Understanding sustainability transitions for urban informality in the Middle East

References

• Ababsa M. 2012. Public policies toward informal settlements in Jordan. In: Ababsa, M., Dupret, B.,Denis, E., editors. Popular housing and urban land tenure in the Middle East: Case Studies from Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press; p. 259–282.
   Google Scholar
• Abrams C. 1964. Man’s struggle for shelter in an urbanizing world. Cambridge (Mass): MITT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler P, Kwon S. 2002. Social capital respective or a new concept. Acad Manage Rev. 27(1):17–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Sayyad N. 2004. Urban Informality as a ‘New’ way of life. In: Roy A, Al Sayyad N, editors. Urban informality: transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lanham (USA): Lexington Books; p. 7–30.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander C, Silverstein, M, Angel, S, Ishikawa, S, Denny Abrams, D. 1975. The Oregon Experiment. California (USA): The Center for Environmental Structure.
   Google Scholar
• Arts B, Van Tatenhove J. 2004. Policy and power. A conceptual framework between the ”oldß and newß” policy idioms. Policy Sci. 37(3–4):339–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino F, Grin J, Jhagroe S, Pell B. 2016. Beyond deconstruction, a reconstructive perspective on sustainability transitions governance. Environ Innovation Societal Transitions. 22:15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai X, McAllister R, Beatty R, Taylor B. 2010. Urban policy and governance in a global environment: complex systems, scale mismatches and public participation. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 2:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bredenoord J, Lindert PV, Smets P, eds. 2014. Affordable housing in the urban global south: seeking sustainable solutions. Oxon (UK): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley R. 1979. The urban informal sector: critical perspectives on employment and housing policies. Headington Hill Hall, UK: Pergamon Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley R. 2004. Power, property and poverty: why De Soto’s mystery of capital cannot be solved. In: Al Sayyad N, Roy A, editors. Urban informality: transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lanham (USA): Lexington Books; p. 271–288.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne R. 2009. Learning drivers: rural electrification regime building in Kenya and Tanzania [PhD Thesis SPRU]. University of Sussex, UK: Science Policy Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell B, Sallis P. 2013. Low-carbon yak cheese: transition to biogas in a Himalayan socio-technical niche. Interface Focus. 3(1):18–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castán Broto V. 2016. Innovation territories and energy transitions. Energy, water and modernity in Spain, 1939–1975. J Environ Policy Plan. 18(5):712–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDR. 2016. Habitat III Lebanese national report. Final Report. Grand Serail, Beirut: Council for Development and Reconstruction,
   Google Scholar
• Coenen L, Benneworth P, Truffer B. 2012. Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Res Policy. 41:968–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier P. 2002. Social capital and poverty: a microeconomic perspective. In: Van Bastelaer T, Grootaert C, editors. The role of social capital in development: an empirical assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 19–41.
   Google Scholar
• d’Alençona PA, Smith H, Álvarez de Andrés E, Cabrera C, Fokdal J, Lombard M, Mazzolini A, Michelutti E, Moretto L, Spire A, et al. 2018. Interrogating informality: conceptualisations, practices and policies in the light of the new urban Agenda. Habitat Int. 75:59–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson F, Payne G. 1985. Urban project manual. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis M. 2006. Planet of slums. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• De Soto H. 1989. The other path: the invisible revolution in the third world. London: I.B. Taurus.
   Google Scholar
• De Soto H. 2000. The mastery of capital: why capitalism triumphs in the west and fails everywhere else. London: Black Swan.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey N, Jenks M. 2010. The future of the compact city. Built Environ. 36(1):5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Denis E. 2012. The commodification of the Ashwa’iyyat: urban land, housing market unification, and de Soto’s interventions in Egypt. In: Ababsa, et al., editor. 2012 popular housing and urban land tenure in the Middle East. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press; p. 227–258.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon T. 2014. Introduction. In: Dixon T, Eames, M, Hunt M, Lannon S C. Editors. Urban retrofitting for sustainability: mapping the transition to 2050. Abingdon: (Oxon, UK): Routledge; p. 1–s16.
   Google Scholar
• Edensor E, Jayne M. eds. 2011. Urban theory beyond the West: A world of cities. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Fathy H. 1973. Architecture for the poor: an experiment in rural Egypt. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fawaz M. 2008. An unusual clique of city-makers: social networks in the production of a neighborhood in Beirut (1950–75). Int J Urban Reg Res. 32.3:565–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawaz M. 2009. Neoliberal Urbanity and the right to the city: a view from Beirut’s periphery. Dev Change. 40(5):827–852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki N, Loorbach D. 2012. Governing societal transitions to sustainability. Int J Sustainable Dev. 15(Nos):1/2.
   Google Scholar
• Gans H. 1962. The urban villager: group and class in the life of Italian-Americans. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gaonkar DP. 2001. Alternative modernities. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes P. 1915. An introduction of the town planning movement and to the study for civics. London: Williams & Norgate.
   Google Scholar
• Geels F, Schot J. 2010. The dynamics of socio-technical transitions: a sociotechnical perspective. In: Rotmans J, Schot J, Grin J, editors. Transitions to Sustainable Development: new directions in the study of long-term transformative change. New York: Routledge; p. 11–93.
   Google Scholar
• Geels F. 2014. Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective theory. Cult Soc. 31(5):21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Geels F, Schot J. 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy. 36:399–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW. 2004. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Res Policy. 33:897–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW. 2005. The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: A multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles. Technol Anal Strategic Manage. 17(4):445–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW, Hekkert MP, Jacobsson S. 2008. The dynamics of sustainable innovation journeys. Technol Anal Strategic Manage. 20(5):521–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels FW, Kern F, Fuchs G, Hinderer, Nele N, Kungl G, Mylan J, Neukirch M, Wassermann S. 2016. The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Res Policy. 45:896–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough I, Wood G, Barrientos A, Bevan P. 2008. Insecurity and welfare regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America: social policy in development contexts. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grin J, Loeber A. 2007. Theories of learning. Agency, structure and change. In: Miller GJ, Sidney MS, Fischer F, editors. Handbook of public policy analysis. Theory, politics, and methods. New York: CRC Press; p. 201–222.
   Google Scholar
• Grin J, Rotmans J, Schot J. 2010. Transitions to sustainable development: new directions in the study of long term transformative change. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guha-Khasnobis B, Kanbur R, Ostrom E. 2006. Beyond formality and informality. In: Kanbur R, Ostrom E, Guha-Khasnobis B, editors. Linking the formal and informal economy: concepts and policies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson LH, Holling CS. 2002. Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart K. 1973. Informal income opportunities and urban employment in Ghana. Mod Afr Stud. 11(1):61–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey D. 1985. The urbanization of capital: studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization 2. Oxford (UK): Basil Blackwell Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey D. 2016. The ways of the world. London: Profile Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan A. 2001. Working with communities. Karachi. Pakistan: City Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatina M. 2007. Identity politics in the Middle East liberal thought and Islamic challenge in Egypt. London: Tauris Academic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman J. 2013. Theorising power in transition studies: the role creativity in novel practices in structural change. Policy Sci. 46(3):257–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogma R, Kemp R, Schot J, Truffer B. 2002. Experimenting for sustainable transport: the approach of strategic niche management. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Labor Office. 1972. Employment, Income and Inequality: A strategy for increasing productivity. Geneva:ILO.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins P. 2013. Urbanization, Urbanism and Urbanity in an African City: home spaces and house cultures. New York (NY): Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp R, Loorbach D, Rotmans J. 2007. Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 14:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp R, Schot J, Hoogma R. 1998. Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technol Anal Strategic Manage. 10:175–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler J., Geels F. W., Kern F., Onsongo E., Wieczorek A. J. (2017). A research agenda for the sustainability transitions research network. amsterdam, Netherland: STRN. Available online at. STRN. https://transitionsnetwork.org/about-strn/research_
   Google Scholar
• Köhlera J, Geels FW, Kern F, Markard J, Onsongo E, Wieczorek A, Alkemade F, Avelino F, Bergek A, Boons F, et al. 2019. An agenda for sustainability transitions research: state of the art and future directions. Environ Innovation Societal Transitions. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman J. 2003. Governing as Governance. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kreibich V. 2012. The mode of informal urbanization: reconciling social and statutory regulation in urban land management. In: Waibel M, McFarlane C, editors. Urban informalities: reflections on the formal and informal. Surrey (UK): Ashgate; p. 183–194.
   Google Scholar
• Laguerre MS. 1994. The Informal City. New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lawhon M, Murphy JT. 2012. Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions insights from political ecology. Prog Hum Geogr. 36:354–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre H. 1971. Everyday life in the modern world. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre H. 1991. The production of space. Maiden (USA): Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Leftwich A. 2010. Redefining politics. People, resources and power. New York (NY): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis O. 1966. Culture of poverty. Sci Am. 215(4):19–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis WA. 1954. Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor. Manchester Sch Econ Soc Stud. 22:139–191.
   Google Scholar
• Lipton M. 1984. Family, fungibility and formality: rural advantages of informal non-farm enterprise versus the urban-formal state. In: Amin S, editor. Human resources, employment and development, vol. 5: developing countries. London: MacMillan, for International Economic Association; p. 189–242.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach D. 2007. Transition Management: new mode of governance for sustainable development. Grifthoek (Utrecht, the Netherlands): International Books.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach D. 2010. Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive complexity-based governance framework. Governance. 23(1):161–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach D, Oxenaar S. 2018. Counting on Nature: transitions to a natural capital positive economy by creating an enabling environment for Natural Capital Approaches. Rotterdam: Dutch Research Institute for Transitions (DRIFT) Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach D, Wittmayer JM, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S. eds. 2016. Governance of urban sustainability transitions: European and Asian experiences. Japan: Springer Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Markard J, Raven R, Truffer B. 2012. Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Res Policy. 41(6):955–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft J. 2007. Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. J Environ Policy Plann. 9(3):299–314.
   Google Scholar
• Mguni P 2015. Sustainability transitions in the developing world: Exploring the potential for integrating Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems in Sub-Saharan Cities [PhD submitted to University of Copenhagen]. Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Mitlin D, Satterthwaite D. 2004. Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society, and urban poverty reduction. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Moser C. 1994. The informal sector debate, Part 1: 1970–1983. In: Rakowski C, editor. Contrapunto: the informal sector Debate in Latin America. Albany (US): State University of New York Press; p. 11–29.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford L. 1962. The city in history: its origins, its transformations, and its prospects. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Payne G, ed. 2002. Land, Rights and Innovation: improving security for the urban poor. London: ITDG.
   Google Scholar
• Perlman JE. 2010. Favela: four decades of living on the edge in Rio de Janeiro, New York: Oxford University Press, Inc
   Google Scholar
• Perlman J. 1976. The Myth of Marginality: urban poverty and politics in Rio de Janeiro. California: California University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rip A, Kemp R. 1998. “Technological change”, in “. In: Rayner S, Malone EL, editors. Human Choice and Climate Change, Volume 2. OH: Columbus, Battelle Press; p. 327–399.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson J. 2006. Ordinary Cities: between Modernity and Development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans J. 2006. A complex systems approach for sustainable cities. In: Ruth M, editor. Smart Growth and Climate Change. Cheltenham (UK; Northampton, MA): Edward Elgar; p. 155–180.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans J, Kemp R, van Asselt M. 2001. More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy”. Foresight. 3(1):15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Roy A. 2005. Urban informality: toward an epistemology of planning. J Am Plann Assoc. 71(2):147–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy A. 2009. The 21st-century metropolis: new geographies of theory. Reg Stud. 43(6):819–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy A, Al-Sayyad N. editors. 2004. Urban informality: transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Maryland (USA): Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schot JW. 1998. The usefulness of evolutionary models for explaining innovation: the case of the Netherlands in the nineteenth century. Hist Technol. 14:173–200.
   Google Scholar
• Schot JW, Geels FW. 2008. Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technol Anal Strategic Manage. 20(5):537–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott J. 1986. Everyday form of peasant resistance. J Peasant Stud. 13(2):5–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seely J. 1959. The Slum: its nature, use and users. J Am Inst Plann. 25(19):7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang G, Smith A. 2007. Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda. Env Polit. 16::584–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi M, Keivani R. eds. 2019. Urban social sustainability: theory, policy and practice. New York & Abingdon (UK): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sims D. 2010. Understanding Cairo: the logic of a city out of control. Cairo: America University Press in Cairo.
   Google Scholar
• Soliman A. 2004. A possible way out: formalizing housing informality in Egyptian cities. Lanham: American University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soliman A. 2012a. Building bridges with the grassroots: housing formalization process in Egyptian cities. J Hous Built Environ. 27(2):241–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliman A. 2012b. Housing and the state in the Middle East. In: Smith SJ, editor. International encyclopedia of housing and home. Amsterdam (Netherlands): Elsevier; p. 346–354.
   Google Scholar
• Soliman A 2013. Living with/in Ashwaiyyat in Egypt: is it a new innovation of urbanity? The Flexible City, International Symposium. Oxford, UK: Institute for Science (Innovation and Society (InSIS), University of Oxford), 24–25 October.
   Google Scholar
• Soliman A. 2017. Land readjustment as a mechanism for new urban land expansion in Egypt: experimenting participatory inclusive processes. Int J Urban Sustainable Dev. 9(3):313–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliman A. 2019. So it’s always a chance: community-led solutions to new urban expansion. In: Attia S, Shafik, Z, Ibrahim, A. editors. New cities and community extensions in Egypt and the Middle East. Germany: Springer International Publishing AG, Springer Nature; p. 159–179.
   Google Scholar
• Soliman A. Forthcoming. Experiencing urban informality: politics, economics and culture in Middle East Cities. Germany: Springer International Publishing AG, Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Sovacool B. 2016. How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions, 5. Energy Res Social Sci. 13:202–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes CJ. 1962. A theory of slums. Land Econ. 38(3):187–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swilling M, Musango J, Wakeford J. 2016. Developmental states and sustainability transitions. Prospects of a just transition in South Africa. J Environ Policy Plan. 18(5):650–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truffer B, Binz C, Gebauer H, Störmer E. 2012. Market success of on-site treatment: a systemic innovation problem. In: Udert T, Lienert K, Larsen J, editors. Wastewater treatment: source separation and decentralisation. IWA. London: IWA Publishing; p. 209–223.
   Google Scholar
• Turner J. 1976. Housing by people. London: Marion Boyars Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Turner J, Fichter R. 1972. Freedom to build: dwellers control of the housing process. New York (USA): The Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Turnheim B, Berkhout F, Geels FW, Hof A, McMeekin A, Nykvist B, van Vuuren DP. 2015. Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: bridging analytical. Global Environ Change. 35:239–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. 2003. The challenge of slums: global report on human settlements 2003. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• UN-Habitat. 2018. DG 11 synthesis report 2018: tracking progress towards inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable cities and human settlements. Nairobi (Kenya).
   Google Scholar
• Voss JP, Bauknecht D, Kemp R, Eds. 2006. Reflexive Governance for Sustainable. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Voss J-P, Bornemann B. 2011. The politics of reflexive governance: challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management. Ecol Soc. 16(2):9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakely P. 2018. Housing in Developing Cities: experience and Lessons. New York & Abingdon (UK): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ward P. ed. 1982. Self-help Housing: A critique. London: Alexandrine Press, Mansell Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Ward P. 2004. Informality of Housing production at the Urban-Rural Interface: The “Not so strange case” of Texas colonies. In Roy A, Al-Sayyad N. editors. Urban informality: transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Maryland (USA): Lexington Books; p. 243–270.
   Google Scholar
• Wieczorek A, Berkhout F, Raven R August 2018. “Sustainability experiments in Asia: transnational layeredness and its impact on up-scaling.” Paper presented at ITS Conference. Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Wieczorek AJ. 2018. Sustainability transitions in developing countries: major insights and their implications for research and policy. Environl Sci Policy. 84:204–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilk J, Jonsson B, Rydhagen DC, Ivan C, Noelia C, German E, Silvia K,A, Rani A. 2018. Assessing vulnerability in Cochabamba, Bolivia and Kota, India: how do stakeholder processes affect suggested climate adaptation interventions? Int J Urban Sustainable Dev. 10(1):32–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram M. 2017. Village communities and social innovation policies in Seoul: exploring the urban dimension of Grassroots niches. In: Frantzeskaki, Niki Castán Broto V, Coenen L, Loorbach D, editors. Urban Sustainability Transitions. New York: Routledge; p. 106–132.
   Google Scholar
• Woolcock M, Narayan D. 2000. Social capital: implications for development theory, research, and policy. World Bank Res Obs. 15(2):225–249. (World Bank Res).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar