Knowledge-based policy-making and integration: Distinct indication to Tehran

References

• Akhter SH. 2003. Strategic planning, hyper-competition, and knowledge management. Bus Horiz. 46(1):19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Akhundi A, Barakpur N, Asadie I, Taherkhani H, Basirat M. 2008. The perspective of the Tehran urban-region governance system. Honar Ha Ye Ziba. 33(1):15–26. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Akhundi A, Barakpur N, Taherkhani H, Asadie I, Basirat M. 2007. Tehran city-region governance: challenges and trends. Honar Ha Ye Ziba. 29:5–16. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Ambruosi CS, Baldinelli GM, Cappuccini E, Migliardi F. 2010. Metropolitan governance: which policies for globalizing cities. Transit Study Rev. 17(2):320–331.
   Google Scholar
• Apurva A, Singh MD. 2011. Understanding knowledge management: a literature review. Int J Eng Sci Technol. 3(2):927–939.
   Google Scholar
• Asadie I. 2016a. Explaining the rationality of metropolitan regionalism in Tehran [ dissertation]. Tehran: Tehran University. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Asadie I. 2016b. Why does Tehran metropolitan region (TMR) need a specific regional governance? Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba. 21(1):5–16. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Asgari A, Kazemian G. 2006. Descibtion and analysis of the system of currant urban conurbations in Iran. Urban Manag Q. 18:6–21. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Brakpur N, Asadie I. 2008. Theories of urban management and governance. Tehran: Art University. Report No.: 12/32122. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Berger G, Steurer R. 2009. Horizontal policy integration and sustainable development: conceptual remarks and governance examples. Vienna: ESDN Quarterly Report. June.
   Google Scholar
• Bornemann B. 2007. Sustainable development and policy integration – some conceptual clarifications. Paper presented at: Marie Curie summer school on earth system governance; May 28–Jun 6; Amsterdam (Netherland).
   Google Scholar
• Bounfour A. 2002. The management of intangibles: the organisation’s most valuable assets. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Briassoulis H. 2004. Policy integration for complex policy problems: what, why and how. In: Greening of policies: inter-linkages and policy integration. Proceedings of 2004 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environment Change; Dec 3–4; Berlin (Germany).
   Google Scholar
• Briassoulis H. 2005. Complex environmental problems and the quest for policy integration. In: Briassoulis H, editor. Policy integration for complex environmental problems. Aldershot: Asggate; p. 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Bunker R, Searle G. 2009. Theory and practice in metropolitan strategy: situating recent Australian planning. Urban Policy Res. 27(2):101–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buser M, Farthing S. 2011. Spatial planning as an integrative mechanism: a study of sub-regional planning in south Hampshire, England. Plann Pract Res. 26(3):307–324.
   Google Scholar
• Comprehensive Plan for Tehran (CPTM). 2006. [ICSPA] [Iran’s Supreme Council for Planning and Architecture]. Tehran: Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell R, Martin S. 2003. The joy of joining up: modes of integrating the local government modernization agenda. Environ Plann C. 21(2):159–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneshpour ZA. 2007. Spatial inequality and dislocation in Tehran’s urban region. In: Klausen JE, Swianiewicz P, editors. Cities in city regions- governing the diversity. European Urban Research Association Conference, Warsaw, Poland. Warsaw: University of Warsaw.
   Google Scholar
• Daneshpour ZA. 2011. Considering the quality of life and sustainability in the metropolitan landscapes. Paper presented at: EURA 2011. Proceeding of Cities without limits, International Conference of the European Urban Research Association (EURA); Jun 23–25; Copenhagen (Denmark).
   Google Scholar
• Daneshpour ZA, Tarantash M. 2017. Analysing the impact of unplanned metropolitan growth on the peripheral natural environment: special reference to the metropolitan region of Tehran. Baghe Nazar j. 13(43):41–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [DCLG] Department for Communities and Local Government. 2004. Planning policy statement 11: regional spatial strategies. London: Communities Local Government Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond DR. 1997. Metropolitan governance: its contemporary transformation. Jerusalem: Floersheimer Institute for Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker PF. 1992. The age of discontinuity: guidelines to our changing society. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimnia V, Daneshpour ZA. 2017. Policy-making in Tehran: exploring the dichotomy of integration-disintegration. Honar Ha Ye Ziba. 21(1):15–28. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Friend J, Hickling A. 2005. Planning under pressure: the strategic choice approach. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hall P, Pain K. 2006. The polycentric metropolis- learning from mega-city regions in Europe. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Harris B. 1987. Information is not enough. URISA News 90. p. 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Heim CE. 2001. Leapfrogging, urban sprawl, and growth management: Phoenix, 1950–2000. Am J Econ Sociol. 60(1):245–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey P. 2007. Urban complexity and spatial strategies: towards a relational planning for our times. London and NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holcombe R 1999. Urban sprawl: pro and con. Bozeman (MT): [PERC] Property and Environment Research Center; [accessed 2018 Aug 14]. https://www.perc.org/1999/02/10/urban-sprawl-pro-and-con/.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins LD, Schaeffer PV. 1985. The logic of planning behaviour. Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Illinois. Planning paper. Jul.
   Google Scholar
• Hovik S, Bjørn Stokke K. 2007. Network governance and policy integration: the case of regional coastal zone planning in Norway. Eur Plann Stud. 15(7):927–944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussaini SS. 2011. A feasibility study of the establishment of knowledge- management from the perspective of the infrastructure situation in district 8 of Tehran [ master’s thesis]. Tehran: Shahed University. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• [IMSC] Iranian Management Services Corporation. 2006. Strategic revision of Tehran metropolitan management system. Tehran: Tehran Urban Research and Planning Center. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Economics of Tarbiat Modarres University. 2001. Designing the urban conurbation management systems of Iran. Tehran: Urban and Rural Research Centre, Ministry of Interior. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemian G, Mirabedini Z. 2011. Pathology of integrated urban management in Tehran from the perspective of urban policy-making and decision-making. Honarhaye Ziba J. 46(3):27–38. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd S. 2007. Towards a framework of integration in spatial planning: an exploration from a health perspective. Plann Theory Pract. 2(8):161–181.
   Google Scholar
• Kim J. 2004. Fiscal decentralization in Korea. Seoul: Korea Institute of Public Finance.
   Google Scholar
• Koresawa A, Konvitz J. 2001. Towards a new role for spatial planning. In: OEC Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, editor. Towards a new role for spatial planning. Paris: OECD Publication Service; p. 11–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lailhonen H, Lonnqvist A. 2013. Managing regional development, a knowledge perspective. Int J Knowledge-Based Dev. 4(1):50–63.
   Google Scholar
• Liebowitz J, Beckman TJ. 1998. Knowledge organisations: what every manager should know. London: CRC Press LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Mansouri SM. 2014. Analysis of the comprehensive plan for Tehran (CPTM). Tehran: Nazar Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Motawef S. 2010. Integrated urban management and urban development planning organization of Tehran. Manzar J. 6:34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Nadin V. 2007. The emergence of the spatial planning approach in England. Plann Pract Res. 22(1):43–62.
   Google Scholar
• Nijkamp P, Rietveld P. 1989. Information systems for regional policy evaluation. Ekistics. 56:231–238.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka I. 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science. 5:14–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [OECD] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2006. Competitive cities in the global economy. Paris: OECD Territorial Reviews.
   Google Scholar
• [OECD] Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2009. Building blocks for policy coherence for development. Paris: OECD Publishing Services.
   Google Scholar
• Otim S. 2006. A case-based knowledge management system for disaster management: fundamental concepts. Paper presented at: ISCRAM Conference 2006. Proceedings of the 3rd International ISCRAM Conference; May; Newark (NJ).
   Google Scholar
• Park CM. 2000. Local politics and urban power structure in South Korea. Korean Soc Sci J. 27(2):41–68.
   Google Scholar
• Park CM. 2006. Developing local democracy in South Korea: challenges and prospects. Paper presented at: IPSA 2006. Proceedings of the 20th International Political Science Association World Congress; Jul 9–13; Fukuoka (Japan).
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer K, Baud I, Denis E, Scott D, Sydenstricker-Neto J. 2010. Spatial knowledge management tools in urban development. Paper presented at: N-AERUS 2010. Proceedings of the 11th N-AERUS Conference; Oct 28–30; Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• [PBO] Plan and Budget organisation of Iran. 2004. Law of the fourth plan of economic, social and cultural development of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: PBO. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenstein-Montano B. 2000. A survey of knowledge-based information systems for urban planning: moving towards knowledge management. Comput Environ Urban Syst. 24:155–172.
   Google Scholar
• Sarrafi M, Nejati NA. 2015. New regionalism approach for improving the system of spatial development management in Iran. Hum Geogr Res. 46(4):857–874. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon MA, Schmidt CH. 2002. Theoretical approaches to understanding inter-sectoral policy integration. In: Tikkanen I, Gluck P, Pajuoja H, editors. Proceedings of the Cross-sectoral policy Impacts on Forests Event; Apr 4–6; Savonlinna, Finland, Joensuu: European Forest Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Shokuhi MSB, Mahmeli HRA, Qaffari N, Mostofi AN. 2012. Indicators and measures of Tehran master plan assessment. Tehran: Tehran Urban Research and Planning Centre. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• [SCI] Statistical Centre of Iran. 2018. Atlas of Selected Results of the 2016, 2011, 2006, 1996, 1986, 1976, 1966, 1956 National Population and Housing Census. Tehran: plan and budget organization. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Stead D, Meijers E. 2004. Policy integration in practice: some experiences of integrating transport, land use planning and environmental policies in local government. In: Greening of policies: inter-linkages and policy integration. Proceedings of 2004 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environment Change; Dec 3–4; Berlin (Germany).
   Google Scholar
• Stead D, Meijers E. 2009. Spatial planning and policy integration: concepts, facilitators and inhibitors. Plann Theory Pract. 10(3):317–332.
   Google Scholar
• Iran’s Supreme Council of Planning and Architecture. 2002. Tehran urban region plan. Tehran: Iran’s Supreme Council of Planning and Architecture Tehran. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Tsekos T. 2003. Towards integrated policy making: remedying the public action dichotomy through information and communication technologies and learning. In: Rosenbaum A, Gajdosova LL, editors. State modernization and decentralization, implications for education and training. Public administration: Selected central European and global perspectives; Dec 6–8. Bratislava (Slovakia. Bratislava): NISPAcee. p. 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• The Structure of the Tokyo Metropolitan Government [TMG]. 2006–2018. Tokyo: Tokyo Metropolitan Government; [accessed 2018 Jul 21]. http://www.metro.tokyo.jp/english/about/structure/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Underdal A. 1980. Integrated marine policy - what? why? how. Mar Policy. 4(3):159–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonk G, Geertman S. 2008. Knowledge-based planning using planning support systems: practice-oriented lessons. In: Yigitcanlar T, Velibeyoglu K, Baum S, editors. Creative urban regions: harnessing urban technologies to support knowledge city initiatives. United Kingdom: Information science reference; p. 203–217.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson MI, Corey KE. 2008. The ALERT model: a planning-practice process for knowledge-based urban and regional development. In: Yigitcanlar T, Velibeyoglu K, Baum S, editors. Knowledge-based urban development: planning and applications in the information era. Hershey PA: IGI Global. p. 82–100.
   Google Scholar
• Yigitcanlar T, Velibeyoglu K. 2008. Knowledge-based strategic planning: harnessing (in)tangible assets of city-regions. Paper presented at: IFKAD 2008. Proceedings of the International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynmics; Jun 26–27. Matera, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Yue W. 2013. Measuring urban sprawl and its drivers in large Chinese cities: the case of Hangzhou. Land Use Policy. 31:358–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead M. 2003. (Re) Analysing the sustainable city: nature, urbanisation and the regulation of socio-environmental relations in the UK. Urban Stud. 40(7):1183–1206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [ISNA] Iranian Students’ News Agency. 2006.Workshop of analysis of the Comprehensive Plan for Tehran (CPTM). Tehran: [ISNA] Iranian Students’ News Agency. Persian.
   Google Scholar