2,883
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Grassroots innovations in community-led housing in England: the role and evolution of intermediaries

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 52-72 | Received 14 Nov 2018, Accepted 23 Aug 2019, Published online: 22 Sep 2019

References

  • Aalbers MB, Christophers B. 2014. Centring housing in political economy. Hous Theory Soc. 31(4):373–394.
  • [BSHF] Building and Social Housing Federation. 2014. Scaling up community housing solutions: background paper to the consultation. [accessed 2018 Nov 14]. https://www.bshf.org/publications/scaling-up-community-housing-solutions/
  • Agger A, Jensen JO. 2015. Area-based initiatives – and their work in bonding, bridging and linking social capital. Eur Plan Stud. 23(10):2045–2061.
  • Balmer I, Gerber J-D. 2018. Why are housing cooperatives successful? Insights from Swiss affordable housing policy. Housing Stud. 33(3):361–385.
  • Bengtsson B. 1992. Not the middle way but both ways — cooperative housing in Sweden. Scan Hous Plan Res. 9(Suppl2):87–104.
  • Bergman N, Whitmarsh L, Kohler J, Haxeltine A, Schilperoord M. 2007. Assessing transitions to sustainable housing and communities in the UK. In: Horner M, Hardcastle C, Price A, Bebbington J, editors. International Conference on While Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment. Glasgow. [accessed 2019 Sep 17]. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.511.509&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  • Berkhout F, Smith A, Stirling A 2003. Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts. SPRU Electronic Working Paper No. 106. Brighton (UK): SPRU – Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex; p. 26; [accessed 2017 February 1]. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/spru/publications/imprint/sewps/sewp106/sewp106.pdf
  • Bowman A, Ertürk I, Froud J, Johal S, Law J, Leaver A, Moran M, Williams K. editors. 2014. The end of the experiment? From competition to the foundational economy. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Boyer RH. 2015. Grassroots innovation for urban sustainability: comparing the diffusion pathways of three ecovillage projects. Environ Plann A. 47(2):320–337.
  • Boyer RH, Leland S. 2018. Cohousing for whom? Survey evidence to support the diffusion of socially and spatially integrated housing in the United States. Hous Policy Debate. 28(5):653–667.
  • Braunholtz-Speight T. 2015. Scottish community land initiatives: going beyond the locality to enable local empowerment. People Place Policy. 9(2):123–138.
  • Brunie A. 2009. Meaningful distinctions within a concept: relational, collective, and generalized social capital. Soc Sci Res. 38(2):251–265.
  • Cadywould C, O’Leary D. 2015. Community builders. London: Demos; [accessed 2018 Nov 14]. https://www.demos.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Community-Builders.pdf
  • [DCLG] Department for Communities and Local Government. 2011a. A plain English guide to the localism act. London: HM Government; [accessed 2018 Nov 14]. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/5959/1896534.pdf
  • [DCLG] Department for Communities and Local Government. 2011b. Laying the foundations: a housing strategy for England. [accessed 2018 Nov 14]. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/7532/2033676.pdf
  • Caniëls MCJ, Romijn HA. 2008. Actor networks in strategic niche management: insights from social network theory. Futures. 40(7):613–629.
  • Chatterton P. 2013. Towards an agenda for post-carbon cities: lessons from Lilac, the UK’s first ecological, affordable cohousing community. Int J Urban Reg. 37(5):1654–1674.
  • Czischke D. 2018. Collaborative housing and housing providers: towards an analytical framework of multi-stakeholder collaboration in housing co-production. Int J Housing Policy. 18(1):2023–2040.
  • Defourny J, Nyssens M. 2013. Social economy, social innovation and social enterprise: what can the European debate tell us? In: Moulaert F, MacCallum D, Mehmood A, Hamdouch A, editors. The international handbook on social innovation. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar; p. 40–52.
  • Dubois A, Gadde L-E. 2002. Systematic combining: an abductive approach to case research. J Bus Res. 55:553−560.
  • Fromm D. 2012. Seeding community: collaborative housing as a strategy for social and neighbourhood repair. Built Environ. 38(3):364–394.
  • Geels FW. 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case study. Res Policy. 31(8–9):1257–1274.
  • Geels FW. 2004. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res Policy. 33(6–7):897–920.
  • Geels FW, Deuten JJ. 2006. Local and global dynamics in technological development: a socio-cognitive perspective on knowledge flows and lessons from reinforced concrete. Sci Publ Policy. 33(4):265–275.
  • Geels FW, Raven RPJM. 2003. Non-linearity and expectations in niche-development trajectories: ups and downs in Dutch biogas development (1973–2003). Technol Anal Strateg. 18(3–4):375–392.
  • Geels FW, Schot J. 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy. 36(3):399–417.
  • Gibb K. 2015. The multiple policy failures of the UK bedroom tax. Int J Housing Policy. 15(2):148–166.
  • Gibbs D, O’Neill K. 2015. Building a green economy? Sustainability transitions in the UK building sector. Geoforum. 59:133–141.
  • Gruber E, Lang R. 2018. Collaborative housing models in Vienna through the lens of social innovation. In: Van Bortel G, Gruis V, Nieuwenhuijzen J, Pluijmers B, editors. Affordable housing governance and finance: innovations, partnerships and comparative perspectives. London: Routledge; p. 41–58.
  • Hargreaves T, Hielscher S, Seyfang G, Smith A. 2013. Grassroots innovations in community energy: the role of intermediaries in niche development. Global Environ Chang. 23(5):868–880.
  • Hatzl S, Seebauer S, Fleiß E, Posch A. 2016. Market-based vs. grassroots citizen participation initiatives in photovoltaics: a qualitative comparison of niche development. Futures. 78–79:57–70.
  • [HCA] The Homes and Communities Agency. 2011. Community-led development: eligibility criteria. [accessed 2018 Nov 14]. http://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/394037/community_led_eligibility.pdf
  • Heywood A 2016. Local housing, community living: prospects for scaling up and scaling out community-led housing, London: The Smith Institute; [accessed 2018 Nov 14]. http://www.smith-institute.org.uk/book/local-housing-community-living-prospects-for-scaling-up-and-scaling-out-community-led-housing/
  • Hodkinson S. 2015. All that is solid: the great housing disaster, by Danny Dorling. Int J Urban Reg. 39(3):641–643.
  • Immergluck D. 2011. Critical commentary. Sub-prime crisis, policy response and housing market restructuring. Urban Stud. 48(16):3371–3383.
  • Jarvis H. 2015. Towards a deeper understanding of the social architecture of co-housing: Evidence from the UK, the USA and Australia. Urban Research & Practice. 8(1):93–105.
  • Kemp R, Schot J, Hoogma R. 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technol Anal Strateg. 10(2):175–195.
  • Lang R. 2019. Social sustainability and collaborative housing: Lessons from an international comparative study. In: Shirazi MR, Keivani R, editors. Urban Social Sustainability: Theory, Policy and Practice. London: Routledge; p. 193–215
  • Lang R, Mullins D. 2015. Bringing real localism into practice through co-operative housing governance: the role and prospects for community-led housing in England. HCRG Working Paper 1-2015. Birmingham (UK): Housing and Communities Research Group (HCRG), University of Birmingham; p. 74. [accessed 2018 Nov 14]. http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-social-sciences/social-policy/IASS/housing/2015/working-paper-series/HCR-WP-1-2015.pdf
  • Lang R, Mullins D. 2019. Field emergence in civil society: A theoretical framework and its application to community-led housing organisations in England. Voluntas. [accessed 2019 Sep 18]. doi: doi.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-019-00138-z.
  • Lang R, Novy A. 2014. Cooperative housing and social cohesion: the role of linking social capital. Eur Plan Stud. 22(8):1744–1764.
  • Mayring P. 2010. Qualitative inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis Basics and techniques]. 11th ed. Weinheim (German): Beltz Verlag.
  • Middlemiss L, Parrish B. 2010. Building capacity for low-carbon communities: the role of grassroots initiatives. Energ Policy. 38:7559–7566.
  • Mullins D. 2018. Achieving policy recognition for community-based housing solutions: The case of self-help housing in England. Int J Hous Policy. 18(1):143–155.
  • Mullins D, Moore T. 2018. Self-organised and civil society participation in housing provision. Int J Hous Policy. 18(1):1–14.
  • Murie A. 2008. Moving homes: The housing corporation 1964–2008. London: Poltico’s.
  • Nicholls A, Teasdale S. 2017. Neoliberalism by stealth? Exploring continuity and change within the UK social enterprise policy paradigm. Policy Polit. 45(3):323–341.
  • O’Neill KJ, Gibbs DC. 2014. Towards a sustainable economy? Socio-technical transitions in the green building sector. Local Environ. 19(6):572–590.
  • Osborne C, Baldwin C, Thomsen D. 2016. Contributions of social capital to best practice urban planning outcomes. Urban Policy Res. 34(3):212–224.
  • Poortinga W. 2012. Community resilience and health: the role of bonding, bridging, and linking aspects of social capital. Health Place. 18(2):286–295.
  • Rotmans J, Kemp R, Van Asselt M. 2001. More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. foresight. 3(1):15–31.
  • Rowlands R. 2009. Forging mutual futures–co-operative, mutual and community based housing in practice: History and potential. Birmingham: Commission on Co-operative & Mutual Housing.
  • Ruiu ML. 2016. The social capital of cohousing communities. Sociology. 50(2):400–415.
  • Sanders F, van Bortel G. 2018. Exploring social system barriers and enablers in Dutch collaborative housing, using Rogers’ diffusion of innovations framework. Paper presented at the European Network for Housing Research Conference. Uppsala (Sweden); June 26–29.
  • Sanguinetti A. 2014. Transformational practices in cohousing: enhancing residents’ connection to community and nature. J Environ Psychol. 40:86–96.
  • Sayer A. 1992. Method in social science: A realist approach. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
  • Schot J, Geels FW. 2008. Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technol Anal Strateg. 20(5):537–554.
  • Seyfang G. 2010. Community action for sustainable housing: building a low-carbon future. Energ Policy. 38(12):7624–7633.
  • Seyfang G, Hielscher S, Hargreaves T, Martiskainen M, Smith A. 2014. A grassroots sustainable energy niche? Reflections on community energy in the UK. Environ Innov Societ Transitions. 13:21–44.
  • Seyfang G, Smith A. 2007. Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda. Environ Polit. 16(4):584–603.
  • Shirazi MR, Keivani R. 2017. Critical reflections on the theory and practice of social sustainability in the built environment: A meta- analysis. Local Environ. 22(12):1526–1545.
  • Smith A. 2007. Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Technol Anal Strateg. 19(4):427–450.
  • Smith A, Hargreaves T, Hielscher S, Martiskainen M, Seyfang G. 2016. Making the most of community energies: three perspectives on grassroots innovation. Environ Plann A. 48(2):407–432.
  • Smith A, Raven R. 2012. What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Res Policy. 41(6):1025–1036.
  • Smith A, Seyfang G. 2013. Constructing grassroots innovations for sustainability. Global Environ Chang. 23(5):827–829.
  • Szreter S, Woolcock M. 2004. Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health. Int J Epidemiol. 33(4):650–667.
  • Thompson M. forthcoming. Reconstructing Public Housing: Liverpool’s history of collective alternatives. Author’s manuscript. Liverpool University Press
  • Tummers L. 2016. The re-emergence of self-managed co-housing in Europe: A critical review of co-housing research. Urban Stud. 53(10):2023–2040.
  • Witkamp MJ, Raven RPJM, Royakkers LMM. 2011. Strategic niche management of social innovations: the case of social entrepreneurship. Technol Anal Strateg. 23(6):667–681.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.