Deliberating for sustainability: lessons from the Porto Alegre experiment with participatory budgeting

References

• Agyeman J. 2005. Sustainable communities and the challenge of environmental justice. London: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• ANTP. 2017. Tarifas em capitais e cidades com mais de 500 mil habitantes. [accessed 2017 Sept 22]. http://www.antp.org.br/sistema-de-informacoes-da-mobilidade/tarifas.html
   Google Scholar
• Avritzer L. 2006. New public spheres in Brazil: local democracy and deliberative politics. Int J Urban Reg Res. 30(3):623–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avritzer L. 2010. Living under a democracy: participation and its impact on the living conditions of the poor. Lat Am Res Rev. 45:166–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand K, Khan J, Kronsell A, Lövbrand E. 2010. eds Environmental politics and deliberative democracy: examining the promise of new modes of governance. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Baiocchi G. 2003. Participation, activism, and politics: the Porto Alegre experiment. In: Archon Fung A, Wright EO, editors. Deepening democracy: institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso; p. 45–76.
   Google Scholar
• Baiocchi G. 2005. Militants and citizens: the politics of participatory democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bortoleto AP, Hanaki K. 2007. Report: citizen participation as a part of integrated solid waste management: Porto Alegre case. Waste Manage Res. 25:276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulding C, Wampler B. 2010. Voice, votes, and resources: evaluating the effect of participatory democracy on well-being. World Dev. 38(1):125–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazil A 2017. Atlas do Desenvolvimento Humano no Brasil. Porto Alegre; [accessed 2017 Sept 22]. http://www.atlasbrasil.org.br/2013/pt/perfil_m/porto-alegre_rs
   Google Scholar
• Cabannes Y. 2004. 72 frequently asked questions about participatory budgeting. In: United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) Urban governance toolkit series. Quito: UN-HABITAT. ISBN: 92-1-131699-5. https://unhabitat.org/books/72-frequently-asked-questions-about-participatory-budgeting/
   Google Scholar
• Cabannes Y. 2004a. Participatory budgeting: a significant contribution to participatory democracy. Environ Urban. 16(1):27–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabannes Y. 2015. The impact of participatory budgeting on basic services: municipal practices and evidence from the field. Environ Urban. 27(1):257–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabannes Y, Delgado C, editors. 2015. Participatory budgeting, dossier Nº 1, another city is possible ! Alternatives to the city as a commodity series. Lisbon: Spora. ISBN 978-989-20-5561-9.
   Google Scholar
• Calisto Friant M, Langmore J. 2015. The buen vivir: a policy to survive the Anthropocene? Global Policy. 6(1):64–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carris. 2017. Títulos e Conquistas. [accessed 2017 Nov 17]. http://www.carris.com.br/default.php?p_secao=63
   Google Scholar
• Christoff P, Eckersley R. 2013. Globalization and the environment. Landham (MD): Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cifuentes LA, Krupnick AJ, O’Ryan R, Toman M. 2005. Urban air quality and human health in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington (DC): Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Fung A. 2004. Radical democracy. Swiss Political Sci Rev. 10(4):23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Dias SM, Alves FCG 2008, Integration of the informal recycling sector in solid waste management in Brazil. Study Prepared For GIZ’s Sector Project “Promotion Of Concepts For Pro-Poor And Environmentally Friendly Closed-Loop Approaches In Solid Waste Management.
   Google Scholar
• Downey L, Strife S. 2010. Inequality, democracy, and the environment. Organiz Environ. 23:155–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek JS. 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek JS. 2012. Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek JS, Stevenson H. 2011. Global democracy and earth system governance. Ecol Econ. 70(11):1865–1874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek JSStevenson H. 2011. Global democracy and earth system governance. Ecological Economics. 70(11):1865–1874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckersley R. 2004. The green state: rethinking democracy and sovereignty. Cambridge. (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• EPTC (Empresa Pública de Transporte e Circulação). 2011. Total de Passageiros. [accessed 2017 Aug 22]. http://lproweb.procempa.com.br/pmpa/prefpoa/eptc/usu_doc/total_passageiros_transportados_portipo_porano_mar2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fedozzi L, Furtado A, Bassani VDS, Macedo CEG, Parenza CT, Cruz M. 2013. Orçamento Participativo de Porto Alegre: perfil, avaliação e percepções do público participante. Porto Alegre: Gráfica e Editora Hartmnn.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin JS. 2011. When the people speak: deliberative democracy and public consultation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes-Nieva R, Galasso N. 2014. Working for the few: political capture and economic inequality. Oxford: Oxfam.
   Google Scholar
• Fung A. 2011. Reinventing democracy in Latin America. Perspect. Politics. 9:857–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung A, Wright EO, editors. 2003. Deepening democracy: institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. The Real Utopias Project IV. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves S. 2014. The effects of participatory budgeting on municipal expenditures and infant mortality in Brazil. World Dev. 53:94–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gret M, Sintomer Y. 2005. The Porto Alegre experiment: learning lessons for better democracy. Translated by Wright S. London/New York: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hall D, Lobina E, Viero OM, Maltz H. 2002. Water in Porto Alegre, Brazil. In: A Psiru and DMAE paper for WSSD. Porto Alegre: DMAE and PSI.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D. 2008. The right to the city. New Left Rev. 53:23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D. 2012. Rebel cities: from the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hilmer JD. 2010. The state of participatory democratic theory. New Political Sci. 32(1):43–63.
   Google Scholar
• IBGE (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica). 2010. Censo demografico 2010. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
   Google Scholar
• Inter-America Development Bank (IADB). 2005. Assessment of participatory budgeting in Brazil. Washington (DC): IADB.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre H. 1968. Le droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos.
   Google Scholar
• Marquetti A. 2002. O Orçamento Participativo como uma política redistributiva em Porto Alegre. 1º Encontro de Economia Gaúcha, 16–17 May 2002. Porto Alegre: FEE.
   Google Scholar
• Marquetti A, Schonerwald Da Silva CE, Campbell A. 2012. Participatory economic democracy in action participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre, 1989–2004. Rev Radical Political Econ. 44(1):62–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason M. 1999. Environmental democracy. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J. 1992. Beyond the limits: global collapse or a sustainable future. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Melgar TR. 2014. A time of closure? Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre, Brazil, after the workers’ party era. J Lat Am Stud. 46(1):121–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menegat R. 2002. Participatory democracy and sustainable development: integrated urban environmental management in Porto Alegre. Brazil Environ Urban. 4(2):181–206.
   Google Scholar
• Molina Molina J. 2011. Los presupuestos participativos un modelo para priorizar objetivos y gestionar eficientemente en la Administración Local. Pamplona: Editorial Aranzadi.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez T. 2018. Porto Alegre, from a role model to a crisis. In: Dias N, editor. Hope for democracy: 25 years of participatory budgeting worldwide. Porto Alegre: Epopeia Records and Oficina coordination; ; p. 517–536.
   Google Scholar
• ObservaPoA. 2017. Porto Alegre Em Analise, Sistema de gestão e análise de indicadores. [accessed 2017 Aug 29]. http://portoalegreemanalise.procempa.com.br/.
   Google Scholar
• PMPA (Prefeitura Municipal de Porto Alegre). 2002. Plano de Investimentos e Serviços – 2002. Porto Alegre: PMPA CRC, GAPLAN.
   Google Scholar
• PMPA (Prefeitura Municipal de Porto Alegre). 2017. A Cidade. [accessed 2017 Aug 29] http://www2.portoalegre.rs.gov.br/turismo/default.php?p_secao=256.
   Google Scholar
• Rennó L, Souza A. 2012. A metamorfose do orçamento participativo. Revista de Sociologia e Política. 20(41):235.
   Google Scholar
• Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Å P, Chapin III FS, Lambin E, Lenton T, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, et al. 2009. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc. 14:2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite D. 2003. The links between poverty and the environment in urban areas of Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Ann Am Acad Political Soc Sci. 590(1):73–92.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg D. 2007. Defining environmental justice: theories, movements and nature. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schouten G, Leroy P, Glasbergen P. 2012. On the deliberative capacity of private multi-stakeholder governance: the roundtables on responsible soy and sustainable palm oil. Ecol Econ. 83:42–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silveira Campos P, Silveira N. 2015. Orçamento participativo de Porto Alegre: 25 anos. Porto Alegre: Editora da Cidade/Gráfica Expresso.
   Google Scholar
• Smith G. 2003. Deliberative democracy and the environment. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Souza A. 2010. A metamorfose do orçamento participativo: uma analise da transição politica em Porto Alegre (1990-2009). [master’s thesis] Brasilia: Universidade de Brasília, instituto de Ciencias Sociais.
   Google Scholar
• Steenbergen MR, Bächtiger A, Spörndli M, Steiner J. 2003. Measuring political deliberation: a discourse quality index. Comp Eu Politics. 1(1):21–48.
   Google Scholar
• Touchton M, Wampler B. 2014. Improving social well-being through new democratic institutions. Comp Polit Stud. 47(10):1442–1469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallejo Silva T, Calisto Friant M. 2015. Ecuador’s Yasuní-ITT initiative for mitigating the impact of climate change. Environ Plann Law J. 32:278–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Weizsäcker EU, Wijkman A. 2018. Come on!: capitalism, short-termism, population and the destruction of the planet. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wampler B. 2012. Entering the state: civil society activism and participatory governance in Brazil. Polit Stud. 60:341–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters CN, Zalasiewicz J, Summerhayes C, Barnosky AD, Poirier C, Gałuszka A, Cearreta A, Edgeworth M, Ellis EC, Ellis M, et al. 2016. The anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science. 351:6269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WB (World Bank). 2008. Brazil: toward a more inclusive and effective participatory budget in Porto Alegre. Washington (DC): World Bank. Report No. 40144-BR. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/8042
   Google Scholar