Simultaneous Confidence Intervals Compatible with Sequentially Rejective Graphical Procedures

References

• Alosh, M., Bretz, F., and Huque, M. (2014), “Advanced Multiplicity Adjustment Methods in Clinical Trials,” Statistics in Medicine, 33, 693–713. doi: 10.1002/sim.5974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretz, F., Maurer, W., Brannath, W., and Posch, M. (2009), “A Graphical Approach to Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedures,” Statistics in Medicine, 28, 586–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretz, F., Maurer, W., and Hommel, G. (2011a), “Test and Power Considerations for Multiple Endpoint Analyses Using Sequentially Rejective Graphical Procedures,” Statistics in Medicine, 13, 1489–1501.
   Google Scholar
• Bretz, F., Posch, M., Glimm, E., Klinglmueller, F., Maurer, W., and Rohmeyer, K. (2011b), “Graphical Approaches for Multiple Comparison Procedures Using Weighted Bonferroni, Simes, or Parametric Tests,” Biometrical Journal, 53, 894–913. doi: 10.1002/bimj.201000239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burman, C.-F., Sonesson, C., and Guilbaud, O. (2009), “A Recycling Approach for the Construction of Bonferroni-Based Multiple Tests,” Statistics in Medicine, 28, 739–761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dmitrienko, A., Bretz, F., Westfall, P. H., Troendle, J., Wiens, B. L., Tamhane, A. C., and Hsu, J. C. (2009), “Multiple Testing Methodology,” in Multiple Testing Problems in Pharmaceutical Statistics, eds. A. Dmitrienko, A. C. Tamhane, and F. Bretz, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC, pp. 35–98.
   Google Scholar
• Dmitrienko, A., and Tamhane, A. C. (2007), “Gatekeeping Procedures with Clinical Trial Applications,” Pharmaceutical Statistics, 6, 171–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dmitrienko, A., Tamhane, A. C., Wang, X., and Chen, X. (2006), “Stepwise Gatekeeping Procedures in Clinical Trial Applications,” Biometrical Journal, 48, 984–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Y. (2017), “Step-Down Parametric Procedures for Testing Correlated Endpoints in a Group-Sequential Trial,” Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 10, 18–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goeman, J. J., and Solari, A. (2010), “The Sequential Rejection Principle of Familywise Error Control,” Annals of Statistics, 38, 3782–3810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilbaud, O. (2008), “Simultaneous Confidence Regions Corresponding to Holm's Step-Down Procedure and Other Closed-Testing Procedures,” Biometrical Journal, 50, 678–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2009), “Alternative Confidence Regions for Bonferroni-Based Closed-Testing Procedures that are not Alpha-Exhaustive,” Biometrical Journal, 51, 721–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2012), “Simultaneous Confidence Regions for Closed Tests, Including Holm-, Hochberg-, and Hommel-Related Procedures,” Biometrical Journal, 54, 317–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2014), “Sharper Confidence Intervals for Hochberg- and Hommel-related Multiple Tests Based on an extended Simes Inequality,” Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 6, 123–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartung, H. P., Gonsette, R., König, N., Kwiecinski, H., Guseo, A., Morrisey, S. P., Krapf, H., and Zwingers, T. (2002). “Mitoxantrone in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized, Multicenter Trial,” Lancet, 360, 2018–2025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979), “A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, G., and Bretz, F. (2008), “Aesthetics and Power Considerations in Multiple Testing – A Contradiction?,” Biometrical Journal, 50, 657–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, G., Bretz, F., and Maurer, W. (2007), “Powerful Short-Cuts for Multiple Testing Procedures with Special Reference to Gatekeeping Strategies,” Statistics in Medicine, 26, 4063–4073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, E. L., and Romano, J. P. (2005), “Generalizations of the Familywise Error Rate,” Annals of Statistics, 33, 1138–1154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer, W., and Bretz, F. (2013a), “Memory and Other Properties of Test Procedures Generated by Entangled Graphs,” Statistics in Medicine, 32, 1739–1753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2013b), “Multiple Testing in Group Sequential Trials using Graphical Approaches,” Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 5, 311–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohmeyer, K., and Klinglmueller, F. (2015). “gMCP: Graph Based Multiple Test Procedures. R package version 0.8.10,” available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gMCP.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S., and Brannath, W. (2014), “Informative Simultaneous Confidence Intervals in Hierarchical Testing,” Methods of Information in Medicine, 53, 278–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2015), “Informative Simultaneous Confidence Intervals for the Fallback Procedure,” Biometrical Journal, 57, 712–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strassburger, K., and Bretz, F. (2008), “Compatible Simultaneous Lower Confidence Bounds for the Holm Procedure and other Bonferroni-Based Closed Tests,” Statistics in Medicine, 27, 4914–4927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiens, B., and Dmitrienko, A. (2005), “The Fallback Procedure for Evaluating a Single Family of Hypotheses,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 15, 929–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (2010), “On Selecting a Multiple Comparison Procedure for Analysis of A Clinical Trial: Fallback, Fixed Sequence, and Related Procedures,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 2, 22–32.
   Google Scholar
• Xi, D., Glimm, E., Maurer, W., and Bretz, F. (2017), “A Unified Framework for Weighted Parametric Multiple Test Procedures,” Biometrical Journal, 59, 918–931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar