The Role of Multiple Imputation in Noninferiority Trials for Binary Outcomes

References

• Cochran, W. G. (1954), “Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ2 Tests,” Biometrics, 10, 417–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., and Kam, C. M. (2001), “A Comparison of Inclusive and Restrictive Strategies in Modern Missing Data Procedures,” Psychological Methods, 6, 330–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, C. P., and Manning, G. (1990), “Test Statistics and Sample Size Formulae for Comparative Binomial Trials With Null Hypothesis of Non-Zero Risk Difference or Non-Unity Relative Risk,” Statistics in Medicine, 9, 1447–1454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration (2016), Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials to Establish Effectiveness: Guidance for Industry, Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, available at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/…/Guidances/UCM202140.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gallo, P., and Chuang-Stein, C. (2009), “A Note on Missing Data in Noninferiority Trials,” Drug Information Journal, 43, 469–474.
   Google Scholar
• Lipkovich, I., Duan, Y., and Ahmed, S. (2005), “Multiple Imputation Compared with REPL and GEE for Analysis of Binary Repeated Measures in Clinical Studies,” Pharmaceutical Statistics, 4, 267–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A., and Rubin, D. B. (2002), Statistical Analysis with Missing Data (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Li, E., Wang, N., and Wang, N.-Y. (2007), “Joint Models for a Primary Endpoint and Multiple Longitudinal Covariate Processes,” Biometrics, 63, 1068–1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, G. F., and Pang, L. (2017), “Control-Based Imputation and Delta-Adjustment Stress Test for Missing Data Analysis in Longitudinal Clinical Trials,” Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 9, 186–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liublinska, V., and Rubin, D. B. (2014), “Sensitivity Analysis for a Partially Missing Binary Outcome in a Two-Arm Randomized Clinical Trial,” Statistics in Medicine, 33, 4170–4185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallinckrodt, C., and Lipkovich, I. (2016), Analyzing Longitudinal Clinical Trial Data: A Practical Guide, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Mantel, N., and Haenszel, W. (1959), “Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 719–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassiri, V., Molenberghs, G., and Verbeke. G. (2017), “A Simple, Principled Rule to Determine the Number of Multiple Imputations,” Submitted for Publication.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (2010), “The Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data in Clinical Trials,” Panel on Handling Missing Data in Clinical Trials, Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioural and Social Sciences and Education, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ratitch, B., O'Kelly, M., and Tosiello, R. (2013), “Missing Data in Clinical Trials: From Clinical Assumptions to Statistical Analysis Using Pattern Mixture Models,” Pharmaceutical Statistics, 12, 337–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothmann, M. D., Wiens, B. L., and Chan, I. S. F. (2012), Design and Analysis of Non-Inferiority Trials, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, R. (2016), “Confidence Interval of Difference of Proportions in Logistic Regression in Presence of Covariates,” Statistical Methods in Medical Research, pii, 0962280216631583. [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1987), Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. (2013), SAS/STAT® 9.4 User's Guide, Cary, NC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Schomaker, M., and Heumann, C. (2016), “Bootstrap Inference When Using Multiple Imputation,” arXiv:1602.07933 available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.07933.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Y. (2017), “An Efficient Multiple Imputation Algorithm for Control-Based and Delta-Adjusted Pattern Mixture Models using SAS,” Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 9, 116–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Buuren, S. (2012), Flexible Imputation of Missing Data, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Buuren, S., and Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011), “mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R,” Journal of Statistical Software, 45, 1–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiens, B. L. (2015), “Controversial (Unresolved) Issues in Noninferiority Trials,” in Clinical Trial Biostatistics and Biopharmaceutical Applications, eds. W. R. Young and D.-G. Chen, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiens, B. L., and Rosenkranz, G. (2013), “Missing Data in Non-inferiority trials,” Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 5, 383–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiens, B. L., and Zhao, W. (2007), “The Role of Intention to Treat in Analysis of Noninferiority Studies,” Clinical Trials: Journal of the Society for Clinical Trials, 4, 286–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, X., Lee, S., and Li, N. (2009), “Missing Data Handling Methods in Medical Device Clinical Trials,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 19, 1085–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanagawa, T., Tango, T., and Hiejima, Y. (1994), “Mantel-Haenszel-Type Tests for Testing Equivalence or More Than Equivalence in Comparative Clinical Trials,” Biometrics, 50, 859–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar