Bayesian Simultaneous Credible Intervals for Effect Measures from Multiple Markers

References

• Abramovich, F., and Angelini, C. (2006), “Bayesian Maximum a Posteriori Multiple Testing Procedure,” Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, 68, 436–460.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. O., Bernardo, J. M., and Sun, D. (2015), “Overall Objective Priors,” Bayesian Analysis, 10, 189–221. DOI: 10.1214/14-BA915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravarthy, U., Evans, J., and Rosenfeld, P. (2010), “Clinical Review, Age Related Macular Degeneration,” British Medical Journal, 340, c981. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c981.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cytel Inc. (2019), StatXact 12. Software Manual. Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Dmitrienko, A., and Tamhane, A. C. (2007), “Gatekeeping Procedures with Clinical Trial Applications,” Pharmaceutical Statistics, 6, 171–180. DOI: 10.1002/pst.291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, K. R. (1969), “Simultaneous Test Procedures—Some Theory of Multiple Comparisons,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 40, 224–250. DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177697819.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, M., and Heitjan, D. F. (2010), “Multiplicity-Calibrated Bayesian Hypothesis Tests,” Biostatistics, 11, 473–483. DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxq012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, T. W., Ferrari, M. D., Dodick, D. W., Galet, V., Kost, J., Fan, X., Leibensperger, H., Froman, S., Assaid, C., Lines, C., Koppen, H., and Winner, P. K. (2008), “Efficacy and Tolerability of MK-0974 (telcagepant), a New Oral Antagonist of Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Receptor, Compared with Zolmitriptan for Acute Migraine: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Treatment Trial,” Lancet, 372, 2115–2123. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61626-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochberg, Y. (1988), “A Sharper Bonferroni Procedure for Multiple Tests of Significance,” Biometrika, 75, 800–802. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/75.4.800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979), “A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, G., Bretz, F., and Maurer, W. (2007), “Powerful Shortcuts for Multiple Testing Procedures with Special Reference to Gatekeeping Strategies,” Statistics in Medicine, 26, 4063–4073. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huque, M. F., Quasem, M., Rahman, A., and Dubey, S. D. (2010), “An Improved ad-hoc Multiplicity Adjustment Method for Correlated Response Variables,” Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 2, 1–21. DOI: 10.1198/sbr.2009.0052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammer, M. (2020), simdata 0.2.0.9003. R package.
   Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K. (2014), Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with r, JAGS, and stan (2nd ed.), Amsterdam: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith, M., and Kruschke, J. (2020), “R package Highest (Posterior) Density Intervals v. 0.2.2, 2020-05-18,” R package, R 4.1.2.
   Google Scholar
• Montiel Olea, J. L., and Plagborg-Møller, M. (2019), “Simultaneous Confidence Bands: Theory, Implementation, and an Application to SVARS,” Journal of Applied Economics, 34, 1–17. DOI: 10.1002/jae.2656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe, R. G. (1998), “Interval Estimation for the Difference between Independent Proportions: Comparison of Eleven Methods,” Statistics in Medicine, 17, 873–890. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<873::AID-SIM779>3.0.CO;2-I.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurminen, M., and Mutanen, P. (1987), “Exact Bayesian Analysis of Two Proportions,” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 14, 61–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ollila, T., Silvennoinen, J., Joshi, A., Liu, J., Kulathinal, S., and Immonen, I. (2022), “Analyzing Subgroups and Treatment Discontinuation in a Finnish Cohort of Patients with Neovascular AMD,” Ophthalmologica, 245, 358–367. DOI: 10.1159/000524848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesarin, F. (1990), “On a Nonparametric Combination Method for Dependent Permutation Tests with Applications,” Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Quality of Life in the Medically Ill: A Psychosomatic Approach, 54, 172–179. DOI: 10.1159/000288391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robin, R., Susanne, U., Gerd, R., and Martin, P. (2019), “Methods for the Analysis of Multiple Endpoints in Small Populations: A Review,” Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 29, 1–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röhmel, J. G. C., Benda, N., and Läuter, J. (2006), “On Testing Simultaneously Non-inferiority in Two Multiple Primary Endpoints and Superiority in at Least One of Them,” Biometrical Journal, 48, 916–933. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.200510289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousson, V. (2014), “Measuring an Effect Size from Dichotomized Data: Contrasted Results whether using a Correlation or an Odds Ratio,” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 144–163. DOI: 10.3102/1076998614524597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, S. N., and Bose, R. C. (1953), “Simultaneous Confidence Interval Estimation,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 24, 513–536. DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177728912.
   Google Scholar
• Simes, R. J. (1986), “An Improved Bonferroni Procedure for Multiple Tests of Significance,” Biometrika, 63, 655–660. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/73.3.751.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, N., and Yu, B. (2020), “Simultaneous Confidence Interval for Assessing Non-inferiority with Assay Sensitivity in a Three-arm Trial with Binary Endpoints,” Pharmaceutical Statistics, 19, 518–531. DOI: 10.1002/pst.2010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkkan, M., and Pham-Gia, T. (1993), “Computation of the Highest Posterior Density Interval in Bayesian Analysis,” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 44, 243–250. DOI: 10.1080/00949659308811461.
   Google Scholar
• Waterman, M. S., and Whiteman, D. E. (1978), “Estimation of Probability Densities by Empirical Density Functions,” International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 9, 127–137. DOI: 10.1080/0020739780090201.
   Google Scholar
• Westfall, P. H., and Krishen, A. (2001), “Optimally Weighted, Fixed Sequence and Gatekeeper Multiple Testing Procedures,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 99, 25–41. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-3758(01)00077-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar