenant M, Antrop M. 2010. Transdisciplinary landscape planning: does the public have aspirations? Experiences from a case study in Ghent (Flanders, Belgium). Land Use Policy. 27:373–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw E. 2014. From water justice to eco-political equality: politicizing water. Viewpoints – Santa Cruz declaration on the global water crisis. Water Int. 39:258–259.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler S, Moench M. 2012. A framework for urban climate resilience. Climate Dev. 4:311–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergert P, Sandland S, Newport D, Van Den Abeele P. 2013. Harnessing advances in eco-innovation to achieve resource efficient cities. In: Bartolo H, et al., editors. Green design, materials and manufacturing processes. London: Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• WCED. 1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh M. 2014. Resilience and responsibility: governing uncertainty in a complex world. Geogr J. 180:15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westley FR, Tjornbo O, Schultz L, Olsson P, Folke C, Crona B, Bodin Ö. 2013. A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 18:27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson C. 2012. Social-ecological resilience: insights and issues for planning theory. Plann Theory. 11:148–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams K. 2010. Sustainable cities: research and practice challenges. Int J Urban Sust Dev. 1:128–132.
   Google Scholar
• Ye Y, Okada N. 2001. Improving management of urban earthquake disaster risks. In: Spencer BF, Hu YX, editors. Earthquake engineering frontiers in the new millennium. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Yin RK. 2009. Case study research design and methods. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar