Broader impacts of the fare-free public transportation system in Tallinn

References

• Aas T, 2013. Free public transport in Tallinn – financial, environmental and social aspects. Presentation on Union of the Baltic Cities Joint Seminar on Sustainable Transport Solutions; Tallinn (Estonia). Available on: http://www.tallinn.ee/eng/tasutauhistransport/UBCJoint-Seminar-on-Sustainable-Transport-solutions.
   Google Scholar
• Aftimus P, Santini D. 2018. Brazil: from Dream to Nightmare. In: Dellheim J, Prince J, editors. Free public transit: and why we don’t pay to ride elevators. Montreal: Black Rose Books; p. 185–198.
   Google Scholar
• Baum HJ. 1973. Free public transport. J Transp Econ Policy. 3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Brie M. 2018. Belgium: ending the car Siege in Hasselt. In: Dellheim J, Prince J, editors. Free public transit: and why we don’t pay to ride elevators. Montreal: Black Rose Books; p. 81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham P, Lutz KG, Grant W, Layton-Henry Z. 2008. Research methods in politics. New York, NY: Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cats O, Reimal T, Susilo Y. 2014. Public transport pricing policy – empirical evidence from a fare-free scheme in Tallinn. Estonia. Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Cats O, Susilo Y, Reimal T. 2017. The prospects of fare-free public transport: evidence from Tallinn. Transportation. 44:1083–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark B., Chatterjee K., Melia S. 2016. Changes to commute mode: The role of life events, spatial context and environmental attitude. Transportation Research Part A. Policy and Practice. 89:89–105.
   Google Scholar
• Commission European (2017) Country profile. Key indicators. Eesti. http://https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/informat/country2020/country_ee_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• David Q, Del Fabbro M, Vertier P. 2018. Etude sur la «gratuité» des transports en commun à Paris (No. info: hdl: 2441/5mq2s8mv9l9228rf1rhsu48492). Sciences Po, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Dellheim J. 2018. Germany: europe’s “Car Country” is Turning on its Head. In: Dellheim J, Prince J, editors. Free public transit: and why we don’t pay to ride elevators. Montreal: Black Rose Books; p. 151–168.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (2010). Europe 2020: a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Working paper {COM (2010) 2020}.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing R, Cervero R. 2010. Travel and the built environment. J Am Plann Assoc. 76(3):265–294. doi:10.1080/01944361003766766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fearnley N. 2013. Free fares policies: impact on public transport mode share and other transport policy goals. Int J Transp. 1(1):75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Gabaldón-Estevan D, Kaufmann C (2016) Environmental innovation through transport policy: the implementation of the free fare policy on public transport in Tallinn, Estonia. At the XII Conference on Transport Engineering; 7-9 June; Valencia (Spain).
   Google Scholar
• Gabaldón-Estevan D, Orru K, Kaufmann C, Orru H (2016) Evaluating an experiment: the case of fare-free public transportation system in Tallinn. At INOGOV MC and WG4 meeting “New Directions in Climate Policy and Governance: Polycentricity in Action?”; 1–3 June; Bratislava (Slovak Republic).
   Google Scholar
• Geels FW. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy. 31(8–9):1257–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW. 2005. Thed Dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: a multi- level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to auto-mobiles (1860–1930). Technol Anal Strateg Manag. 17(4):445–476. doi:10.1080/09537320500357319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW, Schot J. 2010. The dynamics of transitions: A socio-technical perspective. In: Grin J, Rotmans J, Schot J, editors. Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term transformative change. New York: Routledge; p. 11–104.
   Google Scholar
• Geels FW. 2012. A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transports studies. J Transp Geogr. 24:471–482. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW. 2014. Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: developing an inter-disciplinary triple embeddedness framework. Res Policy. 43(2):261–277. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman R, Veeneman W, Harman P. 2012. Innovation in public transport. In: Geels F.W, Kemp R, Dudley G, Lyons G, editors. Automobility in Transition? A Socio-Technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport. New York, NY: Routledge; p. 286–307.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann T, 2002, Projektbeschreibung „Fahrscheinfreier Stadtbusverkehr“ in Templin, Landkreis Uckermark. http://www.sozialticket.info/aktuell/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/2007_DarstellungStadtverkehrTemplin_Hertrich.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Holden E, Norland IT. 2005. Three challenges for the compact city as a sustainable urban form: household consumption of energy and transport in eight residential areas in the greater oslo region. Urban Studies. 42(12):2145–2166. doi:10.1080/00420980500332064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood C, Rothstein H, Baldwin R. 2001. The government of risk: understanding risk regulation regimes. New York (NY, USA): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jäggi M. 2018. Bologna’s Traffic Policy: “Free fares were just the beginning”. In: Dellheim J, Prince J, editors. Free public transit: and why we don’t pay to ride elevators. Montreal: Black Rose Books; p. 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson C, Norman M.Gidhagen L. 2007. Spatial and temporal variations of PM10 and particle number concentrations in urban air Environ. Monit. Assess., 127, pp. 477–487
   Google Scholar
• Kębłowski W. 2018a. Free Public Transit: scope and Definitions. In: Dellheim J, Prince J, editors. Free public transit: and why we don’t pay to ride elevators. Montreal: Black Rose Books; p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kębłowski W. 2018b. France: A “New May 1968” in Aubagne? In: Dellheim J, Prince J, editors. Free public transit: and Why We Don’t Pay to Ride Elevators. Montreal: Black Rose Books; p. 103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Kilani M, Houassa F. 2018. La réforme de la mobilité urbaine en présence de modes de transport semi-collectifs: le cas de la ville de Sousse. Revue dEconomie Regionale Urbaine. (4):805–828.
   Google Scholar
• Kriis K. 2018. Tasuta bussisõit − peavalu maainimestele ja bussifirmadele. Põhjarannik. 12(09):2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrechts D. 2005. Mobility policy in Hasselt. Belgium: Technische Dienst Verkeer.
   Google Scholar
• Lefèvre B. 2009. Urban transport energy consumption: determinants and strategies for its reduction. S.A.P.I.En.S. 2(3):1–17. http://sapiens.revues.org/914.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier J, Carrier M, Duarte F, Tremblay-Racicot F. 2016. Policy tools for sustainable transport in three cities of the Americas: seattle, Montreal and Curitiba. Transp Policy. 50:95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naess P. 2012. Urban form and travel behavior: experience from a Nordic contex. J Transp Land Use. 5:2. doi:10.5198/jtlu.v5i2.314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygård A. 2018. Sweden: jumping Turnstiles with Planka.nu. In: Dellheim J, Prince J, editors. Free Public Transit: and Why We Don’t Pay to Ride Elevators. Montreal: Black Rose Books; p. 111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Orru K, Poom A, Nordlund A. 2019. Socio-structural and psychological factors behind car use: comparing Northern and Eastern Europe. Transp Res Part A. 119:313−325. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.007
   Google Scholar
• Orru K, Rothstein H. 2015. Not ‘dead letters’, just ‘blind eyes’: the Europeanisation of drinking water risk regulation in Estonia and Lithuania. Environ Plann A. 47:356–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poom A, Ahas R. 2016. How does the environmental load of household consumption depend on residential location? Sustainability. 8(9):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poom A, Ahas R, Orru K. 2014. The impact of residential location and settlement hierarchy on ecological footprint. Environ Plann A. 46(10):2369−2384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince J. 2018. Jamming Fare Boxes in Montreal. In: Dellheim J, Prince J, editors. Free public transit: and Why We Don’t Pay to Ride Elevators. Montreal: Black Rose Books; p. 57–80.
   Google Scholar
• Ray R. 2018. The US: seeking Transit Justice from Seattle to NYC. In: Dellheim J, Prince J, editors. Free public transit: and Why We Don’t Pay to Ride Elevators. Montreal: Black Rose Books; p. 137–150.
   Google Scholar
• Reckien D, Flacke J, Dawson RJ, Heidrich O, Olazabal M, Foley A, Hamann JJ-P, Orru H, Salvia M, de Gregorio Hurtado S, et al. 2014. Climate change response in Europe: what’s the reality? Analysis of adaptation and mitigation plans from 200 urban areas in 11 countries. Clim Change. 122(1–2):331–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld H. 2018. Toronto: challenging the Impossible. In: Dellheim J, Prince J, editors. Free Public Transit: and Why We Don’t Pay to Ride Elevators. Montreal: Black Rose Books; p. 127–136.
   Google Scholar
• Storchmann K. 2003. Externalities by automobiles and fare-free transit in Germany – A paradigm shift? J Public Transp. 6(4):89–103.
   Google Scholar
• Templin S. 2000. Fahrscheinfreier Stadtverkehr der Stadt Templin. Informationsschrift. Templin (Germany): Stadt Templin.
   Google Scholar
• Tira M, DeRobertis M. 2018. Learning from Red Bologna. In: Dellheim J, Prince J, editors. Free public transit: and Why We Don’t Pay to Ride Elevators. Montreal: Black Rose Books; p. 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• Tomanek R (2017). Free-fare public transport in the concept of sustainable urban mobility. Transport Problems. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Zobel C, 2009. Aubagne and Etoile region, France: free public transport, United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG). www.uclg.org/cisdp/observatory.
   Google Scholar