615
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Encouraging household energy conservation through transdisciplinary approaches in Ghana and South Africa: assumptions, challenges and guidelines

, &
Pages 201-214 | Received 18 Jul 2022, Accepted 04 Jun 2023, Published online: 12 Jun 2023

References

  • Allen A, Lampis A, Swilling M. editors. 2015. Untamed Urbanisms (Open Access). London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315746692.
  • Ambole A, Musango JK, Buyana K, Ogot M, Anditi C, Mwau B, Kovacic Z, Smit S, Lwasa S, Nsangi G, et al. 2019. Mediating household energy transitions through co-design in Urban Kenya, Uganda and South Africa. Energy Res Soc Sci. 55:208–217. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2019.05.009.
  • Becker E. 2012. Social-ecological systems as epistemic objects. In: human-nature interactions in the Anthropocene: potentials of social-ecological systems analysis editors. Glaser, M; Krause, G; Ratter, B; Welp, M). London: Routledge; pp. 37–59.
  • Bornmann L. 2013. What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A Literature Survey. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 64(2):217–233. doi:10.1002/asi.22803.
  • Burger P, Kamber R, Schindler RA, Henry S. 2003. Cognitive integration in transdisciplinary science: knowledge as a key notion. Issues Interdiscip. Stud. 21:43–73.
  • Calitz J, Wright J Statistics of utility-scale power generation in South Africa in 2020. Available online: [accessed on 14 April 2023]. http://hdl.handle.net/10204/11865.
  • Chang H, Ngunjiri FW, Hernandez KAC. 2013. Collaborative Autoethnography. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Cundill G, Harvey B, Tebboth M, Cochrane L, Currie-Alder B, Vincent K, Lawn J, Nicholls Robert J, Scodanibbio L, Prakash A, et al. 2019. Large-scale transdisciplinary collaboration for adaptation research: challenges and Insights. Glob Chall. 3(4):1700132. doi:10.1002/gch2.201700132.
  • de Jong, SP, Wardenaar T, Horlings E, de Jong SPL. 2016. Exploring the promises of transdisciplinary research: a quantitative study of two climate research programmes14. Engag Sci. 45(7):1397–1409. doi:10.1016/J.RESPOL.2016.04.008.
  • Department of Energy. 2012. A survey of energy-related behaviour and perceptions in South Africa: the residential sector. Online. www.energy.gov.za
  • Energy Commission Ghana. 2012. Ghana - Sustainable energy for all action plan. Ghana: Republic of Ghana.
  • Eshun ME, Amoako-Tuffour JA. 2016. A review of the trends in Ghana’s power sector. Energy Sustain Soc. 6(1):9. doi:10.1186/s13705-016-0075-y.
  • ESKOM. 2014. Facts and figures. Online. www.eskom.co.za
  • Fazey I, Schäpkeb N, Canigliac G, Pattersond J, Hultmane J, van Mierlof B, Säwee F, Wiek A, Wittmayerh J, Alduncei P, et al. 2018. Ten Essentials for action-oriented and second order energy transitions, transformations, and climate change research. Energy Res Soc Sci. 40:54–70. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.026.
  • Femenías P, Thuvander L. 2018. Transdisciplinary research in the built environment: a question of time. Technol Innov Manag Rev. 8(8):27–40. doi:10.22215/timreview/1176.
  • Fritz L, Binder CR. 2020. Whose knowledge, whose values? An empirical analysis of power in transdisciplinary sustainability research. Eur J Futur Res. 8(1):1–21. doi:10.1186/s40309-020-0161-4.
  • Ghana Statistical Service. 2012. Population and Housing Census 2010. Ghana: Government of Ghana.
  • Guimarães MH, Pohl C, Bina O, Varanda M. 2019. Who is doing inter- and transdisciplinary research, and Why? An empirical study of motivations, attitudes, skills, and behaviours. Futures 112:102441. 10.1016/j.futures.2019.102441.
  • Hadorn GH, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Hoffmann-Riem H, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E. 2008. The emergence of transdisciplinarity as a form of research. In: Hadorn GH, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U Zemp E, editors. Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Netherlands: SpringerDordrecht; pp. 19–39. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6699-3_2
  • Hansson S, Polk M. 2018. Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: the usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact. Res Eval. 27:132–144. doi:10.1093/reseval/rvy004.
  • Hansson S, Polk M. 2018. Assessing the Impact of Transdisciplinary Research: The Usefulness of Relevance, Credibility, and Legitimacy for Understanding the Link between Process and Impact. Res Eval. 27(2):132–144.
  • Integrated Development Plan. 2020. IDP 2019–2020 for Makana Local Municipality. Makana. Available online: [accessed on 20 November 2021]. http://www.makana.gov.za/wpcontent/uploads/2013/06/Final-IDP-2019-20-updated.pdf
  • International Energy Agency. 2019. World Energy Outlook 2019. [Accessed 15 April 2023]. www.iea.org/weo .
  • Jaglin S. 2014. Regulating service delivery in southern cities: rethinking urban heterogeneity. In: Parnell S, Oldfield S, ed. The Routledge handbook on cities of the global south. London and New York: Routledge; pp. 456–469.
  • Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ. 2012. Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustain Sci. 7(S1):25–43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x.
  • Marshall MN. 1996. Sampling for qualitative research. Fam Pract. 13(6):522–526. doi:10.1093/fampra/13.6.522.
  • Marta N, Agnieszka T. 2015. Load shedding and the energy security of Republic of South Africa. J Pol Saf Reliab Assoc. 6:99–108.
  • Maslow AH. 1943. A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev. 50(4):370. doi:10.1037/h0054346.
  • Ministry of Environment, Science, Technology, and Innovation (MESTI). 2013. Comprehensive Urban Development Plan for Greater Kumasi in the Republic of Ghana. Accra, Ghana: Ministry of Environment, Science, Technology and Innovation.
  • Moser SC. 2016. Can science on transformation transform science? Lessons from Co-Design. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 20:106–115. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2016.10.007.
  • Mutumbi U, Thondhlana G, Ruwanza S. 2022. Co-designed interventions yield electricity savings among low-income households in Makhanda, South Africa. Energies. 15(7):2320. doi:10.3390/en15072320.
  • Mutumbi U, Thondhlana G, Ruwanza S. 2021. Reported behavioural patterns of electricity use among low-income households in Makhanda, South Africa. Sustainability. 13(13):7271. doi:10.3390/su13137271.
  • Nahiduzzaman KM, Aldosary AS, Abdallah AS, Asif M, Kua HW, Alqadhib AM. 2018. Households energy conservation in Saudi Arabia: lessons learnt from change-agents driven interventions program. J Clean Prod. 185:998–1014. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.052.
  • Norström AV, Cvitanovic C, Löf MF, West S, Wyborn C, Balvanera P, Bednarek AT, Bennett EM, Biggs R, de Bremond A, et al. 2020. Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nat Sustain. 3(3):182–190. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2.
  • Odume ON, Amaka-Otchere ABK, Onyima BN, Aziz F, Kushitor SB, Thiam S. 2021. Pathways, Contextual and cross-scale dynamics of science-policy-society interactions in transdisciplinary research in African Cities. Environ Science & Policy. 125:116–125. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.08.014.
  • Obeng GY. 2001. Kumasi Suame Magazine: A background paper. UNU/INTECH-KITE Research Project, Kumasi.
  • Pohl C, Hadorn GH 2007. Principles for Designing Transdisciplinary Research; oekom verlag.
  • Roy CP, JE W, EM W, Lunga D, TM L, St Rose AN, BL B. 2020. Electricity consumption patterns within cities: application of a data-driven settlement characterization method. Int J Digit Earth. 13(1):119–135. doi:10.1080/17538947.2018.1556355.
  • Schneider F, Giger M, Harari N, Moser S, Oberlack C, Providoli I, Schmid L, Tribaldos T, Zimmermann A. 2019. Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge and sustainability transformations: three generic mechanisms of impact generation. Environ Science & Policy 102:26–35. 10.1016/j.envsci.2019.08.017.
  • Spangenberg JH. 2011. Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons. Environ Conserv. 38(3):275–287. doi:10.1017/S0376892911000270.
  • Song K, Qu S, Taiebat M, Liang S, Xu M. 2019. Scale, distribution and variations of global greenhouse gas emissions driven by U.S. households. Environ Int. 9(133):105137. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105137.
  • Thomas DR. 2006. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 27(2):237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748.
  • Thondhlana G, Kua HW. 2016. Promoting Household energy conservation in low-income households through tailored interventions in Grahamstown, South Africa. J Clean Prod. 131:327–340. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.026.
  • Thondhlana G, Mubaya CP, McClure A, Amaka-Otchere ABK, Ruwanza S. 2021. Facilitating urban sustainability through transdisciplinary (td) research: lessons from Ghana, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. Sustainability. 13(11):6205. doi:10.3390/su13116205.
  • Umar BB, Kunda-Wamuwi CF. 2019. Socio-economic effects of load shedding on poor urban households and small business enterprises in Lusaka, Zambia. EER. 9(2):20. doi:10.5539/eer.v9n2p20.
  • van Breda J, Swilling M. 2018. The guiding logics and principles for designing emergent transdisciplinary research processes: learning Experiences and Reflections from a Transdisciplinary Urban Case Study in Enkanini Informal Settlement, South Africa. Sustain Sci. 14(3):823–841. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0606-x.
  • Wiek A. 2007. Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation – experiences from transdisciplinary case study research. GAIA - Ecol Perspect Sci Soc. 16(1):52–57. doi:10.14512/gaia.16.1.14.
  • Wiek A, Farioli F, Fukushi K, Yarime M. 2012. Sustainability science: bridging the gap between science and society. Sustain Sci. 7(S1):1–4. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0154-0.
  • Wiesmann U, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Hadorn GH, Hoffmann-Riem H, Joye D, Pohl C, Zemp E. 2008. Enhancing Transdisciplinary Research: a Synthesis in Fifteen Propositions. In: Hadorn GH, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U Zemp E, editors. Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research. Netherlands: SpringerDordrecht; pp. 433–441. 10.1007/978-1-4020-6699-3_29