Performance of LTMLE in the Presence of Missing Data in Control-Matched Longitudinal Studies

References

• Akaike, H. (1973), “Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle”, in Proceeding of the 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory, Tsahkadsor, Armenia, USSR, Sept. 2–8, 1971, eds. B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki, pp. 267–281, Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
   Google Scholar
• Akosile, M., Zhu, H., Zhang, S., Johnson, N. P., Lai, D., and Zhu, H. (2018), “Reassessing the Effectiveness of Right Heart Catheterization in the Initial Care of Critically Ill Patients Using Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation,” International Journal of Clinical Biostatistics and Biometrics, 4, 018. DOI: 10.23937/2469-5831/1510018..
   Google Scholar
• Austin, P. C. (2011), “An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 399–424. DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard, J., and Rubin, D. B. (1999), “Miscellanea. Small-Sample Degrees of Freedom with Multiple Imputation,” Biometrika, 86, 948–955. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/86.4.948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. A., Mallinckrodt, C. H., Lindborg, S. R., and Carter, M. K. (2008), “The Impact of Missing Data and How It Is Handled on the Rate of False Positive Results in Drug Development,” Pharmaceutical Statistics, 7, 215–225. DOI: 10.1002/pst.310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, H. A., Leyrat, C., Mansfield, K. E., Seaman, S., Tomlinson, L. A., Carpenter, J., and Williamson, E. J. (2020), “Propensity Scores Using Missingness Pattern Information: a Practical Guide,” Statistics in Medicine, 39, 1641–1657. DOI: 10.1002/sim.8503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J., Dekkers, O. M., and Cessie, S. I. (2019), “A Comparison of Different Methods to Handle Missing Data in the Context of Propensity Score Analysis,” European Journal of Epidemiology, 34, 23–36. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-018-0447-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffman, D. L., Zhou, J., and Cai, X. (2020), “Comparison of Methods for Handling Covariate Missingness in Propensity Score Estimation with a Binary Exposure,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20, 168–181. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01053-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz, I., and van der Laan, M. J. (2017), “Doubly Robust Inference for Targeted Minimum Loss-Based Estimation in Randomized Trials with Missing Outcome Data,” Statistics in Medicine, 36, 3807–3819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efroymson, M. A. (1960), “Multiple Regression Analysis”, in Mathematical Methods for Digital Computers, eds. A. Ralston and H. S. Wilf, pp. 191–203, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, S., and van der Laan, M. J. (2010), “A Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimator of a Causal Effect on a Bounded Continuous Outcome,” The International Journal of Biostatistics, 6, article 26. DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gruber, S., and van der Laan, M. J. (2009), “Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation: A gentle Introduction”, U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series. Working Paper 252, available at https://biostats.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper252.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, C. R. (1990), “Statistical Method in Animal Improvement: Historical Overview”, in Advances in Statistical Methods for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, eds. D. Gianola and K. Hammond, pp. 1–14, New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., and Stuart, E. A. (2007), “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference,” Political Analysis, 15, 199–236. DOI: 10.1093/pan/mpl013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., and Sturdivant, R. X. (2008), Applied Logistic Regression (3rd ed.), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kalaycioglu, O., Copas, A., King, M., and Omar, R. Z. (2016), “A Comparison of Multiple-Imputation Methods for Handling Missing Data in Repeated Measures Observational Studies,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 179, 683–706. DOI: 10.1111/rssa.12140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lendle, S. D., Schwab, J., Petersen, M. L., and van der Laan, M. J. (2017), “ltmle: An R package Implementing Targeted Minimum Loss-Based Estimation for Longitudinal Data,” Journal of Statistical Software, 81, 1–21. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v081.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, M. S., and Yue, L. Q. (2013), “Regulatory Issues of Propensity Score Methodology Application to Drug and Device Safety Studies,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 23, 110–121. DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2013.735778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipkovich, I., Ratitch, B., and Mallinckrodt, C. H. (2020), “Causal Inference and Estimands in Clinical Trials,” Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 12, 54–67. DOI: 10.1080/19466315.2019.1697739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, R. J. A., and Rubin, D. B. (2002), Statistical Analysis with Missing Data (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Malla, L., Perera-Salazar, R., McFadden, E., Ogero, M., Stepniewska, K., and English, M. (2018), “Handling Missing Data in Propensity Score Estimation in Comparative Effectiveness Evaluations: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 7, 271–279. DOI: 10.2217/cer-2017-0071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallinckrodt, C., Clark, W. S., and David, S. R. (2001), “Accounting for Dropout Bias Using Mixed-Effects Models,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 11, 9–21. DOI: 10.1081/BIP-100104194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morshed, S., Tornetta, P., and Bhandari, M. (2009), “Analysis of Observational Studies: A Guide to Understanding Statistical Methods,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 91, 50–60. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01577.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., and Rubin, D. B. (1983), “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects,” Biometrika, 70, 41–55. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1974), “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701. DOI: 10.1037/h0037350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1976), “Inference and Missing Data,” Biometrika, 63, 581–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1977), “Formalizing Subjective Notations About the Effect of Nonrespondents in Sample Surveys,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72, 538–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (2004), “On Principles for Modeling Propensity Scores in Medical Research,” Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 13, 855–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B., and Thomas, N. (2000), “Combining Propensity Score Matching with Additional Adjustments for Prognostic Covariate,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 573–585. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2000.10474233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. (2015), “SAS/STATR 14.1 User’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc,” available at https://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/stat/141/mixed.pdf. Accessed May 21, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Schnitzer, M. E., Lok, J. J., and Bosch, R. J. (2016), “Double Robust and Efficient Estimation of a Prognostic Model for Events in the Presence of Dependent Censoring,” Biostatistics, 17, 165–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuler, M. S., and Rose, S. (2017), “Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies,” American Journal of Epidemiology, 185, 65–73. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kww165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, G. E. (1978), “Estimating the Dimension of a Model,” Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, S. R., Casella, G., and McCulloch, C. E. (1992), Variance Components, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, O. (2011), “MMRM versus MI in Dealing with Missing Data – A Comparison Based on 25 NDA Datasets,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 21, 423–436. DOI: 10.1080/10543401003777995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steyerberg, E. W. (2008), Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating, Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Storica, P., and Selen, Y. (2004), “Model-Order Selection: A Review of Information Criterion Rules,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 21, 36–47. DOI: 10.1109/MSP.2004.1311138.
   Google Scholar
• Toh, S., Rodriguez, L. A. G., and Hernan, M. A. (2012), “Analyzing Partially Missing Confounder Information in Comparative Effectiveness and Safety Research of Therapeutics,” Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 21, 13–20. DOI: 10.1002/pds.3248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Laan, M. J., and Gruber, S. (2016), “One-Step Targeted Minimum Loss-Based Estimation Based on Universal Least Favorable One-Dimensional Submodels,” The International Journal of Biostatistics, 12, 351–378. DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0054.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Laan, M. J., Polley, E. C., and Hubbard, A. E. (2007), “Super Learner,” Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 6. DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Laan, M. J., and Robins, J. M. (2003), Unified Methods for Censored Longitudinal Data and Causality, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van der Laan, M. J., and Rose, S. (2011), Targeted Learning: Prediction and Causal Inference for Observational and Experimental Data, New York: Springer, available at http://www.targetedlearningbook.com.
   Google Scholar
• van der Laan, M. J. (2018), Targeted Learning in Data Science: Causal Inference for Complex Longitudinal Studies, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• van der Laan, M. J., and Rubin, D. E. (2006), “Targeted Maximum Likelihood Learning,” The International Journal of Biostatistics, 2. Available at https://biostats.bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper213/.
   Google Scholar
• van der Laan, M. J., and Gruber, S. (2011), “Targeted Minimum Loss based Estimation of an Intervention Specific Mean Outcome,” U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series, Working Paper 290, available at https://biostats/bepress.com/ucbbiostat/paper290.
   Google Scholar
• Venables, W. N., and Ripley, B. D. (2002), Modern Applied Statistics with S (4th ed.), New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, P. T. (2020), “How Many Imputations Do You Need? A Two-Stage Calculation Using a Quadratic Rule,” Sociological Methods & Research, 49, 699–718. DOI: 10.1177/0049124117747303..
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue, L. Q. (2012), “Regulatory Considerations in the Design of Comparative Observational Studies Using Propensity Scores,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 22, 1272–1279. DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2012.715111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H. (2019), “Covariate Adjusted Response Adaptive Randomization Designs with Targeted Learning”, Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Public Health, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA, available at https://digitalcommons.library.tmc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1202andcontext=uthsph_dissertsopen.
   Google Scholar