Understanding the interactions between biowaste valorisation and the Sustainable Development Goals: insights from an early transition stage

References

• Aghbashlo M, Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha H, Shahbeik H, Tabatabaei M. 2022. The role of sustainability assessment tools in realizing bioenergy and bioproduct systems. Biofuel Res J. 9(3):1697–1706. doi: 10.18331/BRJ2022.9.3.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarenga P, Mourinha C, Farto M, Santos T, Palma P, Sengo J, Morais MC, Cunha-Queda C. 2015. Sewage sludge, compost and other representative organic wastes as agricultural soil amendments: benefits versus limiting factors. Waste Manag. 40(276):44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.027.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bennich T, Weitz N, Carlsen H. 2020. Deciphering the scientific literature on SDG interactions: a review and reading guide. Sci Total Environ. 728:138405. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstad A. 2014. Household food waste separation behavior and the importance of convenience. Waste Manag. 34(7):1317–1323. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.03.013. Internet.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw C. 2018. Waste law and the value of food. J Environ Law. 30(2):311–331. doi: 10.1093/jel/eqy009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braguglia CM, Gallipoli A, Gianico A, Pagliaccia P. 2018. Anaerobic bioconversion of food waste into energy: a critical review. Bioresour Technol. 248:37–56. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.145. Internet.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman A. 2012. Social Research Methods. 4th ed. London, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calicioglu Ö, Bogdanski A. 2021. Linking the bioeconomy to the 2030 sustainable development agenda: can SDG indicators be used to monitor progress towards a sustainable bioeconomy? N Biotechnol. 61(November 2020):40–49. doi: 10.1016/j.nbt.2020.10.010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christensen LD. 2022. Policy coherence in the Nordic bioeconomy? A novel set-theoretic approach to studying relations among policy goals. Environ Policy Gov. 32(5):390–410. doi: 10.1002/eet.1978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen T, Philippidis G, van Leeuwen M, Singh A, Panoutsou C. 2022. Bridging modelling and policymaking efforts to realize the European bioeconomy. GCB Bioenergy. 14(11):1183–1204. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12996.
   Google Scholar
• D’Amato D, Droste N, Allen B, Kettunen M, Lähtinen K, Korhonen J, Leskinen P, Matthies BD, Toppinen A. 2017. Green, circular, bio economy: a comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. J Clean Prod. 168:716–734. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amato D, Korhonen-Kurki K, Lyytikainen V, Matthies BD, Horcea-Milcu AI. 2022. Circular bioeconomy: actors and dynamics of knowledge co-production in Finland. For Policy Econ. 144(June 2021):102820. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102820. Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Dahiya S, Kumar AN, Shanthi Sravan J, Chatterjee S, Sarkar O, Mohan SV. 2018. Food waste biorefinery: sustainable strategy for circular bioeconomy. Bioresour Technol. 248(July 2017):2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.176. Internet.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ddiba D, Ekener E, Lindkvist M, Finnveden G. 2022. Sustainability assessment of increased circularity of urban organic waste streams. Sustain Prod Consum. 34:114–129. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.08.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drangert JO, Tonderski K, McConville J. 2018. Extending the European Union Waste Hierarchy to Guide Nutrient-Effective Urban Sanitation toward global food security—opportunities for phosphorus recovery. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2(February):1–13. doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2018.00003.
   Google Scholar
• Elghali L, Clift R, Sinclair P, Panoutsou C, Bauen A. 2007. Developing a sustainability framework for the assessment of bioenergy systems. Energy Policy. 35(12):6075–6083. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engström RE, Collste D, Cornell SE, Johnson FX, Carlsen H, Jaramillo F, Finnveden G, Destouni G, Howells M, Weitz N, et al. 2021. Succeeding at home and abroad: accounting for the international spillovers of cities’ SDG actions. NPJ Urban Sustain. 1(1). doi:10.1038/s42949-020-00002-w.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018a. Directive (EU) 2018/851 of the European Parliament and of the council of 30 May 2018 amending directive 2008/98/EC on waste; Internet. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2008/98/2018-07-05
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018b. A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. [Internet]. Brussels. doi:10.2777/478385.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, Platt R, Bauen A, Reumerman P, Geier C, Van Ree R, Vural Gursel I, Garcia L, Behrens M, Philip von B, et al. 2021. EU biorefinery outlook to 2030 – studies on support to research and innovation policy in the area of bio-based products and services [internet]. Brussels: Publications Office. 10.2777/103465.
   Google Scholar
• Falconer RE, Haltas I, Varga L, Forbes PJ, Abdel-Aal M, Panayotov N. 2020. Anaerobic digestion of food waste: eliciting sustainable water-energy-food nexus practices with Agent Based Modelling and visual analytics. J Clean Prod. 255:120060. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120060. Internet.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuso Nerini F, Sovacool B, Hughes N, Cozzi L, Cosgrave E, Howells M, Tavoni M, Tomei J, Zerriffi H, Milligan B. 2019. Connecting climate action with other sustainable development goals. Nat Sustain. 2(8):674–680. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0334-y. Internet.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanakis CM, Brunori G, Chiaramonti D, Matthews R, Panoutsou C, Fritsche UR. 2022. Bioeconomy and green recovery in a post-COVID-19 era. Sci Total Environ. 808:152180. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152180. [Internet]. 808:152180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gheewala SH. 2023. Life cycle assessment for sustainability assessment of biofuels and bioproducts. Biofuel Res J. 10(1):1810–1815. doi: 10.18331/BRJ2023.10.1.5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen V, Mäkinen-Rostedt K, Horcea-Milcu A, D’Amato D, Jämsä J, Soini K. 2022. Transdisciplinary research in natural resources management: towards an integrative and transformative use of co-concepts. Sustain Dev. 30(2):309–325. doi: 10.1002/sd.2276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanssen SV, Daioglou V, Steinmann ZJN, Frank S, Popp A, Brunelle T, Lauri P, Hasegawa T, Huijbregts MAJ, Van Vuuren DP. 2020. Biomass residues as twenty-first century bioenergy feedstock—a comparison of eight integrated assessment models. Clim Change. 163(3):1569–1586. doi: 10.1007/s10584-019-02539-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimann T. 2019. Bioeconomy and SDGs: does the bioeconomy support the achievement of the SDGs? Earth’s Futur. 7(1):43–57. doi: 10.1029/2018EF001014. Internet.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellenic Ministry of Environment and Energy. 2020. National Waste Management Plan 2020-2030 [Internet]. Greece. http://www.opengov.gr/minenv/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2020/08/ΕΣΔΑ-ΔΙΑΒΟΥΛΕΥΣΗ-6-8-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hellenic Republic. 2021. Law 4819/2021 framework law for waste. Greece. http://www.publicrevenue.gr/elib/view?d=/gr/act/2021/4819/
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Orozco E, Lobos-Alva I, Cardenas-Vélez M, Purkey D, Nilsson M, Martin P. 2021. The application of soft systems thinking in SDG interaction studies: a comparison between SDG interactions at national and subnational levels in Colombia. Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01808-z
   Google Scholar
• Hoolohan C, Soutar I, Suckling J, Druckman A, Larkin A, McLachlan C. 2019. Stepping-up innovations in the water–energy–food nexus: a case study of anaerobic digestion in the UK. Geogr J. 185(4):391–405. doi: 10.1111/geoj.12259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huovila A, Siikavirta H, Antuña Rozado C, Rökman J, Tuominen P, Paiho S, Å H, Ylén P. 2022. Carbon-neutral cities: critical review of theory and practice. J Clean Prod. 341(February):130912. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130912.
   Google Scholar
• Iacovidou E, Millward-Hopkins J, Busch J, Purnell P, Velis CA, Hahladakis JN, Zwirner O, Brown A. 2017. A pathway to circular economy: developing a conceptual framework for complex value assessment of resources recovered from waste. J Clean Prod. 168:1279–1288. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.002. Internet.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Advisory Council on Global Bioeconomy (IACGB). 2020. Global bioeconomy policy report (IV): a decade of bioeconomy policy development around the world. [internet]. (IV): 1–170. https://gbs2020.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/GBS-2020_Global-Bioeconomy-Policy-ReportIVweb-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson S. 2004. Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Med Educ. 38(12):1217–1218. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02012.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson N. 2021. Why is biogas production and not food donation the Swedish political priority for food waste management? Environ Sci Policy. 126(October):60–64. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.09.020. Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson N. 2022. Recycling warning! Reconfiguring the toxic politics of a circular economy. Sustain Sci (Who 2004). 18(2):1043–1048. doi: 10.1007/s11625-022-01220-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson N, Krook J. 2021. How to handle the policy conflict between resource circulation and hazardous substances in the use of waste? J Ind Ecol. 25(4):994–1008. doi: 10.1111/jiec.13103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaza S, Yao LC, Bhada-Tata P, Van Woerden F. 2018. What a waste 2.0, a Global Snapshot of Solid waste Management to 2050. Washington, DC: World Bank: The World Bank. [Internet]. 10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0.
   Google Scholar
• Kostetckaia M, Hametner M. 2022. How sustain Dev.(December goals interlinkages influence European Union countries’ progress towards the 2030 Agenda. Sustainable Dev. 30(5):916–926. doi: 10.1002/sd.2290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll C, Warchold A, Pradhan P. 2019. Sustainable development goals (SDGs): are we successful in turning trade-offs into synergies? Palgrave Commun. 5(1):1–11. doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0335-5. Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova E, Cardin MA, Diao M, Zhang S. 2019. Integrated decision-support methodology for combined centralized-decentralized waste-to-energy management systems design. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 103(December 2017):477–500. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.020. Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Lindfors A, Feiz R, Eklund M, Ammenberg J. 2019. Assessing the potential, performance and feasibility of urban solutions: methodological considerations and learnings from biogas solutions. Sustain. 11(14):3756. doi: 10.3390/su11143756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Lucia L, Slade R, Khan J. 2021. Decision-making fitness of methods to understand sustainable development goal interactions. Nat Sustain. 5(2):131–138. doi: 10.1038/s41893-021-00819-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markard J, Raven R, Truffer B. 2012. Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Res Policy. 41(6):955–967. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollum DL, Echeverri LG, Busch S, Pachauri S, Parkinson S, Rogelj J, Krey V, Minx JC, Nilsson M, Stevance AS, et al. 2018. Connecting the sustainable development goals by their energy inter-linkages. Environ Res Lett. 13(3):033006. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aaafe3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misslin R, Clivot H, Levavasseur F, Villerd J, Soulié JC, Houot S, Therond O. 2022. Integrated assessment and modeling of regional recycling of organic waste. J Clean Prod. 379(October):134725. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134725.
   Google Scholar
• Muscat A, de Olde EM, Kovacic Z, de Boer IJM, Ripoll-Bosch R. 2021. Food, energy or biomaterials? Policy coherence across agro-food and bioeconomy policy domains in the EU. Environ Sci Policy. 123(April):21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.001.
   Google Scholar
• Muscat A, de Olde EM, Ripoll-Bosch R, Van Zanten HHE, Metze TAP, CJAM T, van Ittersum MK, de Boer IJM. 2021. Principles, drivers and opportunities of a circular bioeconomy. Nat Food. 2(8):561–566. doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00340-7. Internet.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nerland R, Nilsen HR, Andersen B. 2022. Biosphere-based sustainability in local governments: sustainable development goal interactions and indicators for policymaking. Sustain Dev (march). 31(1):39–55. doi: 10.1002/sd.2371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Chisholm E, Griggs D, Howden-Chapman P, McCollum D, Messerli P, Neumann B, Stevance AS, Visbeck M, Stafford-Smith M. 2018. Mapping interactions between the sustainable development goals: lessons learned and ways forward. Sustain Sci. 13(6):1489–1503. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0604-z. Internet.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Griggs D, Visbeck M. 2016. Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature. 534(7607):320–322. doi: 10.1038/534320a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Zamparutti T, Petersen JE, Nykvist B, Rudberg P, Mcguinn J. 2012. Understanding policy coherence: analytical framework and examples of sector-environment policy interactions in the EU. Environ Policy Gov. 22(6):395–423. doi: 10.1002/eet.1589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntostoglou E, Khatiwada D, Martin V. 2021. The potential contribution of decentralized anaerobic digestion towards urban biowaste recovery systems: a scoping review. Sustain. 13(23):13435. doi: 10.3390/su132313435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papargyropoulou E, Lozano R, Steinberger K, Wright J, Ujang N, Bin Z. 2014. The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste. J Clean Prod. 76:106–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan P, Costa L, Rybski D, Lucht W, Kropp JP. 2017. A systematic study of sustainable development goal (SDG) interactions. Earth’s Futur. 5(11):1169–1179. doi: 10.1002/2017EF000632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvis B, Mao Y, Robinson D. 2019. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustain Sci. 14(3):681–695. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. Internet.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi D, Roe BE. 2017. Foodservice Composting Crowds Out Consumer Food Waste Reduction Behavior in a dining experiment. Am J Agric Econ. 99(5):1159–1171. doi: 10.1093/ajae/aax050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanauske N, Balezentis T, Streimikiene D. 2023. Biomass use and its implications for bioeconomy development: a resource efficiency perspective for the European countries. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 193(November 2022):122628. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122628. Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Ranjbari M, Saidani M, Shams Esfandabadi Z, Peng W, Lam SS, Aghbashlo M, Quatraro F, Tabatabaei M. 2021. Two decades of research on waste management in the circular economy: insights from bibliometric, text mining, and content analyses. J Clean Prod. 314(June):128009. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128009. Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Redlingshöfer B, Barles S, Weisz H. 2020. Are waste hierarchies effective in reducing environmental impacts from food waste? A systematic review for OECD countries. Resour Conserv Recycl. 156(January):104723. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104723. Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Rejeb A, Rejeb K, Appolloni A, Treiblmaier H, Iranmanesh M. 2023. Circular Economy Research in the COVID-19 era: a review and the road ahead. place unknown: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/s43615-023-00265-2.
   Google Scholar
• Ronzon T, Iost S, Philippidis G. 2022. Has the European Union entered a bioeconomy transition? Combining an output-based approach with a shift-share analysis. Environ Dev Sustain. 24(6):8195–8217. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01780-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronzon T, Sanjuán AI. 2020. Friends or foes? A compatibility assessment of bioeconomy-related sustainable development goals for European policy coherence. J Clean Prod. 254:119832. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvador R, Puglieri FN, Halog A, Andrade F, Piekarski CM, De Francisco AC. 2021. Key aspects for designing business models for a circular bioeconomy. J Clean Prod. Internet. 278:124341. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santagata R, Ripa M, Genovese A, Ulgiati S. 2021. Food waste recovery pathways: challenges and opportunities for an emerging bio-based circular economy. A systematic review and an assessment. J Clean Prod. 286:125490. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125490. Internet.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder P, Anggraeni K, Weber U. 2019. The relevance of circular economy practices to the sustainable development goals. J Ind Ecol. 23(1):77–95. doi: 10.1111/jiec.12732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh E, Kumar A, Mishra R, Kumar S. 2022. Solid waste management during COVID-19 pandemic: Recovery techniques and responses. Chemosphere. 288(P1):132451. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132451. Internet.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slorach PC, Jeswani HK, Cuéllar-Franca R, Azapagic A. 2019. Environmental and economic implications of recovering resources from food waste in a circular economy. Sci Total Environ. 693:693. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltanian S, Kalogirou SA, Ranjbari M, Amiri H, Mahian O, Khoshnevisan B, Jafary T, Nizami AS, Gupta VK, Aghaei S, et al. 2022. Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: a systematic critical review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 156(December 2021):111975. Internet. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111975.
   Google Scholar
• Stark S, Biber-Freudenberger L, Dietz T, Escobar N, Förster JJ, Henderson J, Laibach N, Börner J. 2022. Sustainability implications of transformation pathways for the bioeconomy. Sustain Prod Consum. 29:215–227. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.011. Internet.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starke JR, Metze TAP, Candel JJL, CJAM T. 2022. Conceptualizing controversies in the EU circular bioeconomy transition. AMBIO. 51(10):2079–2090. doi: 10.1007/s13280-022-01730-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegmann P, Londo M, Junginger M. 2020. The circular bioeconomy: its elements and role in European bioeconomy clusters. Resour Conserv Recycl X [Internet]. 6(July 2019):100029. doi: 10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100029.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner T, Zhang Y, Möller JN, Agarwal S, Löder MGJ, Greiner A, Laforsch C, Freitag R. 2022. Municipal biowaste treatment plants contribute to the contamination of the environment with residues of biodegradable plastics with putative higher persistence potential. Sci Rep. 12(1):1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12912-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teigiserova DA, Hamelin L, Thomsen M. 2020. Towards transparent valorization of food surplus, waste and loss: clarifying definitions, food waste hierarchy, and role in the circular economy. Sci Total Environ. 706:136033. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136033. Internet.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiriet P, Bioteau T, Tremier A. 2020. Optimization method to construct micro-anaerobic digesters networks for decentralized biowaste treatment in urban and peri-urban areas. J Clean Prod. 243:118478. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. doi:10.1163/157180910X12665776638740.
   Google Scholar
• Vandermeersch T, Alvarenga RAF, Ragaert P, Dewulf J. 2014. Environmental sustainability assessment of food waste valorization options. Resour Conserv Recycl. 87:57–64. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.03.008. Internet.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vea EB, Martinez-Sanchez V, Thomsen M. 2018. A review of waste management decision support tools and their ability to assess circular biowaste management systems. Sustain. 10(10):40–60. doi: 10.3390/su10103720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkata Mohan S, Dahiya S, Amulya K, Katakojwala R, Vanitha TK. 2019. Can circular bioeconomy be fueled by waste biorefineries — a closer look. Bioresour Technol Reports. 7(July):100277. doi: 10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100277. Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Weidner T, Graça J, Machado T, Yang A. 2020. Comparison of local and centralized biowaste management strategies – a spatially-sensitive approach for the region of Porto. Waste Manag. 118:552–562. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.013. Internet.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witjes S, Lozano R. 2016. Towards a more circular economy: proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models. Resour Conserv Recycl. 112:37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.015. Internet.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeller V, Lavigne C, D’Ans P, Towa E, Achten WMJ. 2020. Assessing the environmental performance for more local and more circular biowaste management options at city-region level. Sci Total Environ. 745:140690. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeug W, Bezama A, Moesenfechtel U, Jähkel A, Thrän D. 2019. Stakeholders’ interests and perceptions of bioeconomy monitoring using a sustainable development goal framework. Sustain. 11(6):1511. doi: 10.3390/su11061511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar