Smart structures with embedded flexible sensors fabricated by fused deposition modeling-based multimaterial 3D printing

References

• Kumar KU, Boby SN, Ghoshal S, et al. An experimental study of sensor based smart structure design: a modal study. Int J Civil Eng Technol. 2017;8:862–867.
   Google Scholar
• Teng KH, Kot P, Muradov M, et al. Embedded smart antenna for non-destructive testing and evaluation (NDT&E) of moisture content and deterioration in concrete. Sensors (Basel). 2019;19(3):547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Wu T, Zhao W, et al. Laser-induced corrugated graphene films for integrated multimodal sensors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(31):37433–37444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrman B, du Pasquier C, Thomsen C, et al. Printed silicone pneumatic actuators for soft robotics. Addit Manuf. 2021;40:101860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez EF, Wanasinghe SV, Flynn AE, et al. 3D-printed self-healing elastomers for modular soft robotics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(24):28870–28877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Yu L, Yeo JC, et al. Flexible hybrid sensors for health monitoring: materials and mechanisms to render wearability. Adv Mater. 2020;32(15):e1902133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derakhshandeh H, Aghabaglou F, McCarthy A, et al. A wirelessly controlled smart bandage with 3D-printed miniaturized needle arrays. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30(13):1905544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh A, Edwards DJ, Hosseini MR. Patterns and trends in Internet of Things (IoT) research: future applications in the construction industry. Eng Constr Archit Manage. 2020;28(2):457–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelgawad A, Yelamarthi K. Internet of things (IoT) platform for structure health monitoring. Wireless Commun Mobile Comput. 2017;2017:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ge Q, Li Z, Wang Z, et al. Projection micro stereolithography based 3D printing and its applications. Int J Extreme Manuf. 2020;2(2):022004.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald E, Wicker R. Multiprocess 3D printing for increasing component functionality. Science. 2016;353(6307):aaf2093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, He X, Cheng J, et al. Hydrogel-elastomer-based stretchable strain sensor fabricated by a simple projection lithography method. Int J Smart Nano Mater. 2021;1–13. DOI:10.1080/19475411.2021.1952335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronca A, Rollo G, Cerruti P, et al. Selective laser sintering fabricated thermoplastic polyurethane/graphene cellular structures with tailorable properties and high strain sensitivity. Appl Sci. 2019;9(5):864.
   Google Scholar
• Ge Q, Chen Z, Cheng J, et al. 3D printing of highly stretchable hydrogel with diverse UV curable polymers. Sci Adv. 2021;7(2):eaba4261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahammed SR, Praveen AS. Direct ink writing method for manufacturing electronic circuits using multiwalled carbon nanotubes and polyvinyl alcohol composites. Mater Performance Characterization. 2020;9(1):665–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T, Li Y, Karyappa R, et al. Fabrication of integrated microfluidic devices by direct ink writing (DIW) 3D printing. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2019;297:126609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y-F, Ge Q. A numerical framework for the design of Joule-heating circuits to thermally activate smart materials. Smart Mater Struct. 2019;28(11):115026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y-F, Li Z, Li H, et al. Fractal-based stretchable circuits via electric-field-driven microscale 3D printing for localized heating of shape memory polymers in 4D printing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021. DOI:10.1021/acsami.1c03572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine AD, Busbee TA, Boley JW, et al. Hybrid 3D printing of soft electronics. Adv Mater. 2017;29(40):1703817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh GL, Dikshit V, Koneru R, et al. Fabrication of design-optimized multifunctional safety cage with conformal circuits for drone using hybrid 3D printing technology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2022;120(3–4):2573–2586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell J, Ahmadkhanlou F, and Yoon H-S, et al. All-printed smart structures: a viable option? Active Passive Smart Struct Integr Syst. 2014 9057 ;727–734.
   Google Scholar
• Ji Y, Luan C, Yao X, et al. Recent progress in 3D printing of smart structures: classification, challenges, and trends. Adv Intell Sys. 2021;2000271. DOI:10.1002/aisy.202000271.
   Google Scholar
• Han D, Lee H. Recent advances in multi-material additive manufacturing: methods and applications. Curr Opin Chem Eng. 2020;28:158–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolfagharian A, Mahmud MP, Gharaie S, et al. 3D/4D-printed bending-type soft pneumatic actuators: fabrication, modelling, and control. Virtual Phys Prototyping. 2020;15:373–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolfagharian A, Gharaie S, Gregory J, et al. A bioinspired compliant 3D-printed soft gripper. Soft Robot. 2021. DOI:10.1089/soro.2020.0194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarali E, Baniasadi M, Zolfagharian A, et al. Magneto‐/electro‐responsive polymers toward manufacturing, characterization, and biomedical/soft robotic applications. Appl Mater Today. 2022;26:101306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirado-Garcia I, Garcia-Gonzalez D, Garzon-Hernandez S, et al. Conductive 3D printed PLA composites: on the interplay of mechanical, electrical and thermal behaviours. Compos Struct. 2021;265:113744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Yang B, Fu F, et al. Resistivity and its anisotropy characterization of 3D-printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene copolymer (ABS)/carbon black (CB) composites. Appl Sci. 2017;7:20.
   Google Scholar
• Yang X, Ren H, and Wu C, et al. Flexible strain sensors fabricated by fused deposition modeling-based multimaterial 3D printing with conductive polyurethane composites. 2021 27th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP) 26-28 November 2021 Shanghai, China. 546–551. (2021).
   Google Scholar
• Anderegg DA, Bryant HA, Ruffin DC, et al. In-situ monitoring of polymer flow temperature and pressure in extrusion based additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf. 2019;26:76–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaunier L, Guessasma S, Belhabib S, et al. Material extrusion of plant biopolymers: opportunities & challenges for 3D printing. Addit Manuf. 2018;21:220–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi P, Banerjee SS. Fused Deposition modeling of thermoplastics elastomeric materials: challenges and opportunities. Addit Manuf. 2021;102177. DOI:10.1016/j.addma.2021.102177.
   Google Scholar
• Das A, Gilmer EL, Biria S, et al. Importance of polymer rheology on material extrusion additive manufacturing: correlating process physics to print properties. ACS Appl Polym Mater. 2021;3:1218–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkataraman N, Rangarajan S, Matthewson M, et al. Feedstock material property–process relationships in fused deposition of ceramics (FDC). Rapid Prototyping J. 2000;6(4):244–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmer EL, Mansfield C, and Gardner JM, et al. Polymer-based additive manufacturing: recent developments 1315 . In: Characterization and analysis of polyetherimide: realizing practical challenges of modeling the extrusion-based additive manufacturing process Jonathan E, Seppala, Anthony P, Kotula, Chad R, Snyder. Washington, DC: ACS Publications, 2019. 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Go J, Schiffres SN, Stevens AG, et al. Rate limits of additive manufacturing by fused filament fabrication and guidelines for high-throughput system design. Addit Manuf. 2017;16:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Li H, Yu Q, et al. Strain sensing behaviors of stretchable conductive polymer composites loaded with different dimensional conductive fillers. Compos Sci Technol. 2018;168:388–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park Y-L, Chen B-R, Wood RJ. Design and fabrication of soft artificial skin using embedded microchannels and liquid conductors. IEEE Sens J. 2012;12(8):2711–2718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong Y, Yang X. A review on in-tire sensor systems for tire-road interaction studies. Sens Rev. 2018;38(2):231–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Totaro M, Beccai L. Toward perceptive soft robots: progress and challenges. Adv Sci. 2018;5(9):1800541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YF, Zhang N, Hingorani H, et al. Fast‐response, stiffness‐tunable soft actuator by hybrid multimaterial 3D printing. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29:1806698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Z, Li Y, Zheng J, et al. A state-of-the-art on self-sensing concrete: materials, fabrication and properties. Compos Part B Eng. 2019;177:107437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppola B, Di Maio L, Incarnato L, et al. Preparation and characterization of polypropylene/carbon nanotubes (PP/CNTs) nanocomposites as potential strain gauges for structural health monitoring. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(4):814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han B, Ding S, Yu X. Intrinsic self-sensing concrete and structures: a review. Measurement. 2015;59:110–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar